#51
Solid Snake , 08-17-14 01:46 PM
Banned
Quote:
There's reasons why these action movies from the 80s and 90s hold up. They're not all gold, but a lot of them are solid entertainment. I don't see revisionist thinking in 10 years with these movies.
The potential for them to be awesome was there -- you got the stars. It's just everything else was shit for the most part.
Originally Posted by My Other Self
Given that was the whole build-up before the first film came out, I'd have to agree. There's reasons why these action movies from the 80s and 90s hold up. They're not all gold, but a lot of them are solid entertainment. I don't see revisionist thinking in 10 years with these movies.
The potential for them to be awesome was there -- you got the stars. It's just everything else was shit for the most part.
Totally. I don't see these things being classics. Considering they're not all that good either.
#52
Quote:
Originally Posted by My Other Self
There's reasons why these action movies from the 80s and 90s hold up.


#53
Just got back form it and you know what, I liked it a lot. I really don't get most of the negative reviews and kinda feel like a lot of them just come from the mindset of "oh great ANOTHER Stallone movie". In fact, I would say this was easily my favorite action movie this year.
The new guys adapted well to the cast and I thought Antonio, Snipes, Ford, and Grammer were all good additions to the cast. I agree that it seemed like Antonio had no script but it worked well. Gibson also made for a good villain. I'm not sure if he was as good as Van Damme but he worked well in this.
The weakest parts not surprisingly come from the "new" Expendables. They just didn't have any charisma whatsoever and I honestly couldn't even tell you what the first names of any of them were. Ronda Rousey being the worst of them. Makes me wonder how she will do in Furious 7. If the goal was to spin them off to their own series they failed miserably in casting. It also stunk because seeing them compared to the old timers made me want to spend more time with the old cast.
I thought the action scenes were really good and even though you can see where there were some edits to get the PG-13 rating, the rating didn't really hold the action back too much. Seriously they must have killed a 1,000 men in the finale. I agree that the Stallone/Gibson fight was way to short and easily pales in comparison to the Van Damme/Stallone fight from 2.
Overall I had a lot of fun watching this movie. The action and stunts were well done and I had a huge smile on my face all the way through. Whereas a movie like The Raid 2 dissapointed me and bored me to tears this kept me entertained throughout and really that's all I asked for.
4/5
The new guys adapted well to the cast and I thought Antonio, Snipes, Ford, and Grammer were all good additions to the cast. I agree that it seemed like Antonio had no script but it worked well. Gibson also made for a good villain. I'm not sure if he was as good as Van Damme but he worked well in this.
The weakest parts not surprisingly come from the "new" Expendables. They just didn't have any charisma whatsoever and I honestly couldn't even tell you what the first names of any of them were. Ronda Rousey being the worst of them. Makes me wonder how she will do in Furious 7. If the goal was to spin them off to their own series they failed miserably in casting. It also stunk because seeing them compared to the old timers made me want to spend more time with the old cast.
I thought the action scenes were really good and even though you can see where there were some edits to get the PG-13 rating, the rating didn't really hold the action back too much. Seriously they must have killed a 1,000 men in the finale. I agree that the Stallone/Gibson fight was way to short and easily pales in comparison to the Van Damme/Stallone fight from 2.
Overall I had a lot of fun watching this movie. The action and stunts were well done and I had a huge smile on my face all the way through. Whereas a movie like The Raid 2 dissapointed me and bored me to tears this kept me entertained throughout and really that's all I asked for.
4/5
#54
I will agree that none of these qualify as good movies. They are very much throw-backs to the kind of stuff made in the 80s . What I liked about the first one is that it managed to be a movie with that kind of feeling without coming across as a spoof of such movies. The second and third had too much self-parody and that really detracted from everything.
Side note: was Kelsey's Grammer's character originally going to be played by someone like maybe John Travolta or Nic Cage? He just seemed like an odd casting choice for this kind of movie.
Side note: was Kelsey's Grammer's character originally going to be played by someone like maybe John Travolta or Nic Cage? He just seemed like an odd casting choice for this kind of movie.
#55
Mike86 , 08-17-14 05:05 PM
DVD Talk Hero
Mike86
DVD Talk Hero
close
- Join DateApr 2009
- LocationSouth Dakota
- Posts:25,741
Received 1,413 Likes
on
1,089 Posts
One thing that sort of irritates me with these films is the casting of MMA stars. I've never really loved the idea of them being in the films from the get-go and don't really see how they fit in. I get that they're tough guys and girls but I'd prefer just action stars.
#56
^ Same here. I wonder if Rousey's presence might have been meant as a lead-in to Expendabelles? She looked good in that red dress, but damn is she a lousy actor.
#57
Why So Blu? , 08-17-14 05:21 PM
DVD Talk Hero
Why So Blu?
DVD Talk Hero
close
- Join DateFeb 2012
- LocationLos Angeles
- Posts:40,456
Received 1,772 Likes
on
1,348 Posts
Rousey is insanely fuckable. She also looks a bit like Julia Stiles.
#58
Mike86 , 08-17-14 05:31 PM
DVD Talk Hero
Mike86
DVD Talk Hero
close
- Join DateApr 2009
- LocationSouth Dakota
- Posts:25,741
Received 1,413 Likes
on
1,089 Posts
Quote:
Yeah I wondered the same thing about Rousey's character. The weakest aspect of the new film by far though is the younger team members. None of them were built up well and just felt forced in. I know that the older stars can't do these films forever and maybe the filmmakers/studio wants to keep the franchise going but there are far better action stars that could fill those roles. None of the younger team members are memorable in the slightest.Originally Posted by Dr. DVD
^ Same here. I wonder if Rousey's presence might have been meant as a lead-in to Expendabelles? She looked good in that red dress, but damn is she a lousy actor.
#59
RocShemp , 08-17-14 05:42 PM
DVD Talk Hero
RocShemp
DVD Talk Hero
close
- Join DateMay 2001
- Posts:42,224
Received 1,469 Likes
on
1,144 Posts
I feel they should bring back Scott Adkins as a totally different character and have him be a member of the team. Hell, pair him with Donnie Yen. Or make Donnie Yen the next villain and have the final fight between Adkins and Yen (after Yen beats the living shit out of Stallone, like how Steve Austin beat him up in EX1 and Randy Couture had to finish off Austin in the end).
#60
JimRochester , 08-17-14 05:53 PM
DVD Talk Legend
Quote:
I'm sure it's to pull the younger demographic. Those that weren't at least teenagers in the 80's just can't get the same kick out of seeing Stallone and Schwarzenegger on the screen togetherOriginally Posted by Mike86
One thing that sort of irritates me with these films is the casting of MMA stars. I've never really loved the idea of them being in the films from the get-go and don't really see how they fit in. I get that they're tough guys and girls but I'd prefer just action stars.
#61
Quote:
Side note: was Kelsey's Grammer's character originally going to be played by someone like maybe John Travolta or Nic Cage? He just seemed like an odd casting choice for this kind of movie.
That was originally the plan. Cage was approached first and turned it down because I don't really know why. Travolta was approached also but had scheduling conflicts. Side note: was Kelsey's Grammer's character originally going to be played by someone like maybe John Travolta or Nic Cage? He just seemed like an odd casting choice for this kind of movie.
Quote:
Yeah I wondered the same thing about Rousey's character. The weakest aspect of the new film by far though is the younger team members. None of them were built up well and just felt forced in. I know that the older stars can't do these films forever and maybe the filmmakers/studio wants to keep the franchise going but there are far better action stars that could fill those roles. None of the younger team members are memorable in the slightest.
Yeah I can't mention again how bad the younger team members were. I get that they wanted 20 year old hearth throb types but none of them had any charisma at all. When the old stars were on screen you could see what made them stars in the first place. All of them just had that "it" factor that makes you want to watch the screen. The young guys were about as exciting as watching paint dry.Yeah I wondered the same thing about Rousey's character. The weakest aspect of the new film by far though is the younger team members. None of them were built up well and just felt forced in. I know that the older stars can't do these films forever and maybe the filmmakers/studio wants to keep the franchise going but there are far better action stars that could fill those roles. None of the younger team members are memorable in the slightest.
#62
I wonder if this movie tanking stateside will convince them that PG-13 was a mistake?
#63
RocShemp , 08-17-14 08:38 PM
DVD Talk Hero
RocShemp
DVD Talk Hero
close
- Join DateMay 2001
- Posts:42,224
Received 1,469 Likes
on
1,144 Posts
Quote:
In a weird way, that may have been the point. Barney thought he needed fresh blood to take out Stonebanks. That whole operation blows up in his face (literally) and its the older stars (notice that Galgo, who Barney initially rejected, is the one who rescues him) that have to save the day.Originally Posted by robin2099
Yeah I can't mention again how bad the younger team members were. I get that they wanted 20 year old hearth throb types but none of them had any charisma at all. When the old stars were on screen you could see what made them stars in the first place. All of them just had that "it" factor that makes you want to watch the screen. The young guys were about as exciting as watching paint dry.
#64
hanshotfirst1138 , 08-17-14 09:18 PM
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Quote:
Probably not, especially in this day and age where the unrated cut comes out a few months later. I'm fairly sure they'll blame the leak though.Originally Posted by Dr. DVD
I wonder if this movie tanking stateside will convince them that PG-13 was a mistake?
#65
hanshotfirst1138 , 08-17-14 09:20 PM
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Quote:
I would rathe Yen and Li have a rematch, or even take on the bad guy together, preferably with a proper choreographer. This franchise's lack of fisticuffs is unforgivable.Originally Posted by RocShemp
I feel they should bring back Scott Adkins as a totally different character and have him be a member of the team. Hell, pair him with Donnie Yen. Or make Donnie Yen the next villain and have the final fight between Adkins and Yen (after Yen beats the living shit out of Stallone, like how Steve Austin beat him up in EX1 and Randy Couture had to finish off Austin in the end).
#66
Every time I hear about Scott Adkins and seen what he's done, I feel the best he can do is fight Jeff Speakman. That's what we need now, an Expendables type franchise with action heroes from 80's B movies.
#67
RocShemp , 08-17-14 09:30 PM
DVD Talk Hero
RocShemp
DVD Talk Hero
close
- Join DateMay 2001
- Posts:42,224
Received 1,469 Likes
on
1,144 Posts
Quote:
Jeff Imada. He has tons of 80's cred, is still active (and thriving), and can make even non-combatants look like fighters on screen.Originally Posted by hanshotfirst1138
preferably with a proper choreographer.
#68
RocShemp , 08-17-14 09:33 PM
DVD Talk Hero
RocShemp
DVD Talk Hero
close
- Join DateMay 2001
- Posts:42,224
Received 1,469 Likes
on
1,144 Posts
Quote:
Adkins is a total badass and Expendables 2 did him no favors whatsoever.Originally Posted by trespoochies
Every time I hear about Scott Adkins and seen what he's done, I feel the best he can do is fight Jeff Speakman. That's what we need now, an Expendables type franchise with action heroes from 80's B movies.
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/KMd_I3FNWBA?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
They should get Isaac Florentine to direct Expendables 4.
#69
Nah, he hasn't sold me at all. And I saw Ninja and Ninja 2, the Undisputed one, El Gringo, Universal Soldier...just something about him that is very lackluster. To each their own I guess.
#70
RocShemp , 08-17-14 10:15 PM
DVD Talk Hero
RocShemp
DVD Talk Hero
close
- Join DateMay 2001
- Posts:42,224
Received 1,469 Likes
on
1,144 Posts
I'll grant you that he doesn't have the charisma of Donnie Yen or Jason Statham. However, in terms of martial arts badassery, I'd put him right there with Yen.
#71
Solid Snake , 08-18-14 04:44 AM
Banned
Yeah. He ain't the best actor but point him in the direction to kick ass and he's amazing. Very athletic too. I still think they should have puy Adkins in the Batman suit for whatever fights he'll be in the new movie. We desperately need more detective work and more athletic/acrobatic ass kicking from Bats.
#72
RocShemp , 08-18-14 04:55 AM
DVD Talk Hero
RocShemp
DVD Talk Hero
close
- Join DateMay 2001
- Posts:42,224
Received 1,469 Likes
on
1,144 Posts
Quote:
I remember when that was the rumor. He would have been a perfect fight double for Batfleck since both men are rather similar.Originally Posted by Solid Snake
I still think they should have puy Adkins in the Batman suit for whatever fights he'll be in the new movie.
#73
stingermck , 08-18-14 07:16 AM
DVD Talk Legend
stingermck
DVD Talk Legend
close
- Join DateJul 2002
- LocationCobra Island
- Posts:19,068
Received 578 Likes
on
375 Posts
I now want to see a buddy cop movie with Arnold and Jet Li 
At least Li's absence was explained that Trench pays more, a throwback to Li's line in the first one needing more money for his family. (Though there is a theory they are a couple: http://www.buzzfeed.com/adambvary/ex...ppened#3o6381s)
I thought the movie was fine. Banderas and Gibson stole the show, and Rhonda did fine with what she had. Here's hoping Gibson continues getting more roles, cause he still has it.
It does suck that this is flopping. With 2.2 million downloads so far, there is no way that is not hurting the box office.

At least Li's absence was explained that Trench pays more, a throwback to Li's line in the first one needing more money for his family. (Though there is a theory they are a couple: http://www.buzzfeed.com/adambvary/ex...ppened#3o6381s)
I thought the movie was fine. Banderas and Gibson stole the show, and Rhonda did fine with what she had. Here's hoping Gibson continues getting more roles, cause he still has it.
It does suck that this is flopping. With 2.2 million downloads so far, there is no way that is not hurting the box office.
#74
#75
What's really dumb if you think about it is this. The first one was going to be PG-13 then changed to R after a huge fan backlash. The second was going to be PG-13 then changed to R again after a backlash. This time though after grosses dropped they decided the third time was a charm and edited it down to PG-13 knowing that would alienate a lot of their audience. Doesn't make much sense.