Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-21-11 | 10:33 PM
  #776  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,271
Received 493 Likes on 354 Posts
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)

Originally Posted by Dragon Tattoo
Jesus Fucking Christ.
Here we go.
Old 07-21-11 | 10:46 PM
  #777  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: So Cal
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)

Originally Posted by PopcornTreeCt
I loved Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2. The sequel was one of the best comic book movies to date. Ebert included it in his top movies of the year. Part 3 is bad though and suffered so much cause 2 was so good.
If they had taken out the emo/hipster Peter montage with the jazzy Spider-man theme, the song and dance number in the club, the song and dance number while Harry and Mary Jane are making omelettes, the entire Gwen Stacy sub-plot that went nowhere (they could keep the action scene and just remove dialogue just to make it seem like she's some random girl and she looks like Gwen as fan service), the children during the final action sequence, the scenes where the Sandman talks to his family, and the incredibly stupid scene where Harry's butler reveals that he knew all along that his father was responsible for his own death and Spider-man is innocent, the movie would have been much stronger. You don't need to add extra Venom scenes or anything like that. The movie is pretty full as it is.
Old 07-22-11 | 12:13 AM
  #778  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,811
Received 380 Likes on 287 Posts
From: Seattle, WA
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)

I think the preview's pretty great. I didn't hate the Raimi movies...and I don't see part 3 as some abomination, similar to X3, it's just a weaker entry to what came before. I liked the colors, music, overall vibe... but the acting and dialogue was just so bad.... you had to look at it as a cartoon to buy any of it. If they can dial that in, while retaining the fun aspects... I guess that's what I'm looking for in a Spidey flick.
Old 07-22-11 | 08:59 AM
  #779  
madcougar's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,691
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Houston
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)

Originally Posted by Superboy
If they had taken out the emo/hipster Peter montage with the jazzy Spider-man theme, the song and dance number in the club, the song and dance number while Harry and Mary Jane are making omelettes, the entire Gwen Stacy sub-plot that went nowhere (they could keep the action scene and just remove dialogue just to make it seem like she's some random girl and she looks like Gwen as fan service), the children during the final action sequence, the scenes where the Sandman talks to his family, and the incredibly stupid scene where Harry's butler reveals that he knew all along that his father was responsible for his own death and Spider-man is innocent, the movie would have been much stronger. You don't need to add extra Venom scenes or anything like that. The movie is pretty full as it is.
I would add recasting Venom with ANYONE as Topher Grace was an abomination as Venom.

Originally Posted by dvdjunkie32
This trailer blows. Even gave me a headache watching it. As a spidey fan, I'm really pissed at this reboot. I had no problem with Toby and the rest of the cast. They stayed true to the comic, and there was so many other villian stories that could be milked instead of watching the origin story all over again.
What Spider-Man comic books have you been reading? The official movie adaptation is about the only comic book the Raimi movies stayed true to... with that said however, there was a lot of good stuff, which brings me to...

Originally Posted by Sierra Disc
I don't get this historical revisionism that says all the Raimi Spidey movies were awful. I love the first two (yeah the Green Goblin armor is awful) and I don't think 3 is anywhere near as bad as all that. Raimi gets the tone of the comic unlike this mopey trailer.
And bingo has a name-o. Raimi (for the most part) got the tone of the comic book right. Peter wasn't some emo outsider on the fringe of society. He had a small group of friends who loved and understood him. Sure he was a nerd who incurred the wrath of bullies, but he was still a funny kid who loved and respected his aunt and uncle dearly.

The trailer is Spider-Man by way of Twilight and MTV. I hope that this movie doesn't break Spider-Man like Batman and Robin broke Batman.
Old 07-22-11 | 09:12 AM
  #780  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 46,671
Received 1,387 Likes on 1,089 Posts
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)

Originally Posted by Superboy
If they had taken out the emo/hipster Peter montage with the jazzy Spider-man theme, the song and dance number in the club, the song and dance number while Harry and Mary Jane are making omelettes, the entire Gwen Stacy sub-plot that went nowhere (they could keep the action scene and just remove dialogue just to make it seem like she's some random girl and she looks like Gwen as fan service), the children during the final action sequence, the scenes where the Sandman talks to his family, and the incredibly stupid scene where Harry's butler reveals that he knew all along that his father was responsible for his own death and Spider-man is innocent, the movie would have been much stronger. You don't need to add extra Venom scenes or anything like that. The movie is pretty full as it is.
You ignored the single worst part of the movie - the high school love triangle occuring between three grown adults, it was embarassing as hell watching that. Plus Sandman was not an interesting villian at all.

Topher as Venom didn't bother me, but I was never a big Spider-man comic book fan.

I liked the first half of Spider-man 1 (hated it once it became him vs. Green Goblin who was incredibly uninteresting) and thought Spider-man 2 was great. 3 was terrible.
Old 07-22-11 | 07:50 PM
  #781  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)

Speaking of the incessant rebooting, I just read that WB has already announced that after The Dark Knight Rises, they're gonna reboot Batman again.... sigh.
Old 07-22-11 | 08:02 PM
  #782  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)

on the Batman thing...wasn't Nolan going to help out in creating a continuation franchise for Bats?
Old 07-22-11 | 08:12 PM
  #783  
Deftones's Avatar
DVD Talk God
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 83,667
Received 2,073 Likes on 1,398 Posts
From: Arizona
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)

Originally Posted by lamphorn
Speaking of the incessant rebooting, I just read that WB has already announced that after The Dark Knight Rises, they're gonna reboot Batman again.... sigh.
i'm wondering if that is out of context. only in the sense that it will obviously be new actors/director in the parts and that is being considered a "reboot." my guess is they just build on the universe that nolan has built. it's just too good to abandon that.
Old 07-22-11 | 08:16 PM
  #784  
islandclaws's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,084
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
From: Behind the Orange Curtain
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)

^ That's what they've said, which is what leads me to believe that with Bale out and this universe continuing, Wayne may end up a cripple after all.
Old 07-22-11 | 08:45 PM
  #785  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,426
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Indiana
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)

Bring in Jean Paul Valley!
Old 07-22-11 | 10:16 PM
  #786  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)

Originally Posted by kgrogers1979
Bring in Jean Paul Valley!
And then after a few Azrael movies, bring Bale back for something along the lines of "The Dark Knight Returns", right?

Wait, this is the Spidey thread? Crap.
Old 07-23-11 | 01:43 AM
  #787  
Giles's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 33,646
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
From: Washington DC
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)

aside from the ending of the trailer where the viewer get's Spidey's perspective of leaping and jumping around the buildings in 3D no less - it really didn't impress me as I had hoped
Old 07-23-11 | 01:57 AM
  #788  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,197
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: STL
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)

I thought Topher was great as Eddie Brock/Venom. Sure he wasn't buff like Venom is supposed to be, but he did pretty good with what he had to work with, which was nothing.
Old 07-23-11 | 02:08 AM
  #789  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,271
Received 493 Likes on 354 Posts
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)

Originally Posted by lamphorn
Speaking of the incessant rebooting, I just read that WB has already announced that after The Dark Knight Rises, they're gonna reboot Batman again.... sigh.
WHAT!? Are you fucking kidding me? This is out of control. First the way too soon "Superman" and "Spider-Man" reboots, now this? Hollywood just keeps sinking creatively lower and lower.
Old 07-23-11 | 02:10 AM
  #790  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,017
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)

That's why I support Marvel's efforts in making a linked cinematic universe; they wouldn't be putting so much effort in interconnecting the films just to reboot them 5 years later.
Old 07-23-11 | 02:21 AM
  #791  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 42,203
Received 1,464 Likes on 1,139 Posts
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)

Well the Batman reboot is at the behest of Christopher Nolan, from what has been rumoured. Apparently he's adamant that TDKR will be a definitive conclusion to his Batman trilogy with no opening for further sequels.
Old 07-23-11 | 05:43 AM
  #792  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,426
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Indiana
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)

Originally Posted by RocShemp
Apparently he's adamant that TDKR will be a definitive conclusion to his Batman trilogy with no opening for further sequels.

Hmmm. What if Bane doesn't break Batman's back but actually kills him...

But that would still leave an opening for Jean Paul.
Old 07-23-11 | 12:16 PM
  #793  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)

Fuck no to JPL....also this is the damn Spidey thread. Get back on track, motherfuckers.
Old 07-23-11 | 12:52 PM
  #794  
fumanstan's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 55,349
Received 27 Likes on 15 Posts
From: Irvine, CA
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)

Batman!
Old 07-23-11 | 03:31 PM
  #795  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)

Apparently the dude who plays the villain in this flick is a real dbag or this is just a publicity stunt

http://blog.moviefone.com/2011/07/23...-at-comic-con/
Old 07-23-11 | 03:38 PM
  #796  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,197
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: STL
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)

It's not true

Also: Low Quality Lizard pics

Last edited by anomynous; 07-23-11 at 04:13 PM.
Old 07-23-11 | 06:07 PM
  #797  
slop101's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 44,034
Received 472 Likes on 327 Posts
From: So. Cal.
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)

Everyone who complained about "emo" Peter Parker in Spiderman3, you were wrong, this is emo Spiderman!

Seriously, I like this cast, but every single thing about this looks wrong; wrong tone, wrong plot, unnecessary re-boot, another origin, too dark, etc, etc. It's all wrong for Spiderman/Parker, who as a character has gone through some serious shit, but is never dark nor brooding. And that POV segment looked worse than a video game.

I guess I'm the wrong audience for this, as it seems they're targeting the Twilight crowd. Further, in the press, the director of this new one is deriding the Rami films as if they're missteps or something. SP2 is one of the best superhero movies of them all, and while 3 head it's issues, it's not like it's Superman 4. To pretend the old ones weren't that hot, just to justify his shitty new take on it is pure bullshit.
Old 07-23-11 | 06:12 PM
  #798  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,182
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)

I wouldn't have so much of a problem except that they feel the need to retell the origin. I can understand soft rebooting the character to have him in high school again and involved with Gwen Stacy rather than Mary Jane, but the first Maguire Spider-Man movie was that long ago. I don't think they needed to really retell the origin story. Maybe that's how they felt it was best to reintroduce Peter as a teenager, but I just have a feeling it's going to be deja vu and feel like wasted screen time.
Old 07-23-11 | 09:06 PM
  #799  
PopcornTreeCt's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 25,913
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)

Originally Posted by anomynous
It's not true

Also: Low Quality Lizard pics
Yahoo is reporting it also. He was put under a citizen arrest.
Old 07-23-11 | 10:35 PM
  #800  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)

Originally Posted by slop101
Everyone who complained about "emo" Peter Parker in Spiderman3, you were wrong, this is emo Spiderman!

Seriously, I like this cast, but every single thing about this looks wrong; wrong tone, wrong plot, unnecessary re-boot, another origin, too dark, etc, etc. It's all wrong for Spiderman/Parker, who as a character has gone through some serious shit, but is never dark nor brooding. And that POV segment looked worse than a video game.

I guess I'm the wrong audience for this, as it seems they're targeting the Twilight crowd. Further, in the press, the director of this new one is deriding the Rami films as if they're missteps or something. SP2 is one of the best superhero movies of them all, and while 3 head it's issues, it's not like it's Superman 4. To pretend the old ones weren't that hot, just to justify his shitty new take on it is pure bullshit.
This guy directed 500 Days of Summer. For that alone he deserves a massive cockpunch, much less for dissing the Raimi Spiderman flicks.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.