The Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015, Whedon)
#1853
DVD Talk Hero
Re: The Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015, Whedon)
Nope. It's already pretty well established that they're prisoners of Baron Strucker and the first action scene of the movie will be the Avengers taking him out (being one of the last vestiges of Hydra), and freeing Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch. During the celebration of their victory, Ultron attacks.
#1854
DVD Talk Godfather
#1855
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: The Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015, Whedon)
Par for the course for the Avengers, though. The Quicksilver/Scarlett Witch/Hawkeye lineup with Cap was basically all villains at the time (which they addressed). And they got tricked multiple times, by Swordsman and Wonderman and others, but they still let whoever into the clubhouse.
Then again, I wanted to blow through those Don Heck issues as fast as possible.
#1856
DVD Talk Godfather
Re: The Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015, Whedon)
Interview with Whedon about Ultron, Quicksilver/Scarlet Witch, and Pym.
http://www.empireonline.com/intervie...w.asp?IID=2017
http://www.empireonline.com/intervie...w.asp?IID=2017
When did you know you wanted Ultron as the villain for this movie?
Before I took the first movie. For me what was interesting is that he is this angry, and I hired the smoothest talker in Hollywood to play him. I did it on purpose. I needed a guy who can give you the Morpheus but then can just LOSE HIS SHIT. Spader’s really good at that and he’s really good at finding the darkness, but also the comedy. The comedy is always a huge thing for me. Tom Hiddleston is hilarious. Hiddleston can turn on a dime, which is my favourite thing. He can be absolutely apocalyptic and then, ‘Um, point of order?’ Ultron has the same thing. He is very different, obviously, in his rhythms and his concepts, but for me it’s a guy who’s that angry and who hates the Avengers that much and is also a robot and is therefore going to have every issue that a robot’s going to have with humanity anyway… there’s a lot to play there. For me, he’s an iconic figure.
Did you play around with his powers, and what he’s capable of?
Yeah, I did. The powers in comic books – they’re always like, ‘And then I can reverse the polarity of your ions!’ – well, we have to ground things a lot more. With Ultron, we have to make him slightly less omnipotent because he’d win. Bottom line. Also, having weaknesses and needs and foibles and alliances and actually caring what people think of him, all these things, are what make him a character and not just a tidal wave. A movie about a tidal wave can be great, but it’s different than a conflict between one side and the other.
When Ultron speaks, he has a point. He is really not on top of the fact that the point he’s making has nothing to do with the fact that he’s banoonoos. And that he hates the Avengers for bringing him into this world, and he can’t really articulate that or even understand how much he hates humanity. He thinks he all that. That guy is very fun to write. He combines all the iconic stuff. The powers he has are slightly different – he can control certain things, he’s not just firing repulsors.
And you also have Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch.
They have an origin but it’s largely described. They’re already good to go by the time we’re up and running. You don’t want to fall into Spider-Man 3 territory – and I say that as a guy who actually thinks pretty well of that movie, there’s some great stuff in that movie – but there comes a point where you’re overloaded with frontstory, backstory, origin story and it becomes very hard to juggle. My instinct is always, ‘Don’t put in more, work with what you have.’
But I insisted on putting in more in this movie because I felt I needed more villains. I needed someone for Ultron to talk to, and I need more trouble for the Avengers. As powerful as Ultron is, if he builds more Ultrons, they’re Ultrons. There’s no reason for him to ever to talk to them because they’re him. ‘I need you to – I KNOW! I AM TOTALLY YOU! I DID IT EARLIER! I know that because I am also me.’ That’s not a good conversation. Actually, it sounded pretty good there. I think I’m onto something.
You’ve retconned Ultron’s origin. In the comics, Hank Pym – Ant-Man – creates Ultron. Here, it’s Tony and, to a lesser extent, Bruce.
Of all the heat I’ve ever taken, not having Hank Pym was one of the bigger things. But the fact of the matter was, Edgar had him first and by virtue of what Edgar was doing, there was no way for me to use him in this. I also thought it was a bridge too far. Ultron needs to be the brainchild of the Avengers, and in the world of the Avengers and the MCU, Tony Stark is that guy. Banner has elements of that guy – we don’t really think of him as being as irresponsible as Tony Stark, but the motherfucker tested gamma radiation on himself, with really terrible, way-worse-than-Tony-Stark results.
It didn’t make sense to introduce a third scientist, a third sciencetician, to do that. It was hard for me, because I grew up on the comics, to dump that, but at the end of the day, it’s a more interesting relationship between Tony and Ultron if Tony was once like, ‘You know what would be a really great idea?’ They’re doing what they always do – which is jump in headfirst, and then go, ‘Sorry, world!’ But you have to make it their responsibility without just making it their fault.
Before I took the first movie. For me what was interesting is that he is this angry, and I hired the smoothest talker in Hollywood to play him. I did it on purpose. I needed a guy who can give you the Morpheus but then can just LOSE HIS SHIT. Spader’s really good at that and he’s really good at finding the darkness, but also the comedy. The comedy is always a huge thing for me. Tom Hiddleston is hilarious. Hiddleston can turn on a dime, which is my favourite thing. He can be absolutely apocalyptic and then, ‘Um, point of order?’ Ultron has the same thing. He is very different, obviously, in his rhythms and his concepts, but for me it’s a guy who’s that angry and who hates the Avengers that much and is also a robot and is therefore going to have every issue that a robot’s going to have with humanity anyway… there’s a lot to play there. For me, he’s an iconic figure.
Did you play around with his powers, and what he’s capable of?
Yeah, I did. The powers in comic books – they’re always like, ‘And then I can reverse the polarity of your ions!’ – well, we have to ground things a lot more. With Ultron, we have to make him slightly less omnipotent because he’d win. Bottom line. Also, having weaknesses and needs and foibles and alliances and actually caring what people think of him, all these things, are what make him a character and not just a tidal wave. A movie about a tidal wave can be great, but it’s different than a conflict between one side and the other.
When Ultron speaks, he has a point. He is really not on top of the fact that the point he’s making has nothing to do with the fact that he’s banoonoos. And that he hates the Avengers for bringing him into this world, and he can’t really articulate that or even understand how much he hates humanity. He thinks he all that. That guy is very fun to write. He combines all the iconic stuff. The powers he has are slightly different – he can control certain things, he’s not just firing repulsors.
And you also have Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch.
They have an origin but it’s largely described. They’re already good to go by the time we’re up and running. You don’t want to fall into Spider-Man 3 territory – and I say that as a guy who actually thinks pretty well of that movie, there’s some great stuff in that movie – but there comes a point where you’re overloaded with frontstory, backstory, origin story and it becomes very hard to juggle. My instinct is always, ‘Don’t put in more, work with what you have.’
But I insisted on putting in more in this movie because I felt I needed more villains. I needed someone for Ultron to talk to, and I need more trouble for the Avengers. As powerful as Ultron is, if he builds more Ultrons, they’re Ultrons. There’s no reason for him to ever to talk to them because they’re him. ‘I need you to – I KNOW! I AM TOTALLY YOU! I DID IT EARLIER! I know that because I am also me.’ That’s not a good conversation. Actually, it sounded pretty good there. I think I’m onto something.
You’ve retconned Ultron’s origin. In the comics, Hank Pym – Ant-Man – creates Ultron. Here, it’s Tony and, to a lesser extent, Bruce.
Of all the heat I’ve ever taken, not having Hank Pym was one of the bigger things. But the fact of the matter was, Edgar had him first and by virtue of what Edgar was doing, there was no way for me to use him in this. I also thought it was a bridge too far. Ultron needs to be the brainchild of the Avengers, and in the world of the Avengers and the MCU, Tony Stark is that guy. Banner has elements of that guy – we don’t really think of him as being as irresponsible as Tony Stark, but the motherfucker tested gamma radiation on himself, with really terrible, way-worse-than-Tony-Stark results.
It didn’t make sense to introduce a third scientist, a third sciencetician, to do that. It was hard for me, because I grew up on the comics, to dump that, but at the end of the day, it’s a more interesting relationship between Tony and Ultron if Tony was once like, ‘You know what would be a really great idea?’ They’re doing what they always do – which is jump in headfirst, and then go, ‘Sorry, world!’ But you have to make it their responsibility without just making it their fault.
#1857
DVD Talk Hero
Re: The Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015, Whedon)
Yes, more up and running and less handholding of origins. And a great reason to include them, to flesh out the villain.
Also, movie Tony Stark (and modern age comic book Tony Stark) are actually perfect for creating Ultron... perfect blend of arrogance, AI knowledge and super science. Though it does take away one of the two defining moments of Hank Pym's somewhat lackluster superhero career (both negative).
Also, movie Tony Stark (and modern age comic book Tony Stark) are actually perfect for creating Ultron... perfect blend of arrogance, AI knowledge and super science. Though it does take away one of the two defining moments of Hank Pym's somewhat lackluster superhero career (both negative).
#1858
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Re: The Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015, Whedon)
Yeah. Kind of sad how Pym has 2 great moments in his life. One isn't as bad other but damnit... he slapped Janet once and it just went to shit for him.
I am glad we got Vision though... that's going to be fucking exciting and I'm glad they're holding off on him in trailers. Cuz he's going to be badass.
I am glad we got Vision though... that's going to be fucking exciting and I'm glad they're holding off on him in trailers. Cuz he's going to be badass.
#1860
DVD Talk Hero
Re: The Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015, Whedon)
Horrible photoshopping of Robert Downey, Jr's head notwithstanding, it's a decent poster.
Interesting that Evans is billed a tad low. I wonder how much Ruffalo is pulling in from this one.
I also see that Hayley Atwell is listed. I hope she gets more than just a cameo this time around. Would love a flashback with her and the Howling Commandos.
Interesting that Evans is billed a tad low. I wonder how much Ruffalo is pulling in from this one.
I also see that Hayley Atwell is listed. I hope she gets more than just a cameo this time around. Would love a flashback with her and the Howling Commandos.
Last edited by RocShemp; 02-24-15 at 02:37 PM.
#1862
DVD Talk Hero
Re: The Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015, Whedon)
Poor Ruffalo, he'll never make the poster.
#1863
DVD Talk Hero
Re: The Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015, Whedon)
I'm hearing that the post-credits tag will be
Spoiler:
#1864
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Los Angeles , California
Posts: 3,596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#1865
Re: The Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015, Whedon)
Idris Elba is gonna have more screentime than Andy Serkis? And I didn't know Anthony Mackie would be in this.
#1866
DVD Talk Hero
#1867
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
#1868
DVD Talk Hero
Re: The Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015, Whedon)
#1869
DVD Talk Hero
#1870
Re: The Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015, Whedon)
All the MCU movie posters just suck. So creatively bankrupt. I guess it doesn't really matter as the movies still pull in bank.
I think Chris Hemsworth has a really good agent. He got promoted to second billing. He also originally got $10M more for The Huntsman than Charlize Theron, who has an Oscar.
I think Chris Hemsworth has a really good agent. He got promoted to second billing. He also originally got $10M more for The Huntsman than Charlize Theron, who has an Oscar.
#1871
DVD Talk Hero
Re: The Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015, Whedon)
So does Mark Ruffalo. They both leapfrogged over Chris Evans. Though, Hemsworth clearly has the better agent.
#1872
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Re: The Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015, Whedon)
Now if only they could match that with quality scripting for Thor.
I've always hated how they photoshop Downey Jr's head in there. Always looks awkward. The BD cover looked bad too.
I've always hated how they photoshop Downey Jr's head in there. Always looks awkward. The BD cover looked bad too.
#1873
DVD Talk Godfather
Re: The Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015, Whedon)
At least Cap is front and center in the poster with Iron Man, if not slightly in front of him. All of Marvel's posters seem similar to me, I still don't really get why folks raved about the Guardians one (which we discussed heavily back then)).
#1874
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015, Whedon)
Movie posters in general are pretty crappy now days so its kind of whatever to me I guess. I actually don't think the ones for The Avengers or Age of Ultron are that bad for just being ensemble posters. The films are great so I could really care less about the posters.
#1875
DVD Talk Hero
Re: The Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015, Whedon)
But, as Defiant1 said, "it doesn't really matter as the movies still pull in bank." When your movies are licenses to print money, no sense to waste any on a talented graphic designer when an intern can shit out a poster for free.