Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

What changes would you make to a movie?

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

What changes would you make to a movie?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-28-13 | 10:54 AM
  #101  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 24,460
Received 438 Likes on 341 Posts
From: Daytona Beach, FL
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?

I'll second that Tucker worked better in Fifth Element with subsequent viewings. A lot had less to do with the character and more with my lack of familiarity as to who he(Tucker the actor) was when I first saw it. Given the movie's over-the-top Heavy Metal type atmosphere, he fit quite well. In fact, many J6P types only like the movie because of him. Take that FWIW.

More changes I would make, to movies: take out all of the non-Hobbit stuff in the movie. The movie worked quite well when it stuck to that story IMO. I'm not saying I felt the added stuff was total crap, but it didn't add anything IMO. I probably dislike the whole aspect of Azog and his war party chasing them more than the attempts to tie-in to LOTR. I have always felt that Smaug was Thorin and Co.s ' greatest adversary, this makes it obvious he won't be in this version and will be mostly secondary.
Old 02-28-13 | 11:12 AM
  #102  
sauce07's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,547
Received 23 Likes on 17 Posts
From: Centreville, VA
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?

Die Hard - Karl should've stayed dead, it still makes my eyes roll when he pops back up at the end.
Old 02-28-13 | 11:23 AM
  #103  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,306
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?

Originally Posted by Dr. DVD

More changes I would make, to movies: take out all of the non-Hobbit stuff in the movie. The movie worked quite well when it stuck to that story IMO. I'm not saying I felt the added stuff was total crap, but it didn't add anything IMO. I probably dislike the whole aspect of Azog and his war party chasing them more than the attempts to tie-in to LOTR. I have always felt that Smaug was Thorin and Co.s ' greatest adversary, this makes it obvious he won't be in this version and will be mostly secondary.
Not sure I agree with this.

Jackson should not have made 3 movies out of this. In order to do that, so much filler is needed that he had to have Azog play a major role just so he could fill up the running time. Azog is barely even in the book.

I think Smaug will definitely play a major role. Giving Azog more of a role will just give Thorin a major adversary during the Battle of the Five Armies.

Spoiler:
In the book Thorin dies of his battle wounds and hardly any detail is given. Basically Bilbo gets bumped on the head, passes out and when he wakes up the battle is over and he learns that Thorin is on death's door. Tolkien then goes on for about 2 pages about what actually happened during the battle--Eagles showing up and kicking ass and whatnot.


In the movie version I'm sure the actual Battle of the Five Armies will get a lot of screentime and Azog will play a major role in the battle even though

Spoiler:
again, in the book, Azog was not present during the battle and nobody knew who actually injured Thorin. I can only assume that Azog and Thorin will have a one on one battle, with Thorin coming out victorious, but ultimately dying due to his wounds that were inflicted by Azog.


Smaug is still the main antagonist, but Azog will just be around as a secondary antagonist.
Old 02-28-13 | 11:24 AM
  #104  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?

Argyle, Karl coming back, and the FBI agents. Take that out and Die Hard would've so much better.
Old 02-28-13 | 11:32 AM
  #105  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 3,403
Received 31 Likes on 28 Posts
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?

Originally Posted by Solid Snake PAC
Argyle, Karl coming back, and the FBI agents. Take that out and Die Hard would've so much better.

Does that include Deputy Dwayne P. Robinson?
Old 02-28-13 | 11:33 AM
  #106  
TGM's Avatar
TGM
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 17,093
Received 474 Likes on 295 Posts
From: Massachusetts
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?

WTF ever with all of this Chris Tucker love.
Old 02-28-13 | 12:08 PM
  #107  
Nick Danger's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 32,933
Received 2,374 Likes on 1,475 Posts
From: Albuquerque
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?

Originally Posted by TallGuyMe
WTF ever with all of this Chris Tucker love.
Tucker was obnoxious in the movie, and it was by design and is funny. He's the opposite of Billy Crystal, whose obnoxious by accident, and isn't funny.
Old 02-28-13 | 12:19 PM
  #108  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 3,403
Received 31 Likes on 28 Posts
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?

Count me in as another fanboy who believes that:

Anakin should never have been revealed as the creator of C-3PO.

Threepio could have just been some random droid found in Watto's shop - with no backstory.


By doing this, Lucas painted himself into a corner and made the Star Wars universe even smaller.
Old 02-28-13 | 01:08 PM
  #109  
Mattflix's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Northern New Jersey
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?

Originally Posted by Solid Snake PAC
Argyle, Karl coming back, and the FBI agents. Take that out and Die Hard would've so much better.
The FBI was the key to Gruber's plan though.
Old 02-28-13 | 02:55 PM
  #110  
Decker's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather & 2020 TOTY Winner
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 93,643
Received 10,406 Likes on 7,077 Posts
From: Vegas, Baby!
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?

Originally Posted by Crocker Jarmen
Your post reminded me of the one thing I can't stand about the otherwise perfect Almost Famous. I loath the "gag" near the end when they think the plane is going down and the one guy blurts out "Fuck it, I'm gay" only to have (ho-ho) the plane not going down after all, and then the guys is looking around all embarrassed because (hee-haw) he admitted he was gay for no reason! Ha ha, what a dope!

Christ, that part is an embarrassment.
I've got no problem with that at all. Yes, it's a little dated to do an "I'm gay" joke now, but we're way more sensitive than we were a decade ago. In this scene, everyone on that plane is making confessions and saying things they'd never otherwise say thinking they were about to die. In the moment of all this emotional unloading, the drummer (who barely speaks in the film to that point) drops what might be the biggest bombshell to his bandmates and it leads to some awkwardness. That's fine, expecially in the context of a comedy, which this film is. As I said it's Fallon's half-heated delivery of his line that makes it feel like an SNL sketch. That and the unfortunate coincidence that Seinfeld used almost the exact same scene in their widely-seen and widely-loathed finale (which was shot after this scene was filmed, but aired before the movie came out).

<iframe width="853" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/TEAIVXJ1Qds" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Old 02-28-13 | 03:01 PM
  #111  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 24,460
Received 438 Likes on 341 Posts
From: Daytona Beach, FL
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?

Originally Posted by whoopdido
Not sure I agree with this.

Jackson should not have made 3 movies out of this. In order to do that, so much filler is needed that he had to have Azog play a major role just so he could fill up the running time. Azog is barely even in the book.

I think Smaug will definitely play a major role. Giving Azog more of a role will just give Thorin a major adversary during the Battle of the Five Armies.

Spoiler:
In the book Thorin dies of his battle wounds and hardly any detail is given. Basically Bilbo gets bumped on the head, passes out and when he wakes up the battle is over and he learns that Thorin is on death's door. Tolkien then goes on for about 2 pages about what actually happened during the battle--Eagles showing up and kicking ass and whatnot.


In the movie version I'm sure the actual Battle of the Five Armies will get a lot of screentime and Azog will play a major role in the battle even though

Spoiler:
again, in the book, Azog was not present during the battle and nobody knew who actually injured Thorin. I can only assume that Azog and Thorin will have a one on one battle, with Thorin coming out victorious, but ultimately dying due to his wounds that were inflicted by Azog.


Smaug is still the main antagonist, but Azog will just be around as a secondary antagonist.
I think we are kind of arguing for the same point. I'm saying that the presence of Azog was unnecessary and made the movie bloated. You're saying Azog had to be in there to add to the extra time because PJ chose to make this a trilogy. Conclusion : PJ shouldn't have made this a trilogy.
Old 02-28-13 | 04:43 PM
  #112  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,306
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?

Originally Posted by Dr. DVD
I think we are kind of arguing for the same point. I'm saying that the presence of Azog was unnecessary and made the movie bloated. You're saying Azog had to be in there to add to the extra time because PJ chose to make this a trilogy. Conclusion : PJ shouldn't have made this a trilogy.
Agreed.

You're right. Now that I think about it my long winded argument was pretty much what you said anyway. Azog shouldn't be in it but since PJ decided to bloat the hell out of this thing, he pretty much has to be. I guess since what's done is done, I'm fine with Azog's movie role but I think The Hobbit could easily have been one 2.5-3 hour movie and if that were the case there wouldn't be any room for him.

I actually just finished reading The Hobbit and Tolkien bloated it too. The book probably could have been reduced to about a 50 page short story. I'm not knocking Tolkien but he put so much extra fluff in there and it seemed like he was just trying to fill up pages. It was actually kind of a chore to get through because it took so long to get to the point and usually the most interesting parts were rushed.
Old 02-28-13 | 05:06 PM
  #113  
Suspended
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,872
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
From: Earth
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?

Only because Back to the Future trilogy is dear in my hear, I'd change the ending in part III. Once marty avoided the car crash with a street drag racing with Flea and the fax that says "you're fired" disappeared, that should be the end of it. We don't need Doc, who have repeatedly said time machine is something he wishes he didn't invent, came back from the west with an even better and bigger time machine to explain why that fax disappeared. Doc had always wanted to go back and live in the old west, then once Martin came back, Doc's wishes have already came true.
Old 02-28-13 | 05:12 PM
  #114  
stvn1974's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 9,540
Received 1,438 Likes on 786 Posts
From: Oklahoma
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?

Remove Tom Cruise from Legend somehow. I would even be OK with them replacing him with Hayden Christiansen.
Old 02-28-13 | 11:19 PM
  #115  
Crocker Jarmen's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 9,879
Received 698 Likes on 460 Posts
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?

Originally Posted by Decker
I've got no problem with that at all. Yes, it's a little dated to do an "I'm gay" joke now, but we're way more sensitive than we were a decade ago. In this scene, everyone on that plane is making confessions and saying things they'd never otherwise say thinking they were about to die. In the moment of all this emotional unloading, the drummer (who barely speaks in the film to that point) drops what might be the biggest bombshell to his bandmates and it leads to some awkwardness. That's fine, expecially in the context of a comedy, which this film is. As I said it's Fallon's half-heated delivery of his line that makes it feel like an SNL sketch. That and the unfortunate coincidence that Seinfeld used almost the exact same scene in their widely-seen and widely-loathed finale (which was shot after this scene was filmed, but aired before the movie came out).
I don't know, I think doing an "I'm gay" joke was dated even back in 2000. I get what you're saying, but the delivery of the joke is off, and seems to rely on little more than the idea that someone being gay is hilarious.

And I'm doubtful the Seinfeld plane scene was shot after the Almost Famous one. The last episode of Seinfeld aired in mid 1998, Almost Famous came out in late 2000 (not that there's anything wrong with that)
Old 02-28-13 | 11:46 PM
  #116  
Michael Corvin's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 63,453
Received 1,377 Likes on 943 Posts
From: Louisville, KY
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?

Maybe I'm remembering wrong but wasn't the Almost Famous joke loosely based on a similar event with one of the bands Crowe was following at the time?
Old 03-01-13 | 12:54 AM
  #117  
Crocker Jarmen's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 9,879
Received 698 Likes on 460 Posts
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?

That would be Lynyrd Skynrd, but Crowe was unable to make it half as funny as the real like inspiration.
Old 03-01-13 | 01:15 AM
  #118  
GoldenJCJ's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 32,698
Received 4,816 Likes on 3,014 Posts
From: Colorado
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?

Crowe mentions in the commentary that he wanted to have a plane almost go down but pull out of it at the last minute. He said he'd never seen that done in a movie before. He then mentions how the Seinfeld finale burst his bubble because they managed to beat him to the punch with the same idea.
Old 03-01-13 | 02:30 AM
  #119  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,017
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?

Originally Posted by stvn1974
Remove Tom Cruise from Legend somehow. I would even be OK with them replacing him with Hayden Christiansen.
Legend needs one more action scene between the group starting their mission and them reaching the castle and the Meg Mecklebones sequence should have been longer.
Old 03-01-13 | 04:45 PM
  #120  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?

Saving Private Ryan. Melish (sp?) lives, Upham dies.
Old 03-02-13 | 01:23 PM
  #121  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,530
Received 84 Likes on 69 Posts
From: Earth ....
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?

Recast the leading man in Ladyhawke. Rutger Hauer just had no chemistry with anyone. The rest of the film was great but Hauer just does failed in the role imo.
Old 03-03-13 | 12:47 PM
  #122  
UAIOE's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,598
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: LV-426
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?

Originally Posted by Draven
Chris Tucker is the reason I went from liking The 5th Element to loathing it. Not even Jar Jar ruins a movie like that character.
I don't know how someone can dislike a movie simply because they hate a character that was intended to be an annoyance.

Chris Tucker was fine in the role.


Originally Posted by SuperJim88
Only because Back to the Future trilogy is dear in my hear, I'd change the ending in part III. Once marty avoided the car crash with a street drag racing with Flea and the fax that says "you're fired" disappeared, that should be the end of it. We don't need Doc, who have repeatedly said time machine is something he wishes he didn't invent, came back from the west with an even better and bigger time machine to explain why that fax disappeared. Doc had always wanted to go back and live in the old west, then once Martin came back, Doc's wishes have already came true.
I don't mind this ending as it gave Marty and Doc closure. However, the ending of Part 2 has always bugged the hell out of me. The movie should have faded to the "To Be Continued" right after Marty tries to contact Doc on the walkie-talkie. None of that "show scenes from the next movie" BS.
Old 03-03-13 | 12:51 PM
  #123  
Troy Stiffler's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 27,546
Received 607 Likes on 429 Posts
From: Under an I-10 Overpass
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?

I hate you guys so much. That Almost Famous moment is classic.
Old 03-03-13 | 09:35 PM
  #124  
Decker's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather & 2020 TOTY Winner
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 93,643
Received 10,406 Likes on 7,077 Posts
From: Vegas, Baby!
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?

Originally Posted by troystiffler
I hate you guys so much. That Almost Famous moment is classic.
My point was only that Fallon sucked in his role and delivered his line like it was an SNL sketch. Disagree?
Old 03-03-13 | 09:49 PM
  #125  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,306
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: What changes would you make to a movie?

Originally Posted by Decker
My point was only that Fallon sucked in his role and delivered his line like it was an SNL sketch. Disagree?
Maybe but it was intended to be at least somewhat humorous. I mean a revelation like the dude in Rockstar with Marky Mark wouldn't have fit. Not a fan of the movie but that dude's "I'm gay" revelation was actually pretty emotional and well done.

Could he have done the line better and still make it humorous? Probably but I didn't think it was that bad.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.