Star Wars
#2151
re: Star Wars
Here's a funny post made on the blu-ray.com thread:
Originally Posted by C A Iversen
I wonder if it's possible that Lucas turned up at James Earl Jones' house and told him what scene he was planning to insert audio into and Jones basically said "No.....Noooooooo!"
And Lucas stood up and said, "that'll do nicely James" and walked out with his pocket recording device?
I wonder if it's possible that Lucas turned up at James Earl Jones' house and told him what scene he was planning to insert audio into and Jones basically said "No.....Noooooooo!"
And Lucas stood up and said, "that'll do nicely James" and walked out with his pocket recording device?
#2152
DVD Talk Legend
re: Star Wars
Exactly. Once he releases the remastered originals he's done (besides 3d). It's the same thing he did with DVD - wait until the format's almost dead and then release the originals as a last gasp (he packaged them with re-releases of the SE's knowing we'd buy the same crap again just to get the originals) - and he'll do it again with blu-ray.
I bought the first DVD set (the silver 2004 set), but I would have gladly bought the versions with the originals had they been 16x9. I even remember when that was announced, I kinda did an eye-rolling, "that's my Lucas" kind of reaction, but I immediately put them in my DVDAficionado wishlist (I took them right out when the truth was revealed). But the point was I could have lived with that kind of double dip.
These Blu-rays never even made it to my DVDAf wishlist. I almost wish I had pre-ordered so I could cancel it also.
I'll live with my DVD versions, but I've also got three widescreen VHS sets and two different laserdisc sets of the originals. I can wait out Lucas.
#2154
DVD Talk Legend
re: Star Wars
It bears repeating: I'd settle for 16x9 DVDs of the 97 SE's at this point.
#2156
re: Star Wars
I'm not trying to change Lucas' mind or start a boycott or anything. There's no way I'd be able to enjoy these movies with all the idiotic changes that have been made, so I am not going to buy the blu-rays. End of story.
#2157
re: Star Wars
My take on all these changes (after 86 pages) as a former 'LucasFan': I'd be cool with whatever modifications he wants to make - heck, I might even be excited about them - if he just made proper restorations of the originals available. Folks wouldn't be as critical as they are now. Of course, with a legion of rear-smooching yes-men surrounding him, the outside criticism means nothing to him, and he continues to stand firmly in his film-history-defacing ways. His McCallums will tell him that it's just a small group of bitter fans that are crying foul on blogs and twitter. When you get as much criticism as Lucas has gotten - and God knows he's gotten a lot of shit since 1983, a great deal of it well-deserved - a survival mechanism kicks in and at a certain point you learn to phase it out.
That said, I think Lucas was receptive to criticism in 1999, based on the lack of Jar-Jar screentime in episodes 2 and 3. There were many other problems with episode 1, but none as obvious as Jar-Jar and practically every single newspaper and magazine review in the world noted it. He listened then.
Today, it's just a bunch of bitter purists. He doesn't care.
In his defense, we're asking him to spend a couple million on restorations that probably won't recoup the investment.
But, whatever. I'm taking the discussion back 50 pages. I pre-ordered the set and at least I've got those deleted scenes to look forward to.
#2158
re: Star Wars
I've never been a fan of any of the changes ('97, '04, '11). I will always prefer the original versions that I grew up watching and I would pay a premium for the original unaltered trilogy on Blu-ray. However, I just don't take Star Wars that seriously anymore to get all worked up about it. After my son was born, I started to completely mellow out about stuff like this. I hope we will get the UOT on BD someday, but I'm going to buy this release in the meantime. Sure, I'll cringe during certain scenes (Jabba in ANH, Jedi Rocks, Hayden's ghost, Vader leaving Cloud City, etc)...but I can still enjoy the films for what they are...and I'm charged to see a lot of the extras.
I don't know what to think about re-watching the Prequels though...I don't really enjoy any of them...even ROTS. "The Clone Wars" series is better than anything Lucas has put out in years...it's what the PT should have been in my opinion...
#2159
DVD Talk Gold Edition
re: Star Wars
This would be a DAY 1 purchase for me that dare I say I would even pay MSRP of probably what $89.99 for say just the original trilogy restored? I imagine most here would as well, and I'm guessing at that MSRP it would probably be about $50 on release day. Unless you are talking more than say $10 million or so(you said a "couple") I don't see how he would not. And mind you I would buy the complete saga as well to have the PT and all the extras. Just as long as I knew I could also get, albeit seperately the UOT.
#2162
DVD Talk Hero
re: Star Wars

Last edited by RocShemp; 09-01-11 at 12:04 PM.
#2163
DVD Talk Legend
re: Star Wars
I probably wouldn't notice or care (this much) about most of these changes, but the double "No" from Vader in ROTJ almost makes me want to pass simply because Lucas ruined one of the greatest scenes of the entire series.
#2164
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
re: Star Wars
I'm not seeing much of a difference? The bottom shot is just brighter and the color is a bit different. Even 3P0 looks different. Doesn't look like anything's changed, or am I missing something?
EDIT: I guess he is reflecting more light off certain surfaces. Huh, nice find...
EDIT: I guess he is reflecting more light off certain surfaces. Huh, nice find...
#2165
DVD Talk Gold Edition
re: Star Wars
I'm not seeing much of a difference? The bottom shot is just brighter and the color is a bit different. Even 3P0 looks different. Doesn't look like anything's changed, or am I missing something?
EDIT: I guess he is reflecting more light off certain surfaces. Huh, nice find...
EDIT: I guess he is reflecting more light off certain surfaces. Huh, nice find...
#2166
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#2167
DVD Talk Hero
re: Star Wars
^ Don't forget the extra rocks. Boy, if I had a dime for every time I've heard someone complain about the lack of rocks in Star Wars for the last 34 years...
#2168
DVD Talk Legend
re: Star Wars
Star Wars
Star Wars The Empire Strikes Back
Star Wars Return Of The Jedi
For some reason the Episode IV A New Hope and so on have bothered me.
#2170
DVD Talk Hero
#2171
re: Star Wars
I too canceled my pre-order. With lackluster special features and the near certainty that the untampered originals would not be included, I was already on the fence. The new changes are just another in a long list of reasons not to buy. Maybe I'll pick it up used one day if nothing better comes along.
#2172
re: Star Wars
I started losing my interest in Star Wars the day tickets for Phantom Menace went on sale. I got there six hours before the theater opened. The line was already around the building. After I waited for two hours, I finally realized that the movie would be the same no matter when I saw it, so why spend half my day waiting in line?
And in the years since, I realized that there are way, way, way too many other films out there to spend so much time worrying about just three of them.
I'd pay $90 for the original films I love. But if they aren't available, fuck it. I'll watch something else.
#2174
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
re: Star Wars
Dear,
Your order has been successfully canceled. For your reference, here's a summary of your order:
You just canceled order #xxx-xxxxx-xxxxx placed on January 6, 2011.
Status: CANCELED
_____________________________________________________________________
1 of Star Wars: The Complete Saga (Episodes I-VI) [Blu-ray]
By: Mark Hamill, et al
Sold by: Amazon.com LLC
Cancelled Reason: Other -
George Lucas
Your order has been successfully canceled. For your reference, here's a summary of your order:
You just canceled order #xxx-xxxxx-xxxxx placed on January 6, 2011.
Status: CANCELED
_____________________________________________________________________
1 of Star Wars: The Complete Saga (Episodes I-VI) [Blu-ray]
By: Mark Hamill, et al
Sold by: Amazon.com LLC
Cancelled Reason: Other -
George Lucas
#2175
DVD Talk Special Edition
re: Star Wars
A famous man once said...
and...
and recently said...
To me, film is historical document and therefore it has practical value. People 500 years from now will look at our films and be able to figure out what we were like...They are technological extensions of, a derivation from, the comic strip.
A copyright is held in trust by its owner until it ultimately reverts to public domain. American works of art belong to the American public; they are part of our cultural history.
People who alter or destroy works of art and our cultural heritage for profit or as an exercise of power are barbarians, and if the laws of the United States continue to condone this behavior, history will surely classify us as a barbaric society. The preservation of our cultural heritage may not seem to be as politically sensitive an issue as "when life begins" or "when it should be appropriately terminated," but it is important because it goes to the heart of what sets mankind apart. Creative expression is at the core of our humanness. Art is a distinctly human endeavor. We must have respect for it if we are to have any respect for the human race.
These current defacements are just the beginning. Today, engineers with their computers can add color to black-and-white movies, change the soundtrack, speed up the pace, and add or subtract material to the philosophical tastes of the copyright holder. Tommorrow, more advanced technology will be able to replace actors with "fresher faces," or alter dialogue and change the movement of the actor's lips to match. It will soon be possible to create a new "original" negative with whatever changes or alterations the copyright holder of the moment desires. The copyright holders, so far, have not been completely diligent in preserving the original negatives of films they control. In order to reconstruct old negatives, many archivists have had to go to Eastern bloc countries where American films have been better preserved.
In the future it will become even easier for old negatives to become lost and be "replaced" by new altered negatives. This would be a great loss to our society. Our cultural history must not be allowed to be rewritten.
The public's interest is ultimately dominant over all other interests. And the proof of that is that even a copyright law only permits the creators and their estate a limited amount of time to enjoy the economic fruits of that work.
People who alter or destroy works of art and our cultural heritage for profit or as an exercise of power are barbarians, and if the laws of the United States continue to condone this behavior, history will surely classify us as a barbaric society. The preservation of our cultural heritage may not seem to be as politically sensitive an issue as "when life begins" or "when it should be appropriately terminated," but it is important because it goes to the heart of what sets mankind apart. Creative expression is at the core of our humanness. Art is a distinctly human endeavor. We must have respect for it if we are to have any respect for the human race.
These current defacements are just the beginning. Today, engineers with their computers can add color to black-and-white movies, change the soundtrack, speed up the pace, and add or subtract material to the philosophical tastes of the copyright holder. Tommorrow, more advanced technology will be able to replace actors with "fresher faces," or alter dialogue and change the movement of the actor's lips to match. It will soon be possible to create a new "original" negative with whatever changes or alterations the copyright holder of the moment desires. The copyright holders, so far, have not been completely diligent in preserving the original negatives of films they control. In order to reconstruct old negatives, many archivists have had to go to Eastern bloc countries where American films have been better preserved.
In the future it will become even easier for old negatives to become lost and be "replaced" by new altered negatives. This would be a great loss to our society. Our cultural history must not be allowed to be rewritten.
The public's interest is ultimately dominant over all other interests. And the proof of that is that even a copyright law only permits the creators and their estate a limited amount of time to enjoy the economic fruits of that work.
As a filmmaker and a lover of cinema, I have always appreciated the many disciplines that go into making a film-- the props, the costumes, all the aspects that come together to make the whole as great as the sum of its parts. I have archived all the important pieces from my own films, and I am a staunch believer it's important that we all make an effort to preserve our cinematic heritage-- before it's too late.




