Word on 'Da Vinci Code' ? Not good.
#201
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Peep
Why didn't you just ask them? I spent a while talking about the movie with my friends after we saw it. Most of us, including myself, hadn't read the book and none of us were confused by the story.
I don't agree with people who say that the movie followed the book quite closely. Maybe in vague terms it did, and in general it did....but a lot of IMPORTANT elements were left out. In addition to some things already mentioned by other posters, the beginning and ending are different from the book as well.
Spoiler:
#202
Suspended
Originally Posted by immortal_zeus
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Last edited by baracine; 05-22-06 at 02:48 PM.
#203
Moderator
I'm sure this has been mentioned, but I for one thought Tom Hanks was terribly miscast...
what actor springs to mind who would have played Robert Langdon better?
what actor springs to mind who would have played Robert Langdon better?
#204
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Giles
I'm sure this has been mentioned, but I for one thought Tom Hanks was terribly miscast...
what actor springs to mind who would have played Robert Langdon better?
what actor springs to mind who would have played Robert Langdon better?
#207
Suspended
Originally Posted by Giles
I'm sure this has been mentioned, but I for one thought Tom Hanks was terribly miscast...
what actor springs to mind who would have played Robert Langdon better?
what actor springs to mind who would have played Robert Langdon better?
#208
Suspended
Originally Posted by kcbrett5
Spoiler:
#211
Speaking of Clint Howard, where was he?
Methinks he would've been perfect as one of the Inquisitors in one of Langdon's flashback stories.
Methinks he would've been perfect as one of the Inquisitors in one of Langdon's flashback stories.
#213
Suspended
Originally Posted by clemente
Lecture in the morning, book singing at night...lots of time in between, hopefully all your minds are at rest.
#214
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Originally Posted by Mondo Kane
Speaking of Clint Howard, where was he?
Methinks he would've been perfect as one of the Inquisitors in one of Langdon's flashback stories.
Methinks he would've been perfect as one of the Inquisitors in one of Langdon's flashback stories.
I was almost distracted through out the entire movie trying to spot him in there somewhere. I didn't see him, though.
I really enjoyed the movie and felt totally satisfied afterwards. I only wish that Silas was more menacing, as he was in my mind when I was reading the book.
#215
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: St. Albans, England (UK)
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Da Vinci Code - 3.5/5
Not a bad film by any means - extremely well made and designed.
The 1st hour/hour and a half moves along at a frantic pace and is very exciting, (some things in the book are missing in the film, though in general the film is very close to the book) - however the concluding parts (when the action moves to London) are less compelling and the pace slows right down.
Jean Reno is very good, seeming very like Fache in the book, and I also liked Ian McKellen who can play eccentrics very well!
Paul Bettany does suprisingly well as the creepy Albino monk Silas, a fanatical member of Opus Dei. The scene where he flagilates himself is a bit nasty!
However, crucially faults lie with the main characters. Tom Hanks and Audrey Tatou (thankfully lacking Ruth Kelly haircut) aren't "bad" as such, but they look uncomfortable and lack any real chemistry with each other. Hanks was miscast IMO. I imagined Langdon as someone younger.
Even though the film is obviously fiction, it doesnt stop Hanks delivering a little speech at the end to calm down the Christian Right.
Not a bad film by any means - extremely well made and designed.
The 1st hour/hour and a half moves along at a frantic pace and is very exciting, (some things in the book are missing in the film, though in general the film is very close to the book) - however the concluding parts (when the action moves to London) are less compelling and the pace slows right down.
Jean Reno is very good, seeming very like Fache in the book, and I also liked Ian McKellen who can play eccentrics very well!
Paul Bettany does suprisingly well as the creepy Albino monk Silas, a fanatical member of Opus Dei. The scene where he flagilates himself is a bit nasty!
However, crucially faults lie with the main characters. Tom Hanks and Audrey Tatou (thankfully lacking Ruth Kelly haircut) aren't "bad" as such, but they look uncomfortable and lack any real chemistry with each other. Hanks was miscast IMO. I imagined Langdon as someone younger.
Even though the film is obviously fiction, it doesnt stop Hanks delivering a little speech at the end to calm down the Christian Right.
#216
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by kcbrett5
Spoiler:
Originally Posted by baracine
That part of the explanation doesn't make sense anymore if Langdon's actions have been public knowledge all night, i.e. the lecture and the book signing.
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
#217
Suspended
Originally Posted by baracine
Did anybody else notice the signs in the Louvre pointing to the "Monna Lisa" with two "n"'s?
It turns out "Mona" is the old Italian abbreviation of "Madonna", which means "Mrs.", and that since the modern abbreviation of "Madonna" is "Monna", the Italian-language signs at the Louvre now point to the "Monna Lisa". (See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mona_Lisa )
Ron Howard, though, is still a clown.
#218
Suspended
Maybe they should have called it The McDaVinci Code...
That's Ronald ("Howard") McDonald, 7th from the left, in the clown suit.
That's Ronald ("Howard") McDonald, 7th from the left, in the clown suit.
Last edited by baracine; 05-23-06 at 09:16 AM.
#220
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm amused at the accusation of a hugely popular (airport-quality... this ain't high literature) book that got its success primarily due to midwestern America being dumbed down for midwestern America for the movie adaptation. Especially when said movie was riding the controversy bandwagon all the way to the bank.
Isn't it much more likely that the (already accused of being overly talky) movie had some parts removed or consolidated due to length, or Akiva just generally being a hack? I really can't see anybody in the chain of command for this film trying their damndest to make sure it doesn't offend anyone.
Isn't it much more likely that the (already accused of being overly talky) movie had some parts removed or consolidated due to length, or Akiva just generally being a hack? I really can't see anybody in the chain of command for this film trying their damndest to make sure it doesn't offend anyone.
#221
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: St. Albans, England (UK)
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey,
Unfortunately I havent read ALL of the book yet, doh!
Paul Bettany was good, somehow less menacing than I thought he'd be.
Unfortunately I havent read ALL of the book yet, doh!
Paul Bettany was good, somehow less menacing than I thought he'd be.
Spoiler:
#224
Suspended
Originally Posted by sethsez
I'm amused at the accusation of a hugely popular (airport-quality... this ain't high literature) book that got its success primarily due to midwestern America being dumbed down for midwestern America for the movie adaptation. Especially when said movie was riding the controversy bandwagon all the way to the bank.
Isn't it much more likely that the (already accused of being overly talky) movie had some parts removed or consolidated due to length, or Akiva just generally being a hack? I really can't see anybody in the chain of command for this film trying their damndest to make sure it doesn't offend anyone.
Isn't it much more likely that the (already accused of being overly talky) movie had some parts removed or consolidated due to length, or Akiva just generally being a hack? I really can't see anybody in the chain of command for this film trying their damndest to make sure it doesn't offend anyone.
Last edited by baracine; 05-23-06 at 08:46 AM.