Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

World War Z

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-07-11 | 02:26 AM
  #76  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,017
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Re: World War Z

And the Walking Dead gets it's rating from the network, not from some ratings board.
Old 07-07-11 | 02:27 AM
  #77  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,037
Likes: 0
Received 99 Likes on 73 Posts
From: Very far away..
Re: World War Z

Originally Posted by TimeandTide
AMC's The Walking Dead manages to do this on a show that would probably garner a PG-13 rating.
No fucking way. Not even almost
Old 07-07-11 | 08:15 AM
  #78  
Osiris3657's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 10,261
Received 371 Likes on 234 Posts
From: Denver, Colorado
Re: World War Z

Originally Posted by Draven
I loved both Quantum of Solace and Stranger Than Fiction and my wife enjoyed Finding Neverland...I don't think Forester is a bad director in the slightest.

I don't think PG-13 makes a movie good or bad, and this movie doesn't need a lot of gore to capture the tone of the book.

I could give two shits about early script reviews.
Are you kidding me? You've lost all credibility (not that you had any) if you think not showing the carnage that the book described would affect the tone of the story.

By the way that 2nd draft is the one they are using for the movie.

Oh and you're in the extremely small minority about QoS.
Old 07-07-11 | 08:19 AM
  #79  
Osiris3657's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 10,261
Received 371 Likes on 234 Posts
From: Denver, Colorado
Re: World War Z

Originally Posted by Matthew Chmiel
Granted, there's not a lot of zombie carnage, but you honestly think this would get a PG-13?

<object width="640" height="390"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/afcWyJhsBXo?version=3&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/afcWyJhsBXo?version=3&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="390" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>

I wish I could live in a world where the MPAA would give that one-minute clip a PG-13.

It's kind of hard to make a PG-13 film based upon the fact the only way to kill a zombie is either to dismember them or shoot them directly in the head.
Unless the action happens off screen
Old 07-07-11 | 09:24 AM
  #80  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 47,764
Received 2,291 Likes on 1,421 Posts
From: Rosemount, MN
Re: World War Z

Originally Posted by Osiris3657
Are you kidding me? You've lost all credibility (not that you had any) if you think not showing the carnage that the book described would affect the tone of the story.
Oh no, I've lost all credibility on a DVD enthusiast forum. What's the point of even getting up tomorrow? Oh wait, I don't care what you think.

The moments from the book I remember the most are the ones about the aftermath, some of which are completely zombie-free.

By the way that 2nd draft is the one they are using for the movie.
Great - we'll see what it's like when the film is actually finished.

Oh and you're in the extremely small minority about QoS.

Might want to check your math. 64% on Rotten Tomatoes means more liked it than didn't. And it's rated from "Rent It" to "Highly Recommended" here on DVDTalk. Maybe you're the problem.
Old 07-07-11 | 10:19 AM
  #81  
Osiris3657's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 10,261
Received 371 Likes on 234 Posts
From: Denver, Colorado
Re: World War Z

If you don't care, don't respond.

And Casino Royale had a 94% positive rating...QoS was a major drop in quality.

Last edited by Osiris3657; 07-07-11 at 03:56 PM.
Old 07-07-11 | 10:21 AM
  #82  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Re: World War Z

...You guys aren't going to suck each others' dicks now, are you?

Anyway...I'm amazed this was actually filming. I've wanted to read the book for a while...but...I do believe that an R has to be something that the Zombie genre needs. The R pretty much lets the Zombie genre do it's thing. Unless it somehow handles the Zombieness well offscreen or sets up a very dark tone or whatever...I don't know if this is going to work.

Either way...I await to trailer to see what they got and from there I'll see if I'm a go or a no.
Old 07-07-11 | 10:21 AM
  #83  
Groucho's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 71,383
Received 130 Likes on 92 Posts
From: Salt Lake City, Utah
Re: World War Z

Old 07-07-11 | 10:25 AM
  #84  
Osiris3657's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 10,261
Received 371 Likes on 234 Posts
From: Denver, Colorado
Re: World War Z

Originally Posted by Solid Snake PAC
...You guys aren't going to suck each others' dicks now, are you?

Anyway...I'm amazed this was actually filming. I've wanted to read the book for a while...but...I do believe that an R has to be something that the Zombie genre needs. The R pretty much lets the Zombie genre do it's thing. Unless it somehow handles the Zombieness well offscreen or sets up a very dark tone or whatever...I don't know if this is going to work.

Either way...I await to trailer to see what they got and from there I'll see if I'm a go or a no.
I'm not interested in giving you spank bank material.
Old 07-07-11 | 10:27 AM
  #85  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 47,764
Received 2,291 Likes on 1,421 Posts
From: Rosemount, MN
Re: World War Z

Originally Posted by Osiris3657
If you don't care, don't respond.

And Casino Royale had a 94% positive rating...QoS was a major drop in quality.
I don't care what YOU think. But you aren't the only person on this board. And I'll respond to whatever I like, thanks.

So you went from "extreme minority" liking the movie to a "drop in quality." I would have agreed with that, but I still think Quantum is a good follow-up to Casino Royale and one of the better Bond films if you look at them as a whole.
Old 07-07-11 | 10:34 AM
  #86  
Osiris3657's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 10,261
Received 371 Likes on 234 Posts
From: Denver, Colorado
Re: World War Z

An interesting note is that the top critics rating drops even further, to only 37%
Old 07-07-11 | 01:37 PM
  #87  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,656
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
From: Los Angeles
Re: World War Z

There are plenty of movies that get a PG-13 rating that are violent and gruesome. The MPAA is very strange about their rules for gore; if blood isn't bright red (if it tends more towards black), then it's more tolerable and more likely to get a PG-13 for a particularly violent scene. So I could see them doing exactly that for this film, like they've done for The Walking Dead and even LOTR.

Quantum of Solace didn't suffer from bad direction; if anything the script was at fault. In fact, I thought the direction kept the movie engaging when the script started to get confusing.

Throwing critical percentages around is never going to get someone to change their mind about a movie, so stop it.
Old 07-07-11 | 01:45 PM
  #88  
bcd
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 906
Received 48 Likes on 28 Posts
From: A place with only 3 seasons of Community
Re: World War Z

Originally Posted by FinkPish
Throwing critical percentages around is never going to get someone to change their mind about a movie, so stop it.
I wish you would have told me that sooner, after I was made aware that the top critics positive reviews at rottentomatoes was only at 37%, I used my QoS dvd as target practice for when I have to take on the baddies in the eventual zombiepocalypse.

Why are you repeating posts?
Originally Posted by Osiris3657
If you don't care, don't respond.

And Casino Royale had a 94% positive rating...QoS was a major drop in quality...and if you look at the "Top Critics rating", you'll see that the percentage drops even lower to 37% positive.
Originally Posted by Osiris3657
An interesting note is that the top critics rating drops even further, to only 37%

On a different note I can't wait to see how this unfolds on the big screen. WWZ is one of my favourite books, and I think it will be awesome!
Old 07-07-11 | 03:55 PM
  #89  
Osiris3657's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 10,261
Received 371 Likes on 234 Posts
From: Denver, Colorado
Re: World War Z

Originally Posted by bcd

Why are you repeating posts?
Computer error. I edited my first post and it didn't show up, then I made a separate post and now all of the sudden the edit appeared.
Old 07-07-11 | 03:58 PM
  #90  
Osiris3657's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 10,261
Received 371 Likes on 234 Posts
From: Denver, Colorado
Re: World War Z

Originally Posted by FinkPish
There are plenty of movies that get a PG-13 rating that are violent and gruesome. The MPAA is very strange about their rules for gore; if blood isn't bright red (if it tends more towards black), then it's more tolerable and more likely to get a PG-13 for a particularly violent scene. So I could see them doing exactly that for this film, like they've done for The Walking Dead and even LOTR.
As it's already been mentioned before, TV ratings and the MPAA are two different things, so don't bring up the Walking Dead.

so stop it.
No.
Old 08-08-11 | 05:00 PM
  #91  
DJLinus's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 8,996
Received 44 Likes on 39 Posts
From: Richmond, VA
Re: World War Z

Today in Bryan Cranston: Bryan Cranston in talks for World War Z
by Sean O'Neal August 8, 2011

Finally in compliance with motion picture regulations, Paramount has begun negotiating with Bryan Cranston to join World War Z, its adaptation of Max Brooks’ zombie apocalypse drama—one that has, until now, been dangerously freewheeling it without Cranston’s stabilizing force. Cranston would be taking on a “small but flashy role,” which is both his métier and, of course, the federally mandated minimum requirement of Cranston. Should he take the part, he’d be joining past and present AMC stars James Badge Dale (Rubicon) and Mireille Enos (The Killing), as well as star Brad Pitt, all of whom will be able to sleep much more soundly.
http://www.avclub.com/articles/today...alks-fo,60081/

Oh, yeah.
Old 08-08-11 | 05:11 PM
  #92  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Re: World War Z

...alright...I'm digging this more now.
Old 08-09-11 | 01:23 AM
  #93  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,190
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: World War Z

Originally Posted by CreatureX
World War Z is an amazing book. Hopefully they can translate it successfully to the big screen without losing too much from the book. I would've loved to have seen this as an HBO or Showtime miniseries.
I haven't read the book yet. But I plan too soon. A friend of mine was telling me about this the other day and he said that he wished the book would have been optioned for a miniseries on premium cable. He really doesn't think this will work as a movie.
Old 08-09-11 | 10:09 PM
  #94  
DJLinus's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 8,996
Received 44 Likes on 39 Posts
From: Richmond, VA
Re: World War Z

Some more set pics, but nothing really exciting: http://dailydead.com/new-world-war-z...w-matthew-fox/

Also, it now has a release date: Dec. 21, 2012.
Old 08-10-11 | 08:24 AM
  #95  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 47,764
Received 2,291 Likes on 1,421 Posts
From: Rosemount, MN
Re: World War Z

Originally Posted by writer106
I haven't read the book yet. But I plan too soon. A friend of mine was telling me about this the other day and he said that he wished the book would have been optioned for a miniseries on premium cable. He really doesn't think this will work as a movie.
Again, it's basically written as a movie. You just have to decide which vignettes to cut and you've got it made.

A miniseries would work because you could just do more of the vignettes, but it would basically be a different cast for every one, which no network is going to try to do.
Old 08-10-11 | 11:40 AM
  #96  
nemein's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 34,198
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
From: 1bit away from total disaster
Re: World War Z

Originally Posted by DJLinus

Also, it now has a release date: Dec. 21, 2012.
Old 08-10-11 | 05:46 PM
  #97  
DJLinus's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 8,996
Received 44 Likes on 39 Posts
From: Richmond, VA
Re: World War Z

Today in WWZ kinda sorta news:

World War Z: New Plot Details
8/10/2011 3:51 PM

After the recent set pics and casting leaks, Paramount has issued a press release officially announcing the cast, release date, and plot for World War Z. While the release date and cast list is nothing new, the plot synopsis reveals that World War Z doesn’t appear to be following the exact same story from the book:

“The story revolves around United Nations employee Gerry Lane (Pitt), who traverses the world in a race against time to stop the Zombie pandemic that is toppling armies and governments and threatening to decimate humanity itself. Enos plays Gerry’s wife Karen Lane; Kertesz is his comrade in arms, Segen.”

Paramount could just be spicing up the plot details, thinking “a race against time to stop the Zombie pandemic” sounds better to those who have never read the book, but this seems like a big departure. Those who have read World War Z know that it takes place years after the zombie war, with oral histories of the survivors being collected. Will the film be a series of flashbacks? Is it taking place in the middle of the zombie apocalypse and abandoning the style of the book? We have a lot of questions at this point and will keep an eye out for more information as it is released.
http://dailydead.com/world-war-z-new-plot-details/
Old 08-10-11 | 06:03 PM
  #98  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Re: World War Z

Interesting...
Old 08-10-11 | 09:46 PM
  #99  
Osiris3657's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 10,261
Received 371 Likes on 234 Posts
From: Denver, Colorado
Re: World War Z

More terrible news. Why do they have to fuck with the narrative? It's perfect! PG-13, Marc Forster directing, and now the plot has been seriously altered from the book. WWZ to be the biggest film disappointment ever.
Old 08-11-11 | 09:30 AM
  #100  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Re: World War Z

?

Just cuz they muck up w/ the source material doesn't mean it'll be a bad film. The rating is very odd considering the subject at hand really needs that rating. I'm neutral on this. Give me a trailer...and I'll tell you what I think from what we're shown.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.