![]() |
re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by Josh Z
(Post 10605871)
Except for Gen. Grievous, of course. D'oh! Plot hole...
|
re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
(Post 10605930)
What evidence do we have the Greivous uses the Force? He wields lightsabers, but not in a way that the Jedi or Sith do. And he gets knocked about pretty badly by Obi-Wan using the Force.
|
re: Star Wars
The mystery of why Mark Hamill breaks character and shouts "Carrie!" when exiting the X-Wing is now solved!
http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/7432/...sbeerxwing.gif |
re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by Josh Z
(Post 10606046)
Admittedly, it's been a while since I've watched Revenge of the Sith. Doesn't he do Force Pushes? Maybe that's in the original Clone Wars animated series (the Tartakovsky one)? Or maybe I'm misremembering it, but I thought he did.
So in conclusion, I don't know :) |
re: Star Wars
I don't think Grievous is ever supposed to be indicated to have Force powers. He's a cyborg with the mind of a military leader so his tactical abilities are old fashioned training and natural talent. The bit with the lightsabers is the machine parts of him giving him the speed and reflexes necessary to handle (most Jedi) in saber content. As we see in ROTS, once he goes up against someone like Obi Wan, his non-Jedi limitations quickly show up.
|
re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by MinLShaw
(Post 10605892)
Can you imagine being told you don't have the right blood cell count to be a Catholic?
|
re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by Josh Z
(Post 10606046)
Admittedly, it's been a while since I've watched Revenge of the Sith. Doesn't he do Force Pushes? Maybe that's in the original Clone Wars animated series (the Tartakovsky one)? Or maybe I'm misremembering it, but I thought he did.
Originally Posted by milo bloom
(Post 10606473)
Not to drag this too off topic, but isn't Jewish lineage fairly dependent on your bloodline? And I believe you have to show a certain amount of Native American ancestry to get certain things from the US government? The SW movies have plenty of issues, but there's also plenty of little details that Lucas took from real life.
|
re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
(Post 10606505)
You can be born into Judaism or you can convert. However, neither method gives you the ability to use the Force.
|
re: Star Wars
Spoiler:
|
re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by Jason
(Post 10606290)
I don't think there's anything in the movies that indicate Grievous is force sensitive, but in making a quick google search about it, I saw something from the comics about Grievous being the recipient of a transfusion from Jedi Master Sifo-Dyas (who ordered the clone army). Supposedly Dooku had killed him and kept him on ice for a while. So in the expanded universe (which is all non-canon), he might have some force abilities.
So in conclusion, I don't know :) |
re: Star Wars
Interesting. It never even crossed my mind that Grievous might be force sensitive. I always took it like Jason said. He's a warrior who just happens to have taught himself some badass saber skills.
|
re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
(Post 10606505)
You can be born into Judaism or you can convert. However, neither method gives you the ability to use the Force.
|
re: Star Wars
:lol: Nice.
|
re: Star Wars
That was smart :lol:
|
re: Star Wars
Since we know for sure that these blu-rays will not contain the theatrical version of the original trilogy, does anyone think the films will be further altered yet again? Maybe this is just more wishful thinking, but since Lucas clearly has zero intention of giving the original releases proper treatment, it would be nice if he corrected SOME things that are globally hated. Like maybe Han shooting first, or re-doing the Jabba scene from IV making him look more like he did in VI. Or maybe he'll make more alterations and fuck it up even further. I don't know
|
re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by Imail724
(Post 10609480)
Since we know for sure that these blu-rays will not contain the theatrical version of the original trilogy, does anyone think the films will be further altered yet again? Maybe this is just more wishful thinking, but since Lucas clearly has zero intention of giving the original releases proper treatment, it would be nice if he corrected SOME things that are globally hated. Like maybe Han shooting first, or re-doing the Jabba scene from IV making him look more like he did in VI. Or maybe he'll make more alterations and fuck it up even further. I don't know
|
re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by Imail724
(Post 10609480)
Or maybe he'll make more alterations and fuck it up even further.
|
re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by Imail724
(Post 10609480)
Since we know for sure that these blu-rays will not contain the theatrical version of the original trilogy, does anyone think the films will be further altered yet again?
|
re: Star Wars
All he needs to do is put Sebastian Shaw back in the ending of ROTJ and I'll be happy.
|
re: Star Wars
George Lucas went through each movie frame by frame. He's bound to have found many things he wants changed.
|
re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by BobSchlapowitz
(Post 10609917)
All he needs to do is put Sebastian Shaw back in the ending of ROTJ and I'll be happy.
|
re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by MinLShaw
(Post 10609872)
I've said for years that what I look forward to most is the inevitable tampering with the prequels. I'm eager to see how the generation that thought the OT crowd over-reacted handles "their" movies being tweaked. And you know what? I'm so used to it by now that I'm actually curious to see what's different about these movies come September.
At least he can't f-up the prequels. |
re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by Ignohippo
(Post 10611092)
At least he can't f-up the prequels.
|
re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by Ignohippo
(Post 10611092)
At least he can't f-up the prequels.
|
re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by Ignohippo
(Post 10611092)
At least he can't f-up the prequels.
But then, maybe we'll get a 20 minute real time class lecture from Yoda about the science of midichlorians, the pod race will be even longer and all of Natalie Portman's performance will be replaced with outtakes that were even worse. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:29 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.