Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) ? The Reviews Thread

Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters
View Poll Results: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
25.21%
30.81%
31.37%
5.32%
2.80%
1.40%
1.68%
0
0%
0
0%
0.28%
0.56%
I have no desire to boldly go where many will go before.
0.56%
Voters: 357. You may not vote on this poll

Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Old 06-10-09 | 11:34 AM
  #801  
Travis McClain's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,798
Received 209 Likes on 135 Posts
From: Western Hemisphere
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by RoboDad
I think you may have missed my point. It was that the changes to the timeline, while widespread in their aftershocks, would not be universal in that regard. For example, the Klingons will still be the Klingons, and I could see the Federation in this new timeline being somewhat more militaristic, more prone to conflict with the Klingons. But what of the Organians? Are they not still out there? And will they still reach a point where they step in and stop the silly children from fighting their war? If not, then why not
No, I got your point the first time. Message boards across the Internet have been alight with such ideas from fans, trying to pick apart things that were already in motion in the 1.0 continuity that would still affect 2.0, such as V'ger returning to Earth and the Borg, etc. Yes, these would be "new experiences" for the 2.0 characters but what I'm saying I'm tired of is seeing the same species again and again, 1.0, 2.0 or other.

Go back and watch the original series sometime. The Klingons appear in the most number of episodes, and it's a lot less than you'd think. The Romulans feature in precisely two episodes. We see two different Andorians, and one of those is in an asylum for the criminally insane. The only other species I can recall appearing twice is an Orion slave girl, and technically the first one we see is just Vina appearing as one in "The Cage." That's it. Every other episode actually showed us "strange, new worlds; new life and new civilization." I don't need to see 2.0 versions of anything I've already seen.

Story-wise, I'll go along with anything as long as it's interesting but, and this is going to sound strange, what I absolutely do not have any interest in is a story about Star Trek. I don't care what 2.0 Organians are like. Their role in the 1.0 time line was to personify MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction), the military threat that kept the Cold War cold. They played a role in telling a story about U.S./Soviet relations in the 1960s. If 2.0 Organians are the best way to tell a story about 21st Century international relations, then I'm all for it. But telling a story about them just because they were a memorable species from back when is not, to me, a sufficient reason to build a story around them.
Old 06-11-09 | 12:38 PM
  #802  
Kal-El's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,992
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Fortress of Solitude
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Pretty funny, and spot on when you think about it.
Old 06-11-09 | 12:51 PM
  #803  
Travis McClain's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,798
Received 209 Likes on 135 Posts
From: Western Hemisphere
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Nice. Surprised they didn't mention that the farmboy has the hots for a chick that instead hooks up later with the guy he dislikes but comes to be friends with.
Old 06-11-09 | 10:17 PM
  #804  
Giantrobo's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 65,242
Received 2,670 Likes on 1,585 Posts
From: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Hey for those of you still wanting to see Star Trek in "IMAX LITE" check your local AMC listings. I'm still seeing it scheduled.


**Not "real" Imax but still, the picture is slightly bigger and better and the sound is awesome.

Last edited by Giantrobo; 06-11-09 at 10:19 PM.
Old 06-11-09 | 10:43 PM
  #805  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Just saw it tonight, and I have to say...not all that impressed.

I had pretty high expectations, which were only fueled by the postive reviews. I'm not a Trekkie by any means, but I do like movies, especially II-IV. I even enjoyed The Final Frontier.

The opening scene was great. Very powerful. Sets the story up nicely. Then...it just never recaptures that feeling. The villain was fairly dull, his intentions weren't made clear, the story was kind of convoluted (made worse when Leonard Nimoy shows up to explain what's going on). It was great to see Nimoy back as Spock, but his lengthy explaination was kind of confusing. I do get the jist of it, it just seemed much ado about nothing.

The action was pretty good, and the pace was quick, and in this day and age, I appreciated that there wasn't one eye-rolling moment in the whole film, but that's not enough. Spock and Uhura's relationship was completely undeveloped; nothing is really.

I do have to admit that I was kind of tired when I saw it, but I thought it would be balanced by the fact that I've really wanted to see it.

My rating: **1/2 (out of 4)
Old 06-27-09 | 01:37 PM
  #806  
OldBoy's Avatar
Thread Starter
TOTY Winner 2018 and Inane Thread Master
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 53,886
Received 1,677 Likes on 1,383 Posts
From: "Are any of us really anywhere?"
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

just saw it for a 2<sup>nd</sup> time which i never do in this day and age, but still a thrill ride. even knowing what is to come, still enjoyable and was able to take it in more and see things i didn't first time around. can't wait for hopefully a nice dvd package for my thirdsies.

best o' year so far.
Old 09-30-09 | 09:46 AM
  #807  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: The Phantom Zone
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Finally got around to seeing this, which is good, because I'm sure had I seen this on its opening weekend then the hype would have lessened my enjoyment of the film. It was good, but nothing really wowed me.

I haven't seen ST: Nemesis for a couple of years, but from my memory of that film, Nero seemed cut from the same cloth as Shinzon. I don't have a particular problem with Nemesis, really; it was a slick entry in the series, just as this one was.

Loved the winks and nods to earlier Trek, particularly the bit with the overzealous red shirt who bites it on the dive to reach and destroy the drill on Vulcan. Although I thought they skimped out on some of the character development of young (kid) Kirk. The whole joyride scene served little other purpose other than him telling us his name. At least young Spock's scene contributed something to his back-story.

Looking forward to the Blu-ray!
Old 09-30-09 | 11:10 AM
  #808  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 29,850
Received 23 Likes on 16 Posts
From: Bartertown due to it having a better economy than where I really live.
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

it showed that Kirk's whole life he was a cocky trouble maker with no respect for authority
Old 09-30-09 | 11:14 AM
  #809  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 29,850
Received 23 Likes on 16 Posts
From: Bartertown due to it having a better economy than where I really live.
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

I recently read the prequel comic
while it explains some things, and shows us that
Spoiler:
Data is back
Nero's hate of Spock is even less clear than the movie without the back story. He knew Spock was doing all he could and that the Romulan government was to blame for the delay
Old 09-30-09 | 02:04 PM
  #810  
Giantrobo's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 65,242
Received 2,670 Likes on 1,585 Posts
From: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Wow, if could find a theater playing ST now I'd see another 4 or 5 times.
Old 10-01-09 | 12:58 PM
  #811  
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 451
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
From: Downers Grove, IL
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

It's been back since the beginning of Sept. at my AMC...in full IMAX. Here's the list:

http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/09/01/...turns-to-imax/
Old 10-01-09 | 01:30 PM
  #812  
Giantrobo's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 65,242
Received 2,670 Likes on 1,585 Posts
From: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by 0073735963
It's been back since the beginning of Sept. at my AMC...in full IMAX. Here's the list:

http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/09/01/...turns-to-imax/

Universal City , CA – Citywalk Stadium 19 with IMAX
Westchester , CA – Bridge De Lux 18 + IMAX

Cool thanks!
Old 10-01-09 | 11:13 PM
  #813  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,430
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
From: Puyallup
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

I thought I read it was only a 2 week limited engagement, starting at the start of september..?
Old 03-20-10 | 10:41 PM
  #814  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,615
Received 55 Likes on 41 Posts
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/sjckbAqUwT0&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/sjckbAqUwT0&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>
Old 03-20-10 | 11:46 PM
  #815  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 41,983
Received 1,417 Likes on 1,105 Posts
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Taysiders in Space: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KEg5NDZ6rnM

Last edited by RocShemp; 03-20-10 at 11:52 PM.
Old 07-13-10 | 02:54 AM
  #816  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 41,983
Received 1,417 Likes on 1,105 Posts
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

http://www.howitshouldhaveended.com/...id=68701708001
Old 07-13-10 | 07:54 AM
  #817  
Trevor's Avatar
Challenge Guru & Comic Nerd
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 37,371
Received 951 Likes on 611 Posts
From: spiritually, Minnesota
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

That was fun. Never seen that site before, looks like they have lots of others.
Old 07-13-10 | 08:38 AM
  #818  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

I love HISHE . pretty funny.
Old 07-13-10 | 08:05 PM
  #819  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 29,850
Received 23 Likes on 16 Posts
From: Bartertown due to it having a better economy than where I really live.
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

there goes the rest of the night
Old 07-14-10 | 12:24 AM
  #820  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: TeXas
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Old 07-20-10 | 12:17 AM
  #821  
Josh-da-man's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 49,193
Received 4,420 Likes on 2,913 Posts
From: The Bible Belt
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Moonstone
In order to revive Khan you HAVE to do Space Seed and have "the Enterprise encounter the Botany Bay, lost in space from the year 1996" over again and remaroon him on Ceti Alpha V before Wrath of Khan can be redone again in this new timeline.

Hopefully Abrams and Co are smart to avoid went on before, I may not have liked the new film but a lot of people did because it started all over and changed the rules of the game through a few key events (death of Kirk's father, destruction of Vulcan), if they simply use it to recycle old plot lines, there is a very serious risk of alienating the fans won over by this film and lastly, who could play Khan half as well as Ricardo did.
How about this:

Instead of having the Enterprise come across the Botany Bay, the Klingons find it first. And Khan, being the supreme badass he is, takes over the Klingon Empire and then sets his sights on the Federation. So you have Klingons being villains again. Khan is back, and not just in a rehash of Space Seed or Wrath of Khan. Khan and his supermen actually get to lead an Empire full of the galaxy's most hardcore warriors.
Old 07-20-10 | 12:58 AM
  #822  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 41,983
Received 1,417 Likes on 1,105 Posts
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
How about this:

Instead of having the Enterprise come across the Botany Bay, the Klingons find it first. And Khan, being the supreme badass he is, takes over the Klingon Empire and then sets his sights on the Federation. So you have Klingons being villains again. Khan is back, and not just in a rehash of Space Seed or Wrath of Khan. Khan and his supermen actually get to lead an Empire full of the galaxy's most hardcore warriors.
I approve of this idea (not that it means much in the grand scheme of things).
Old 07-20-10 | 08:58 AM
  #823  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,058
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Portland, OR
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

No Khan. No, no, no. They need to come up with new ideas.
Old 07-20-10 | 09:14 AM
  #824  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 46,550
Received 1,353 Likes on 1,062 Posts
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Agreed. The plot of Star Trek was its weakest element (well that and JJ Abrams obsession with super duper close-ups), and it's a vast universe, they need to come up with something good and original.
Old 07-20-10 | 09:17 AM
  #825  
TGM's Avatar
TGM
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 17,089
Received 472 Likes on 294 Posts
From: Massachusetts
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by RichC2
Agreed. The plot of Star Trek was its weakest element (well that and JJ Abrams obsession with super duper close-ups), and it's a vast universe, they need to come up with something good and original.
I wouldn't mind Khan for JJ's Star Trek 3 or 4... but would agree they need to do some new stuff... or maybe elevate a different character from the original show to something more... Tholians, Harry Mudd, etc. Would love to see a full out Federation v. Gorn battle tho.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.