![]() |
Re: Noah (Aronofsky, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
For those keeping score:
How Biblically Accurate Is Noah? Here Are All the Ways the Movie Departs From Its Source Material. http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/...arts_from.html |
Re: Noah (Aronofsky, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Not having seen the film... Seems like it was nothing too big of a change.
Or maybe I just don't feel like they are. I just want a good movie. |
Re: Noah (Aronofsky, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by Dr. DVD
(Post 12061527)
Looks like a movie that connects with critics and fans of art movies, but flops with general audiences. A primary reason auteur filmmakers are seldom given large budgets anymore.
|
Re: Noah (Aronofsky, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by Rypro 525
(Post 12059808)
Also, semi stupid question, but is this the first time this story has been told on the big screen? outside of the 1928 version
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/PmHnjw6XuKM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
Re: Noah (Aronofsky, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Seeing this tomorrow night!
|
Re: Noah (Aronofsky, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Even with the decent opening weekend, I see this doing a "Where the Wild Things Are" and dropping quick the second weekend. Of course I will attribute that less to word of mouth and more to it having the new Captain America movie against it. I have no doubt that I will find "Noah" the better movie of the two, but Captain America more fun.
|
Re: Noah (Aronofsky, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Thoroughly enjoyed it. I do think the number of watchers and their appearance went a bit overboard, I think having just a few and for them to remain more mysterious visually would've helped dampen the criticism and laughter. And Adam and Eve looked like the aliens from Cocoon...lol.
Still, great acting and visuals.. I have the soundtrack ordered. The shot of the multitudes on the rocks with the wave crashing up against it was probably my favorite... straight out of Simon Bisley's The Bible. |
Re: Noah (Aronofsky, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by Rypro 525
(Post 12059808)
having seen it tonight, there actually is a little bit of that w Emma Watsons character (although obvs not shown)
As an athiest (& never having read the source material), i enjoyed the movie, & for the most part was able to follow it. Although there is kind of unintentional humor out of Anthony Hopkins' character Methuselah being obsessed with finding berries. Also the walking & talking rock creatures too, known as 'the watchers'' Also, semi stupid question, but is this the first time this story has been told on the big screen? outside of the 1928 version |
Re: Noah (Aronofsky, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by dvdjunkie32
(Post 12060540)
One lousy trick in the trailer is where Noah stands up to the bad guy, and says "I'm not alone". Wow, that's powerful, God is on his side. But in the movie, Noah is actually talking about the Watchers/Demons. They are portrayed as sympathetic creatures.
|
Re: Noah (Aronofsky, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
To clarify, god is clearly on Noah's side throughout the film.
|
Re: Noah (Aronofsky, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Aronofsky is one of my favorite directors, he hasn't failed me yet and I was extremely in the middle on this one. I didn't hate it by any means, but I was very indifferent to most of it. Emma Watson was fantastic, and Crowe gave his typical performance. It was entertaining but there were a few plot holes (in both the writing and the overall story/religion aspect) that annoyed me. I'd say it is my least favorite Aronofsky movie but better than most crap being shoved down our throats on a weekly basis. I'll buy it when it eventually gets cheap.
|
Re: Noah (Aronofsky, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Aaron Klein does a radio show on WABC-AM on Sunday nights and he talked about NOAH tonight. He took issue with the ways the film strayed from the Bible. He points out that in the Bible, Noah's three sons all bring their wives with them on the Ark, with the purpose of repopulating the Earth after the flood. In the movie, he says, Noah's purpose is to make sure no babies are born after the flood and he keeps the sons' wives off the boat, letting only one woman besides his wife on the boat because she's barren. If true, that's a pretty serious distortion of the Bible, don't you think? When the previously barren woman (played by Emma Watson, I think) gets pregnant thanks to "dark magic," it's, again, something not in the Bible.
Klein also claims that the movie's goal is to promote vegan ideology and a pro-animal, anti-human viewpoint. He adds that the reception after the movie's premiere offered only vegetarian dishes and that Aronofsky and Crowe are both avowed Vegans. I haven't seen the movie and I'm just reporting what I heard. To anyone who's seen the movie, does any of this make any sense to you? |
Re: Noah (Aronofsky, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by Ash Ketchum
(Post 12062226)
Aaron Klein does a radio show on WABC-AM on Sunday nights and he talked about NOAH tonight. He took issue with the ways the film strayed from the Bible. He points out that in the Bible, Noah's three sons all bring their wives with them on the Ark, with the purpose of repopulating the Earth after the flood. In the movie, he says, Noah's purpose is to make sure no babies are born after the flood and he keeps the sons' wives off the boat, letting only one woman besides his wife on the boat because she's barren. If true, that's a pretty serious distortion of the Bible, don't you think? When the previously barren woman (played by Emma Watson, I think) gets pregnant thanks to "dark magic," it's, again, something not in the Bible.
Klein also claims that the movie's goal is to promote vegan ideology and a pro-animal, anti-human viewpoint. He adds that the reception after the movie's premiere offered only vegetarian dishes and that Aronofsky and Crowe are both avowed Vegans. I haven't seen the movie and I'm just reporting what I heard. To anyone who's seen the movie, does any of this make any sense to you? Spoiler:
|
Re: Noah (Aronofsky, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Oh, and while I liked the movie quite a bit, I did agree with the DVDtalk review that said the second half was a bit weak and meandering, and a little anticlimatic. And thinking about it some more, it did seem like once they got on the ark, the real drama should have been "hey, the world's been destroyed, and are we ever going to see dry land again?"---and that is played down quite a bit due to the other drama that Aronofsky inserted.
|
Re: Noah (Aronofsky, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by Rypro 525
(Post 12059808)
Also, semi stupid question, but is this the first time this story has been told on the big screen? outside of the 1928 version
|
Re: Noah (Aronofsky, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
So, if I am reading you guys correctly, this is NOT the prequel to Evan Almighty?
|
Re: Noah (Aronofsky, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by Ash Ketchum
(Post 12062226)
Aaron Klein does a radio show on WABC-AM on Sunday nights and he talked about NOAH tonight. He took issue with the ways the film strayed from the Bible. He points out that in the Bible, Noah's three sons all bring their wives with them on the Ark, with the purpose of repopulating the Earth after the flood. In the movie, he says, Noah's purpose is to make sure no babies are born after the flood and he keeps the sons' wives off the boat, letting only one woman besides his wife on the boat because she's barren. If true, that's a pretty serious distortion of the Bible, don't you think? When the previously barren woman (played by Emma Watson, I think) gets pregnant thanks to "dark magic," it's, again, something not in the Bible.
Klein also claims that the movie's goal is to promote vegan ideology and a pro-animal, anti-human viewpoint. He adds that the reception after the movie's premiere offered only vegetarian dishes and that Aronofsky and Crowe are both avowed Vegans. I haven't seen the movie and I'm just reporting what I heard. To anyone who's seen the movie, does any of this make any sense to you? Noah and his family don't eat meat, and that's contrasted with the villains, who eat meat raw. It doesn't say that we should all die and that only animals should live. It does however say that humans can't just treat animals however they like with impunity simply because we're human and they're not. And you know what? Who gives a fuck if it deviates from the Bible? If you want to get the biblical account of Noah, read the Bible. If you want Aronofsky's (beautiful, heartfelt, and spiritual IMO) version, then see this movie. |
Re: Noah (Aronofsky, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
I'm curious to see how this does in the long run. There are a ridiculous number of versions of the original story, so it's kind of ridiculous to see people arguing accuracy. That said, there are religious folks that seem to be liking it and others that are hating it for the same reasons, it's kind of funny.
The more "faith-based" movies coming out lately (God's Not Dead, Heaven is For Real) kind of crack me up as well, Heaven is For Real looks terrible but has a few decent actors in it and at least it looks like they tried, what cracked me up for it was the "FOR GROUP SALES CALL" at the time of the trailer. Yeah, they know their audience. |
Re: Noah (Aronofsky, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by Ash Ketchum
(Post 12062226)
Aaron Klein does a radio show on WABC-AM on Sunday nights and he talked about NOAH tonight. He took issue with the ways the film strayed from the Bible. He points out that in the Bible, Noah's three sons all bring their wives with them on the Ark, with the purpose of repopulating the Earth after the flood. In the movie, he says, Noah's purpose is to make sure no babies are born after the flood and he keeps the sons' wives off the boat, letting only one woman besides his wife on the boat because she's barren. If true, that's a pretty serious distortion of the Bible, don't you think? When the previously barren woman (played by Emma Watson, I think) gets pregnant thanks to "dark magic," it's, again, something not in the Bible.
Spoiler:
|
Re: Noah (Aronofsky, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by Supermallet
(Post 12062302)
It's not anti-human, there's no dark magic.
|
Re: Noah (Aronofsky, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
bottom line is the bible belt is upset with this movie the way star wars fans were upset with the last three star wars films.
|
Re: Noah (Aronofsky, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
That's a poor comparison. The SW prequels were terribly made, poorly acted, had shitty scripts. Noah is beautiful, with great performances, and a thought provoking, introspective script. The reason that Bible thumpers are mad is because it doesn't conform to their narrow minded vision.
|
Re: Noah (Aronofsky, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by Supermallet
(Post 12063402)
That's a poor comparison. The SW prequels were terribly made, poorly acted, had shitty scripts. Noah is beautiful, with great performances, and a thought provoking, introspective script. The reason that Bible thumpers are mad is because it doesn't conform to their narrow minded vision.
|
Re: Noah (Aronofsky, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Well then feel free to complain, but those are not the complaints from religious people/groups, most of whom haven't even seen the movie.
|
Re: Noah (Aronofsky, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by Ash Ketchum
(Post 12062226)
I haven't seen the movie and I'm just reporting what I heard. To anyone who's seen the movie, does any of this make any sense to you?
"You're going to find that many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view." And that's really what it comes down to... the scripture interpretation is somewhat different than what we were taught in Sunday School... same with the additions. (which are actually rooted in scripture, but again... not in the way many are comfortable with) I myself didn't realize it wasn't customary to not eat meat pre-flood...that's something I'm doing some following up on for myself. I find it fascinating. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:29 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.