More Brokeback crying...
#51
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Boy, that's a really graceless column by Proulx. I quite like her writing, but this really comes off poorly for her to write such a diatribe.
#53
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: 2nd City
Wow, I take a few days off and come back to more of this shit? It's amazing to me that EITHER side is still talking about this. I'm in FULL agreement with Roeper -- get the fuck over it!
#54
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Originally Posted by Kerborus
I for one, thought Crash was well deserving. It's always been my opinion that if you are even nominated for Best Picture, than in effect you were one of the best pictures of the year, win or lose. Since movies are subjective, all 5 movies really win. The big winner, per se, is just icing on the cake.
It's sad to think that people need validation by a body that is biased in order to enjoy or think the movie they like is good. I'm guilty of that as well, btw, but a couple of years down the road, who cares?
Now if you needed that win as a needs to further your social progressive ideas than I don't know what to tell you...
It's sad to think that people need validation by a body that is biased in order to enjoy or think the movie they like is good. I'm guilty of that as well, btw, but a couple of years down the road, who cares?
Now if you needed that win as a needs to further your social progressive ideas than I don't know what to tell you...
Originally Posted by talemyn
Whining is never justified . . . even if you're a 3-year-old. At least then it's permissable, but it's still not justified.
Anyway, I think the article does make Annie Proulx sound really bad.
#55
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally Posted by Duality
This thread is outrageous and insulting. Brokeback Mountain is a story about tragedy in the lives of four people. You people, who didn't enjoy the film, started months ago with jokes and comments that, if they were racial, would not have been tolerated anywhere. Furthermore, most people who love the movie aren't posting in these "crap" threads. Personally, I will only let so much idiocy fly before I say, "enough!" If you love the movie that was given the BP award on March 5th, good for you. Honestly, that winning isn't enough for you people says far more with regard to "character" than the displeasure some Brokeback fans, including Annie, are expressing about losing.
Because I am interested in seeing it (though have not yet) I have read every post in this thread and the "modern classic" thread (yes, all 30+ pages) to get an idea of what people are saying about it. Because I haven't seen it, I can not make any comments on the movie itself, so I have refrained from doing so.
However, what this has also allowed me to do is observe peoples responses objectively since I don't have an opinion of it yet. I appreciate that the movie touched you and means something very personal to you, but no film deserves the vehemence with which you are defending this one. There have honestly been a few times when your posts have come off to me as borderline obsessive.
An internet forum should not be able to affect you this way . . . these are people you don't know and whose opinions really don't matter to you personally unless you allow them to. If it is going to make you this upset, I really would recommend that you take a break. It's just not worth it.
#56
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally Posted by RagingBull80
Sure it is, that's why I live in America. I think that you would also be singing a different tune if Crash had lost. It's hard to tell now but I think there would be a shit load of whining over Crash not winning best picture.

As for the "live in America" comment, that may give you the right to whine, but it doesn't make whining itself any better.
Originally Posted by RagingBull80
Anyway, I think the article does make Annie Proulx sound really bad.
#57
DVD Talk Special Edition
Originally Posted by talemyn
Dude . . . you need to let it go.
Because I am interested in seeing it (though have not yet) I have read every post in this thread and the "modern classic" thread (yes, all 30+ pages) to get an idea of what people are saying about it. Because I haven't seen it, I can not make any comments on the movie itself, so I have refrained from doing so.
However, what this has also allowed me to do is observe peoples responses objectively since I don't have an opinion of it yet. I appreciate that the movie touched you and means something very personal to you, but no film deserves the vehemence with which you are defending this one. There have honestly been a few times when your posts have come off to me as borderline obsessive.
An internet forum should not be able to affect you this way . . . these are people you don't know and whose opinions really don't matter to you personally unless you allow them to. If it is going to make you this upset, I really would recommend that you take a break. It's just not worth it.
Because I am interested in seeing it (though have not yet) I have read every post in this thread and the "modern classic" thread (yes, all 30+ pages) to get an idea of what people are saying about it. Because I haven't seen it, I can not make any comments on the movie itself, so I have refrained from doing so.
However, what this has also allowed me to do is observe peoples responses objectively since I don't have an opinion of it yet. I appreciate that the movie touched you and means something very personal to you, but no film deserves the vehemence with which you are defending this one. There have honestly been a few times when your posts have come off to me as borderline obsessive.
An internet forum should not be able to affect you this way . . . these are people you don't know and whose opinions really don't matter to you personally unless you allow them to. If it is going to make you this upset, I really would recommend that you take a break. It's just not worth it.
Back to work for me.
#59
DVD Talk Special Edition
I was someone who was hoping Brokeback Mountain would win, but not because of any political agenda. I'm not gay and not particularly invested in the gay movement. I just found it to be the best written and directed film I've seen this year. However, I would have been totally cool with Capote, Munich or Goodnight and Good Luck winning because I respect those films. The sting is just that when I saw Crash (well before the Oscars), I felt that it was the worst film I've seen in years. Just such a purile piece of offensively condescending crap. That the worst film I saw all year won Best Picture is just mind-boggling to me.
Last edited by lamphorn; 03-17-06 at 03:51 PM.
#60
DVD Talk Hero
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 28,204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Words
Originally Posted by Kudama
I still can't believe that Batman Begins didn't sweep the awards. 
F**k the Academy!

F**k the Academy!
-p
#61
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Atlanta, GA
Originally Posted by lamphorn
I was someone who was hoping Brokeback Mountain would win, but not because of any political agenda. I'm not gay and not particularly invested in the gay movement. I just found it to be the best written and directed film I've seen this year. However, I would have been totally cool with Capote, Munich or Goodnight and Good Luck winning because I respect those films. The sting is just that when I saw Crash (well before the Oscars), I felt that it was the worst film I've seen in years. Just such a purile piece of offensively condescending crap. That the worst film I saw all year won Best Picture is just mind-boggling to me.
#62
DVD Talk Special Edition
Originally Posted by Kerborus
I'm curious as to why Crash was offensive and purile?
There were no human beings in the story. Each character was at worst a racist stereotype, and at best a manipulative After-School Special spokesperson for an "issue". The characters were made to behave in completely unmotivated and illogical ways to service an unbelievable plot. Just the shot where the little girl was "shot", with the zoom in to the guy's face as he screamed and the slo-mo, and the dude with the gun making a slo-mo face as if he didn't realize he had a gun in the first place. That moment was so overwrought that it had the audience chuckling. It was like a Saturday Night Live sketch. The plot was clever because it was very intricately mapped out, but the characters had no logic and no credibility, which killed any intended effect the film should have had. Everybody had to lecture everybody else. The dialogue was like listening to people reading rejected letters-to-the-editor.
On a final note, the ending "catharsis" was ripped from Magnolia (complete with a "Save Me" sound-alike, and unusual precipitation) but lacked any of the actual human sentiment that Magnolia had. Just my opinion, but you asked for it.
#63
Moderator
Originally Posted by lamphorn
I just found it to be the best written and directed film I've seen this year.
And I'm really suprised that someone hasn't already posted something like:
"Ms. Proulx should just bend over and take it like a man!"

... and for the record, I haven't seen any of the films that were nominated for Best Picture, so I have no clue what I'm talking about.
#64
DVD Talk Special Edition
Originally Posted by Goldberg74
Well... it did win the awards for Best Directing and Best Adapted Screenplay, so I really don't see what you are upset about.
And I'm really suprised that someone hasn't already posted something like:
"Ms. Proulx should just bend over and take it like a man!"
... and for the record, I haven't seen any of the films that were nominated for Best Picture, so I have no clue what I'm talking about.
And I'm really suprised that someone hasn't already posted something like:
"Ms. Proulx should just bend over and take it like a man!"

... and for the record, I haven't seen any of the films that were nominated for Best Picture, so I have no clue what I'm talking about.
I'm no more upset than I was when Chicago (which was crap) won, or when A Beautiful Mind (which was crap) won, or when Oliver! beat 2001. Or that Scorsese still hasn't won for directing. It's just particularly unfortunate that the Academy had a 4 out of 5 chance to pick a great film for Best Picture, and STILL picked a crappy one.
Last edited by lamphorn; 03-18-06 at 01:02 PM.
#65
Banned
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Richard Roeper should understand that Brokeback Mountain isn't about "two gay cowboys". It is about homophobia and the terrible consequences thereof. As far as I'm concerned, Roeper is a sleaze who doesn't deserve the time of day.
#67
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Atlanta, GA
Originally Posted by lamphorn
Well, what I said was "offensively condescending" , not "offensive". But here's why-
There were no human beings in the story. Each character was at worst a racist stereotype, and at best a manipulative After-School Special spokesperson for an "issue". The characters were made to behave in completely unmotivated and illogical ways to service an unbelievable plot. Just the shot where the little girl was "shot", with the zoom in to the guy's face as he screamed and the slo-mo, and the dude with the gun making a slo-mo face as if he didn't realize he had a gun in the first place. That moment was so overwrought that it had the audience chuckling. It was like a Saturday Night Live sketch. The plot was clever because it was very intricately mapped out, but the characters had no logic and no credibility, which killed any intended effect the film should have had. Everybody had to lecture everybody else. The dialogue was like listening to people reading rejected letters-to-the-editor.
On a final note, the ending "catharsis" was ripped from Magnolia (complete with a "Save Me" sound-alike, and unusual precipitation) but lacked any of the actual human sentiment that Magnolia had. Just my opinion, but you asked for it.
There were no human beings in the story. Each character was at worst a racist stereotype, and at best a manipulative After-School Special spokesperson for an "issue". The characters were made to behave in completely unmotivated and illogical ways to service an unbelievable plot. Just the shot where the little girl was "shot", with the zoom in to the guy's face as he screamed and the slo-mo, and the dude with the gun making a slo-mo face as if he didn't realize he had a gun in the first place. That moment was so overwrought that it had the audience chuckling. It was like a Saturday Night Live sketch. The plot was clever because it was very intricately mapped out, but the characters had no logic and no credibility, which killed any intended effect the film should have had. Everybody had to lecture everybody else. The dialogue was like listening to people reading rejected letters-to-the-editor.
On a final note, the ending "catharsis" was ripped from Magnolia (complete with a "Save Me" sound-alike, and unusual precipitation) but lacked any of the actual human sentiment that Magnolia had. Just my opinion, but you asked for it.
#68
Suspended
Originally Posted by Kerborus
Finally, there is no story that hasn't been told, so 'ripping' other movies off is kind of a silly thing to say.
#69
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
Yes there is! I'm working on a script about a monkey who becomes paralyed after being hit by an ice cream truck. Its a Love story. Oh, there are Zombies to. And a talking turtle who gives advice. Original? Yes
#70
Needs to contact an admin about multiple accounts
Originally Posted by Kerborus
Movies are subjective, of course, but I would say of all of the trained film watchers who vote on these things, the majority seemed to disagree with your assessment, as they voted it best picture..
you're talking about members of the academy right? good one!!!
#71
DVD Talk Reviewer
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
Yes there is! I'm working on a script about a monkey who becomes paralyed after being hit by an ice cream truck. Its a Love story. Oh, there are Zombies to. And a talking turtle who gives advice. Original? Yes
I smell a Golden Globe, but it'll probably get shafted at the Oscars.
#72
Banned
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by art
Richard Roeper should understand that Brokeback Mountain isn't about "two gay cowboys". It is about homophobia and the terrible consequences thereof. As far as I'm concerned, Roeper is a sleaze who doesn't deserve the time of day.
Roeper was dead on.
#73
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cygnet74
you're talking about members of the academy right? good one!!!Call me crazy, but I'll continue trusting my own judgment (and that of respectable critics whose opinions I trust...Roeper would not be among those).
#74
DVD Talk Legend
No offense to any of the "mega" fans of Brokeback, but over the course of the Academy Awards, there are far greater films that have been denied. Be grateful that it at least got nominated, and actually won three - one of which being one of the main awards on the entire show.
Ang Lee is an Academy Award winning director, yet Martin Scorsese is not. It sucks that I am even able to type that truth, and I'm not happy about it but I'm not going to bitch about it forever.
My favorite film of all time is Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, and it wasn't even nominated for best picutre or director. Sure, that didn't sit too well with me last year, but it isn't like it really matters. Why should I care if a select group of people votes for it or not? Why should any of the huge Brokeback fans really care about it not winning? No matter what, the film will always remain, and if it's really as great and as impactful and as important that so many people claim (I don't think so personally), then history will be the real judge. For all we know, in 10, 20, 50 years from now hardly anyone will remember Crash and Brokeback will be the true "classic" that is really remembered (I don't think so either, not for either one of them). If that ends up being the case, isn't that more important than if it won a single award, in a single year?
Ang Lee is an Academy Award winning director, yet Martin Scorsese is not. It sucks that I am even able to type that truth, and I'm not happy about it but I'm not going to bitch about it forever.
My favorite film of all time is Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, and it wasn't even nominated for best picutre or director. Sure, that didn't sit too well with me last year, but it isn't like it really matters. Why should I care if a select group of people votes for it or not? Why should any of the huge Brokeback fans really care about it not winning? No matter what, the film will always remain, and if it's really as great and as impactful and as important that so many people claim (I don't think so personally), then history will be the real judge. For all we know, in 10, 20, 50 years from now hardly anyone will remember Crash and Brokeback will be the true "classic" that is really remembered (I don't think so either, not for either one of them). If that ends up being the case, isn't that more important than if it won a single award, in a single year?
Last edited by BrentLumkin; 03-19-06 at 01:37 PM.
#75
DVD Talk Special Edition
Originally Posted by art
Richard Roeper should understand that Brokeback Mountain isn't about "two gay cowboys". It is about homophobia and the terrible consequences thereof. As far as I'm concerned, Roeper is a sleaze who doesn't deserve the time of day.
I'm pretty sick of the preachy fans of the warring films. I know that I'm a terrible monster because I didn't like either film. Get off your high horse(s).
And even though I thought Brokeback Mountain was a far better film than Crash, neither were even close to being the best film of 2005. The Academy seldom gets it right, and it shouldn't rile any fans of any film. We're talking about a popularity contest.
I'm gonna go watch Shaun of the Dead...WHICH WASN'T NOMINATED FOR ANY OSCARS!!!!! HOW CAN I GO ON LIVING??!?!!
cheers,
-the Jesus



