View Poll Results: Would Miami Vice have done better in the box office with Johnson and Thomas?
Yes, the budget would have been much smaller



11
11.11%
No, it would have bombed even worse



36
36.36%
No, the film was fine with Foxx and Farrell



41
41.41%
Don't care, didn't like Miami Vice show and movie



11
11.11%
Voters: 99. You may not vote on this poll
Miami Vice Poll
#1
Thread Starter
DVD Talk God
Miami Vice Poll
Do you think Miami Vice would have done better in the box office had they casted Don Johnson and Phillip Michael Thomas?
#3
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Los Angeles , California
Originally Posted by DJariya
Do you think Miami Vice would have done better in the box office had they casted Don Johnson and Phillip Michael Thomas?
Maybe if they made the movie in the 80's.
#5
DVD Talk Hero
I liked the film just fine as it was. Not as good as Heat or Collateral but still enjoyable.
#10
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Parcher
I'm a Mann fan - what made Vice a not so good movie?
#11
I don't think they should have cast the originals, but I do think they should have kept the tone of the TV series. I don't think there was a big market for a serious take on Miami Vice. Why would there be? To quote a friend, "They play it straight? Screw that. Let's go see that new Will Ferrell movie."
Last edited by onebyone; 08-14-06 at 12:52 PM.
#12
DVD Talk Godfather
Originally Posted by onebyone
I don't think they should have cast the originals, but I do think they should have kept the tone of the TV series. I don't think there was a big market for a serious take on Miami Vice. Why would there be? To quote a friend, "They play it straight? Screw that. Let's go see that new Will Ferrell movie."
#14
Originally Posted by The Bus
If it wasn't played "straight" then it would've been Starsky & Hutch and Michael Mann would not have been involved. That doesn't sound that good to me.
#15
Needs to contact an admin about multiple accounts
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Remove the Miami Vice title, and its just another generic cop action flick. Aside from the character names, there is nothing that connects it to the series.
#16
They should have made the movie right after the series ended. I remember they were tossing the idea around. The show in the end when no one was watching it was actually getting better. It got darker and more serious. They even had the cool story arc where Sonny became a bad guy 'cause he lost his memory.
#17
Originally Posted by THX7966
Remove the Miami Vice title, and its just another generic cop action flick. Aside from the character names, there is nothing that connects it to the series.
#19
New Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Toronto, ON
It was kind of a strange idea to make a movie based on a hit TV show, then not really base it on it at all. I think it's safe to say that attaching the 'Miami Vice' name hurt this movie. Any fan of the show got something completely different, and anyone who didn't like the show probably avoided this in fear that it would be similar. In the end, it was really unnecessary. As someone said already, the only thing that was kept the same was the character names. The movie could have simply had a different title and different character names (with Colin Farrell looking less...you know) and boom, cool new Michael Mann movie with no predisposed (I think that's the word I'm looking for) ideas about the movie.
But regardless, I think the movie should do all right on DVD. As long as they cut out the whole Cuba part of the movie.
But regardless, I think the movie should do all right on DVD. As long as they cut out the whole Cuba part of the movie.
#20
DVD Talk Legend
I thought the movie was okay, but was disappointed overall. They followed the formula of a TV ep. of the show to a T IMO, but they eliminated the cheese and a lot of action, which in all honesty is what a lot of Miami Vice fans liked about the show in the first place, and people about it despized. In short, they had to market a movie that lacked what the loyalists wanted, and everyone else refused to see based on its existence.
FWIW, this movie could have made a lot more IMO if they had taken the Charlie's Angels approach. They could have had the movie take place in the 80s, blasted the music to the max, and cast Will Ferrell as Crockett and maybe Will Smith as Tubbs. They would have had to get an entirely different director of course, as it would be a comedy at heart, but don't tell me it wouldn't have opened huge if it also got a PG-13 rating.
FWIW, this movie could have made a lot more IMO if they had taken the Charlie's Angels approach. They could have had the movie take place in the 80s, blasted the music to the max, and cast Will Ferrell as Crockett and maybe Will Smith as Tubbs. They would have had to get an entirely different director of course, as it would be a comedy at heart, but don't tell me it wouldn't have opened huge if it also got a PG-13 rating.
#21
DVD Talk Legend
Does anyone know how well its done internationally?
#22
Thread Starter
DVD Talk God
Very poor international box office. According to boxofficemojo, it's only made a little more than $8M. So far, the movie has grossed about $63M Worldwide.
#24
DVD Talk Special Edition
Yep thats what happens when you make a movie on a show and word gets out it has lilttle to nothing to do with the actual show, then top it off with a half ass story that drags on and on.
I dont get the whole cheese crap everyone says about the tv show, at the time it was kick ass mucic, cool stories, and style that made the show what it was, not this stupid chesse crap eveyones going on about, yeah its cheesy now, but it sure as hell wasnt 17 yrs ago.
I dont get the whole cheese crap everyone says about the tv show, at the time it was kick ass mucic, cool stories, and style that made the show what it was, not this stupid chesse crap eveyones going on about, yeah its cheesy now, but it sure as hell wasnt 17 yrs ago.
#25
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
No.
I'm going to go out on a limb and think most people 25 and under are like me and think of those two as just total loser washed up has-beens. I grew up thinking of them as nothing but punchlines. Maybe old people hold them in higher regard because apparently people liked the TV series but if you're getting zero interest from the 16-25 crowd for a movie like this you're going to bomb hard.
I'm going to go out on a limb and think most people 25 and under are like me and think of those two as just total loser washed up has-beens. I grew up thinking of them as nothing but punchlines. Maybe old people hold them in higher regard because apparently people liked the TV series but if you're getting zero interest from the 16-25 crowd for a movie like this you're going to bomb hard.


