![]() |
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
Originally Posted by Mike86
(Post 13411676)
I’m not claiming to be right or wrong. People (not you) have cherry picked my posts and assumed differently because of my feelings towards The Last Jedi. I’m just making an observation.
This line from your original post is more than an observation, it's pushing a viewpoint:
Originally Posted by Mike86
(Post 13411438)
Seems a little telling to me that he conveniently didn’t mention Johnson or his trilogy....
Originally Posted by Mike86
(Post 13411667)
It seems like some of you want me to not post because you don’t like my speculation... Again I’m taking what was said and speculating on that...
|
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
“Seems a little telling to me.” To me being the key words. I really can’t believe I have to spell it out for you this much. Essentially I was just phrasing a different way of saying in my opinion or in other words speculation. Of course that’s my viewpoint but I never claimed it to be right or wrong. That’s how I felt and continue to feel about it. Christ man give it a rest.
|
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
Originally Posted by Mike86
(Post 13411699)
“Seems a little telling to me.” To me being the key words. I really can’t believe I have to spell it out for you this much. Essentially I was just phrasing a different way of saying in my opinion or in other words speculation...
An "observation" from that article would be "Iger didn't explicitly mention RJ's trilogy in his non-exclusive list of possible upcoming Star Wars movies." Inferring any additional meaning from that is speculation, based on particular viewpoints. So you were never "just making an observation," since from the first post calling it "telling," you were pushing a particular viewpoint of that situation. |
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
FFS... When someone says it "seems a little telling", it's their take on an event. Period. Mike86 was giving his interpretation of Iger's statement. Hell I don't even agree with his take but can understand how he could arrive at that conclusion.
If we're going to start splitting hairs on "observation/speculation" when the two are inherently linked, the conversation is pretty much done. |
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 13411722)
But speculation isn't observation, they're two different things. An observation is factual, objective, and neutral. Speculation is pushing a particular viewpoint.
An "observation" from that article would be "Iger didn't explicitly mention RJ's trilogy in his non-exclusive list of possible upcoming Star Wars movies." Inferring any additional meaning from that is speculation, based on particular viewpoints. So you were never "just making an observation," since from the first post calling it "telling," you were pushing a particular viewpoint of that situation. |
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
Originally Posted by Hokeyboy
(Post 13411726)
FFS... When someone says it "seems a little telling", it's their take on an event. Period. Mike86 was giving his interpretation of Iger's statement. Hell I don't even agree with his take but can understand how he could arrive at that conclusion.
If we're going to start splitting hairs on "observation/speculation" when the two are inherently linked, the conversation is pretty much done.
Originally Posted by Mike86
(Post 13411730)
Okay Jay G. you win. You know all my thoughts and the motivations behind what I say.
Originally Posted by Mike86
(Post 13411730)
Just like you know what Iger says or just like you like to push how the opinions you have versus everyone else are the right ones.
And why is it acceptable for you to state your opinions on this thread, but wrong for me to state mine?
Originally Posted by Mike86
(Post 13411730)
Seriously are you this fucking arrogant in real life?
|
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
Originally Posted by Hokeyboy
(Post 13411726)
FFS... When someone says it "seems a little telling", it's their take on an event. Period. Mike86 was giving his interpretation of Iger's statement. Hell I don't even agree with his take but can understand how he could arrive at that conclusion.
If we're going to start splitting hairs on "observation/speculation" when the two are inherently linked, the conversation is pretty much done. |
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 13411741)
I can be, sure. Are you?
|
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
Originally Posted by Mike86
(Post 13411758)
I’m not the one coming across that way...
Your posts follow a very familiar pattern. Post something you think is damning. When an alternative opinion is posted, you challenge it and defend your opinion. When you no longer want to defend your opinion (or have no defense left), you start playing the victim card, saying others are out to get you, instead of just arguing against a poor opinion you stated. You then switch to attacking me, the person, instead of the points I bring up in my posts. This thread isn't about me. If you think I'm wrong, just explain why I'm wrong. Don't accuse me of arrogance just because I challenged your opinion. Or just drop the argument if you don't feel like defending your position anymore, or have said all you want to say about it. I'm under no obligation to give you the last word or to humor your wrong opinions. |
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
Maybe a poll is in order on how people "come off".
|
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
The Last Jedi sucks.
|
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
I guess we can add hair-splitting to the “Rian Johnson The Last Jedi Defense Kit.”
Right between ad hominem attacks and whatabouting. |
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
Originally Posted by stvn1974
(Post 13411810)
The Last Jedi sucks.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped..._lion_head.jpg |
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
Originally Posted by stvn1974
(Post 13411810)
The Last Jedi sucks.
|
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
I would bust a nut for 2 hours straight if the GoT guys were making a KOTOR trilogy.
|
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
Ah, if only we could go back to a day when Jay G. was the guy who would pop into threads and post helpful facts and information and mike86 was the guy going back and forth with me defending TLJ. Those truly were the good old days.
|
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
Originally Posted by rocket1312
(Post 13411890)
Ah, if only we could go back to a day when Jay G. was the guy who would pop into threads and post helpful facts and information and mike86 was the guy going back and forth with me defending TLJ. Those truly were the good old days.
|
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
Originally Posted by Draven
(Post 13411865)
The Last Jedi is the best Star Wars movie since Empire Strikes Back.
|
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
Originally Posted by rocket1312
(Post 13411890)
Ah, if only we could go back to a day when Jay G. was the guy who would pop into threads and post helpful facts and information and mike86 was the guy going back and forth with me defending TLJ. Those truly were the good old days.
https://forum.dvdtalk.com/video-game...l#post13405666 Also, I'm not defending TLJ at all in this thread. You can hate it all you want for whatever reasons you want. My disagreement in this thread has nothing to do with my opinion of TLJ and everything to do with an accurate assessment of the facts as presented. Finally, I guess some people have never been on my "bad side" before, but I can be pretty tenacious when I disagree with someone. This thread from 2007 is the earliest, and possibly purest, example that I can recall: https://forum.dvdtalk.com/movie-talk...g-colours.html |
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 13411591)
He gave one example, the first to pop into his head. Maybe he just got off the phone with the GoT guys before the interview, or it's the one he's looking forward to the most. It's not evidence of anything.
|
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
In my opinion.
Originally Posted by Mike86
(Post 13411758)
I’m not the one coming across that way. The way you seem to talk down to everyone and act like your opinion is always the right one makes you come off that way. I don’t go around telling people their opinions are wrong or right or what they meant by something they posted. You are really something else.
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 13411765)
How do you know how you come off? Are you presuming to know how others are interpreting your posts?
Your posts follow a very familiar pattern. Post something you think is damning. When an alternative opinion is posted, you challenge it and defend your opinion. When you no longer want to defend your opinion (or have no defense left), you start playing the victim card, saying others are out to get you, instead of just arguing against a poor opinion you stated. You then switch to attacking me, the person, instead of the points I bring up in my posts. This thread isn't about me. If you think I'm wrong, just explain why I'm wrong. Don't accuse me of arrogance just because I challenged your opinion. Or just drop the argument if you don't feel like defending your position anymore, or have said all you want to say about it. I'm under no obligation to give you the last word or to humor your wrong opinions. So there you go there's some evidence on how you guys are perceived. |
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
Originally Posted by rocket1312
(Post 13411890)
Ah, if only we could go back to a day when Jay G. was the guy who would pop into threads and post helpful facts and information and mike86 was the guy going back and forth with me defending TLJ. Those truly were the good old days.
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 13412019)
Well, I still just pop into threads with what I hope is helpful info. I think this recent post of mine may qualify as an example of that:
https://forum.dvdtalk.com/video-game...l#post13405666 Also, I'm not defending TLJ at all in this thread. You can hate it all you want for whatever reasons you want. My disagreement in this thread has nothing to do with my opinion of TLJ and everything to do with an accurate assessment of the facts as presented. Finally, I guess some people have never been on my "bad side" before, but I can be pretty tenacious when I disagree with someone. This thread from 2007 is the earliest, and possibly purest, example that I can recall: https://forum.dvdtalk.com/movie-talk...g-colours.html |
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
Originally Posted by tanman
(Post 13412081)
You are coming off as an arrogant asstard.
Originally Posted by Trevor
(Post 13412084)
I miss the days when Jay’s bad side only took a dozen posts to bring a thread to a close.
|
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
Originally Posted by Trevor
(Post 13412084)
I miss the days when Jay’s bad side only took a dozen posts to bring a thread to a close.
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 13412139)
To be fair to baracine, he stopped when he ran out of argument, instead of sequeing into playing the victim card or attacking me.
|
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 13412139)
To be fair to baracine, he stopped when he ran out of argument, instead of sequeing into playing the victim card or attacking me.
/endrant |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:19 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.