![]() |
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
(Post 10748237)
The trailer is just a bunch of things exploding and shit.
Is this a "movie"? |
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Originally Posted by al_bundy
(Post 10748419)
to keep the story going hasbro and whoever made the cartoon added construction trucks that turn into a super robot as a voltron rip off, insect robots, and retarted/autistic dino robots
And actually I liked the Constructicons/Devastator. Probably my favorite episode ever was the one where Omega Supreme was telling the story about how he and the Constructicons used to be friends but then they turned on him. Even the Insecticons were ok I guess. I liked the original the best when the only "big guys" were Omega Supreme, who really didn't do much other than mope around, Devastator, Tripticon, who got his ass beat every single time and always ended up getting thrown into the ocean and the big city dude--Metroplex I think his name was. It got idiotic when every episode introduced a new "big guy" |
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
i liked them as a kid as well, but at 37 looking back on it the dinobots were retarts and the whole story was based for the mind of a 7 year old. Bay is a genius for turning this into movies that adults can watch. i don't like everything about the movies, but overall i liked the first two
and i just checked wikipedia and the constructicons did come after voltron which was based on a Japanese story |
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Originally Posted by whoopdido
(Post 10748617)
I liked the original the best when the only "big guys" were Omega Supreme, who really didn't do much other than mope around, Devastator, Tripticon, who got his ass beat every single time and always ended up getting thrown into the ocean and the big city dude--Metroplex I think his name was. |
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Originally Posted by Giantrobo
(Post 10748496)
Not in my book... Diaz has her rare, "Kinda looks good" moments but she's generally a Pig.
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Originally Posted by Giles
(Post 10748875)
have seen pics of Diaz without her 'film' makeup in the rag mags - she looks banged up and crap - whaaawww :yack:
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
with bad CGI |
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
If the movies had less Shia and other humans and was just robot action, they'd be better.
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
The only humans I'd keep are the soldiers. They show off the scale of the bots and how practically impossible they are to kill by mere humans. Even if they manage to get a few kills in on lesser grunts, it's usually a large coordinated affair to accomplish just that. It makes the robot on robot bashing even more impressive when you know how hard these things are to kill.
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
I'd keep Sam and the soldiers. He's an emotional link to the transformers..the problem w/ that is that they don't really write him well.
Also...wtf happened w/ that extra that got hurt pretty bad? |
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Filming was temporarily delayed on September 2, 2010 in Hammond, Indiana, when an extra was seriously injured during a stunt. The accident happened when a steel cable snapped from a car being towed, owing to a failed weld, hitting the extra's car and damaging her skull. The extra, identified as Gabriella Cedillo, had to undergo brain surgery.[33] The injury has left her permanently brain-damaged, paralyzed on her left side and her left eye stitched shut.[34][35] As a result, Paramount took responsibility for the accident and covered all medical costs incurred by Cedillo.[36] In spite of this, on October 5, Cedillo's family filed a lawsuit, which cites seven counts of negligence against Paramount, D.W. Studios and several other defendants (not including Bay), with total damages sought in excess of US$350,000.[37] |
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Originally Posted by RichC2
(Post 10749716)
Surprised they're only going after $350,000.
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
The injury has left her permanently brain-damaged, paralyzed on her left side and her left eye stitched shut. I'm going to assume that it's going to take a lot more to take care of that girl than $350,000. Damn. I'm just thinking about that damage done to her. *shudder* |
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Originally Posted by Solid Snake PAC
(Post 10749741)
holy fuck...wow. That's shitty to live on.
I'm going to assume that it's going to take a lot more to take care of that girl than $350,000. Damn. I'm just thinking about that damage done to her. *shudder* |
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
^ I read an article back in February that said that Paramount reneged on the promise to pay the medical bills and still at that time hadn't paid a dime.
Anyway, I'm not impressed yet. ROTF also had an awesome trailer. |
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Looking into this further, it seems that the initial figure sought was "in excess of $50,000." Gossipvita.com ran an update in October:
Gabriela Cedillo’s attorney Todd Smith tells us the 350K only covers her initial month long hospital stay — and does not include other costs like an airlift, ambulance rides, and the rehab facility where Gabriela is now. But Smith says the lawsuit filed yesterday on Gabriela’s behalf will go forward no matter what. Smith says, “Medical bills are just the beginning … her ability to earn income is enormously affected.” Smith added Paramount hasn’t actually bucked up yet, but he believes they will once Gabriela’s current medical expenses are calculated. For anyone interested in reading the actual complaint filed in court, here it is. I was under the impression that she was a stunt performer, but it appears instead that she was merely an extra who was effectively recruited into the performance of a stunt. I'm stunned that the stunt coordinator would have allowed that, since it's been my understanding that those people are obsessive about the safety of their work, knowing how easily it can go wrong. |
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Originally Posted by Solid Snake PAC
(Post 10749708)
I'd keep Sam and the soldiers. He's an emotional link to the transformers..the problem w/ that is that they don't really write him well.
Also...wtf happened w/ that extra that got hurt pretty bad? I am really hoping for a Grimlock cameo but I don't have my hopes up. I'm sure we'll get another robot with balls instead. |
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Originally Posted by MinLShaw
(Post 10749773)
I'm stunned that the stunt coordinator would have allowed that, since it's been my understanding that those people are obsessive about the safety of their work, knowing how easily it can go wrong.
Originally Posted by edstein
(Post 10749810)
I'd keep Sam and a female interest for sure. The soldiers never seem to have anything to do. And when they do they have no effect against the robots. Tanks and planes yes, soldiers not so much.
The soldiers have had effect against the robots on the ground..it's harder for them obviously but they get it done. In reference...I'm using the end of the first film...I don't really remember TF2, I only saw it once. |
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
The injury has left her permanently brain-damaged, paralyzed on her left side and her left eye stitched shut. |
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Just saw the trailer. Ugh. It looks only slightly better than 1 and 2....but that still doesn't make it good. Have they fixed Bumblebee's no talking thing yet ? It didn't show in the ad, if they did.
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Yeah, I'm wondering about that too. I wouldn't mind Bumblebee actually putting in some input...actually most of the other Autobots.
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Originally Posted by fumanstan
(Post 10748333)
New to Transformers?
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
(Post 10750144)
Not new, but Transformers was actually a pretty good film that didn't rely on so much 'boom'. The trailer is like 90% 'boom'. Eh. Blu-ray rental anyway.
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
We see Sam adjusting Bumblebee's "pacifier" in this new trailer so maybe they finally permanently fix his vocal processors.
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Finally got around to watching the latest trailer (my router has begun to freak out any time I've tried to stream it until now). Very exciting stuff. Optimus Prime indicates that information about the Transformers was withheld from them. I wonder if they find out through Wikileaks. Also, it appears that Shockwave is a key figure in the Chicago assault. I'm really hoping that's a sign he's the ruthless bastard I remember from the comics, rather than just another lackey (as he was in the animated series). This has the potential to be the most enjoyable summer outing of the year--and I've been looking forward to a Green Lantern movie since some time in the early 90s.
Off-topic, has anyone caught Transformers: Prime? The first episode is free on iTunes so I downloaded and watched that the other night and really liked it. I saw another episode on HUB last night. Orci & Kurtzman developed it, so it's similar in tone and aesthetics to the live action series. It's got Peter Cullen as Optimus and Frank Welker as Megatron. I remember Bay rejected Welker for the films because he felt Welker's aged voice was a bad fit for the look of Megatron, but it works perfectly here. (I'm not second-guessing Bay here; I readily acknowledge that there's a difference between a large-scale, live action movie and an animated TV series.) I'll forget to be a regular viewer, but I dig what I've seen. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:11 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.