The Thing Remake?
#26
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: The Other Side
Originally Posted by zombiezilla
And whether or not you like Ray's work (and I do, I'm a MAJOR fan), I think it was just weird to have him do commentary on the original.
#27
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 9,917
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
From: Sitting on a beach, earning 20%
Originally Posted by Egon's Ghost
That's not the point. It's been done; and Carpenter's was a fresh take on the original Hawks film and the original story. I would also argue that the idea for Carpenter's remake wasn't to capitalize on the original, as a modern remake would exist solely to capitalize on the "brand" of the Carpenter film.
#30
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 4,806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Grounded in reality. For the most part.
Originally Posted by Groucho
They should set it in a high school this time, with the Faculty members being taken over one by one.
#31
DVD Talk Hero
Sounds like no one has anything more concrete than a hearsay account from another director on an XM radio interview. I think I'll wait until I actually hear Romero say he wants to do it before I start my conniption.
#32
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Seattle, WA
Wasn't Ridley Scott supposed to be working on a Sci-Fi channel remake/prequel to this a while back? Haven't heard anything on it in some time, so perhaps that fell through (thankfully).
#33
DVD Talk Godfather
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 65,284
Received 2,698 Likes
on
1,599 Posts
From: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
What they need to do is a short on what happened to the guys after the credits rolled.
#34
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
No remake. The Thing is still one of the creepiest movies period. CGI has it's place, but when the "real" effects of Carpenter's movie are almost perfect...
Ok, perhaps the effects weren't perfect, but they still hold up and the accomplish exactly what they were meant to do....give me the willies. I'm not even sure about a sequel....
Ok, perhaps the effects weren't perfect, but they still hold up and the accomplish exactly what they were meant to do....give me the willies. I'm not even sure about a sequel....
#35
Cool New Member
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: home of the 2003 stanley cup champs
Originally Posted by movielib
Carpenter's The Thing is one of the few remakes which blows away an original. Not only did it follow the novella (Who Goes There?) far more closely than the original, it's superior in any way I can think of. The original seems silly (vegetable monster?) by comparison.
About the only reason for a remake I can think of is to be able to use CGI, and even that is not a very good reason as the pre-CGI effects of Carpenter's film surpassed the state of the art at the time and still hold up today and always will.
About the only reason for a remake I can think of is to be able to use CGI, and even that is not a very good reason as the pre-CGI effects of Carpenter's film surpassed the state of the art at the time and still hold up today and always will.
I actually think the famous "KEEP WATCHING THE SKIES!"ending of Hawkes movie is much more satisfying then Carpenters.




