Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

Twilight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-13-09 | 12:40 PM
  #226  
Suspended
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 31,779
Received 101 Likes on 87 Posts
From: Formerly known as "GizmoDVD"/Southern CA
Re: Twilight

Originally Posted by wlj
I reading the series right now. I am almost through the second book "New Moon". It is definitely a page turner. I disagree with Lizard saying that the book isn't about vampires -- it is a romance. The book does have quite a bit of romance, but don't let that scare you away. They are vampire books, and it extends out a little more but I will not spoil it for you.

I am a 30 year old male and I am really digging the series so far.

wlj
I just started Eclipse today...so far so good!
Old 03-24-09 | 06:32 PM
  #227  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,255
Received 489 Likes on 351 Posts
Re: Twilight

Just caught this via Netflix and I thought it was pretty terrible. Now I know I'm not it's target audience. But still. I've never seen so much preening and posing in one movie in my entire life. The acting and script were also bad. I haven't read any of the books. Are they geared for younger people only too? Or can both young and old get something out of it, like the "Harry Potter" books?
Old 03-24-09 | 07:03 PM
  #228  
Brack's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,011
Received 63 Likes on 40 Posts
From: near Cincinnati
Re: Twilight

The acting was fine, I just thought the ending was horribly rushed, and some of the effects were made on the cheap (though this made the film amazingly profitable). The Cullens are barely in this compared to the book. I hope Chris Weitz brings something to the sequel. I really liked The Golden Compass.
Old 03-24-09 | 07:11 PM
  #229  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,255
Received 489 Likes on 351 Posts
Re: Twilight

Originally Posted by Brack
The acting was fine, I just thought the ending was horribly rushed, and some of the effects were made on the cheap (though this made the film amazingly profitable). The Cullens are barely in this compared to the book. I hope Chris Weitz brings something to the sequel. I really liked The Golden Compass.
Hey, I loved "The Golden Compass". And "About a Boy" is one of my all-time favorite films. So I was very pleased to see Chris Weitz attached to the sequel. And I didn't mind "Twilight" looking cheap. But, again, found the acting and writing to be just awful. Who do you think did a good job acting in this?
Old 03-24-09 | 07:32 PM
  #230  
Brack's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,011
Received 63 Likes on 40 Posts
From: near Cincinnati
Re: Twilight

None of the actors were ever going to get an Oscar nomination for Twilight, but I didn't think anybody was terrible. I thought the film wasn't going for anyone being too over the top except maybe the James character. A lot of the characters were underdevelped, the last half of the movie just doesn't gel very well, leaving little suspense. They tried to turn the movie into an action flick at the end, and it just didn't work.
Old 03-24-09 | 08:34 PM
  #231  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Ontario, Canada
Re: Twilight

I haven't seen this film, nor have I read the books (and I don't intend to read them) but I must say, seeing all the posters, T-shirts and other stuff about this film makes me feel old, because it's essentially a successor to Buffy and Angel. I doubt it's nearly as good, but it's certainly a successor to whole young adult vampire genre.
Old 03-24-09 | 08:43 PM
  #232  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,430
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
From: Puyallup
Re: Twilight

Originally Posted by Nick Martin
I doubt it's nearly as good, but it's certainly a successor to whole young adult vampire genre.
It is not as good, but it is more popular than Buffy/Angel.
Old 03-24-09 | 11:53 PM
  #233  
Rypro 525's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 28,263
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: a frikin hellhole
Re: Twilight

Man, i fucking hated this. So much so that i actually turned it off after an hour. I thought the acting (especially from the 2 leads) was really bad. It came off as really stiff and even bored. I think i turned it off after the scene where Edward gives that long speech about being a vamprie and with endless shots of them looking at each other. Combine that with really bad effects, poor editing, and a sense that i have seen this done much better (True Blood and Buffy/Angel), i just about had had enough by that point.
Old 03-25-09 | 01:00 AM
  #234  
Boba Fett's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,486
Received 115 Likes on 85 Posts
Re: Twilight



For the record, I actually liked the film, much to my own shock.
Old 03-25-09 | 10:39 AM
  #235  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Rocky Mountain High
Re: Twilight

Originally Posted by DRG
Finally saw this at the bargain theater. Having read the book prior, I will say the script is very good, in that it manages to condense Meyer's sprawling mess of a book into something that more or less works. Some things were unavoidable... the 'plan' at the end of the book is still completely stupid, but the screenwriters were smart to amp up the action and show the confrontation (where Meyer simply dodged the whole climax of her own story).

The main problem with the film version is that the fx and many of Hardwicke's decisions were failures in their own right... the supposed 'wow' moments (the sunny sparkle, the superhuman powers) weren't just anticlimactic; they came off as silly.

So while the film improves on a lot of the book's problems, it creates several new problems of its own.
This sums up my feelings perfectly, although I read the book after I saw it, but watching it again now after having read the book, all of the above still holds true of the problems with both book and movie.

Also, anybody know the name of the song that is playing when they are dancing on the cazebo at prom?
Old 03-25-09 | 10:51 AM
  #236  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Twilight

Did anybody else find Rosalie has fat thighs? The baseball uniform makes her fat! That doesn't go well with her image in the book, her long sexy legs etc.
Old 03-25-09 | 11:19 AM
  #237  
The Bus's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 54,920
Received 23 Likes on 18 Posts
From: New York
Re: Twilight

Originally Posted by Daytripper
Or can both young and old get something out of it, like the "Harry Potter" books?
The only adults I know who've read Twilight are women. I've never met a male who has read any of the books (myself included).
Old 03-25-09 | 11:56 AM
  #238  
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 8,733
Received 153 Likes on 115 Posts
From: SnogBox
Re: Twilight

Funny how I started this thread. I've never read the books. Saw the film this weekend because it was a free rental.

It wasn't bad, but it wasn't really that good either. I thought all of the actors/actresses were good and (seemed?) to fit their parts. However, everything just felt so slow and flat. I didn't feel like I was watching a hollywood product until about 1.5 hours in. I felt like both the leads had good chemistry with each other, but it's as if somebody didn't know how to capture it. Ashame too, because I think everybody involved seemed like they were trying to do their best, aside from the director.
Old 03-25-09 | 12:52 PM
  #239  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Ontario, Canada
Re: Twilight

Originally Posted by superdeluxe
It is not as good, but it is more popular than Buffy/Angel.
Unfortunate.

No accounting for taste is there?
Old 03-25-09 | 01:33 PM
  #240  
Suspended
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 31,779
Received 101 Likes on 87 Posts
From: Formerly known as "GizmoDVD"/Southern CA
Re: Twilight

Originally Posted by Rypro 525
Man, i fucking hated this. So much so that i actually turned it off after an hour. I thought the acting (especially from the 2 leads) was really bad. It came off as really stiff and even bored. I think i turned it off after the scene where Edward gives that long speech about being a vamprie and with endless shots of them looking at each other. Combine that with really bad effects, poor editing, and a sense that i have seen this done much better (True Blood and Buffy/Angel), i just about had had enough by that point.
Did you atleast get to first base during this film?
Old 03-25-09 | 01:41 PM
  #241  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 10,989
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Michigan
Re: Twilight

Originally Posted by Rypro 525
Man, i fucking hated this. So much so that i actually turned it off after an hour. I thought the acting (especially from the 2 leads) was really bad. It came off as really stiff and even bored. I think i turned it off after the scene where Edward gives that long speech about being a vamprie and with endless shots of them looking at each other. Combine that with really bad effects, poor editing, and a sense that i have seen this done much better (True Blood and Buffy/Angel), i just about had had enough by that point.
I stomached my way to watching the whole thing. My wife bought the Blu-ray. I was bored as hell, but where I went from bored to hating the movie was the goddam "glittering in the sunlight" thing. His ass should have been ashes!
Old 03-25-09 | 03:11 PM
  #242  
Rypro 525's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 28,263
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: a frikin hellhole
Re: Twilight

Yeah, i thought that part (when he goes into the sunlight, and it glitters) was just plain stupid (and either the transfer of the dvd was that bad, or i was half falling asleep), i honstly said out loud "he looks exactly the same", then i saw little sparkle thingys. Another problem i had to, is that he has no problem with being out in overcast days, when isnt' vampire myth that any major light period bothers them

Last edited by Rypro 525; 03-25-09 at 03:13 PM.
Old 03-25-09 | 03:12 PM
  #243  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,044
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Marina Del Rey, California
Re: Twilight

I actually liked the movie. The direction of it was pretty terrible though.
Old 03-25-09 | 03:44 PM
  #244  
Rypro 525's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 28,263
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: a frikin hellhole
Re: Twilight

Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
Did you atleast get to first base during this film?
someone actually remebers that. Oh and no, actually, i called up a friend of mine sayin 'hey, you wanna watch/suffer through twilight" and she was like 'fuck you, im not watchin that emo shit'
Old 03-25-09 | 03:55 PM
  #245  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,430
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
From: Puyallup
Re: Twilight

Originally Posted by Nick Martin
Unfortunate.

No accounting for taste is there?
I guess not, The teen-tween fanbase is REALLY into this. It is quite insane.

For example, Peter Facillineli (Plays the dad vampire), had a signing for the dvd at Fort Lewis on Saturday, and he signed everything/took pictures from 9:30 am to 10:30pm. He did not stop once. He even cancelled his flight, because he did not want to stop until everyone that was there got something signed.

It was pretty crazy from the pictures I have seen.
Old 03-25-09 | 06:02 PM
  #246  
lizard's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 7,944
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: the Western Slope, Colorado
Originally Posted by The Bus
The only adults I know who've read Twilight are women. I've never met a male who has read any of the books (myself included).
Speaking as an older male, I read and enjoyed it (and have also listened to the audio book version — terrific narrator, by the way). But I read a LOT of fantasy and really like romance, in contrast to many here who denigrate such things as "chick flicks" or "chick lit" (my favorite book, by far, is Pride and Prejudice, the greatest romance ever written).

Twilight wasn't written for the action/adventure or horror movie crowd, nor for young males in general. I can see why it is popular with tween and teen girls. And I can see why some here really hate it.

I didn't care as much for the second book in the series and haven't gotten around to reading the third and fourth, but will someday. Too many books, not enough time...
Old 03-25-09 | 06:20 PM
  #247  
Suspended
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 31,779
Received 101 Likes on 87 Posts
From: Formerly known as "GizmoDVD"/Southern CA
Re: Twilight

Originally Posted by Rypro 525
someone actually remebers that. Oh and no, actually, i called up a friend of mine sayin 'hey, you wanna watch/suffer through twilight" and she was like 'fuck you, im not watchin that emo shit'
So don't leave us in suspense - did you or did you not get "fucked" by her? Did you chose to watch Twilight over that? And yes, we remember...we also will. I revisit that thread every few months for laughs during a slow work day.
Old 03-25-09 | 06:21 PM
  #248  
lizard's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 7,944
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: the Western Slope, Colorado
Originally Posted by superdeluxe
It is not as good, but it is more popular than Buffy/Angel.
How can you possibly compare a seven season TV series like Buffy and a movie (or a book)? Buffy and Angel are pretty popular and have a dedicated fanbase, but the impact was spread out over years.
Old 03-25-09 | 06:21 PM
  #249  
Suspended
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 31,779
Received 101 Likes on 87 Posts
From: Formerly known as "GizmoDVD"/Southern CA
Re: Twilight

Originally Posted by lizard
Speaking as an older male, I read and enjoyed it (and have also listened to the audio book version — terrific narrator, by the way). But I read a LOT of fantasy and really like romance, in contrast to many here who denigrate such things as "chick flicks" or "chick lit" (my favorite book, by far, is Pride and Prejudice, the greatest romance ever written).

Twilight wasn't written for the action/adventure or horror movie crowd, nor for young males in general. I can see why it is popular with tween and teen girls. And I can see why some here really hate it.

I didn't care as much for the second book in the series and haven't gotten around to reading the third and fourth, but will someday. Too many books, not enough time...
I'm an adult male and enjoyed all of the Twilight books.
Old 03-25-09 | 08:20 PM
  #250  
FantasticVSDoom's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,610
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: No longer trapped
Re: Twilight

Yeah have to chime in as another adult male who enjoyed the series... But again, I can see why many don't. They are expecting one thing, and got something else. This is for a specific audience and there happen to be some of us who fall outside of that group, but on this board especially, its going to get more of a backlash.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.