Word on 'Da Vinci Code' ? Not good.
#252
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: New York
OK well getting back to rating the movie here is my opinion:
I thought overall the movie was great, I would give it 4 stars (out of 5). The movie was long, but IMHO they were still squeezing stuff in. They didn't go into the albino's history like the book did. A lot of stuff was revealed earlier in the movie then in the book I guess to sort of speed the story up. Bottom line is i think this movie shoulf of been even longer. I liked all the twists at the end. And overall the subject matter was very interesting. I am really not a Ron Howard fan, Cinderalla man made me sick, but i think he did well with this flick. Oh and btw please read my Rant which I Will post after I submit this regarding a matter I have to endure watchng this film. Click on my profile and view other posts.
I thought overall the movie was great, I would give it 4 stars (out of 5). The movie was long, but IMHO they were still squeezing stuff in. They didn't go into the albino's history like the book did. A lot of stuff was revealed earlier in the movie then in the book I guess to sort of speed the story up. Bottom line is i think this movie shoulf of been even longer. I liked all the twists at the end. And overall the subject matter was very interesting. I am really not a Ron Howard fan, Cinderalla man made me sick, but i think he did well with this flick. Oh and btw please read my Rant which I Will post after I submit this regarding a matter I have to endure watchng this film. Click on my profile and view other posts.
#253
DVD Talk Legend
***
Pretty decent...loved the elaborate flashbacks/visuals. (i was wondering how they spent 125mill on this movie!)
Hanks was pretty wooden, but that was likely how he was playing it. Langdon isn't a flashy role by any means.
I was a amazed that they actually succeeded in making the film more offensive than I felt the book was. By putting Christ's divinity on the line much more (an effort to raise the stakes and motivations of the characters imo) And then at the end trying to soften it by saying it wouldn't really matter if he was human or divine. Do they simply have no clue about Christianity or do they really think we're gonna buy that?
The book adaptation was so-so, the compressing of the 2nd half was pretty bad I thought, esp changing certain characters fates and motivations.
All in all an ok thriller, but the visual style won me over.
Pretty decent...loved the elaborate flashbacks/visuals. (i was wondering how they spent 125mill on this movie!)
Hanks was pretty wooden, but that was likely how he was playing it. Langdon isn't a flashy role by any means.
I was a amazed that they actually succeeded in making the film more offensive than I felt the book was. By putting Christ's divinity on the line much more (an effort to raise the stakes and motivations of the characters imo) And then at the end trying to soften it by saying it wouldn't really matter if he was human or divine. Do they simply have no clue about Christianity or do they really think we're gonna buy that?
The book adaptation was so-so, the compressing of the 2nd half was pretty bad I thought, esp changing certain characters fates and motivations.
All in all an ok thriller, but the visual style won me over.
#254
DVD Talk Legend
I had someone like Sam Neill in mind for Langdon, and I didn't really buy Tom Hanks.
I thought that the movie was good, not great. It seemed to lessen the role of Sophie in the solving of the puzzles, and I agree that there was no real chemistry between the two leads. It's not a DVD that I would purchase, as I don't think that I would be interested in seeing it multiple times.
I thought that the movie was good, not great. It seemed to lessen the role of Sophie in the solving of the puzzles, and I agree that there was no real chemistry between the two leads. It's not a DVD that I would purchase, as I don't think that I would be interested in seeing it multiple times.
#255
DVD Talk Legend
Another thing... the movie felt like I was watching a video game. Search for clues, solve a puzzle, chase scene, cutscene explaining some of the story, find more clues, solve another puzzle, another chase, etc.
#256
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Los Angeles
Well I say it today (and have read the book) and enjoyed it. I don't understand all the negativity AT ALL. It was entertaining, close to the book and featured good actors. What else do people need?
edit: After reading most of this thread, I am beginning to lose a lot of faith in this board and Internet movie-lovers in general. Calling Ron Howard or Tom Hanks a clown is quite possibly the most idiotic/ignorant shit ever to grace a computer screen.
edit: After reading most of this thread, I am beginning to lose a lot of faith in this board and Internet movie-lovers in general. Calling Ron Howard or Tom Hanks a clown is quite possibly the most idiotic/ignorant shit ever to grace a computer screen.
Last edited by PJsig08; 05-26-06 at 07:52 PM.
#258
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: St. Albans, England (UK)
I agree about there being not much chemistry between the two leads, besides which I felt Hanks was too grumpy and formal as Langdon IMO.
I've got further into the book now (probably about 2/3 of the way by now)
I've got further into the book now (probably about 2/3 of the way by now)
#259
DVD Talk Legend
Watched it last night, felt it dragged on for ages in the last 1/2 hour. I read the book, enjoyed it for what it was, and am one of the ones who think that Hanks was totally miscast in this role.
I don't know who else I'd have cast in the langon role, but I think Tom wasn't very believable. I do see why he was in the film though. Tom Hanks - Everyman.
I don't know who else I'd have cast in the langon role, but I think Tom wasn't very believable. I do see why he was in the film though. Tom Hanks - Everyman.
#260
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Los Angeles
Why are people criticizing Hanks? Isn't Langdon a reserved, Harvard professor? Do we expect him to break out in some martial arts moves? He played the role well, that's how you would expect a professor to handle those situations (wit as opposed to muscle).
#261
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Atlanta
Merely an average flick. I did enjoy hearing what Audrey sounded like speaking English. One of my friends that went with us is a huge Christian history buff and he was scoffing through the whole thing. Made me laugh because you can't enjoy this movie if you take it too seriously. I didn't read the book, but I'll bet it was more fun than the movie.
#262
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Chicago
Saw this flick today, I plan to read the book sometime this summer. I don't see what all the negativity is about. This film is a modern day, yet more toned down Indiana Jones type adventure. I know I had a good time in the theater. There were moments I saw coming, some I didn't. Do you have to suspend your disbelief? Sure, but you have to do that as well if you read something like the Bible and actually take things word for word. It's not anti-religion or anti-catholic at all. I was shocked at how many times it defended the other view.
I have a spoiler question about the book and movie that was brought up in a earlier spoiler.
I have a spoiler question about the book and movie that was brought up in a earlier spoiler.
Spoiler:
Last edited by Michael Ballack; 05-31-06 at 08:27 PM.
#263
I saw it Saturday night. It was the worst movie I've seen in years. It had absolutely no redeeming qualities, and looked amateurish as hell. How Ron Howard has an Oscar for Best Director has to be a far bigger mystery than anything in this putrid, absurd movie.
Oh, and BTW, my criticisms have absolutely nothing to do with any pro- or anti-Catholic bias I might have. I'd hate to be misunderstood about this - I think the people who protest against this movie are even sillier and more dunderheaded than the movie itself.
Oh, and BTW, my criticisms have absolutely nothing to do with any pro- or anti-Catholic bias I might have. I'd hate to be misunderstood about this - I think the people who protest against this movie are even sillier and more dunderheaded than the movie itself.
#264
Moderator
Finally saw it this afternoon... and it was okay. I liked the book alot better and was amazed at some of the stuff that they left out and other parts that they took great liberties in.
I'd give this 2 1/2 out of 4 stars.
I liked the acting and the locations (what was funny is that I got back from two weeks in London and Paris and visited the Louvre and Westminister Abbey.
Here are my gripes:
I would have liked the movie to have been a half an hour longer and a few things weaved back in. I wouldn't have minded it much. Since I had read the book first, I think I was a bit biased walking in.
I won't be buying the DVD, but if I could borrow it from someone I might watch it again.
One last thing... I had no problem with the central plot of the film or book and see it as quite plausable.
I'd give this 2 1/2 out of 4 stars.
I liked the acting and the locations (what was funny is that I got back from two weeks in London and Paris and visited the Louvre and Westminister Abbey.
Here are my gripes:
Spoiler:
I would have liked the movie to have been a half an hour longer and a few things weaved back in. I wouldn't have minded it much. Since I had read the book first, I think I was a bit biased walking in.
I won't be buying the DVD, but if I could borrow it from someone I might watch it again.
One last thing... I had no problem with the central plot of the film or book and see it as quite plausable.
Last edited by Goldberg74; 06-01-06 at 07:18 PM.
#265
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Just saw it - LOVED it! This whole thread is just set up to bash it - primo defense strategy from the catholic spinsters out there (ok its flamebait, i take it partially back.. only partially - just check the title...).
Movie is gorgeous, exciting, I thought well paced and very interesting. They really translated the symbols and imagery well to the big screen.
Ian McKellen was bloody brilliant, Tom & Audrey good too. Paul Bettany i wasnt quiiite buying, but that was ok.
Definitely getting the DVD, cant wait for the commentary. Also think its quite a plausible story.
Movie is gorgeous, exciting, I thought well paced and very interesting. They really translated the symbols and imagery well to the big screen.
Ian McKellen was bloody brilliant, Tom & Audrey good too. Paul Bettany i wasnt quiiite buying, but that was ok.
Definitely getting the DVD, cant wait for the commentary. Also think its quite a plausible story.
#267
DVD Talk Godfather
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 65,242
Received 2,671 Likes
on
1,586 Posts
From: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Saw it last week and I generally enjoyed it. The Flashbacks, the "Biblcal history", the settings, and other things made this a decent flick. I'm not a Ron Howard fan and I think he's waaay overrated so I didn't go in with any expectations of being blown away by an awesome cinematic masterpiece.
#268
Suspended
Originally Posted by ravan
Just saw it - LOVED it! This whole thread is just set up to bash it - primo defense strategy from the catholic spinsters out there (ok its flamebait, i take it partially back.. only partially - just check the title...).
Movie is gorgeous, exciting, I thought well paced and very interesting. They really translated the symbols and imagery well to the big screen.
Ian McKellen was bloody brilliant, Tom & Audrey good too. Paul Bettany i wasnt quiiite buying, but that was ok.
Definitely getting the DVD, cant wait for the commentary. Also think its quite a plausible story.
Movie is gorgeous, exciting, I thought well paced and very interesting. They really translated the symbols and imagery well to the big screen.
Ian McKellen was bloody brilliant, Tom & Audrey good too. Paul Bettany i wasnt quiiite buying, but that was ok.
Definitely getting the DVD, cant wait for the commentary. Also think its quite a plausible story.
(1) people who think the film is OK, but not great; and
(2) people (like me) who think Ron Howard and his (cough) script-writer have watered down the story so much, the film might as well have been made with the lucrative Catholic Spinster market in mind.





Everyone gets a shock to find their parents still have sex so maybe finding her grandparents do is a double shocker, but as far as I can see she saw "something" like her grandfather having sex with his own wife in a sexual ritual.