The Ring ... Scariest Movie I'd Ever Seen
#151
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Tyler_Durden
Besides, it really sickens me how American studios are buying rights to foreign films only to keep them off the market for their (mostly inferior) remake. Then people praise the remake as innovative, masterful etc. when it is not only not original but often not as good as the original either.
Besides, it really sickens me how American studios are buying rights to foreign films only to keep them off the market for their (mostly inferior) remake. Then people praise the remake as innovative, masterful etc. when it is not only not original but often not as good as the original either.
As an aside: American cars. Now that is innovation. I won't drive anything less.
#152
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Hey let's keep it clean you guys. It's a nice discussion going on here.
Although on a side note, I rented Stir of Echoes and started watching it tonight--past 11pm PDT--and I had to turn it off. I was watching by myself in the living room with all the lights turned off and I got to the part where
Although on a side note, I rented Stir of Echoes and started watching it tonight--past 11pm PDT--and I had to turn it off. I was watching by myself in the living room with all the lights turned off and I got to the part where
Spoiler:
#153
DVD Talk Limited Edition
I saw this last night. Pretty good flick.
Of course there were about 5 cell phones that went off, 1 kid screaming BOO at the top of his lungs, several loud conversations, and 2 laser pointers. All that for a 6.50 matinee price! No wonder I haven't been to a movie in 6 months.
It does. I think I figured it out pretty well.
Of course there were about 5 cell phones that went off, 1 kid screaming BOO at the top of his lungs, several loud conversations, and 2 laser pointers. All that for a 6.50 matinee price! No wonder I haven't been to a movie in 6 months.
Originally posted by Otto
Fair enough, but it seemed like it meant something.. Oh well.
Fair enough, but it seemed like it meant something.. Oh well.
Spoiler:
#154
DVD Talk Hero
I'll take a shot at a few of these.
Originally posted by superstringtheory
There are things that make little sense:
There are things that make little sense:
Spoiler:
Last edited by Josh-da-man; 10-27-02 at 09:09 AM.
#155
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Originally posted by Rod Thorn
These dern American studios. Sickening aren't they? Japanese studios. That's where it's at.
As an aside: American cars. Now that is innovation. I won't drive anything less.
These dern American studios. Sickening aren't they? Japanese studios. That's where it's at.
As an aside: American cars. Now that is innovation. I won't drive anything less.
#156
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Asgard
very predictable flick. saw it tonight. knew there was no actual ring from the start of the movie, knew the noah was going to get at the end. long and not even half as good as the exorcist. i thought brian cox would be in it more, he was the only bright spot. the best part was when the horse went off the boat.
#157
Cool New Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok.. I saw the movie again today. Still have some questions.
1.) The girl at the beginning that died, why was she joking about it to her friend? Did she not see visions and her nose bleeding like Rachel?
2.) What was all that stuff about the horses keeping her awake? I thought she couldn't sleep anyways.
1.) The girl at the beginning that died, why was she joking about it to her friend? Did she not see visions and her nose bleeding like Rachel?
2.) What was all that stuff about the horses keeping her awake? I thought she couldn't sleep anyways.
#158
DVD Talk Legend
Seen it, and enjoyed it very much.
But I have to admit, I did like the Japanese movie much better when I seen that one in a theatre... then again, I went into that movie 'blind' and knew nothing about it last year.
-k
###
But I have to admit, I did like the Japanese movie much better when I seen that one in a theatre... then again, I went into that movie 'blind' and knew nothing about it last year.
-k
###
#161
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,945
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Los Angeles
Tell me about it....I ordered the Ring Cycle on DVD (Ring, Ring 2, Ring 0) and watched it all last weekend. Ring 2 had a few really creepy parts but I didn't care for Ring 0 that much.
#162
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Burlington, ON, Canada
Originally posted by cali99boy
Ok.. I saw the movie again today. Still have some questions.
1.) The girl at the beginning that died, why was she joking about it to her friend? Did she not see visions and her nose bleeding like Rachel?
Ok.. I saw the movie again today. Still have some questions.
1.) The girl at the beginning that died, why was she joking about it to her friend? Did she not see visions and her nose bleeding like Rachel?
While they obviously don't allude to her nose bleeding, they most certainly do show that she was suffering trauma from watching the video. Remember her diary/scrap book? Also, IIRC, they even make mention of a quote from her, "why can't I stop thinking about... blah blah blah?" (apologies for lack of verbatim!).
2.) What was all that stuff about the horses keeping her awake? I thought she couldn't sleep anyways.
Another thought is that the father put her in the stables to keep her away from the house - and the horses only compounded her madness. And of course, the horses paid the price for their proximity.
Also, the horses represented things that both parents loved dearly. It was their very livelihood. What better way to revenge upon those who cannot bear loving you then destroying their dreams?
Of course, all speculation, but it just goes to show that many of the perceived "holes" could easily be explained - but the filmmakers chose not to delve into exact details.
Sometimes less is more!
-matt
#163
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Chicago, IL
I don't mind accepting less, per se. I actually like the idea of Samara just being born evil. It doesn't quite make sense that everything in the general vicinity went haywire...fish were dying, crops weren't growing, the horses of course, driven into the sea - but daddy is spared because of 'love' she's not supposed to have love, wants to hurt things. Even her mother, we don't really know what she did to piss her off, but it doesn't really matter. It's the fact that her father comes away with no insanity. He wasn't gone all the time and he states that she still gives him messages in the present. Yet, even the townspeople were inflicted by her, so it doesn't gel and becomes a plot filler.
I wasn't really convinced because Samara didn't really creep me out all that much, there was only one moment for me, otherwise I did not find her all too spooky. In fact, Aiden bothered me more, lol.
I wasn't really convinced because Samara didn't really creep me out all that much, there was only one moment for me, otherwise I did not find her all too spooky. In fact, Aiden bothered me more, lol.
#164
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
at CharlesC post a few up.now a few q's
the making of the video above the well makes sense, but how did Becca and Samara's father now about it?
how does Samara kill everyone at the same time. Does she multiply, or is she just talented like that?
how does Samara actually kill them? I know they look like they've been in a well for a few weeks.
Just wondering if these things are unkown, or if I missed something.
#165
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally posted by Xanager
at CharlesC post a few up.
now a few q's
the making of the video above the well makes sense, but how did Becca and Samara's father now about it?
how does Samara kill everyone at the same time. Does she multiply, or is she just talented like that?
how does Samara actually kill them? I know they look like they've been in a well for a few weeks.
Just wondering if these things are unkown, or if I missed something.
at CharlesC post a few up.now a few q's
the making of the video above the well makes sense, but how did Becca and Samara's father now about it?
how does Samara kill everyone at the same time. Does she multiply, or is she just talented like that?
how does Samara actually kill them? I know they look like they've been in a well for a few weeks.
Just wondering if these things are unkown, or if I missed something.
I don't think the dad knew about "The Tape". I think the only tape he knew about was the one he stole from the hospital. The therapy sessions tape. As for Becca, I'm pretty sure she saw how Samarra killed the niece. And she was told of the tape's existence just a few mins before too. That's why she tells Rachel later on, "she'll show you". She being Samarra.
How does she kill everyone? I think pretty much how she killed Noah. Wouldn't you be freaked out if you saw THAT coming out of the TV and going after you? I'm guessing the 2 other friends who died in the car accident were trying to run away from her and got freaked somewhere on the road while the boyfriend basically ran out of room where he was, hence the jump out of the window/rooftop.
How she kills them? I'm guessing by fright and then when she touches you, yeah, you end up like you just spent a week in a deep well.
#167
Suspended
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Philly, PA
OK, I made a different post but didn't realize everyone was posting here, since the original poster here said no spoilers
But anyway...
I thought this was a great movie. I never saw the jappanese versions, and don't plan to since I hate dubbed actors and/or reading subtitles for 2 hours
I didn't think this movie was too scarey when while we were watching it. Maybe it's cuz I had the whole gang there to keep me sane. It didn't really start hitting me till last night when I was trying to go to sleep, it was all dark and I couldn't stop thinking about parts of the movie and I was getting all creeped out, so I ended up having to get my dog to come in and protect me
I really don't think this movie should have been PG-13. R would have been more sufficient, and I'm usually the last one to say something like that... I'm glad it wasn't a gore flick, the fear came from just the disturbing things in the movie and it just built up and built up.
I really hope that Hollywood doesn't wreck it with lame sequels, but I know that they will let me down as usual. Samara is gonna be the next Freddy or Chuckie, mark my words!
But anyway...I thought this was a great movie. I never saw the jappanese versions, and don't plan to since I hate dubbed actors and/or reading subtitles for 2 hours

I didn't think this movie was too scarey when while we were watching it. Maybe it's cuz I had the whole gang there to keep me sane. It didn't really start hitting me till last night when I was trying to go to sleep, it was all dark and I couldn't stop thinking about parts of the movie and I was getting all creeped out, so I ended up having to get my dog to come in and protect me

I really don't think this movie should have been PG-13. R would have been more sufficient, and I'm usually the last one to say something like that... I'm glad it wasn't a gore flick, the fear came from just the disturbing things in the movie and it just built up and built up.
I really hope that Hollywood doesn't wreck it with lame sequels, but I know that they will let me down as usual. Samara is gonna be the next Freddy or Chuckie, mark my words!
#169
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally posted by sinister
very predictable flick. saw it tonight. knew there was no actual ring from the start of the movie, knew the noah was going to get at the end. long and not even half as good as the exorcist. i thought brian cox would be in it more, he was the only bright spot. the best part was when the horse went off the boat.
very predictable flick. saw it tonight. knew there was no actual ring from the start of the movie, knew the noah was going to get at the end. long and not even half as good as the exorcist. i thought brian cox would be in it more, he was the only bright spot. the best part was when the horse went off the boat.
Spoiler:
I thought it was pretty good--4 out of 5 stars. I don't think it'll stick (more the scary-while-watching type movie than nightmare-giving type) but it did creep me out in the theater.
tasha
#170
DVD Talk Legend
OK, I just saw the movie with my girlfriend, for the second time. Its still a creepy freakin movie.
I still have one major question:
At the end of the movie when Rachel talks to Aiden. Aiden says: " You don't understand SHE DOESN"T SLEEP."
AIden says this like it explains everything. What is it supposed to mean? I understand that she doesn't sleep, but why does he say it like it is the most important fact in the move?
Also, he made it sound like helping her was worse than leaving her there. How is it worse, you still die after seven days.
Anyone have any ideas?
I still have one major question:
At the end of the movie when Rachel talks to Aiden. Aiden says: " You don't understand SHE DOESN"T SLEEP."
AIden says this like it explains everything. What is it supposed to mean? I understand that she doesn't sleep, but why does he say it like it is the most important fact in the move?
Also, he made it sound like helping her was worse than leaving her there. How is it worse, you still die after seven days.
Anyone have any ideas?
#171
Suspended - needs to provide a working email
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Region 1
Originally posted by dgeralsh
I still have one major question:
At the end of the movie when Rachel talks to Aiden. Aiden says: " You don't understand SHE DOESN"T SLEEP."
AIden says this like it explains everything. What is it supposed to mean?
I still have one major question:
At the end of the movie when Rachel talks to Aiden. Aiden says: " You don't understand SHE DOESN"T SLEEP."
AIden says this like it explains everything. What is it supposed to mean?
This would also imply that Samara's parents checked her out of the psychiatric hospital and the mother then killed Samara in an attempt to stop her.
Originally posted by dgeralsh
Also, he made it sound like helping her was worse than leaving her there. How is it worse, you still die after seven days.
Also, he made it sound like helping her was worse than leaving her there. How is it worse, you still die after seven days.
That's just the way I see it though and given the way this film leaves these questions open to speculation I'm sure there are other valid opinions out there.
#172
DVD Talk Legend
I've been thinking about it and I'm still hung up on Aiden's statement: "You don't understand SHE NEVER SLEEPS."
I understand that she never sleeps, it was brought up a couple of times in the movie. I am just wondering why it was brought up in THAT contex. That particular conversation was the true climax of the movie. That statement, said at that time, with that amount of stress makes me think I am simply missing something.
I understand that she never sleeps, it was brought up a couple of times in the movie. I am just wondering why it was brought up in THAT contex. That particular conversation was the true climax of the movie. That statement, said at that time, with that amount of stress makes me think I am simply missing something.
#173
Think typical horror film:
When you "free the spirit" of some meddlesome supernatural entity (telling their story, burying them on sacred ground, whatever), that spirit is "at peace" or "at rest" and stops screwing with people. It's the classic horror formula.
Rachel tells Aiden that she freed her spirit and everything's going to be OK now. Aiden's response is just to let her know that her evil isn't going to rest. It's not going to stop simply because "her spirit is at rest" or some silliness. It doesn't have to do with slumber, but the fact that the evil will continue on.
The reason he is so forceful about this is that everything's not alright like Rachel believes. He and Noah are still on her list.
das
When you "free the spirit" of some meddlesome supernatural entity (telling their story, burying them on sacred ground, whatever), that spirit is "at peace" or "at rest" and stops screwing with people. It's the classic horror formula.
Rachel tells Aiden that she freed her spirit and everything's going to be OK now. Aiden's response is just to let her know that her evil isn't going to rest. It's not going to stop simply because "her spirit is at rest" or some silliness. It doesn't have to do with slumber, but the fact that the evil will continue on.
The reason he is so forceful about this is that everything's not alright like Rachel believes. He and Noah are still on her list.
das
Last edited by das Monkey; 10-30-02 at 11:59 AM.
#175
DVD Talk Limited Edition
How much has "The Ring" effected me since I saw it opening night?
Well, I'm still creeped out when I'm at home in the dark....and I still get freaked when I keep coming back to read this thread.
Well, I'm still creeped out when I'm at home in the dark....and I still get freaked when I keep coming back to read this thread.



