![]() |
Re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by slop101
(Post 13638757)
I don't get it. What does "maclunkey" mean?
|
Re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by slop101
(Post 13638757)
I don't get it. What does "maclunkey" mean?
|
Re: Star Wars
That scene looks even more maclunkey than it previously did.
|
Re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by dex14
(Post 13638764)
That scene looks even more maclunkey than it previously did.
|
Re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by slop101
(Post 13638757)
I don't get it. What does "maclunkey" mean?
|
Re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by orangerunner
(Post 13638741)
I see a few vendors on eBay are selling the "Despecialized" trilogy on Blu-ray. You have to wonder how long they can continue to sell these obviously unlicensed versions.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Star-Wars-O...sAAOSwxmddcwk- |
Re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by orangerunner
(Post 13638777)
I just means the marketing team at Disney have created a cheap way to promote their brand and keep people talking until the new movie comes out.
Disney didn't do this change. There's no reason for it, since it could've potentially pissed off fans and George Lucas alike. On the other hand, George Lucas sneaking in some last minute changes before selling off his studio makes perfect sense. |
Re: Star Wars
Apparently Sebulba in TPM said "maclunkey" which means "This'll be the end of you" or something.
|
Re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by stvn1974
(Post 13638790)
Apparently Sebulba in TPM said "maclunkey" which means "This'll be the end of you" or something.
|
Re: Star Wars
I wonder if Maclunkey is on the new BD's as well.
|
Re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by bunkaroo
(Post 13638839)
I wonder if Maclunkey is on the new BD's as well.
https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Star-...7/#UserReviews Nothing new..... I bought this movie, along with Empire, Jedi and the prequels. It is the first time being released under Disney. The packaging is fantastic. Epic even. They even put cool pics on the discs as well. Unfortunately the material on the disc are the same as before, right down to the FBI warning [FOX] and the menus. Really Mouse house??? I know the Fox releases were excellent, but come on...... A screenshot comparison: Luke - Frame Comparison - Screenshot Comparison made easy Also, people are saying the image looks comparable to this Reliance MediaWorks Image Processing Demo Reel from a few years ago. check out the clips at 0:12, 0:43, 0:58, 1:24 and a few shots in the ending montage at 1:50 . |
Re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by bunkaroo
(Post 13638839)
I wonder if Maclunkey is on the new BD's as well.
Edit: Another major piece of evidence that these are new scans (not that anyone's doubting this fact) is that the reel in RotJ that was scanned out of focus in the DVDs and bds looks correct now. |
Re: Star Wars
|
Re: Star Wars
so weird the shit they tinker with in these movies.
|
Re: Star Wars
Why can't we just go back to the original version?
|
Re: Star Wars
And lose years of fucked up changes? I think not sir. |
Re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by PhantomStranger
(Post 13638970)
Why can't we just go back to the original version?
I think putting the originals as a "bonus" on a Blu-ray box set is still likely, but for watching on TV, online purchase, or Disney+, you're going to get his altered versions. Regarding the new sky: I read that the Lowry 4K restoration was done in anticipation of the 3D re-releases Lucas was planning for each film. What if the new sky is footage that exists in 3D? Like, they were looking at the work to make that scene 3D, realized that they had already cut out and replaced the sky once before, so were like, "screw it, we'll just replace the sky again." |
Re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by slop101
(Post 13638757)
I don't get it. What does "maclunkey" mean?
|
Re: Star Wars
|
Re: Star Wars
The Greedo edit is getting attention because it's so odd. It literally makes no sense, unlike the reason Lucas changed the scene in the first place (because he wanted Han to appear less cold-blooded).
|
Re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by Shannon Nutt
(Post 13639116)
The Greedo edit is getting attention because it's so odd. It literally makes no sense, unlike the reason Lucas changed the scene in the first place (because he wanted Han to appear less cold-blooded).
|
Re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by Shannon Nutt
(Post 13639116)
The Greedo edit is getting attention because it's so odd. It literally makes no sense, unlike the reason Lucas changed the scene in the first place (because he wanted Han to appear less cold-blooded).
|
Re: Star Wars
Lucas' last words on his death bed: They shot at the same time
|
Re: Star Wars
The Han Shot First scene is annoying, but the worst change he made to the OT was to have Vader bellow out "nooooooooo" when he throws the Emperor down the shaft. The silence was so perfect in the original, I can't watch the new version because it basically ruins the scene.
|
Re: Star Wars
Originally Posted by atrium
(Post 13639433)
The Han Shot First scene is annoying, but the worst change he made to the OT was to have Vader bellow out "nooooooooo" when he throws the Emperor down the shaft. The silence was so perfect in the original, I can't watch the new version because it basically ruins the scene.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:20 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.