![]() |
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
Originally Posted by Why So Blu?
(Post 11298995)
Yeah, to Milla. It was so obvious. I have no idea why, because 1 and 2 were left alone.
|
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
I checked out after 2. Kinda like how I checked of Underworld after the first one. Are these movies good? These are two franchises that I always shrug my shoulders about and wonder, Is there that big of an audience for them? I guess the answer is yes. It just kinda sucks that Resident Evil gets 5 movies while stuff like John Carter and The Rocketeer only get one.
|
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
Well John Carter was due to pisspoor marketing. I have no clue why The Rocketeer also failed. Both very good films which makes the lack of sequels very sad.
|
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
I'm definately catching this tomorrow morning.
Thought I'd check in to see what people are saying. Did nobody on here see this yet? |
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
I'm seeing it tomorrow as well. I'm a fan of the series. I'll try to report back tomorrow.
|
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
I don't really have interest in seeing this in theaters, but I have heard it's the best since the first.
|
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
Originally Posted by KillerCannibal
(Post 11386224)
I don't really have interest in seeing this in theaters, but I have heard it's the best since the first.
|
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
I haven't bothered with any of the series after the dreadful Part 2, so I didn't have much baggage going in. I simply expected some interesting action and hot women performing cheesy ass-kicking.
After successfully jettisoning any expectations of coherent plot, I can say I got pretty much what I expected. The opening scene (recap from the last entry?) and Alice's initial Matrix-inspired hallway battle were entirely satisfying. The rest of the film was tolerable thanks to the fun 3D and Tomandandy score. Yes, I rolled my eyed constantly at the idiotic Umbrella/zombie cannon fodder redshirts, dumb deaths by sorta-featured characters, and total lack of mourning by friends of said characters. Visually, the IMAX 3D was probably a big saving grace, and I'm glad I saw it in the format. Also, regarding Jill Valentine: Spoiler:
After seeing this entry, I could entirely see myself going back to catch Extinction and Afterlife while putting back a good deal of whiskey. |
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
They explained the "mind control spider" in Afterlife. When Alice finds Claire she is wearing one, and a big plot point of that film is Claire lost her memory once it was removed. In this one Jill takes it off and remembers Alice after a minute. Kind of a big flaw. This one was kinda bleh. These movies almost kind of seem like episodes of a TV show. Like oh...this year Alice is stuck in a facility with random city models. Just guilty pleasures....if it wasn't for Milla I probably wouldnt bother.
|
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
The best part of the movie was the DmC trailer before the movie started...:(
|
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
Speaking of trailers before....WHAT THE FUCK WAS THAT DANCE MOVIE??? Sawyer...what are you doing? Who the hell would fund such a movie. Looks awful.
|
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
Caught this last night. I'm a fan of the series and would put them in order like so:
1, 3, 4, 2 and 5 This was utterly a complete piece of shit. |
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
I'm surprised these films don't just spontaneously generate themselves at this point.
|
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
I don't like to call movies 'good' or 'bad'.
This movie is completely unsatisfying. What the fuck? From what I could tell, it had one act. I was expecting a war in Washington DC. That doesn't happen. The whole movie takes place at an Umbrella base in Russia. Quite possibly, the most plotless movie I've ever seen. No cool introductions or payoffs. No climax (I thought I was watching a segway to the second half of the movie). I'm not sure how else I can describe it. I feel pissed off. Conned. I like the other RE movies (see my previous post). And I was kind of excited to see this. But this movie is a total cheat. Go and see it if you want. Fuck this movie. |
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
Originally Posted by dex14
(Post 11386698)
Speaking of trailers before....WHAT THE FUCK WAS THAT DANCE MOVIE??? Sawyer...what are you doing? Who the hell would fund such a movie. Looks awful.
|
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
Originally Posted by BuddyRevell
(Post 11386864)
Caught this last night. I'm a fan of the series and would put them in order like so:
1, 3, 4, 2 and 5 This was utterly a complete piece of shit. Saw it in Imax 3D, the only saving grace were the three chubby chicks in skimpy dresses in front of me, and you know when that's the saving grace the movie was in the shitter. |
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
Originally Posted by Shazam
(Post 11387227)
Meh, it was better than 2. ;)
Saw it in Imax 3D, the only saving grace were the three chubby chicks in skimpy dresses in front of me, and you know when that's the saving grace the movie was in the shitter. |
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
I loved the reeeeeaaalllly long recap at the start of the 95-minute movie. That was the first sign there wasn't going to be much there :lol:
|
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
I enjoyed well enough. I was a bit disappointed with the lack of real world apocalypse locales. I wasn't really expecting an "escape the facility" movie. Thought we'd be out in the real world. Oh well, the cliffhanger was cool.
Action was good, Milla in her paper scrubs again, more characters from the game. Can't complain. |
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
From what most of you have said, it sounds like I'll be waiting for this to hit the bargain bin before I add it to my collection. -kd5-
|
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
A friend and I were going to see this yesterday but he couldnt make it. Suddenly I lost the desire to see it, despite being a fan of the series. Sounds like I am not missing much.
Saw this on Wiki: Sequel. Originally, Anderson planned to film a fifth and sixth Resident Evil film back-to-back, but later decided that a sixth film will only be made based on the success of Retribution. Anderson explains that the sixth film will most likely be the finale of the series. |
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
That doesn't suprise me. Like I said, this is a one-act film. I thought we were moving into the second (or maybe third) act (I guess the "suburbia" stuff could be considered an act). And then the movie just ends. The trailers indicate a Washington DC setting. That doesn't happen.
I'm up for watching a DC-based Resident Evil finale. But put SOMETHING in it. This movie just had a bunch of baddies getting shot up. I don't recall if there were any new monsters or not. I don't think there were. It's all just the same stuff (dude with the big meat cleaver/axe, the flower-looking things coming out of peoples mouths, etc.). I guess that the "dead soviets army" was new. |
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
Well this was as terrible as I expected it to be. I don't know why I keep subjecting myself to these films...I do actually (I'm a diehard fan of the game franchise). I keep hoping one day they'll make a good Resident Evil. That won't happen as long as Paul WS Anderson is attached to the franchise. This guy is such a hack!
Also it was painfully obvious that Leon Kennedy and Ada Wong had their voices dubbed. Terrible syncing. The actor who plays Wesker is horribly miscast. The guy just sucks. There were some decent action scenes and Jill and Ada looked hot...other than that I have nothing positive to say. Grade: D |
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
I personally like the series. It's a guilty pleasure like the Underworld franchise.
Here's one issue I had. Afterlife ended on a cliffhanger with a major attack happening on the ship with Alice, Claire and Chris standing right next to each other. Retribution picks up with the attack. Claire and Chris are nowhere to be found. They were only mentioned later as a afterthought. I thought it was strange that they didn't bring back those characters, but brought back Luther. |
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
terrible terrible movie. the franchise has devolved into listless acting and dull and drab action set pieces. it wasn't even bad in a good way. just plain bad.
|
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
I tried watching it last month but after seeing Anderson shamelessly rip off the Dead Island trailer, X-Men, and Dawn of the Dead 04 in a matter of twenty minutes, I shut it down and have yet to return.
I plan on finishing it soon. |
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
I like these movies but this one was a let down. It's basically a re-hash of the escape-from-the-facility that was the first movie. Just bigger. Some cool action scenes, but from the trailers I expected to visit these real world places and not a lab.... I'll still grab it for the collection.
|
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
Watched it last night. More of the same, but I do love these movies. They definitely need to wrap it up with #6. Just go gonzo in Washington and be done.
|
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
I'm reviewing this right now. Awful. Paul WS Anderson was never a great filmmaker, but he used to be a fun one. This movie just felt like everyone was going through the motions.
|
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
The Blu-ray is spectacular! DEMO in every sense of the word. The film itself is not as good as the last one, but then again, these films were never meant to be more than what they are. Hell, my least favorite installment is the first film and I'm one of the few who actually enjoys part 2. Go figure.
I do love the tomandandy music score, too. |
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
I do agree with the Blu-ray quality. Top marks for sound and picture, and a decent set of special features as well.
|
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
As someone who has liked the previous movies to varying degrees, this one was definitely the worst and probably as disappointing as this type of movie could be. The recap was a bit long, and I thought the suburbia sequence in the beginning went on for too long as well. Bringing back Michelle Rodriguez and Oded Fehr was somewhat of a waste, as they didn't do anything particularly interesting and the movie seemed to only rely on people being impressed that they were there.
I didn't really understand the point of Wesker flipping sides like that randomly after the last 2 movies, and Jill's defeat was awfully predictable and too easy. And yeah, given how Claire was influenced before in the last movie her recovery was kind of dumb. Leon and Ada weren't really established very well either, which was a bummer. They could have used an extra 10-15 minutes and made them actually interesting, especially since I couldn't care less about Luther. |
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
This movie was a waste of fucking time.
Just seventy minutes of explosions and gun fights, ten minutes of story, and ten minutes of really bad exposition. Do people seriously give a fuck about any of these characters? And how can you fear monsters that have no personality? They're just moving animated avatars! Seriously what is the appeal? What is the lure for these movies? Can anyone tell me? That final scene was so goddamn stupid, too. |
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
Originally Posted by Terminal
(Post 11520440)
This movie was a waste of fucking time.
Just seventy minutes of explosions and gun fights, ten minutes of story, and ten minutes of really bad exposition. Do people seriously give a fuck about any of these characters? And how can you fear monsters that have no personality? They're just moving animated avatars! Seriously what is the appeal? What is the lure for these movies? Can anyone tell me? That final scene was so goddamn stupid, too. |
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
Originally Posted by Solid Snake PAC
(Post 11520446)
Yet you saw it. How odd.
|
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
There could have been better fodder I'd hope than an RE movie, especially since you kind of went in knowing what you'd get.
|
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
Originally Posted by Solid Snake PAC
(Post 11520460)
There could have been better fodder I'd hope than an RE movie, especially since you kind of went in knowing what you'd get.
|
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
Have you watched all the movies in the series? Seems bizarre to keep watching them if you dislike them. Seems like there would be better things to do or better movies to watch.
Personally, I found some of the zombie action fun in the previous movies, and they took a fun turn with the story in the 3rd movie with all the Alice clones. I've been genuinely interested in what they were doing, but Retribution was pretty poor. |
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
Originally Posted by fumanstan
(Post 11520465)
Have you watched all the movies in the series? Seems bizarre to keep watching them if you dislike them. Seems like there would be better things to do or better movies to watch.
Originally Posted by fumanstan
(Post 11520465)
Personally, I found some of the zombie action fun in the previous movies, and they took a fun turn with the story in the 3rd movie with all the Alice clones. I've been genuinely interested in what they were doing, but Retribution was pretty poor.
|
Re: Resident Evil: Retribution
What's the point of fodder for a year end list?
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:33 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.