Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Why did Alien: Ressurrection Suck?

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

Why did Alien: Ressurrection Suck?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-18-05, 10:52 PM
  #26  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 36,481
Received 1,277 Likes on 851 Posts
Originally Posted by Shannon Nutt
It's a pretty good argument. Would you like a Star Trek movie that opened by killing Riker and Worf and ended with the death of Picard, or a James Bond movie that began with the death of Q and Moneypenny and ended with Bond dying in a vat of lava? Probably not.
These characters are important characters which are part of a franchise. Newt and Hicks were secondary characters in one film. I don't even have a problem with killing Ripley. Does every Hollywood film have to be made taking possible sequels into consideration? I would hope not. It might have pissed off fans but this has little to do with good moviemaking.
Old 09-19-05, 12:38 AM
  #27  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Land of the Lobstrosities
Posts: 10,300
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I really want to like Resurrection, and I can enjoy it on a "turn off your brain and enjoy the pretty pictures" kind of way. The direction is good, the effects are good, the acting is passable for the most part, but there are a couple of major problems.

The alien hybrid does looks ri-god damn-diclous. Theoretically it is forgivable, but the final realization is shite. Like a middle-aged Cronenberg Skeletor, it's not scary, but more disgusting like a deformed fetus. It's appearance at the end of the film leaves a real sour taste in the mouth, which I think accounts for why the movie is generally seen as worse than it really is.

Ripley's return is very flaky. She is the franchise star, so I can forgive bringing her back as it almost has to be done. The method used does add a few cool things, like the "failed" experiments, but brings a lot of baggage. The ridiculous human-alien hybrid is the most obvious, but I think the worst part is that it destroys the Ripley character that was the audience's personal connection for the first three films. Ripley becomes creepy, detached and untrustworthy for the audience, so Ryder's character is the real protagonist for the film. Ryder doesn't do a particularly bad job, but her one-note character is no Ripley.

The cast never really jells. You can tell they were trying to recapture something like the dynamic from Aliens' marines, but it never happens. I haven't seen the movie in a while, so I'm not sure if it's the script that's lacking here or the actors. The characters would have greatly benefited from a little more down time in the beginning and a slower buildup to the action. The first two movies were extremely successful in setting up the characters before the action kicked in and then continuing to develop the characters when they were under duress. This doesn't work so well in Resurrection in part because it steers away from the thriller/horror aspects and more towards action, which is less conducive to character building.
Old 09-19-05, 12:52 AM
  #28  
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cancer Man
Hmmmm, I guess Alien: Ressurrection was set about six hundred years in the future. The projectile weapons they used in the film looked slightly different to sidearms used now, I could see exotic tracer rounds being used. Also I felt that Ressurrection was not a patch on the first two Alien movies and not as good as Alien III.
And what about the fact that there is a guy in a wheelchair? You'd think 600 years in the future they would at least have robotic legs.
Old 09-19-05, 03:53 AM
  #29  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
UAIOE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: LV-426
Posts: 6,598
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Cancer Man
Hmmmm, I guess Alien: Ressurrection was set about six hundred years in the future. The projectile weapons they used in the film looked slightly different to sidearms used now, I could see exotic tracer rounds being used. Also I felt that Ressurrection was not a patch on the first two Alien movies and not as good as Alien III.
Alien 4 takes place 200 years after Ripley dies. "Aliens" takes place somewhere around the year 2182 (give or take some years) and i believe "Alien 3" takes place some weeks(??) after the 2nd movie.

That puts the movie (possibly) at 2382...which confuses me as to why one would still use projectile weapons 300 years in the future. Also, why have projectile weapons (and grenades) when you could run the possibility of a hull breach on a spaceship?


Didn't Hudson mention some heavy power non-projectile based weapons in "Aliens" but they never used them?
Old 09-19-05, 07:24 AM
  #30  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I actually thought Ressurection was pretty good... I definitely enjoyed it more after awakening to JPJ's other movies which I immensely enjoyed. Catching little tongue-in-cheek "stupid american" things like the soldiers chewing bubblegum, things like that. I really dig Ron Perlman too so that helped. Alien^3 was much, much worse, though there's a long backstory on that too.
Old 09-19-05, 08:40 AM
  #31  
DVD Talk Legend
 
matome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: NY
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by UAIOE
I admit i like 4 more than 3, but the last movie really didnt seem to be that much different from any of the other late 90's CG monster movie.
Same here. Little alien baby was the suck though.
Old 09-19-05, 08:51 AM
  #32  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Giantrobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Posts: 63,495
Received 1,925 Likes on 1,184 Posts
Originally Posted by UAIOE
... and i believe "Alien 3" takes place some weeks(??) after the 2nd movie.
But during the autopsy scene in Alien 3 Newt's corpse seemed older than she did when she went into the sleep thing in ALIENS. The corpse appeared to be at least a teenager.


...which confuses me as to why one would still use projectile weapons 300 years in the future. Also, why have projectile weapons (and grenades) when you could run the possibility of a hull breach on a spaceship?
I don't have a problem with projectile weapons in the future. Lasers and Lightsabers are for Pu****s. IMHO, hot metal cutting through flesh in blade or bullet form is more personal.
Old 09-19-05, 08:53 AM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can usually watch the movie right up to the hybrid. It just doesn't fit.
Old 09-19-05, 09:43 AM
  #34  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,396
Received 49 Likes on 38 Posts
I hated Alien 3, then along came Resurrection which made part 3 look like a sci-fi classic in comparison.

It made me realize that Sigourney Weaver couldn't recognize a good script if it glowed in the dark. I remember watching one of the documentaries on the DVD where she said she was reluctant to return as Ripley until she saw this "amazing" script by Joss Whedon. My question isn't so much why did it suck, but who in their right mind would have thought this tired retread that added insult to injury was "amazing."

"Amazing" would have been something that continued the story arc of the Weyland-Yutani corporation. "Amazing" would have been a story set on the alien homeworld or Earth. Even if the story wasn't "amazing," but somehow managed to negate all the unnecessary deaths of the main characters from part 3, I would have forgiven it and been hopeful for a better part 5.

I know Joss Whedon can write great stuff, but his witty comic-book style was apparently a horrible mismatch for this series.
Old 09-19-05, 11:34 AM
  #35  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dark City
Posts: 4,218
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The underwater Aliens were the cool. Hybrid albino baby alien was the suck.
Old 09-19-05, 11:44 AM
  #36  
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
 
Adam Tyner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Greenville, South Cackalack
Posts: 29,009
Received 1,944 Likes on 1,279 Posts
Originally Posted by rennervision
It made me realize that Sigourney Weaver couldn't recognize a good script if it glowed in the dark. I remember watching one of the documentaries on the DVD where she said she was reluctant to return as Ripley until she saw this "amazing" script by Joss Whedon. My question isn't so much why did it suck, but who in their right mind would have thought this tired retread that added insult to injury was "amazing."
The first draft of the screenplay's on the DVD. Read it and decide for yourself. (I've never bothered, so I have no idea if Joss' comments are justified or if he's just bitter/arrogant/something.)

O: When you saw the completed Buffy movie, it wasn't the film you wanted to make, and several years later, you recreated it as a successful franchise. Do you ever have similar thoughts about Alien: Resurrection? Do you ever want to go back and "fix" it?

JW: Oh, yes, I have. Ohhh, yes, the fantasies. I've never had a worse experience in my life, and I've often thought of doing a lecture series on how to make movies based on just showing that movie, because I think they literally did every single thing wrong. The production design, the casting. there wasn't a mistake they left unturned. So I've often thought about it, because we'd been in talks about Alien 5. I love sequels, I love franchises, and I love big epic stories that go on and on. I used to love summer movies, before every single one of them was crap. So, yeah, I've thought about doing what I'd originally thought in Alien 5. And, after I found out on the Internet that I was making it, just after I directed Boy Meets World. [Laughs.] I thought about what I would do, what I would want to do with that franchise. And I was like, "You know what? I think maybe I'd like to work on something that 19 people don't own and control. We have so many executive producers on Buffy-and they leave me alone, they're great, but I think I'd like to do something that isn't just somebody else's. Having said that, I'm now considering doing the Iron Man movie. But that's just because it's got that cool shiny suit. Alien 5 was a longer shot. I mean, you have a body blow to recover from there.

O: Were you on the set for that, watching them take your script apart?

JW: No, I wasn't involved at all. I only went to the set once or twice. I'd been on movie sets, and I tend to stay away from them, because people want rewrites. They see the writer, and they're like, "Wouldn't it be cool if my character." "Gotta go, bye!" So I went once or twice, and I went after the première of Buffy [the series]. And the producer guy they had saw me, and said, "Hey, I went to the première of your show, and it was so weird. I said, ‘Hey, they're playing it the way he writes it!'" I was like, "And what are they doing here?" That was my first sign that there might be trouble. I literally didn't see any of it again until I saw the director's cut, during which I actually cried.

O: Just over what they'd done to your script?

JW: It was a single manly tear rolling down my cheek. About an hour into the movie, I just started to cry. I said, "I can't believe this." I was heartbroken.
Old 09-19-05, 02:25 PM
  #37  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Giantrobo
But during the autopsy scene in Alien 3 Newt's corpse seemed older than she did when she went into the sleep thing in ALIENS. The corpse appeared to be at least a teenager.
All three went into hypersleep after Aliens, meaning they wouldn't age. They all would've been the same age.

The girl in Alien 3 looks like a young girl, not really a teenager. Obviously she's a different actress since Newt would've been too old. I'm not sure how you got the impression she was a teenager...at best they show Ripley feeling her chest which is flat as can be. Otherwise you don't even see Newt save for quick cutaways.
Old 09-19-05, 02:29 PM
  #38  
Retired
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 27,449
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Crappy story line with resurrecting Ripley, having her fuck the alien and produce the lame hybrid alien.

Crappy acting from supporting cast.

Crappy dialogue.

Just a failure on every level.
Old 09-19-05, 04:52 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think the acting and dialogue was bad per se, but alot of the plot was not very good and the Xenomorph creatures somehow didn't seem right.
Old 09-19-05, 06:05 PM
  #40  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Numanoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Down in 'The Park'
Posts: 27,881
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by eXcentris
These characters are important characters which are part of a franchise. Newt and Hicks were secondary characters in one film. I don't even have a problem with killing Ripley. Does every Hollywood film have to be made taking possible sequels into consideration? I would hope not. It might have pissed off fans but this has little to do with good moviemaking.
Agreed. The main complaint with Alien 3 is essentially that it has the balls to do something totally unexpected and non-formulaic, to which I give a big .

Alien 3 is my favorite of the series, btw.
Old 09-19-05, 06:07 PM
  #41  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Numanoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Down in 'The Park'
Posts: 27,881
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
As for Resurrection, if for nothing else, you have to give it props for cinema's most overstated and graphic symbolic abortion scene.
Old 09-19-05, 08:44 PM
  #42  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Giantrobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Posts: 63,495
Received 1,925 Likes on 1,184 Posts
Originally Posted by jaeufraser
All three went into hypersleep after Aliens, meaning they wouldn't age. They all would've been the same age.

The girl in Alien 3 looks like a young girl, not really a teenager. Obviously she's a different actress since Newt would've been too old. I'm not sure how you got the impression she was a teenager...at best they show Ripley feeling her chest which is flat as can be. Otherwise you don't even see Newt save for quick cutaways.
ok...fair enough. But the corpse still looked older. Foo on you!
Old 09-19-05, 08:56 PM
  #43  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: not CT
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Numanoid
Alien 3 is my favorite of the series, btw.
Ditto.
Old 09-20-05, 12:28 AM
  #44  
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I liked Alien:Resurrection much better than Alien 3, because Alien 3 was too slow, and boring.
Old 09-20-05, 03:00 AM
  #45  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
UAIOE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: LV-426
Posts: 6,598
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by jaeufraser
All three went into hypersleep after Aliens, meaning they wouldn't age. They all would've been the same age.

The girl in Alien 3 looks like a young girl, not really a teenager. Obviously she's a different actress since Newt would've been too old. I'm not sure how you got the impression she was a teenager...at best they show Ripley feeling her chest which is flat as can be. Otherwise you don't even see Newt save for quick cutaways.
They say in movie that the girl is 12 years old but that could either them taking a guess or just a mistake in the script.

I was under the impression in "Alien 3" that the events weren't that long after "Aliens"...but i could be wrong.
Old 09-20-05, 07:28 AM
  #46  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: L.A., CA
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
which one did joss whedon write? #3 or 4?
Old 09-20-05, 07:34 AM
  #47  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
4.

I had no idea he resented the movie so badly... makes me think lesser of him really, it wasn't *that* bad. Welcome to Hollywood, kid.
Old 09-20-05, 09:20 AM
  #48  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 39,514
Received 676 Likes on 525 Posts
From the interviews of his I read, beneath the verbose whinning, I think it all boils down to his being upset over being credited for something he essentially didn't write. Imagine if you poured your heart and soul into writing something and along the way the whole thing got changed and was completely alien to what you originally penned down. Then they have the gall to say this is what you wrote all along. I guess if that happpens enough you tend to grow bitter.

For the record, I also don't think 4 was all that bad and 3 was better than people give it credit for.
Old 09-20-05, 11:49 AM
  #49  
Needs to contact an admin about multiple accounts
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ALIEN 3 is a magnificent creation.

ALIEN 4 is loads of fun. I've got no problems with it.
Old 09-20-05, 01:36 PM
  #50  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
UAIOE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: LV-426
Posts: 6,598
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Alien 4 would be a great (B) movie...if it didnt have the "Alien" name attached to it.

Sam goes for the 1998 Godzilla. Call it "New York vs. Giant Iguana" and I find it to be very B-movie tolerable.

Both movies failed for me because both had a name that gave fans a certain level of expectation that both never really lived up to.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.