Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

EVERYTHING that was wrong with INDY4....

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

EVERYTHING that was wrong with INDY4....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-17-11, 04:06 PM
  #51  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 7,114
Received 78 Likes on 63 Posts
Re: EVERYTHING that was wrong with INDY4....

I'm surprised that people dislike Temple of Doom as well. I felt like The Last Crusade was step backwards. There's alot of different pulp themes and villains they could have used from that era, but instead they bring the Nazi world domination plot back. It still was enjoyable though.

I agree that this last Jones movie felt like it was all a big set. The 30s and 40s seems to be a more interesting time to create stories in, instead of the 50s. There could have been a film earlier on when Harrison Ford was still young but supposedly George Lucas couldn't come up with any good stories.
Old 02-17-11, 04:18 PM
  #52  
Moderator
 
Groucho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 71,383
Received 122 Likes on 84 Posts
Re: EVERYTHING that was wrong with INDY4....

Originally Posted by wm lopez
DVDTALK memebers like dark anything.
So does Miley Cyrus, if the rumors are to be believed.
Originally Posted by Dick Van Dork
Presley's Hound Dog is one of the easiest ways to tell/show/inform people that they are in the 1950's. It is one of the iconic Presley songs and iconci songs from the 50's. How the fuck would you have done it in under 5 seconds like the movie did, moron?
Flash text on the screen: 1957.
Old 02-17-11, 04:52 PM
  #53  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,306
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: EVERYTHING that was wrong with INDY4....

Just a thought but maybe Doom gets the hate because MOST people find it vastly inferior to Raiders and at least somewhat inferior to Crusade. Now, I know just in this thread that some people have said that Crusade is their least favorite of the 3, but I believe that the general consensus is that the order of preference goes Raiders, Crusade and then Doom, so in that respect Doom is kind of like the red headed middle child of a great series.
Old 02-17-11, 04:59 PM
  #54  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
arminius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Here I Is!
Posts: 6,967
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Re: EVERYTHING that was wrong with INDY4....

I also liked Temple alot. It was completely different than Raiders but retained the feel of the original. I thought Crusade and Skull were both weak but watchable. My biggest problem with Skull was the complete indifference they showed Karen Allen. She was a big part of how good Raiders was and not only the best female character in any of those films but of any films. That really disappointed me more than anything else.
Old 02-17-11, 05:15 PM
  #55  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,505
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: EVERYTHING that was wrong with INDY4....

Temple of Doom is actually my favorite of the original three films. A lot of that has to do with nostalgia and the fact that it was the first Indiana Jones film I saw as a little kid. I liked the fact that it had a mixture of horror and adventure and there was a kid that I could relate to. Granted, I haven't seen it again since it hit DVD, but my opinion of it didn't change much when I saw it again.
Old 02-17-11, 06:15 PM
  #56  
DVD Talk Hero
 
TomOpus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 40,145
Received 1,302 Likes on 946 Posts
Re: EVERYTHING that was wrong with INDY4....

I think there are more posts in this thread that mentions Temple of Doom than Crystal Skull...
Old 02-17-11, 06:33 PM
  #57  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,306
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: EVERYTHING that was wrong with INDY4....

Originally Posted by arminius
I also liked Temple alot. It was completely different than Raiders but retained the feel of the original. I thought Crusade and Skull were both weak but watchable. My biggest problem with Skull was the complete indifference they showed Karen Allen. She was a big part of how good Raiders was and not only the best female character in any of those films but of any films. That really disappointed me more than anything else.
Wait...are you saying that Marion Ravenwood is the best female character in the history of cinema? Better than say Scarlett O'Hara, Ellen Ripley, Sarah Connor, Princess Leia and Clarice Starling just to name a few?
Old 02-17-11, 07:21 PM
  #58  
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Re: EVERYTHING that was wrong with INDY4....

Yeah...cuz...as much as I love Marion...she's no Ripley. You know...she kind of changed things.
Old 02-17-11, 08:02 PM
  #59  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
The Antipodean's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 6,640
Received 165 Likes on 118 Posts
Re: EVERYTHING that was wrong with INDY4....

A lot of people and critics HATED Temple of Doom in 84 when it came out. I was in 7th grade or so and remember many friends saying how much it stank. I kinda like it myself but it's very different in tone than Raiders. I do like it better than Last Crusade though, which went too over the top and I found Sean Connery's Dad rather one-note.
Old 02-17-11, 09:02 PM
  #60  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 23,512
Received 204 Likes on 158 Posts
Re: EVERYTHING that was wrong with INDY4....

Originally Posted by Sierra Disc
A lot of people and critics HATED Temple of Doom in 84 when it came out. I was in 7th grade or so and remember many friends saying how much it stank. I kinda like it myself but it's very different in tone than Raiders. I do like it better than Last Crusade though, which went too over the top and I found Sean Connery's Dad rather one-note.
I don't remember it getting that much hate when it came out. What I DO remember is not being able to see it as I was only 7 and so many people were calling it inappropriate for kids. It was that movie that more or less necessitated the invention of PG-13, despite being PG itself. However, I did see Gremlins which was also allegedly responsible.
I had to settle for the movie story tape (the ones that had narration over the movie itself; these were just about as close as you could come to experiencing the movie without seeing it) and the story book full of photos from the movie. I was so happy that I had learned to read that previous school year.

I have to say to this day ToD is the only Indy movie I have yet to see in theaters, but have probably seen more times than any of them. I was able to catch Raiders at a theater near my hometown that was showing an anniversary restoration print.

Oh, Crystal Skull was still an entertaining experience despite its flaws, have to keep the thread on topic!
Old 02-18-11, 12:19 AM
  #61  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Josh-da-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Bible Belt
Posts: 43,946
Received 2,742 Likes on 1,889 Posts
Re: EVERYTHING that was wrong with INDY4....

Alexandra DuPont's defense of "Temple of Doom":

Dear God: You really are going to mount a quixotic defense of Temple of Doom, aren't you?

I'm afraid so. Most people hate it. I sort of love it. In fact, if I feel like spinning an Indy movie in the background in the years to come, I can pretty much guarantee that it will be the last 40 minutes of Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom.

Mind you, I'll be the first to admit that Temple of Doom has deeply embedded problems, and that there are popular reasons for disliking it — even hating it. The dialogue is ham-fisted. (I invariably cringe during the "What are you — a lion tamer?"/"I'm allowing you to tag along" exchange. "A lion." "Allowing." A homophone! I get it!) It's surprisingly brutal in the middle. In women's-lib terms, Kate Capshaw's scream-queen Willie Scott is such a step backward from Marion Ravenwood that I'm mildly surprised NOW didn't picket the screenings. (The future Mrs. Spielberg, God bless her, got handed a terribly written role — Willie's the shrieking Jar-Jar of the Indiana Jones series.) And let's not even get into the film's retro-colonialist overtones (which I find sort of perversely funny, but still). And the film is so different from its predecessor — confined largely to one locale, not as sophisticated or quest-driven, and very nearly Satanic in its depictions of evil — that it really couldn't help but let viewers down. And the bad blood persists to this day: Several people who knew I had this DVD box a week early made a point of expressing their jealousy — but also invariably went out of their way to slam "the second one."

Still, despite all that, I managed to find not one but two DVDJ staffers who absolutely adore Temple of Doom — and we gave the platter a spin, in the dark, on a flat-screen HDTV with six-channel sound. And we three geeks arrived at the following list of reasons to love the flick:

1. That unimpeachably awesome opening fight over the diamond and antidote, which contains tributes to classic musicals and Hitchcock and just absolutely rocks the house;

2. Ke Huy Kwan as Short Round, who — despite being handed cute-kid dialogue that includes the lines "Hold onto your potatoes!" and "You call him Doctah Jones, DOLL!" — is quite possibly the most likeable and least obtrusive child sidekick in movie history. Check out the wonderful, genuinely warm give-and-take between Kwan and Ford as they play poker or exchange hats;

3. That "Nice try, Lao Che!" visual gag;

4. Harrison Ford's terrific performance — arguably his best as Jones. I love how Indy stars out as a total greedy asshole, with strong shades of Bogart in Treasure of Sierra Madre, and how there's a distinct character arc as he evolves into a Pied-Piper/holy avenger;

5. The movie's look — again, the best in the series — with its striking wide-angle close ups of Indy's face and strong use of reds and shadows. Temple of Doom is a manual on how to use color in film, no joke. (As one DVDJ staffer [who, BTW, owns the original July 1984 issue of American Cinematographer devoted to Temple of Doom] put it, "This movie contains Spielberg's busiest frames, and it's all beautiful. It's a pornography of cinematography");

6. John Williams' score, which is among his very best — expanding richly on the original and adding wonderful themes for Short Round and the slave children;

7. Vampire bats! Severed thumbs!

8. The matte paintings of Pankot Palace, which are among the best matte paintings ever;

9. The sexy, playful, totally '80s, beautifully edited cat-and-mouse sequence where way-horny Indy and Willie are trying to out-wait each other, only to have the flirtation interrupted by a Thuggee assassin. (How can you not love the way that thug steps out of that wall mural?);

10. The super-icky, super-taut bug-tunnel and death-trap set piece, which is a perfect transition between the palace and the Temple of Doom and which very nearly kicks the ass of the Well of Souls sequence (it certainly makes your skin crawl more) and features that great closing gag where Indy grabs his hat as the door's closing;

11. The way the movie shifts so abruptly into scenes of human sacrifice and child cruelty. I'm sorry, I just love what a cinema bomb Spielberg and Lucas drop here: Yes, the horror's laid on a bit thick, but come on — how totally cathartic are those last 40 minutes as a result, when Indy snaps out of the Black Sleep of Kali and dishes out the hurt to faceless Thuggee goons?

12. That little 1940s tip of the hat Indy gives to that cobra statue as he's stealing the stones — a perfect Bogart moment;

13. Amrish Puri as Mola Ram — by far the scariest and most depraved villain in the series. He's mindlessly scary like Orcs are scary, you know? As one fellow staffer put it, he looks like what Abe Vigoda would look like if he were a sadistic Indian child molester;

14. The way Indiana Jones doesn't just look drugged when he's in the Black Sleep of Kali, but instead looks like he's really into all the sadism and blood, like he's actually tapped into some dark part of his personality that was there all along;

15. And, best of all, the movie's final 40 minutes, which are inventive and cathartic and full of righteous fury and pain and thrilling action — it's Lucas and Spielberg working out all their action-geek demons without apology, and God bless 'em for it. I mean, has any movie ever piled one action sequence on top of the next so successfully? That voodoo conveyor-belt fight followed by the mine-car chase followed by the water tunnel followed by the dual-swordsman tango followed by the rope-bridge blowout? With all kinds of semi-perverse shots like the one where both Indy and Short Round are beating the crap out of age-appropriate foes?


Really. The movie's aged well. Better than you might think. Give it a second chance. It's total geek crack.
Old 02-18-11, 06:46 AM
  #62  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Michael Corvin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 62,519
Received 913 Likes on 648 Posts
Re: EVERYTHING that was wrong with INDY4....

Originally Posted by Dr. DVD
I don't remember it getting that much hate when it came out.
Oh you should have seen the forum, it was crazy.
Old 02-18-11, 10:48 AM
  #63  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,200
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Re: EVERYTHING that was wrong with INDY4....

It could have been worse......P-Diddy could have been in it.
Old 02-18-11, 12:07 PM
  #64  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
nando820's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 4,584
Received 32 Likes on 26 Posts
Re: EVERYTHING that was wrong with INDY4....

I didn't appreciate the fact that they talked about the Incas and the Mayas as if they were the same thing, The Incas were centered in Peru and Mayas in Central America all the way up to Mexico not even in the same Continent and they were completely different cultures. Why couldn't they just chose one for their story. But no they had to mention both so they can offend more people.



Not even when they are flying in Peru do they show the right location for Cusco. The map shows them going to Nasca which is a dessert in the Coast whereas Cusco is in the Andes. I mean it takes 2 minutes to wiki a map no?


Plane Flying on Nazca Lines

Last edited by nando820; 02-18-11 at 12:15 PM.
Old 02-18-11, 12:16 PM
  #65  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Ash Ketchum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 12,636
Received 277 Likes on 212 Posts
Re: EVERYTHING that was wrong with INDY4....

Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
Oh you should have seen the forum, it was crazy.
Yeah, I remember arguing about it with friends on the street afterwards, too. (The ONLY way we could share our thoughts about a movie with like-minded people back then.)
Old 02-18-11, 12:21 PM
  #66  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
arminius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Here I Is!
Posts: 6,967
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Re: EVERYTHING that was wrong with INDY4....

Originally Posted by whoopdido
Wait...are you saying that Marion Ravenwood is the best female character in the history of cinema? Better than say Scarlett O'Hara, Ellen Ripley, Sarah Connor, Princess Leia and Clarice Starling just to name a few?
Originally Posted by Solid Snake PAC
Yeah...cuz...as much as I love Marion...she's no Ripley. You know...she kind of changed things.
Yeah, I worded that poorly.

She was a big part of how good Raiders was and not only the best female character in any of those films but one of the best in any film.
Old 02-18-11, 12:28 PM
  #67  
DVD Talk Hero
 
GoldenJCJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colorado
Posts: 27,327
Received 3,211 Likes on 2,071 Posts
Re: EVERYTHING that was wrong with INDY4....

Originally Posted by Ash Ketchum
Yeah, I remember arguing about it with friends on the street afterwards, too. (The ONLY way we could share our thoughts about a movie with like-minded people back then.)
Face-to-face? Like savages?!
Old 02-18-11, 07:27 PM
  #68  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 24,949
Received 276 Likes on 172 Posts
Re: EVERYTHING that was wrong with INDY4....

My take.

It was fine for what it's supposed to be: a reflection of the time.

The original movies took place in the 1930s and took the tone of what was big then -- action serials.

The new movie took place in the 1950s and took the tone of what was big then -- cheesy alien sci-fi drive-in movies


I hope that Indy 8 takes place in the 1980s so we can get a music montage of Indy "gearing up"
Old 02-18-11, 09:34 PM
  #69  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,306
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: EVERYTHING that was wrong with INDY4....

Originally Posted by arminius
Yeah, I worded that poorly.

She was a big part of how good Raiders was and not only the best female character in any of those films but one of the best in any film.
There ya go. I'd definitely agree with that. I guess I don't know if I could pick THE best female character ever (probably Ripley) but Marion would be up there...just not the best of all time.
Old 02-19-11, 12:01 AM
  #70  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Josh-da-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Bible Belt
Posts: 43,946
Received 2,742 Likes on 1,889 Posts
Re: EVERYTHING that was wrong with INDY4....

Originally Posted by GuessWho
My take.
I hope that Indy 8 takes place in the 1980s so we can get a music montage of Indy "gearing up"
...and then he says "I'm gettin' too old for this shit."
Old 02-19-11, 08:38 AM
  #71  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 23,512
Received 204 Likes on 158 Posts
Re: EVERYTHING that was wrong with INDY4....

Originally Posted by GuessWho

I hope that Indy 8 takes place in the 1980s so we can get a music montage of Indy "gearing up"
I just had this mental image of Indy getting his whip out of the closet and grabbing a walking cane with "You're the Best" (from Karate Kid) blasting away.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.