![]() |
Re: Battle Royale (Arrow Releasing)--October 2010?
Originally Posted by Pizza
(Post 10556478)
I understand how you may feel but it's not like they're charging a premium for this and who would say no to doubling their profits?
The fact is, they stuck these "collector's edition" numbers in our faces. *Look at this! Look at this! Buy NOW or LOSE OUT FOREVER!* When they hit the figurative marketing CAPS LOCK and then can't back it up by delivering what they're shouting about, they deserve to have a little back in their faces, too. We hold them to it if they sell us a pan-and-scan disc under the claim "Widescreen Edition". Why should this be any different? |
Re: Battle Royale (Arrow Releasing)--October 2010?
Originally Posted by Doctorossi
(Post 10556377)
I just think it's lame. Not the end of the world, but lame.
|
Re: Battle Royale (Arrow Releasing)--October 2010?
Here's the deal. I got the exclusive news on the LE for Twitch back in October. The initial idea was to ave a 5,000 print run. The same day that I posted the news on Twitch the article circulated all over the place and Amazon was inundated with orders. The very next day, I got an e-mail from my contact at Arrow telling me that they had to up the order to make sure that they could have some copies of this in stores, otherwise the BD LE would have sold out online and it never would have made it to shelves at all in the UK.
If you are complaining that you didn't see that the print run was bumped up, then you must not have been paying attention very closely because the change in number happened almost immediately, and in fact, I reposted my article on the LE as soon as I found out. It is not bullshit, and Arrow is a company to be commended and not "called on it" as the mistake is yours, not theirs. |
Re: Battle Royale (Arrow Releasing)--October 2010?
Originally Posted by doctorthodt
(Post 10556502)
I wonder how many people are thinking these exact words about what you're saying.
|
Re: Battle Royale (Arrow Releasing)--October 2010?
Originally Posted by Doctorossi
(Post 10556377)
1) They should've kept some control over the pre-order process, so that they could actually honor their exclusivity promise (the original number).
Edit: And zombeaner's post above confirms my reasoning. 2) They should have come up with a better solution to their failure to do that than "Oh, well, we'll just give our customers half of the exclusivity we promised them." Considering that the people complaining about the run increase on this thread are you and.... well, you, it seems like their solution of a one-time increase in the run, changed well before the item's release, and only shortly after announced, was the best one for most of the customers. |
Re: Battle Royale (Arrow Releasing)--October 2010?
Originally Posted by zombeaner
(Post 10556506)
The same day that I posted the news on Twitch the article circulated all over the place and Amazon was inundated with orders. The very next day, I got an e-mail from my contact at Arrow telling me that they had to up the order to make sure that they could have some copies of this in stores, otherwise the BD LE would have sold out online and it never would have made it to shelves at all in the UK.
Order of events: 1) Arrow makes an offer 2) Customers accept offer 3) Arrow rescinds offer Again, how exactly is this not BS? |
Re: Battle Royale (Arrow Releasing)--October 2010?
Originally Posted by Doctorossi
(Post 10556498)
The fact is, they stuck these "collector's edition" numbers in our faces. *Look at this! Look at this! Buy NOW or LOSE OUT FOREVER!* |
Re: Battle Royale (Arrow Releasing)--October 2010?
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 10556513)
However, their announcement of the run increase clearly states that they wanted enough copies so that the product would actually reach store shelves, and thus not be sold out before being released. So even if sites like Amazon only sold the amount they had been allocated, Arrow wanted to increase the number.
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 10556513)
What's the better solution?
|
Re: Battle Royale (Arrow Releasing)--October 2010?
Originally Posted by Doctorossi
(Post 10556520)
There you go, by your own words.
Order of events: 1) Arrow makes an offer 2) Customers accept offer 3) Arrow rescinds offer Again, how exactly is this not BS? Arrow makes an offer. Customers accept offer in huge numbers Arrow extends offer to accommodate You can whine all you want. Cancel your order, whatever. 10K is still a decent limited edition, compared to what some other companies do (um, The Stunt Man LE from Anchor Bay was 120,000 I think) You really want to call them on this? You've got bigger issues. |
Re: Battle Royale (Arrow Releasing)--October 2010?
Where is the goddamned ignore button?
|
Re: Battle Royale (Arrow Releasing)--October 2010?
Originally Posted by slop101
(Post 10556523)
That is pure hyperbole!
Originally Posted by slop101
(Post 10556523)
Anyhoo, I question people's motives who buy out of and are motivated by scarcity, which you seem to be.
|
Re: Battle Royale (Arrow Releasing)--October 2010?
Originally Posted by Doctorossi
(Post 10556510)
I know! Expressing my opinion on an internet forum- what a douche I am!
|
Re: Battle Royale (Arrow Releasing)--October 2010?
I don't understand the big deal here. I'm with the previous poster in that I don't even care about the numbering (as long as I get one in the first batch of 5000 anyway).
|
Re: Battle Royale (Arrow Releasing)--October 2010?
Originally Posted by Doctorossi
(Post 10556498)
There are many, many unethical ways a business can double their profits. They could put Robert DeNiro on the cover. "Woops! Sorry- he's not in the movie!" They could label it a 4-disc set. "Woops! Sorry- our contract manufacturer forgot to press the fourth disc!"
The fact is, they stuck these "collector's edition" numbers in our faces. *Look at this! Look at this! Buy NOW or LOSE OUT FOREVER!* When they hit the figurative marketing CAPS LOCK and then can't back it up by delivering what they're shouting about, they deserve to have a little back in their faces, too. We hold them to it if they sell us a pan-and-scan disc under the claim "Widescreen Edition". Why should this be any different? |
Re: Battle Royale (Arrow Releasing)--October 2010?
Originally Posted by zombeaner
(Post 10556532)
Where is the goddamned ignore button?
|
Re: Battle Royale (Arrow Releasing)--October 2010?
Originally Posted by zombeaner
(Post 10556529)
Arrow extends offer to accommodate
|
Re: Battle Royale (Arrow Releasing)--October 2010?
BTW, I just checked. I made the announcement October 20th and updated it with the new number October 22nd, less than 48 hours later.
|
Re: Battle Royale (Arrow Releasing)--October 2010?
Originally Posted by Doctorossi
(Post 10556542)
The "offer" was 'buy one of these that we're only making 5,000 of'. Adding 5,000 more is not extending that offer, it's wriggling out of their commitment after the offer has been accepted by the customer.
|
Re: Battle Royale (Arrow Releasing)--October 2010?
i didn't buy this because it was limited edition. i bought it because i love the film.
|
Re: Battle Royale (Arrow Releasing)--October 2010?
Originally Posted by riotinmyskull
(Post 10556549)
i didn't buy this because it was limited edition. i bought it because i love the film.
Stick to the 5,000 copies so that the customer could make an extra $2 when he resells it Or Extend the offer and make twice as many customers happy with what is still a very limited edition of a very anticipated film. Seems like a no-brainer to me. |
Re: Battle Royale (Arrow Releasing)--October 2010?
Originally Posted by gryffinmaster
(Post 10556537)
I understand the point you're making about bait-and-switch tactics to drive sales (Freaks and Geeks comes to mind, though it's a bit different), but changing a limited edition quantity from 5,000 to 10,000 once to offset capitalizing hoarders and compensate for a rush of demand -- all within roughly a week after the item went up for sale -- just isn't the same thing. They're giving the people who really wanted to purchase and enjoy the set a chance.
If a salesman is standing next to a yellow truck and says "Hey buddy, I got a nice red truck for you right here!", that's BS. If he just says, "Wanna buy a truck?", that's not BS. See? |
Re: Battle Royale (Arrow Releasing)--October 2010?
Originally Posted by zombeaner
(Post 10556545)
What is this "acceptance" you're talking about? You're babbling, man.
|
Re: Battle Royale (Arrow Releasing)--October 2010?
Originally Posted by riotinmyskull
(Post 10556549)
i didn't buy this because it was limited edition. i bought it because i love the film.
|
Re: Battle Royale (Arrow Releasing)--October 2010?
Originally Posted by Doctorossi
(Post 10556498)
There are many, many unethical ways a business can double their profits. They could put Robert DeNiro on the cover. "Woops! Sorry- he's not in the movie!" They could label it a 4-disc set. "Woops! Sorry- our contract manufacturer forgot to press the fourth disc!"
...We hold them to it if they sell us a pan-and-scan disc under the claim "Widescreen Edition". Why should this be any different? The fact is, they stuck these "collector's edition" numbers in our faces. *Look at this! Look at this! Buy NOW or LOSE OUT FOREVER!* When they hit the figurative marketing CAPS LOCK and then can't back it up by delivering what they're shouting about, they deserve to have a little back in their faces, too. |
Re: Battle Royale (Arrow Releasing)--October 2010?
Originally Posted by zombeaner
(Post 10556553)
Exactly, this is the choice Arrow had:
Stick to the 5,000 copies so that the customer could make an extra $2 when he resells it Or Extend the offer and make twice as many customers happy with what is still a very limited edition of a very anticipated film. Seems like a no-brainer to me. That's the no-brainer, IMO. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:04 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.