Community
Search
HD Talk The place to discuss Blu-ray, 4K and all other forms and formats of HD and HDTV.

Star Wars

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-17 | 06:28 PM
  #4251  
GoldenJCJ's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 32,866
Received 4,893 Likes on 3,060 Posts
From: Colorado
Re: Star Wars

^ Theres definitely a "final straw" feeling to the changes in these movies. One or two changes in and of themselves may not have been a deal breaker but all the little unneeded changes finally added up enough from this last release that I feel it's no longer the trilogy I grew up loving.

For me that final straw was Vader's "Nooo!" at the end of Jedi. Aside from being 100% unnecessary, it was a giant "fuck you" to fans after the backlash from Vader's "Noooo!" at the end of RotS. (I know, the technology just wasn't there in 1983 to have Vader say "No").

I realize I'm beating the bones of a long dead horse.
Old 05-13-17 | 06:52 PM
  #4252  
stvn1974's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 9,687
Received 1,502 Likes on 822 Posts
From: Oklahoma
Re: Star Wars

My brother was with me at FYE the other day and he picked up the Complete Saga set and asked me why I didn't have it and if I wanted it. I yelled out "NO, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO" and took it from him and put it back on the shelf.
Old 05-13-17 | 07:51 PM
  #4253  
Josh-da-man's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 49,644
Received 4,557 Likes on 2,996 Posts
From: The Bible Belt
Re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Alan Smithee
I wouldn't buy it even for $1.
I find that difficult to believe.
Old 05-13-17 | 08:00 PM
  #4254  
OldBoy's Avatar
TOTY Winner 2018 and Inane Thread Master
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 54,221
Received 1,740 Likes on 1,425 Posts
From: "Are any of us really anywhere?"
Re: Star Wars

I don't think I've even seen the doctored Jedi. Have no recollection of Vader saying that. When does it come?
Old 05-13-17 | 08:03 PM
  #4255  
stvn1974's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 9,687
Received 1,502 Likes on 822 Posts
From: Oklahoma
Re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by OldBoy
I don't think I've even seen the doctored Jedi. Have no recollection of Vader saying that. When does it come?
During the best part of the entire fucking saga. When Vader is looking back and forth between Luke and the Emperor as Luke is being tortured before Vader turns and throws the Emperor down the shaft.

I am convinced that Lucas knew how much people hated the NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO in Revenge of The Sith so he added one to Jedi as a last middle finger to the fans.
Old 05-13-17 | 08:09 PM
  #4256  
OldBoy's Avatar
TOTY Winner 2018 and Inane Thread Master
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 54,221
Received 1,740 Likes on 1,425 Posts
From: "Are any of us really anywhere?"
Re: Star Wars

Ugh, that's just terrible. Doesn't even seem necessary. What did he want some emotional continuity with Vader? That is hideous...
Old 05-13-17 | 08:32 PM
  #4257  
Michael Corvin's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 63,473
Received 1,379 Likes on 945 Posts
From: Louisville, KY
Re: Star Wars

Most of the changes are superflous and fine. Greedo shooting first? Eh. Crappy CG Jabba? Ok. Changing rock placement? Whatthefuckever. All the Cloud City changes are actually quite brilliant.

The straw that broke the camel's back for me is putting Hayden fucking Christiansen in Jedi. I can avoid the stink of the PT easy enough, but forcing part of that shitfest into the OT? Fucking terrible. Same goes for getting rid of the Nub Nub song ending so we can see CG shots of PT planets and people celebrating. Fuck that.
Old 05-13-17 | 09:24 PM
  #4258  
Mike86's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 25,745
Received 1,413 Likes on 1,089 Posts
From: South Dakota
Re: Star Wars

CG Jabba is pretty bad just because of how shitty it looks. It's unbelievable that they can't at least make it look better than it did when it was first added in 97.
Old 05-13-17 | 09:33 PM
  #4259  
Josh-da-man's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 49,644
Received 4,557 Likes on 2,996 Posts
From: The Bible Belt
Re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Mike86
CG Jabba is pretty bad just because of how shitty it looks. It's unbelievable that they can't at least make it look better than it did when it was first added in 97.
The Jabba on the DVD and blu-ray looks better than the '97 one, but it's still problematic because Harrison Ford was interacting with a human actor and not something the size of the Jabba as stablished in ROTJ, so Han has to leap over Jabba's tail and his hand moves through Jabba's body.

It's a pointless scene that looks like shit and adds nothing to the movie since it's just a rehash of the coversation Han just had with Greedo.
Old 05-13-17 | 10:06 PM
  #4260  
Mike86's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 25,745
Received 1,413 Likes on 1,089 Posts
From: South Dakota
Re: Star Wars

Yeah it really is a pretty dumb scene. That's the problem with a lot of the special edition scenes, they're mostly pointless additions that don't really add anything that's necessary to the story. Also I think in the case of the Jabba scene it kind of detracts from the impact of first seeing him in Return of the Jedi. I thought that was one of the cooler reveals personally when I first saw the trilogy as a kid after wondering who Jabba was. Granted I didn't have to wait long because I saw them on a marathon on USA back in the day the first time (my parents actually recorded them all on a VHS tape that I still have) but it was still a cool reveal.
Old 05-13-17 | 10:22 PM
  #4261  
OldBoy's Avatar
TOTY Winner 2018 and Inane Thread Master
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 54,221
Received 1,740 Likes on 1,425 Posts
From: "Are any of us really anywhere?"
Re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
Most of the changes are superflous and fine. Greedo shooting first? Eh. Crappy CG Jabba? Ok. Changing rock placement? Whatthefuckever. All the Cloud City changes are actually quite brilliant.

The straw that broke the camel's back for me is putting Hayden fucking Christiansen in Jedi. I can avoid the stink of the PT easy enough, but forcing part of that shitfest into the OT? Fucking terrible. Same goes for getting rid of the Nub Nub song ending so we can see CG shots of PT planets and people celebrating. Fuck that.
wait, they got rid of the "Nub Nub" song and those gorgeous CGI shots of the celebrations and stuff?? Now, this is just getting ridiculous!! George Lucas has truly raped my childhood...
Old 05-14-17 | 12:17 AM
  #4262  
Hailey G's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,038
Received 1,052 Likes on 489 Posts
From: Detroit, formerly known as Obi-Wanma
Re: Star Wars

They got rid of Yub Nub in 1997, when the CGI celebration shots were added.
Old 05-15-17 | 08:44 PM
  #4263  
Michael Corvin's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 63,473
Received 1,379 Likes on 945 Posts
From: Louisville, KY
Re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Obi-Wan Jabroni
They got rid of Yub Nub in 1997, when the CGI celebration shots were added.
Pretty sure the CG stuff came after the prequels as they show Naboo and the Gungans, IIRC.

Then again, I haven't watched Jedi in years.
Old 05-15-17 | 08:51 PM
  #4264  
Mike86's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 25,745
Received 1,413 Likes on 1,089 Posts
From: South Dakota
Re: Star Wars

If I recall right the Yub Nub song was replaced with the celebration scenes and Hayden was added to the Force ghost scene for the 2004 DVD release.
Old 05-15-17 | 08:56 PM
  #4265  
Hailey G's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,038
Received 1,052 Likes on 489 Posts
From: Detroit, formerly known as Obi-Wanma
Re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
Pretty sure the CG stuff came after the prequels as they show Naboo and the Gungans, IIRC.

Then again, I haven't watched Jedi in years.
Naboo was added in on the DVD release, but the rest of the celebrations on other planets were added in 1997, though Courscant was modified to add landmarks from the prequels, like the Jedi Temple.

Yub Nub was taken out in 1997 when the celebrations were originally added. I have the soundtrack release from the special editions in 1997, and it doesn't have Yub Nub on it.
Old 05-15-17 | 08:58 PM
  #4266  
hdnmickey's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 12,524
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Cygnus
Re: Star Wars

The 1997 version had the replacement celebration shots. Then after the prequels they added one more additional celebration shot on Naboo (Weesa Free!) and added the Jedi Temple to the previous Coruscant shot.
Old 05-15-17 | 09:37 PM
  #4267  
milo bloom's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 19,010
Received 1,674 Likes on 1,211 Posts
From: Chicago suburbs
Re: Star Wars

I've never totally hated the new ending to ROTJ.

Before the sequels were announced, I always felt you could see them as a 9 movie set: you have the Holy Trilogy (eps 4-6, in their original theatrical format). For this three movie story, Yub Nub is the best ending - it's a group of friends and their allies having a backyard BBQ with illegal fireworks. The weird neighbors are singing a song in their native language that you don't understand, but you don't care because you're with your friends and everything is okay.

When there were six movies, the extended ending of ROTJ works better. It starts out with the backyard BBQ, but expands out to show how this pivotal moment has affected so many other people and why this Rebellion existed in the first place.

I would gladly own both versions on shelf, I just want the choice.
Old 05-15-17 | 09:41 PM
  #4268  
hdnmickey's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 12,524
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Cygnus
Re: Star Wars

Adding Hayden was far worse than adding the celebration scenes.
Old 05-18-17 | 08:10 AM
  #4269  
hanshotfirst1138's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,678
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
From: Livonia MI
Re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Obi-Wan Jabroni
Why would they release a 9 movie set in fall of 2019 in conjunction with Fox when they could wait a few more months and have full control of (and full profits from) everything except ANH?
If I'm still alive in 2020, that's no guarantee it'll happen. I kind of wish they'd say yes or no. At least no would be an answer at this point.
Old 05-18-17 | 08:58 AM
  #4270  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,099
Received 828 Likes on 577 Posts
Re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by hanshotfirst1138
If I'm still alive in 2020, that's no guarantee it'll happen. I kind of wish they'd say yes or no. At least no would be an answer at this point.
Even if they firmly said no right now, that doesn't mean it couldn't happen in the future. Unless you think a company is "honor bound" to obey the wishes of current employees in perpetuity.

Companies don't tend to announce releases until they have a firm release date in the short future. They're not going to announce a release that's potentially years out, especially if they don't even have the distribution rights at the moment.
Old 05-18-17 | 09:33 AM
  #4271  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 25,295
Likes: 0
Received 51 Likes on 40 Posts
From: Hail to the Redskins!
Re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
Most of the changes are superflous and fine. Greedo shooting first? Eh.
I don't think you ever get to voice another opinion about SW if that's your position on Han not shooing first.
Old 05-18-17 | 09:46 AM
  #4272  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 14,454
Likes: 0
Received 295 Likes on 224 Posts
Re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by milo bloom
I've never totally hated the new ending to ROTJ.

Before the sequels were announced, I always felt you could see them as a 9 movie set: you have the Holy Trilogy (eps 4-6, in their original theatrical format). For this three movie story, Yub Nub is the best ending - it's a group of friends and their allies having a backyard BBQ with illegal fireworks. The weird neighbors are singing a song in their native language that you don't understand, but you don't care because you're with your friends and everything is okay.

When there were six movies, the extended ending of ROTJ works better. It starts out with the backyard BBQ, but expands out to show how this pivotal moment has affected so many other people and why this Rebellion existed in the first place.

I would gladly own both versions on shelf, I just want the choice.
Yes but with the changes to the end of Jedi it screws up the viewing of the entire saga as a whole. Why would old Obi wan be there with you Anakin? Don't give me that crap about Jedi Anakin dying when he was young cause "Anakin" came back when he killed Palpatine. So either both are young or both appear as they do when they died.
Old 05-18-17 | 09:50 AM
  #4273  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,492
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
From: PA
Re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
Most of the changes are superflous and fine. Greedo shooting first? Eh. Crappy CG Jabba? Ok. Changing rock placement? Whatthefuckever. All the Cloud City changes are actually quite brilliant.

The straw that broke the camel's back for me is putting Hayden fucking Christiansen in Jedi. I can avoid the stink of the PT easy enough, but forcing part of that shitfest into the OT? Fucking terrible. Same goes for getting rid of the Nub Nub song ending so we can see CG shots of PT planets and people celebrating. Fuck that.
What bugs me about this change isn't that it was made, but that it looks like shit. Han's movements look choppy, like they were edited on cheap video editing software. It's jarring as hell.


Originally Posted by Timber
Yes but with the changes to the end of Jedi it screws up the viewing of the entire saga as a whole. Why would old Obi wan be there with you Anakin? Don't give me that crap about Jedi Anakin dying when he was young cause "Anakin" came back when he killed Palpatine. So either both are young or both appear as they do when they died.
The reason for young Anakin appearing never made much sense to me, either. Would Luke even know who he was looking at?
Old 05-18-17 | 09:58 AM
  #4274  
hdnmickey's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 12,524
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Cygnus
Re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Timber
Yes but with the changes to the end of Jedi it screws up the viewing of the entire saga as a whole. Why would old Obi wan be there with you Anakin? Don't give me that crap about Jedi Anakin dying when he was young cause "Anakin" came back when he killed Palpatine. So either both are young or both appear as they do when they died.
Exactly. There is no way it makes sense no matter how hard anybody tries. Just a very misguided attempt to put a new shiny bow on a supposed new 6 film series. The worst part is if the prequels were done effectively, the original ending of ROTJ works well as-is. A victory celebration with the force ghosts showing up in their original form. Anybody paying attention knows that it's Anakin that appears after redeeming himself.
Old 05-18-17 | 12:06 PM
  #4275  
Michael Corvin's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 63,473
Received 1,379 Likes on 945 Posts
From: Louisville, KY
Re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by DVD Josh
I don't think you ever get to voice another opinion about SW if that's your position on Han not shooing first.
Two things, first I get what Lucas was trying to do with the character which I'm not opposed to it's just the fact that...

Originally Posted by big e
What bugs me about this change isn't that it was made, but that it looks like shit. Han's movements look choppy, like they were edited on cheap video editing software. It's jarring as hell.
Second, it's been 20 years already(holy shitballs!) and I've been beaten into submission. I just don't care about this change anymore. There are far worse things that need to be rectified like Jabba, Anakin, ROTJ's ending, etc.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.