![]() |
Re: The Hobbit
Any reason why he can't be Legolas? Wasn't he from around Mirkwood which Bilbo and company do visit and encounter elves?
|
Re: The Hobbit
Here you go (from Wiki):
Spoiler:
|
Re: The Hobbit
Way to exaggerate on the 14 years in the works thing.
|
Re: The Hobbit
The article forgot the MGM/New Line negotiations that dragged on forever, along with MGM's bankruptcy.
And yeah, I assumed Bloom would be playing Legolas. |
Re: The Hobbit
I could also see him having more of a role in the other half of the story, since Dol Guldur was located in Mirkwood. He could have worked with the White Council to track and report on the Necromancer's activities.
|
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by RoboDad
(Post 10792314)
I could also see him having more of a role in the other half of the story, since Dol Guldur was located in Mirkwood. He could have worked with the White Council to track and report on the Necromancer's activities.
I am remembering that correctly right? The Necromancer is Sauron and also went by that name...it's not like he was around in the times of the Hobbit but nobody actually knew that he was Sauron and they only discovered that he actually is Sauron 60 years later or whenever the Lord of the Rings takes place. |
Re: The Hobbit
Jackson did confirm over the weekend that both
Spoiler:
|
Re: The Hobbit
I remember reading in the book of "Unfinished Tales" (just a collection of Tolkien's rough drafts and material that didn't make it to the actual novels) that
Spoiler:
|
Re: The Hobbit
I lost interest in this movie when I kept reading cameos of LOTR characters appearing, little by little they take the integrity away from it.
|
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by Dr. DVD
(Post 10795399)
I remember reading in the book of "Unfinished Tales" (just a collection of Tolkien's rough drafts and material that didn't make it to the actual novels) that
Spoiler:
|
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by CloverClover
(Post 10795443)
I lost interest in this movie when I kept reading cameos of LOTR characters appearing, little by little they take the integrity away from it.
|
Re: The Hobbit
Warner Bros. and New Line Cinema put much speculation to rest today by officially naming and dating each installment of Peter Jackson's upcoming big screen adaptation of "The Hobbit." The first installment has been christened "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey" and will hit theaters on Dec. 14, 2012.* The second film shall be known as "The Hobbit: There and Back Again" and will debut on Dec. 13, 2013. * Currently, the only film set for an opening on either date is 20th Century Fox's "Life of Pi," but you can expect that Ang Lee adventure to quickly find another release window. * |
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by CloverClover
(Post 10795443)
I lost interest in this movie when I kept reading cameos of LOTR characters appearing, little by little they take the integrity away from it.
|
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by pinata242
(Post 10795488)
It's a but early to cry about ME characters appearing in... ME, isn't it?
|
Re: The Hobbit
Does Dirty Harry live forever in the world of Amistad? And did he live in a location that both stories occur?
You're right. It's the exact same thing. Just because Tolkien didn't name Legolas in The Hobbit doesn't mean he wasn't there in Mirkwood with his father (the Elvenking). Bilbo's story existed for Frodo to read. Having it appear as a narration will distract you for five minutes. Writing off these movies for these reasons is just asinine Interneting. Enjoy staying home. |
Re: The Hobbit
The Lord of the Rings was "messed with" too. Certain characters were added and deleted, fused together or replaced. It's a total non issue. Like others have said, all characters that have been mentioned were alive during the time that events in The Hobbit took place. They were all in the area too. Just because they weren't mentioned doesn't mean they weren't there.
|
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by pinata242
(Post 10795523)
Does Dirty Harry live forever in the world of Amistad? And did he live in a location that both stories occur?
You're right. It's the exact same thing. Just because Tolkien didn't name Legolas in The Hobbit doesn't mean he wasn't there in Mirkwood with his father (the Elvenking). Bilbo's story existed for Frodo to read. Having it appear as a narration will distract you for five minutes. Writing off these movies for these reasons is just asinine Interneting. Enjoy staying home. ETA: I wasn't going to see it, anyway: I don't care much for the subject matter and even littler for Peter Jackson. |
Re: The Hobbit
Thanks for popping in and checking on us :wave:
|
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by pinata242
(Post 10798676)
Thanks for popping in and checking on us :wave:
|
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by pinata242
(Post 10798676)
Thanks for popping in and checking on us :wave:
|
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by pinata242
(Post 10798676)
Thanks for popping in and checking on us :wave:
While it's difficult to get excited about the casting of Orlando Bloom in...anything, it's perfectly reasonable (and expected, really) for Legolas to show up in a post-LOTR film of The Hobbit. |
Re: The Hobbit
Originally Posted by whoopdido
(Post 10795447)
Isn't he kind of like the Eagles in a way though? Incorruptible? Or maybe already so corrupt that nothing could sway him? Except for one weakness I guess and that weakness wasn't the One Ring.
In terms of Bloom, I fully expected his character to pop up whenever they made The Hobbit. |
Re: The Hobbit
Orlando Bloom was funny in those 7-Up commercials and Office Space, but everything else he's done has been meh. He seems out of place in this film, but I'll reserve judgement until I see the final film.
|
Re: The Hobbit
^ Seriously man, it's getting old.
|
Re: The Hobbit
leave him alone, it's all he's got.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:52 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.