![]() |
Re: The Hobbit
I'm really glad Peter Jackson is doing this. While Guillermo Del Toro is fantastic, it just feels right having Jackson direct it.
|
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by covenant
(Post 10724499)
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="640" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/FfesknLk5uI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
The Hobbit has been my favorite book since I first fell in love with it when I was eleven. With all the production problems, I thought it might not ever get made. Having Peter Jackson at the helm and getting two movies is simply awesome. Can. Not. Freaking. Wait. |
Re: The Hobbit
That video was great. I still insist this should only be one movie rather than two and I fear Jackson's over-indulgences but... I'm definitely looking forward to this. :up:
|
Re: The Hobbit
-other-
|
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by nando820
(Post 10724921)
If it wasn't obvious to you why Hellboy II, Pan's Labyrinth or Devil Backbone are miles ahead M Shyamalan's body of work then my friend I'm afraid you would never understand. But like you said different strokes for different folks :shrug:
But anyway, that video was SWEET. Totally brings back memories of the Lord of the Rings. Del Toro probably would have been fine, but Jackson completing the entire journey is perfect. I just wish I didn't have to wait 2 years to see this. |
Re: The Hobbit
Video was just pulled from YouTube, here's the same one at movieweb (with ads):
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.movieweb.com/v/VILfowodzBXkPL" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="550" height="253"></embed></object> |
Re: The Hobbit
So.....does movieweb have it on youtube?
|
Re: The Hobbit
Or you could go right to the source.
<embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="800" height="600" src="http://www.facebook.com/v/10150223186041807" allowfullscreen="true"> |
Re: The Hobbit
It's on Peter's facebook page, if you have that..
*edit---oh ok, didnt realize, thanks pinata!* |
Re: The Hobbit
Yup, that be the aforementioned source.
|
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by RocShemp
(Post 10725092)
48fps, awesome, whatever. Is he actually gonna use an editor this time around or just ROTK the whole finished feature?
|
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by whoopdido
(Post 10725711)
You're right. I simply do not understand. Like I said, Pan's Labyrinth is great, Devil's Backbone is good and the rest pretty much suck, including Hellboy II. Very similar to Night's career in my opinion.
Per Metacritic Del Toro has directed 7 movies, the highest being rated a 98, while only two are below a 72 (at a 55 and a 52). Shyamalan has also directed 7 films, the highest rating at a 64 and two others at 62 and 59. Everything else he has done since his first three films score as 44, 36, 34, and 20. Now, Metacritic isn't a perfect system, but using these numbers alone, it's pretty clear that most people would probably think otherwise about your GDT and M Night comparison. And just from my standpoint, Del Toro at his worst (which I believe to be Mimic) is much more watchable than what I consider to be M Night Shyamalan's worst (which is pretty much everything after Unbreakable to me). |
Re: The Hobbit
Wow, that brought a tear to my eye. So happy this is being done right with Peter, Ian, Andy, etc....and in the right place: NZ.
|
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by Apple Gooncha
(Post 10725927)
You have to take in the fact that the population at large doesn't view these films the same way you do. Even if you think he made only one great movie and then a bunch of trash, most people would disagree. Now, obviously everyone is free to have their own opinion, but since the masses don't appear to agree with your assessment of Guillermo Del Toro's film output, why would you be surprised that most people think a comparison to M. Night Shymalan is extreme?
Per Metacritic Del Toro has directed 7 movies, the highest being rated a 98, while only two are below a 72 (at a 55 and a 52). Shyamalan has also directed 7 films, the highest rating at a 64 and two others at 62 and 59. Everything else he has done since his first three films score as 44, 36, 34, and 20. Now, Metacritic isn't a perfect system, but using these numbers alone, it's pretty clear that most people would probably think otherwise about your GDT and M Night comparison. And just from my standpoint, Del Toro at his worst (which I believe to be Mimic) is much more watchable than what I consider to be M Night Shyamalan's worst (which is pretty much everything after Unbreakable to me). |
Re: The Hobbit
Nice. Really looking forward to seeing this. Thanks for posting.
|
Re: The Hobbit
Do we know who is doing Smaug?
|
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by whoopdido
(Post 10726234)
For what it's worth, I'm still elated that Jackson is doing the Hobbit rather than Del Toro.
Despite the fact that I was fine with Del Toro doing the films, the hardcore nerd inside of me was thrilled when it was announced that PJ would be making them. |
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by covenant
(Post 10725790)
The more the better, alot of people would be happy if he did the entire Silmarillion.
|
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by arminius
(Post 10726515)
Do we know who is doing Smaug?
|
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by RocShemp
(Post 10726533)
That's not my point. FOTR was a tightly edited and focused feature. Even the extended cut showed a great amount of focus. By ROTK, it was all over the place and sloppy. The extended cut was even worse.
On the other side, though, I do think RotK has some of the best scenes of the entire trilogy, despite being the only movie that I get bored a little bit with at times. |
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by arminius
(Post 10726515)
Do we know who is doing Smaug?
Originally Posted by pinata242
(Post 10726534)
It's none of our business. Smaug's love life is Smaug's concern alone.
|
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by pinata242
(Post 10726534)
It's none of our business. Smaug's love life is Smaug's concern alone.
Anyway, I hope it's not a recognizable voice. Take The Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe for example. I love Liam Neeson and he has a great voice, but every time Aslan opens his mouth, I'm just like "oh, hi Liam". Same with James Earl Jones. That guy has an amazing voice and in restrospect was perfect as Mufasa and as Vader, but while watching the Lion King you can't help but notice that it's just Darth Vader doing the voice of Simba's daddy. Same exact thing with Dragonheart. Sean Connery as a dragon...come on man. It seems like with today's technology somebody's voice could be altered in such a way so it doesn't even sound human. To me it would be weird if Smaug had a human voice. I just always pictured Smaug as something almost otherworldly and pure evil, so it just wouldn't seem right if he had a human voice and would be even worse if we actually recognized the voice. It seems like they should be able to synthesize the voice into something really eerie and almost disturbing. |
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by whoopdido
(Post 10726600)
It seems like they should be able to synthesize the voice into something really eerie and almost disturbing.
|
Re: The Hobbit
I say Serkis should have first crack at doing ADR for Smaug. If not him, then it might be good to get Rhys-Davies in there or one of the other LotR players with no part in The Hobbit. I just like the idea of keeping it "in the family".
|
Re: The Hobbit
So they rebuilt Rivendell and even constructed new areas of it, but Hugo Weaving still hasn't been confirmed to be coming back to play Elrond?
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:47 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.