What changes would you make to a movie?
#101
DVD Talk Legend
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?
I'll second that Tucker worked better in Fifth Element with subsequent viewings. A lot had less to do with the character and more with my lack of familiarity as to who he(Tucker the actor) was when I first saw it. Given the movie's over-the-top Heavy Metal type atmosphere, he fit quite well. In fact, many J6P types only like the movie because of him. Take that FWIW.
More changes I would make, to movies: take out all of the non-Hobbit stuff in the movie. The movie worked quite well when it stuck to that story IMO. I'm not saying I felt the added stuff was total crap, but it didn't add anything IMO. I probably dislike the whole aspect of Azog and his war party chasing them more than the attempts to tie-in to LOTR. I have always felt that Smaug was Thorin and Co.s ' greatest adversary, this makes it obvious he won't be in this version and will be mostly secondary.
More changes I would make, to movies: take out all of the non-Hobbit stuff in the movie. The movie worked quite well when it stuck to that story IMO. I'm not saying I felt the added stuff was total crap, but it didn't add anything IMO. I probably dislike the whole aspect of Azog and his war party chasing them more than the attempts to tie-in to LOTR. I have always felt that Smaug was Thorin and Co.s ' greatest adversary, this makes it obvious he won't be in this version and will be mostly secondary.
#103
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?
More changes I would make, to movies: take out all of the non-Hobbit stuff in the movie. The movie worked quite well when it stuck to that story IMO. I'm not saying I felt the added stuff was total crap, but it didn't add anything IMO. I probably dislike the whole aspect of Azog and his war party chasing them more than the attempts to tie-in to LOTR. I have always felt that Smaug was Thorin and Co.s ' greatest adversary, this makes it obvious he won't be in this version and will be mostly secondary.
Jackson should not have made 3 movies out of this. In order to do that, so much filler is needed that he had to have Azog play a major role just so he could fill up the running time. Azog is barely even in the book.
I think Smaug will definitely play a major role. Giving Azog more of a role will just give Thorin a major adversary during the Battle of the Five Armies.
Spoiler:
In the movie version I'm sure the actual Battle of the Five Armies will get a lot of screentime and Azog will play a major role in the battle even though
Spoiler:
Smaug is still the main antagonist, but Azog will just be around as a secondary antagonist.
#105
#106
DVD Talk Legend
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?
WTF ever with all of this Chris Tucker love.
#107
DVD Talk Hero
#108
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?
Count me in as another fanboy who believes that:
Anakin should never have been revealed as the creator of C-3PO.
Threepio could have just been some random droid found in Watto's shop - with no backstory.
By doing this, Lucas painted himself into a corner and made the Star Wars universe even smaller.
Anakin should never have been revealed as the creator of C-3PO.
Threepio could have just been some random droid found in Watto's shop - with no backstory.
By doing this, Lucas painted himself into a corner and made the Star Wars universe even smaller.
#109
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Northern New Jersey
#110
DVD Talk Godfather & 2020 TOTY Winner
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?
Your post reminded me of the one thing I can't stand about the otherwise perfect Almost Famous. I loath the "gag" near the end when they think the plane is going down and the one guy blurts out "Fuck it, I'm gay" only to have (ho-ho) the plane not going down after all, and then the guys is looking around all embarrassed because (hee-haw) he admitted he was gay for no reason! Ha ha, what a dope!
Christ, that part is an embarrassment.
Christ, that part is an embarrassment.
<iframe width="853" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/TEAIVXJ1Qds" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
#111
DVD Talk Legend
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?
Not sure I agree with this.
Jackson should not have made 3 movies out of this. In order to do that, so much filler is needed that he had to have Azog play a major role just so he could fill up the running time. Azog is barely even in the book.
I think Smaug will definitely play a major role. Giving Azog more of a role will just give Thorin a major adversary during the Battle of the Five Armies.
In the movie version I'm sure the actual Battle of the Five Armies will get a lot of screentime and Azog will play a major role in the battle even though
Smaug is still the main antagonist, but Azog will just be around as a secondary antagonist.
Jackson should not have made 3 movies out of this. In order to do that, so much filler is needed that he had to have Azog play a major role just so he could fill up the running time. Azog is barely even in the book.
I think Smaug will definitely play a major role. Giving Azog more of a role will just give Thorin a major adversary during the Battle of the Five Armies.
Spoiler:
In the movie version I'm sure the actual Battle of the Five Armies will get a lot of screentime and Azog will play a major role in the battle even though
Spoiler:
Smaug is still the main antagonist, but Azog will just be around as a secondary antagonist.
#112
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?
I think we are kind of arguing for the same point. I'm saying that the presence of Azog was unnecessary and made the movie bloated. You're saying Azog had to be in there to add to the extra time because PJ chose to make this a trilogy. Conclusion : PJ shouldn't have made this a trilogy. 

You're right. Now that I think about it my long winded argument was pretty much what you said anyway. Azog shouldn't be in it but since PJ decided to bloat the hell out of this thing, he pretty much has to be. I guess since what's done is done, I'm fine with Azog's movie role but I think The Hobbit could easily have been one 2.5-3 hour movie and if that were the case there wouldn't be any room for him.
I actually just finished reading The Hobbit and Tolkien bloated it too. The book probably could have been reduced to about a 50 page short story. I'm not knocking Tolkien but he put so much extra fluff in there and it seemed like he was just trying to fill up pages. It was actually kind of a chore to get through because it took so long to get to the point and usually the most interesting parts were rushed.
#113
Suspended
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?
Only because Back to the Future trilogy is dear in my hear, I'd change the ending in part III. Once marty avoided the car crash with a street drag racing with Flea and the fax that says "you're fired" disappeared, that should be the end of it. We don't need Doc, who have repeatedly said time machine is something he wishes he didn't invent, came back from the west with an even better and bigger time machine to explain why that fax disappeared. Doc had always wanted to go back and live in the old west, then once Martin came back, Doc's wishes have already came true.
#114
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?
Remove Tom Cruise from Legend somehow. I would even be OK with them replacing him with Hayden Christiansen.
#115
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?
I've got no problem with that at all. Yes, it's a little dated to do an "I'm gay" joke now, but we're way more sensitive than we were a decade ago. In this scene, everyone on that plane is making confessions and saying things they'd never otherwise say thinking they were about to die. In the moment of all this emotional unloading, the drummer (who barely speaks in the film to that point) drops what might be the biggest bombshell to his bandmates and it leads to some awkwardness. That's fine, expecially in the context of a comedy, which this film is. As I said it's Fallon's half-heated delivery of his line that makes it feel like an SNL sketch. That and the unfortunate coincidence that Seinfeld used almost the exact same scene in their widely-seen and widely-loathed finale (which was shot after this scene was filmed, but aired before the movie came out).
And I'm doubtful the Seinfeld plane scene was shot after the Almost Famous one. The last episode of Seinfeld aired in mid 1998, Almost Famous came out in late 2000 (not that there's anything wrong with that)
#116
DVD Talk Godfather
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?
Maybe I'm remembering wrong but wasn't the Almost Famous joke loosely based on a similar event with one of the bands Crowe was following at the time?
#117
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?
That would be Lynyrd Skynrd, but Crowe was unable to make it half as funny as the real like inspiration.
#118
DVD Talk Hero
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?
Crowe mentions in the commentary that he wanted to have a plane almost go down but pull out of it at the last minute. He said he'd never seen that done in a movie before. He then mentions how the Seinfeld finale burst his bubble because they managed to beat him to the punch with the same idea.
#119
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?
Legend needs one more action scene between the group starting their mission and them reaching the castle and the Meg Mecklebones sequence should have been longer.
#121
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?
Recast the leading man in Ladyhawke. Rutger Hauer just had no chemistry with anyone. The rest of the film was great but Hauer just does failed in the role imo.
#122
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?
Chris Tucker was fine in the role.
Only because Back to the Future trilogy is dear in my hear, I'd change the ending in part III. Once marty avoided the car crash with a street drag racing with Flea and the fax that says "you're fired" disappeared, that should be the end of it. We don't need Doc, who have repeatedly said time machine is something he wishes he didn't invent, came back from the west with an even better and bigger time machine to explain why that fax disappeared. Doc had always wanted to go back and live in the old west, then once Martin came back, Doc's wishes have already came true.
#124
DVD Talk Godfather & 2020 TOTY Winner
#125
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?
Could he have done the line better and still make it humorous? Probably but I didn't think it was that bad.



