Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

The Hobbit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-11-12 | 04:56 PM
  #2276  
DaveyJoe's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 19,475
Received 318 Likes on 202 Posts
From: Maryland
Re: The Hobbit

Originally Posted by Why So Blu?
I still get all emotional and shit during that scene
Old 12-11-12 | 05:58 PM
  #2277  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
Re: The Hobbit

Originally Posted by dvdjunkie32
I thought the pace of Fellowship was swift with little filler. Return was extremely bloated with severe false endings. As a viewer, I felt exhausted and relieved when it truely ended.
I refuse to watch the extended cut of ROTK, both because of the intolerable pacing and the horrible bungling of the ghost army.
Old 12-11-12 | 06:27 PM
  #2278  
pinata242's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 30,155
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Owasso, OK
Re: The Hobbit

Originally Posted by Supermallet
the horrible bungling of the ghost army.
I cut that bit out of my digital copy
Old 12-11-12 | 06:35 PM
  #2279  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 42,151
Received 1,448 Likes on 1,124 Posts
Re: The Hobbit

Originally Posted by Supermallet
I refuse to watch the extended cut of ROTK, both because of the intolerable pacing and the horrible bungling of the ghost army.
The "we will fight" bit was bad enough. But then following it up with the assault on the Corsair ship was downright aweful.

Originally Posted by Why So Blu?
People were crying when Return of the King ended as they walked out of the theater. I still get all emotional and shit during that scene: "You bow to no one" in ROTK.
That scene was awesome until the movie suddenly refused to end.

I know the book ended with the "well, I'm back" scene but either transition directly from "you bow to no one" to "well, I'm back" or simply end the movie with "you bow to no one".

The constant alternating between fade to black and fade to white for what seemed like an eternity was simply horrid.
Old 12-11-12 | 06:44 PM
  #2280  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 20,187
Received 344 Likes on 220 Posts
From: behind the eight ball
Re: The Hobbit

Originally Posted by RocShemp
The "we will fight" bit was bad enough. But then following it up with the assault on the Corsair ship was downright aweful.



That scene was awesome until the movie suddenly refused to end.

I know the book ended with the "well, I'm back" scene but either transition directly from "you bow to no one" to "well, I'm back" or simply end the movie with "you bow to no one".

The constant alternating between fade to black and fade to white for what seemed like an eternity was simply horrid.
They needed the closure of Frodo and Sam's individual journeys. Plus, we spent three years with these guys. Ending the movie at Aragorn's coronation would have been a rip off.
Old 12-11-12 | 08:02 PM
  #2281  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 24,465
Received 440 Likes on 343 Posts
From: Daytona Beach, FL
Re: The Hobbit

Originally Posted by RocShemp
The "we will fight" bit was bad enough. But then following it up with the assault on the Corsair ship was downright aweful.

That's the only major gripe I have with the EE of ROTK . That scene completely eliminates any suspense (for non-readers) concerning whether or not Aragorn will arrive to save the day.
Old 12-11-12 | 08:08 PM
  #2282  
Why So Blu?'s Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 40,395
Received 1,761 Likes on 1,339 Posts
From: Los Angeles
Re: The Hobbit

I was okay with the ghost army. I was not okay on how they just left Saruman hanging 10 in his tower then abruptly riding to Gondor. I also hated that they cut Mouth of Sauron out all together even though you could tell where the insert would be. I also like the inclusion of the Witch King fighting Gandalf. In the theatrical cut all he says is: I will break him...and that was it. They never share a frame after that even though the trailers showed footage of the duel. The EE's just feel more complete.

Word has it that the extended cut of the Hobbit (couldn't get clarification if it was just this first one or all three parts) would have 25 more minutes of footage when the EE'(s) are released on Blu-ray.
Old 12-11-12 | 08:42 PM
  #2283  
Sean O'Hara's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 13,533
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Vichy America
Re: The Hobbit

Originally Posted by dvdjunkie32
I thought the pace of Fellowship was swift with little filler. Return was extremely bloated with severe false endings. As a viewer, I felt exhausted and relieved when it truely ended.
The ending could've been fixed if they'd included the Scouring of the Shire to add some excitement to the last ten minutes, like a monster coming back at the end of a horror movie.

Originally Posted by Supermallet
I refuse to watch the extended cut of ROTK, both because of the intolerable pacing and the horrible bungling of the ghost army.
Even in the theatrical release, the revelation of who was on the ships happened too quickly, ruining one of the most suspenseful scenes in the book.
Old 12-11-12 | 10:11 PM
  #2284  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 10,147
Received 380 Likes on 297 Posts
From: Somewhere in the boonies, MA
Re: The Hobbit

Hey guys, I used the original email they sent out of HFR theaters and now have non-refundable (real) IMAX tickets. Now after discovering this thread and the updated list of HFR theaters I find out the theater right across the street is having an HFR showing!!!
Old 12-11-12 | 10:15 PM
  #2285  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Re: The Hobbit

Someone post a pic of Nelson from the Simpsons laughing and pointing. That would be appropriate for Eric F's post.
Old 12-11-12 | 10:29 PM
  #2286  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 10,147
Received 380 Likes on 297 Posts
From: Somewhere in the boonies, MA
Re: The Hobbit

Well, I guess IMAX 3D will be OK. I'm kind of bummed it won't be HFR but what can you do? At least I get to see it on a 5 story screen and an awesome sound system.
Old 12-11-12 | 11:31 PM
  #2287  
Giles's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 33,646
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
From: Washington DC
Re: The Hobbit

Originally Posted by Eric F
Hey guys, I used the original email they sent out of HFR theaters and now have non-refundable (real) IMAX tickets. Now after discovering this thread and the updated list of HFR theaters I find out the theater right across the street is having an HFR showing!!!


Old 12-12-12 | 12:26 AM
  #2288  
Josh-da-man's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 49,447
Received 4,489 Likes on 2,953 Posts
From: The Bible Belt
Re: The Hobbit

I have to admit I was a little put off by the ghost army in ROTK. I mean, I know it was from the books, but the way it was handled it felt like something out of a different movie, like The Frighteners or something.

As far as the multiple endings go, I can understand the complaints, but they had a lot of ground to cover; the whole thing is basically a ten hour movie. Something like the reunion of the Fellowship could have been cut, but you sort of needed Aragorn to be crowned (it's The RETURN OF THE KING, after all), and the Hobbits return to the Shire, and Frodo, Bilbo, and Gandalf leaving on the ship for the Undying Lands.

Saruman sort of presents a problem. If the theatrical cut, it's more or less stated that Saruman lost his power when the Valar resurrected Gandalf as Gandalf the White. So he's just an old man up in a tower now. His part in the larger story is over. Having him die in the extended cut, while final, wasn't wholly necessary.

At the time, I though it was the right call to remove the scouring from ROTK, but as the years have passed, I think this could have been dealt with in a short scene where Frodo, Sam, Merry, and Pippin return to the Shire only to find it overrun by Saruman and Wormtongue. The four Hobbits, empowered from their adventures, then attack and beat the shit out of the two men. S and WT then turn on each other, Wormtongue stabs Saruman in the back, killing him, and the Hobbits then throw Wormtongue out of the Shire. Could have been handled in a short scene of less than five minutes.
Old 12-12-12 | 12:42 AM
  #2289  
Why So Blu?'s Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 40,395
Received 1,761 Likes on 1,339 Posts
From: Los Angeles
Re: The Hobbit

Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
I have to admit I was a little put off by the ghost army in ROTK. I mean, I know it was from the books, but the way it was handled it felt like something out of a different movie, like The Frighteners or something.

As far as the multiple endings go, I can understand the complaints, but they had a lot of ground to cover; the whole thing is basically a ten hour movie. Something like the reunion of the Fellowship could have been cut, but you sort of needed Aragorn to be crowned (it's The RETURN OF THE KING, after all), and the Hobbits return to the Shire, and Frodo, Bilbo, and Gandalf leaving on the ship for the Undying Lands.

Saruman sort of presents a problem. If the theatrical cut, it's more or less stated that Saruman lost his power when the Valar resurrected Gandalf as Gandalf the White. So he's just an old man up in a tower now. His part in the larger story is over. Having him die in the extended cut, while final, wasn't wholly necessary.

At the time, I though it was the right call to remove the scouring from ROTK, but as the years have passed, I think this could have been dealt with in a short scene where Frodo, Sam, Merry, and Pippin return to the Shire only to find it overrun by Saruman and Wormtongue. The four Hobbits, empowered from their adventures, then attack and beat the shit out of the two men. S and WT then turn on each other, Wormtongue stabs Saruman in the back, killing him, and the Hobbits then throw Wormtongue out of the Shire. Could have been handled in a short scene of less than five minutes.


The death of Saruman was also the chapter in the book called The Voice of Saruman. PJ joined those two together.

In fact, there were implied scenes of the Scouring of the Shire in there during the fortune viewings through the Palantir (even when Frodo is with Galadriel looking in the fountain) through all 3 films. Sure, it didn't end like the book, but that material was already technically covered earlier.
Old 12-12-12 | 08:37 AM
  #2290  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 24,465
Received 440 Likes on 343 Posts
From: Daytona Beach, FL
Re: The Hobbit

I have to say, given all of the negativity I am hearing over the HFR, I am surprised people are still wanting to see it that way. If nothing else, sounds like they should offer a discount for viewing it such, not marking it up a bit.
Old 12-12-12 | 09:34 AM
  #2291  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Birmingham, AL
Re: The Hobbit

http://www.wired.com/underwire/2012/...review-48-fps/

"The Hobbit is insanely gorgeous at 48 frames per second. . . . Middle-earth in 3D looks so crisp it’s like stepping into the foreground of an insanely gorgeous diorama."

. . .

"At times, scenes unfold as if part of an extravagantly well-lit, art-directed reality-based series or soap opera."

Another mixed bag. I think the best way to see this flick is first in 2d 24 fps and then in HFR 3d. I really don't want distractions or to have suspension of disbelief thwarted the first time through.
Old 12-12-12 | 11:05 AM
  #2292  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 24,465
Received 440 Likes on 343 Posts
From: Daytona Beach, FL
Re: The Hobbit

Well dang, I'm all torn again. I plan on going to my nearest major city (Orlando) on Saturday and taking in this in either IMAX or HFR along with Silver Linings Playbook. IMAX has the Star Trek preview, but I feel as a movie buff it's my duty to see the HFR. Furthermore, a theater near Universal ,where I have a season pass, is playing both and IMAX and HFR. However, the Universal IMAX is actually a "liemax", I saw Hunger Games there and it wasn't a true screen. They might not even have the Star Trek preview. Agony!...

I read that review, and it appears I called the ending somewhat correctly with a "we're gonna need a bigger boat" moment.
Old 12-12-12 | 11:10 AM
  #2293  
Troy Stiffler's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 27,566
Received 609 Likes on 431 Posts
From: Under an I-10 Overpass
Re: The Hobbit

Originally Posted by Jason
They needed the closure of Frodo and Sam's individual journeys. Plus, we spent three years with these guys. Ending the movie at Aragorn's coronation would have been a rip off.
I loved all of the endings, and was all teary and stuff. This is why I'm fine with Jackson indulging in all the material he can. Grab onto the material while you can.
Old 12-12-12 | 11:27 AM
  #2294  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 42,151
Received 1,448 Likes on 1,124 Posts
Re: The Hobbit

Originally Posted by Dr. DVD
That's the only major gripe I have with the EE of ROTK . That scene completely eliminates any suspense (for non-readers) concerning whether or not Aragorn will arrive to save the day.
What's worse is that the scene of Aragorn falling to his knees when he sees the Corsair ships was a great addition and a perfect spot to end the scene and the whole sequence. "We will fight" and the assault on the Corsair ship should have been presented as a deleted scene (along with the deleted fight in the forest from FOTR that's only glimpsed in the trailer) in the bonus features of the DVD/BD set.
Old 12-12-12 | 11:35 AM
  #2295  
Hokeyboy's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,853
Received 1,041 Likes on 621 Posts
From: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Re: The Hobbit

Regarding people looking back at the LOTR trilogy with a more critical eye: the LOTR films still "hold up" to me, only because I was critical of Pts. 2 & 3 back when they came out. Fellowship of the Ring I felt was a perfectly great movie, but Two Towers spins its wheels and pointlessly meanders way too much, and then Return of the King has to accomplish way too much, way too quickly. I still enjoyed them, but their flaws were readily apparent at the time. If anything, those film "hold up" better now, because I've become more accepting of them, flaws and all.

King Kong, though... there's nothing worth salvaging there.
Old 12-12-12 | 12:01 PM
  #2296  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 42,151
Received 1,448 Likes on 1,124 Posts
Re: The Hobbit

Originally Posted by Hokeyboy
Regarding people looking back at the LOTR trilogy with a more critical eye: the LOTR films still "hold up" to me, only because I was critical of Pts. 2 & 3 back when they came out. Fellowship of the Ring I felt was a perfectly great movie, but Two Towers spins its wheels and pointlessly meanders way too much, and then Return of the King has to accomplish way too much, way too quickly. I still enjoyed them, but their flaws were readily apparent at the time. If anything, those film "hold up" better now, because I've become more accepting of them, flaws and all.
You're not alone in being critical way back then, Hokeyboy. Go back to the old threads and you'll find that we are voicing the same concerns/complaints we had back then.
Old 12-12-12 | 12:59 PM
  #2297  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 35,907
Received 276 Likes on 226 Posts
From: East County
Re: The Hobbit

Originally Posted by Dr. DVD
I am also kind of shocked to see how many people now think LOTR wasn't as great as they remembered it.
I was disappointed in RotK from the moment I saw it.

I still love FotR, and enjoy TTT very much.

The success of the first movie went to his head when he was putting the finishing touches on the rest of the trilogy, particularly RotK.
Old 12-12-12 | 01:35 PM
  #2298  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,306
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: The Hobbit

Originally Posted by Dr. DVD
Well dang, I'm all torn again. I plan on going to my nearest major city (Orlando) on Saturday and taking in this in either IMAX or HFR along with Silver Linings Playbook. IMAX has the Star Trek preview, but I feel as a movie buff it's my duty to see the HFR. Furthermore, a theater near Universal ,where I have a season pass, is playing both and IMAX and HFR. However, the Universal IMAX is actually a "liemax", I saw Hunger Games there and it wasn't a true screen. They might not even have the Star Trek preview. Agony!...

I read that review, and it appears I called the ending somewhat correctly with a "we're gonna need a bigger boat" moment.
I think if you're at all worried about the 48 fps deal potentially ruining your experience, you should just go see it the first time in regular 2D, so you're just seeing the movie and none of the extra frills. Then if you're still interested in seeing the super duper format just go watch it again. Then if the 48 fps ruins it for you, at least you got to enjoy the movie the first time.

That's what I did with Avatar. I really don't like 3D, so I saw it the first time in 2D and then like a week later went back and saw it in 3D.
Old 12-12-12 | 04:34 PM
  #2299  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 24,465
Received 440 Likes on 343 Posts
From: Daytona Beach, FL
Re: The Hobbit

Originally Posted by whoopdido
I think if you're at all worried about the 48 fps deal potentially ruining your experience, you should just go see it the first time in regular 2D, so you're just seeing the movie and none of the extra frills. Then if you're still interested in seeing the super duper format just go watch it again. Then if the 48 fps ruins it for you, at least you got to enjoy the movie the first time.

That's what I did with Avatar. I really don't like 3D, so I saw it the first time in 2D and then like a week later went back and saw it in 3D.

Rest assured, I will be seeing this for the first time in either regular 3D or 2D on Friday. I'm just debating as to whether or not to make the second viewing 48 FPS vs. IMAX, hence my other thread. My only real motivation for seeing it IMAX is the Star Trek opening, as I know Hobbit itself wasn't shot in IMAX.

Last edited by Dr. DVD; 12-12-12 at 04:40 PM.
Old 12-12-12 | 08:35 PM
  #2300  
Giles's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 33,646
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
From: Washington DC
Re: The Hobbit

so the Reston Theater is NOT 'HFR' or Atmos - but AMC's Tysons Corner's ETX screen is Atmos (not HFR)!


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.