DVD Talk Forum

DVD Talk Forum (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/)
-   HD Talk (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/hd-talk-55/)
-   -   Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/hd-talk/624438-lets-talk-about-ultra-hd-blu-ray.html)

Coral 05-13-15 01:53 PM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 
I guess they want to try and piggy-back on the Blu-Ray name and make it feel less like a new format. Will also come in handy when Ultra HD BD players are compatible with standard BD - so people will know it's in the same family (although some may think their current BD player can play 4K - so there's that).

Still DOA. I don't see myself buying an 80"+ TV to notice the upgrade in quality, not to mention having to buy a new player... and I certainly have no desire to re-buy my movies yet again.

orangerunner 05-13-15 02:21 PM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 
Funny enough, it sounds a lot like "HD DVD" - a name that mislead people into thinking the familiar DVD logo meant they could still play them in a regular DVD player.

Shannon Nutt 05-13-15 02:23 PM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 

Originally Posted by orangerunner (Post 12480431)
Funny enough, it sounds a lot like "HD DVD" - a name that mislead people into thinking the familiar DVD logo meant they could still play them in a regular DVD player.

I was thinking the same thing.

I also have zero interest in this format...at least for the foreseeable future.

Supermallet 05-13-15 06:32 PM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 
I could see myself buying new releases on this format if they were shot and mastered in 4k, but I can't think of too many catalog releases I'd shell out the dough for.

RocShemp 05-13-15 07:08 PM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 

Originally Posted by Supermallet (Post 12480714)
I could see myself buying new releases on this format if they were shot and mastered in 4k, but I can't think of too many catalog releases I'd shell out the dough for.

Wasn't the last remaster of Lawrence of Arabia done in 4K? That would be one I'd definitely get.

JimRochester 05-13-15 07:43 PM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 

Originally Posted by Supermallet (Post 12480714)
I could see myself buying new releases on this format if they were shot and mastered in 4k, but I can't think of too many catalog releases I'd shell out the dough for.

Based on the poor sales of catalog titles and the slow release I'd be willing to bet not many titles would even be released on the new format.

PhantomStranger 05-14-15 01:34 AM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 
It's very possible this format sees very few catalog releases. There are many catalog releases on Blu-ray today that barely look better than DVD, much less 4K resolution.

Adam Tyner 05-14-15 06:14 AM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 

Originally Posted by PhantomStranger (Post 12481015)
It's very possible this format sees very few catalog releases. There are many catalog releases on Blu-ray today that barely look better than DVD, much less 4K resolution.

Sure, but a lot of that's due to studios rehashing awful masters from 15+ years ago. No one's really sitting on ancient, low-quality 4K masters, so at least in theory, lackluster looking catalog titles shouldn't be a problem.

The biggest hurdle with 4K is a fundamental lack of content. There might have to be a lot of catalog titles simply because there's so little else. Very, very few films go through the entire post-production process in 4K. Even some of the most lavishly budgeted movies on the planet might shoot in, say, 5K with a RED Epic, but the visual effects and DI will still be 2K. (For instance, The Hobbit trilogy and The Avengers were finished in 2K.) A lot of the "remastered in 4K!" films you see on Blu-ray were scanned at 4K but actually finished in 2K as well. The "funny" thing too is that oversampling produces the best results, so the best looking 4K masters will be the ones scanned at 6K or 8K. :D

You're going to see a lot of upscaled content on Ultra HD Blu-ray. Admittedly, the format has other advantages beyond resolution (colorspace, HDR, more efficient compression), and 2K does have a slightly higher resolution than Blu-ray anyway.

Another crazy thing is that there's not a single television on the market (correct?) that can take advantage of all the bells and whistles of Ultra HD Blu-ray.

milo bloom 05-14-15 09:32 AM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 
So, we found a deal on a UltraHD tv. An LG model for only $999, 60". We've just got the Bluray player and videogame systems hooked up so far, but it still looks nice. Not in any rush for new content, still have a ton of DVDs that I have no plans to upgrade, most look ok upconverted so far.

Supermallet 05-14-15 11:14 AM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 

Originally Posted by Adam Tyner (Post 12481060)
Another crazy thing is that there's not a single television on the market (correct?) that can take advantage of all the bells and whistles of Ultra HD Blu-ray.

Huh? What's the point of the format if 4K TVs can't handle it? I'm confused.

I will say, I assumed adoption of 4K TVs would be a hurdle, but the prices dropped much more quickly for those than they did for 1080i/1080p TVs, and I guess that practically anyone looking for a new TV within the next few years will just default to a 4K TV.

Drexl 05-14-15 11:23 AM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 
I wonder if it could be beneficial to play UHDBDs (-rolleyes-) on a 1080p TV. The idea is that you could have both the luma and the chroma resolution at 1920x1080 instead of just luma at 1920x1080 and chroma at 960x540. It would be like having 4:4:4 HD.

As for the name, "Ultra HD" seems redundant. Ultra should be considered the next step up from high, so that part of the name should be "Ultra Definition." Call it "Ultra Definition Disc," with a manageable UDD abbreviation.

RocShemp 05-14-15 11:56 AM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 

Originally Posted by Supermallet (Post 12481316)
Huh? What's the point of the format if 4K TVs can't handle it? I'm confused.

I will say, I assumed adoption of 4K TVs would be a hurdle, but the prices dropped much more quickly for those than they did for 1080i/1080p TVs, and I guess that practically anyone looking for a new TV within the next few years will just default to a 4K TV.

None of the current UHDTVs on the market meet Rec. 2020 spec. Most don't have HDMI 2.0 and even less are HDCP 2.2 compliant.

You'll have to wait for newer sets (like the upcoming ones with Dolby Vision) to even begin taking advantage of the color space benefits of UHDBD. And the HDCP issue is a big one because copy protected discs will playback at no more than 1080p resolution if your equipment is not HDCP 2.2 compliant.

Supermallet 05-14-15 12:00 PM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 
Oh fer fuck's sake

Good thing I'm not buying a new TV anytime soon.

E Unit 05-14-15 12:25 PM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 
Same here. Maybe in the next 3-4 years. But I have a Sharp 65" in my theater room that I don't use nearly enough. I have a lot of time for all of this hoopla to play itself off. My preliminary guess is that still will fail fairly soon after takeoff. I don't want it to, I love seeing 4k in all its glory, but we'll see little to zero support from just about all of the studios on this.

RocShemp 05-14-15 01:21 PM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 

Originally Posted by Supermallet (Post 12481370)
Oh fer fuck's sake

Good thing I'm not buying a new TV anytime soon.

Ditto.

mattysemo247 05-14-15 02:02 PM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 
I'm still rocking my 1080P Samsung DLP from about 7 years ago. The TV still rocks and has only needed the bulb replaced a couple years ago. My Dad has a Panasonic plasma but I still think the blacks look better on mine :)

Josh Z 05-14-15 03:43 PM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 

Originally Posted by Supermallet (Post 12481370)
Oh fer fuck's sake

Good thing I'm not buying a new TV anytime soon.

Yes, the rollout and timing of all these critical features has been a total clusterfuck that practically no one in the intended consumer target audience understands at all.

A year from now, trying explaining to someone that the alleged 4k TV they bought in mid to late 2015 is not compatible with the 4k UHDBD player released in early 2016 because it doesn't have the right type of HDMI input on the back.

stvn1974 05-14-15 04:42 PM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 
When my 1080P Sony dies I will just go back to reading books by candlelight.

bruceames 05-14-15 05:33 PM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 

Originally Posted by RocShemp (Post 12481366)
None of the current UHDTVs on the market meet Rec. 2020 spec. Most don't have HDMI 2.0 and even less are HDCP 2.2 compliant.

That's hard to believe. Without HDCP 2.2 you're not getting 4K content period (unless it's from youtube or your camcorder). I have a 2013 model and it has both HDMI 2.0 (all ports) and HDCP 2.2 (port 4).

RocShemp 05-14-15 07:57 PM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 

Originally Posted by bruceames (Post 12481807)
That's hard to believe. Without HDCP 2.2 you're not getting 4K content period (unless it's from youtube or your camcorder). I have a 2013 model and it has both HDMI 2.0 (all ports) and HDCP 2.2 (port 4).

If the video isn't copy protected (like via streaming, youtube, or any non-protected discs), you can view 4K content. If it's copy protected then you get restrictions.

popegregFKAgoblin23 05-15-15 02:54 AM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 

Originally Posted by RocShemp (Post 12481366)
None of the current UHDTVs on the market meet Rec. 2020 spec. Most don't have HDMI 2.0 and even less are HDCP 2.2 compliant.

You'll have to wait for newer sets (like the upcoming ones with Dolby Vision) to even begin taking advantage of the color space benefits of UHDBD. And the HDCP issue is a big one because copy protected discs will playback at no more than 1080p resolution if your equipment is not HDCP 2.2 compliant.

Or for those who have a 2013 or later Samsung 4K set, you can *hope* that this functionality is included in a future Evolution kit. I'm betting it will be.

RocShemp 05-15-15 09:23 AM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 

Originally Posted by goblin23 (Post 12482236)
Or for those who have a 2013 or later Samsung 4K set, you can *hope* that this functionality is included in a future Evolution kit. I'm betting it will be.

HDMI 2.0 and HDCP 2.2 compliance are a safe bet. Rec. 2020, however, is unlikely. As far as I understand, that's a panel limitation. So unless the Evolution kit includes a brand new TV, you won't have a Rec. 2020 compliant UHDTV.

Although there is some dissent regarding Rec. 2020. It's believed by some that the new color space is so wide that certain people might have radically different perceptions of the same colors. Similar to the issue with the infamous dress.

zyzzle 05-15-15 04:42 PM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 
Most of the clusterfuck has to do with DRM and copy protection... I'll say that if the studios, MPAA, et al just got their heads out their asses and realized it's a losing battle, they could get on with making money and advancing hidef without all the confusion and platitudes.

That said, I *still* wouldn't upgrade since I'd need an 80"+ set and/or a projection screen in a huge home theatre room to be able to easilly tell the difference between 4k and 1080p...

popegregFKAgoblin23 05-16-15 02:21 AM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 

Originally Posted by RocShemp (Post 12482396)
HDMI 2.0 and HDCP 2.2 compliance are a safe bet. Rec. 2020, however, is unlikely. As far as I understand, that's a panel limitation. So unless the Evolution kit includes a brand new TV, you won't have a Rec. 2020 compliant UHDTV.

Although there is some dissent regarding Rec. 2020. It's believed by some that the new color space is so wide that certain people might have radically different perceptions of the same colors. Similar to the issue with the infamous dress.

Ah I see Rec. 2020 will require a 10 or 12 bit panel. Well at least my Samsung HU8550 supports HDCP 2.2 already.

Josh-da-man 05-16-15 03:16 AM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 

Originally Posted by Supermallet (Post 12480714)
I could see myself buying new releases on this format if they were shot and mastered in 4k, but I can't think of too many catalog releases I'd shell out the dough for.

Star Wars
Lord of the Rings
Alien/Aliens
Indiana Jones
Pulp Fiction
Jaws

That's about all I'd be willing to upgrade to UHD.

Since I got a blu-ray player, I'd say that I haven't upgraded probably 90% of my DVDs, and I'll still buy DVDs for some older 'cult' titles that aren't going to benefit much from 1080p.

This holds moreso for UHDBR. Blu-ray and DVD are going to be good enough for 99% of my library.

Josh-da-man 05-16-15 03:18 AM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 

Originally Posted by zyzzle (Post 12482875)
Most of the clusterfuck has to do with DRM and copy protection... I'll say that if the studios, MPAA, et al just got their heads out their asses and realized it's a losing battle, they could get on with making money and advancing hidef without all the confusion and platitudes.

Never gonna happen. DRM and copy protection are like a security blanket for the industry; they want to drag it around all of the time even though it isn't doing anything to keep the monsters away.

Adam Tyner 06-24-15 09:30 AM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 
From The Hollywood Reporter:

Fox Home Entertainment is releasing its first titles in Ultra HD resolution with high dynamic range (HDR): Kingsman: The Secret Service, The Maze Runner, Life of Pi and Exodus: Gods and Kings.

The new titles are part of a beta launch, through which consumers can purchase these movies on M-GO and download them to their Samsung Video Pack, for viewing on Samsung SUHDTVs, which support UHD and HDR. (Fox previously supplied clips from Pi and Exodus for Samsung demonstrations).

Fox intends to support additional HDR formats as the hardware enters the market. For instance, Ultra HD Blu-ray players are expected in the market during Q4, and Fox is also planning to support this format at launch.

Josh Z 06-24-15 10:23 AM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 
Life of Pi, Kingsman and Maze Runner were all shot with the Arri Alexa, which is a 2k camera. So those will all be upconverts. Only Exodus was shot with a higher resolution camera (the RED Epic Dragon). None of these movies was shot with High Dynamic Range in mind, so they'll all have to be regraded.

Drexl 06-24-15 10:25 AM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 
Christ, how many acronyms do we need? Now "HDR" is a thing?

hanshotfirst1138 06-24-15 10:54 AM

HDR photography has been around a while, I think.


Originally Posted by Josh Z (Post 12517602)
Life of Pi, Kingsman and Maze Runner were all shot with the Arri Alexa, which is a 2k camera. So those will all be upconverts. Only Exodus was shot with a higher resolution camera (the RED Epic Dragon). None of these movies was shot with High Dynamic Range in mind, so they'll all have to be regraded.

I think that Exodus's DI was done at 2K.

Paul_SD 06-24-15 01:12 PM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 
HDR and an expanded color gamut

:lol:

UltraHD is going to be mainly a repository for new and recent (last 10 years) movies.
In other words, about 50% of this product is going to be heavily digitally processed ( jacked around contrast, desaturation), and digitally color graded (emphasis on blues & green & oranges).
For every film like Guardians of the Galaxy that actually does make use of a full bodied range of hues, we're gonna get 5 Exoduses, Gone Girls, and Man Of Steels.

Whoo Hoo! Here's my money- Sign me up!

Josh Z 06-24-15 02:06 PM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 

Originally Posted by hanshotfirst1138 (Post 12517627)
HDR photography has been around a while, I think.

Only if by "a while" you mean one month. There are only two genuine HDR movies so far: Tomorrowland and Inside Out.

hanshotfirst1138 06-24-15 04:14 PM

I think it's been around significantly longer in still photography.

jjcool 06-24-15 04:16 PM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 
It certainly has.

Giles 06-24-15 05:00 PM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 
the aforementioned titles BETTER have their object based audio mixes on the 4K discs.

maybe this time - Fox can fix the PQ problems on 'The King and I' bluray and get it right this time around.

Why So Blu? 06-24-15 06:14 PM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 
I'm not going to actively pursue it but if we get some comped gear from the manufacturers then we'll be all for it. Someone had asked me "what about UHD reviews?" and I was like: we'll, looks like we ain't gonna review them then. I'm not investing in new gear.

zyzzle 06-24-15 08:50 PM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 
Yep, sad that 99% of 4k offerings will be the digitally-tweaked garbage of the last 10 years. Where the extra resolution would be highly apparant is in the older 35mm masters from the 1940s to 1970s and, of course the 65 and 70mm epics, etc. Chances of getting *any* of those in the format are somewhere between "not at all" and "slim to none."

So, epic failure on the whole 4k fad for me, in other words.

BuckNaked2k 06-24-15 09:58 PM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 
Has anyone seen the sales thread lately? Blu-ray is down 15% for the year, and is still outsold 2:1 by DVD. I can't see how there will be much of appetite for this next generation stuff.

PhantomStranger 06-24-15 10:24 PM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 

Originally Posted by BuckNaked2k (Post 12518387)
Has anyone seen the sales thread lately? Blu-ray is down 15% for the year, and is still outsold 2:1 by DVD. I can't see how there will be much of appetite for this next generation stuff.

There will be an initial wave of enthusiasm from technologically astute home theater owners.

I think what type of signals Hollywood sends to the mass market will play a critical role in UHD's acceptance. If consumers see Hollywood hedging their bets with the format and holding back on pushing the format into the marketplace, it's game over before UHD ever really started.

Drexl 06-24-15 10:30 PM

Re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
 

Originally Posted by zyzzle (Post 12518318)
Yep, sad that 99% of 4k offerings will be the digitally-tweaked garbage of the last 10 years. Where the extra resolution would be highly apparant is in the older 35mm masters from the 1940s to 1970s and, of course the 65 and 70mm epics, etc. Chances of getting *any* of those in the format are somewhere between "not at all" and "slim to none."

So, epic failure on the whole 4k fad for me, in other words.

I wouldn't say that. I would be very surprised if we don't get at least a handful of major titles the studios really care about like Lawrence of Arabia, Casablanca, Citizen Kane, etc. Warner loves to reissue The Wizard of Oz and Gone with the Wind. Some of these already have 4K masters.

I wouldn't expect a lot of them, but there are certain films that (apparently) still sell well enough for them to do it.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:06 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.