Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > HD Talk
Reload this Page >

Best & Worst Tech of 2008 (Blu-ray: the Worst)

Community
Search
HD Talk The place to discuss Blu-ray, 4K and all other forms and formats of HD and HDTV.

Best & Worst Tech of 2008 (Blu-ray: the Worst)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-23-08 | 05:52 PM
  #176  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 19,491
Received 1,526 Likes on 1,022 Posts
From: Hamilton, Ontario
That's great people can get Blu-Ray discs cheap online and during special promotions, but the average person doesn't go digging for deals online and they certainly don't visit forums to get info on the best deals. The average person walks into a Best Buy or Wal-Mart and makes a decision based on the price he/she see's at that time.

The latest Best Buy flyer (in Canada) has The Dark Knight on DVD for $21.99 and the Blu-Ray version for $31.99. This is what the average person notices.
Coral is offline  
Old 12-23-08 | 05:54 PM
  #177  
DVD Polizei's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 54,564
Received 299 Likes on 223 Posts
Well, when I walk into any store that sells DVDs I see high prices. What the hek is the difference. Does anybody actually cruise a Best Buy DVD section? I have. I STILL HAVE TO LOOK FOR DEALS ON DVDs.

I don't see any weight in this argument at all. If you're a dumbass shopper, then Blu-ray wasn't the first product you were going to bitch about.

If you're a wise shopper, Blu-ray is your friend. And I know we have a lot of wise shoppers, much more than idiots, so I'm perfectly confident HD and Blu-ray will do just fine. In fact, they're doing even better than expected given the economy (which I eluded to a while back as to what could happen with consumers).

Originally Posted by Coral
That's great people can get Blu-Ray discs cheap online and during special promotions, but the average person doesn't go digging for deals online and they certainly don't visit forums to get info on the best deals. The average person walks into a Best Buy or Wal-Mart and makes a decision based on the price he/she see's at that time.

The latest Best Buy flyer (in Canada) has The Dark Knight on DVD for $21.99 and the Blu-Ray version for $31.99. This is what the average person notices.
And the average person should know by now from buying DVDs in the past that if they wait a few weeks, they can get the Blu version for $10 cheaper.
DVD Polizei is offline  
Old 12-23-08 | 05:56 PM
  #178  
jackson walker's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DVD Polizei
Ask the smart one who wrote the article. I'm sure he'll use it as a negative blow against Blu-ray.



Yeah, I guess you'll have to wait a few weeks for a sale.

I paid $15 for Iron Man on Blu.

Paid $6.69 for a Bond flick on Blu. Oh wait. I actually bought 6 of them for that price each.

Paid $31.99 for Supernatural S3 on Blu.

Paid $41.99 for The Godfather Trilogy on Blu.

Paid $22.49 for When We Left Earth on Blu.

Paid $17.95 for Mad Men Season 1 on Blu.

Paid $14.99 for Kung-Fu Panda on Blu.

Paid $18.95 for Lonesome Dove on Blu.

Paid $8.99 for The Bank Job on Blu.

Paid $8.99 for Crank on Blu.

Paid $17.95 for the Rambo Trilogy on Blu.

Paid $29.98 for a Romancing The Stone / Jewel Of The Nile Blu-ray combo deal. That's $15 each.

He has one example, and you and a small minority of others are screaming, "AHHHHHHDGHDFHDF! There you go! I told you HD was expensive! It's gonna die if these prices remain so high!"

Oh, and by the way, I'm not even paying $15 to buy Step Brothers on Blu.

This guy has no peripheral vision whatsoever. He needs to actually USE THE DAMN PRODUCT before he has a right to bitch. Just like voting. Participate in the process, not just from the sidelines.

Doubting-Blu folk can try and use the B&M excuse for Blu-ray high prices, but the fact is, it is simply retarded to expect a B&M to give the consumer deals at any moment you decide to drop in. And it is accurately stupid and ignorant to expect Blu-ray consumers to NOT be using online retailers to compensate for these higher prices in B&M stores. But of course, people who don't think Blu is going to work conveniently toss aside the online factor.
Good post. On average, I too am only paying about $10.00 to $15.00 each for the discs that I pay money for (I also got in on that James Bond $6.00 a disc deal). But the majority of Blu-ray discs I pick up are paid for when I turn in my old SD discs for credit.
jackson walker is offline  
Old 12-23-08 | 06:00 PM
  #179  
fumanstan's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 55,349
Received 27 Likes on 15 Posts
From: Irvine, CA
Originally Posted by DVD Polizei
Well, when I walk into any store that sells DVDs I see high prices. What the hek is the difference. Does anybody actually cruise a Best Buy DVD section? I have. I STILL HAVE TO LOOK FOR DEALS ON DVDs.

I don't see any weight in this argument at all. If you're a dumbass shopper, then Blu-ray wasn't the first product you were going to bitch about.

We had this discussion before with your belief that most people shop online, but quite frankly most average consumers aren't that smart of shoppers and don't wait for major bargains.

And Blu-ray is a natural thing to bitch about because it will always be compared to DVD, which is typically going to be $10 cheaper for the folks walking the retail aisles.
fumanstan is offline  
Old 12-23-08 | 06:07 PM
  #180  
DVD Polizei's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 54,564
Received 299 Likes on 223 Posts
Which goes back to one of my posts. There are probably two different target markets for Blu-ray, just like other products. One market is the "I don't wait for bargains" sector, and the other is "I do wait for bargains" sector.

We have B&Ms and we have online representatives of those B&Ms which offer special deals not available in stores, and the actual online retailer themselves which don't have an official B&M location.

Sure, we'll have bitching and complaining from the people who don't shop smart, but this is nothing new to the retail sector. And higher quality products have still been produced.

At this time, of course Blu won't be in the same league as DVD. However, over time, it will gradually become a respective force and consumers will be more familiar with it.
DVD Polizei is offline  
Old 12-23-08 | 08:00 PM
  #181  
beebs's Avatar
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,772
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: California, USA
Wait, are people arguing that Blu-ray aren't more expensive than SD DVDs? Tell me that's not the actual point people are trying to make?

The real argument is whether a $25-28 price is or is not a barrier to mass adoption.

-beebs
beebs is offline  
Old 12-23-08 | 09:07 PM
  #182  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I enjoyed Step Brothers. Eh, sometimes I like to watch dumb comedies.

If I didn't have a PS3, I would probably pay $22.99 for the two disc DVD version, but instead I'll pay $24.99 for the Blu-Ray. Of course I know I'm in the minority, but I like extras so I always got the 2 disc version of the DVD, and luckily Blu-Ray has all of the extras for a few dollars more.
cerial442 is offline  
Old 12-23-08 | 09:54 PM
  #183  
DVD Polizei's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 54,564
Received 299 Likes on 223 Posts
Originally Posted by beebs
Wait, are people arguing that Blu-ray aren't more expensive than SD DVDs? Tell me that's not the actual point people are trying to make?

The real argument is whether a $25-28 price is or is not a barrier to mass adoption.

-beebs
1) No, the argument is that Blu-ray titles can be achieved without a massive hit to your wallet. Just like with any product, you have to shop smart or you will pay more.

2) Any initial product availability which is a new technology is going to cost more. Remember LCD monitors when they first became available? Remember memory cards when they first became available? Remember how much DVD writers were when they firt became available? So, this does not mean a certain product will not be accepted and used on a wider mass adoption.

Price is not the only factor, is what I'm arguing.
DVD Polizei is offline  
Old 12-23-08 | 11:29 PM
  #184  
The Man with the Golden Doujinshi's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,882
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
From: Mister Peepers
Originally Posted by DVD Polizei
1) No, the argument is that Blu-ray titles can be achieved without a massive hit to your wallet. Just like with any product, you have to shop smart or you will pay more.
But at the same time, currently, the majority of people feel they're shopping smarter by paying less and just getting a DVD version because they don't really care about the benefits of spending more.

As time goes on, it'll change, but right now this is where we're at.
The Man with the Golden Doujinshi is offline  
Old 12-24-08 | 12:30 AM
  #185  
beebs's Avatar
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,772
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: California, USA
You know this BR can be had at bargain price argument is bunk. It needs to be Apples to Apples, not Anonymous Retail to Internet Bargain Hunter.

It's either...

Retail Shopper for SD DVD vs. Retail Shopper for BR
-or-
Bargain Shopper for SD DVD vs. Bargain Shopper for BR

In both of those cases, BR will be 50% to 300% more. Blu-ray needs to stand on it's own merits. It needs to be compelling. I don't see that yet from this format. Pricing comparable to DVD would certainly make it compelling, but it wouldn't make it any better for the studios.

Perception is reality. All those $24.99 - $34.99 price and shelf tags on Blu-ray in all those retail stores are busy making reality. All those special sales and Columbia House B1G1 are not shaping the pricing perception of the format.

-beebs

Last edited by beebs; 12-24-08 at 12:32 AM.
beebs is offline  
Old 12-24-08 | 12:33 AM
  #186  
pro-bassoonist's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 10,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Blu-ray.com
Originally Posted by beebs
Wait, are people arguing that Blu-ray aren't more expensive than SD DVDs? Tell me that's not the actual point people are trying to make?

-beebs
From this quote:

Blu-ray - I'm happy to see that Blu-ray players have come down in price... but the media has not, and there's no way I'm paying $25 to watch Step Brothers. Plus the technology is still, bafflingly, dog-slow.
...there are two points to be made (which in one way or another people are debating here):

1. Software prices have come down, unlike what the author claims.
2. The technology isn't baffingly (not a word by the way) slow (my opinion).

This being said, disinterest isn't an obstacle for Blu-ray either. Zogby's research certainly shows a different trend:

http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.cfm?ID=1653

Released: December 19, 2008

NEW ZOGBY RESEARCH: BLU-RAY PLAYERS TOP LIST OF GIFTS FUELING HOLIDAY EXCITEMENT

HDTV Consumer Data and Strong Retail Sales Show Momentum for Blu-ray; Hi-Def Player Tops GPS System, Nintendo Wii, and MP3 Player in Recent Survey

Utica, NY (Dec. 19, 2008) – Zogby International today released new survey data showing that among more than a dozen home electronic gift options, High Definition Television (HDTV) owners found a Blu-ray player to be one of the most exciting gifts of the season, second only to another HDTV. Also, according to new statistics from Red Hill, for the week ending December 6, 2008, Blu-ray software sales topped 1.7 million units, nearly 300,000 more units than Black Friday week, accounting for nearly $50 million in consumer spending.

"The survey data and the new retail sales data both show that heading into the heart of the holiday season, Blu-ray’s momentum is undeniably real, "said Blake Thomas of the Tru Blu Group. “With the tough economy, families are focusing more and more on home entertainment options and are increasingly investing in the Blu-ray format.”

The Zogby research was conducted online from December 2-4, 2008 and sampled 1,726 Hi-Def TV Owners. (HDTV) The research found that when asked how excited they would be to receive one of the top home electronics items on the market, respondents were most excited about the prospect of receiving a Blu-ray player as a gift this holiday season, second only to an additional HDTV. Over 30% of respondents stated that they were extremely/very interested in getting a Blu-ray disc player compared to other notable products like a digital camera (28%), a GPS system (27%), the Nintendo Wii (26%), and an MP3 player (22%). Moreover, 18% of respondents indicated they would be most excited to receive a Sony PlayStation 3 (PS3), which also plays Blu-ray discs.

The interest and excitement level around Blu-ray comes at a time when consumers are cutting back on entertainment spending outside of the home. In fact, the Zogby research found that 87% of the respondents stated they would be cutting back on out-of-home spending in the upcoming year. Additionally, the respondents indicated that as Blu-ray player prices have fallen as low as $150, they have become a good value for the money.

Two-thirds of Blu-ray households (individuals who currently have a Blu-ray player or Sony PlayStation 3), indicated a desire to purchase a Blu-ray movie for themselves. Also, over 55% of all respondents indicated some interest in purchasing a Blu-ray movie for their family members or friends who own a Blu-ray player or a PS3. Additionally, the research showed that The Dark Knight was the most anticipated Blu-ray release this holiday season, followed by Mamma Mia!, Wall-E, The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian, and Hancock.

According to Warner Brothers, since its release on December 9, The Dark Knight has sold over 1.7 million Blu-ray units – 600,000 alone on the first day – shattering all previous records for hi-def disc sales. The Dark Knight is the best selling Blu-ray title in history and will become the best selling 2008 title overall this week.

About Zogby International:

Zogby International is respected nationally and internationally for its opinion research capabilities. Since 1984 Zogby International has empowered clients with powerful information and knowledge critical for making informed strategic decisions. The firm conducts multi-phased opinion research engagements for banking and financial services institutions, insurance companies, hospitals and medical centers, retailers and developers, religious institutions, cultural organizations, colleges and universities, and a variety of public and private groups. Zogby International’s dedication and commitment to excellence and accuracy are reflected in their state of the art opinion research capabilities and objective analysis and consultation.

Contact: Brian Jones
202-551-1453
Furthermore:

Originally Posted by fumanstan
I don't really disagree with the original article as well. Just because there are deals to be had once in awhile still doesn't change the fact that the typical price for discs in stores are $25-30 and that's what the typical consumer sees. $25 is a common price to see for movies. And load times are slow compared to DVD (not that I have a problem with it).
...this is probably a fare point to make, but, I am certain you don't share the opinion that "typical consumers" are on board with Blu-ray, do you? I assume that you are concerned that if these prices remain as they are, and I doubt they will, then how will Blu-ray become mass? My answer to you is: following the same progression DVD mapped out on the road to mass - as the market expands prices will come down and awareness will improve. And as we are currently seeing, the market is expanding.

But people already built their libraries with DVD? Unless there is one generation only that cares about cinema then this entire argument is absolutely laughable.

Originally Posted by fumanstan
We had this discussion before with your belief that most people shop online, but quite frankly most average consumers aren't that smart of shoppers and don't wait for major bargains.
Could we also believe that most people are not such sophisticated film-buffs with massive DVD libraries?

Pro-B

Last edited by pro-bassoonist; 12-24-08 at 12:38 AM.
pro-bassoonist is offline  
Old 12-24-08 | 02:02 AM
  #187  
fumanstan's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 55,349
Received 27 Likes on 15 Posts
From: Irvine, CA
Originally Posted by pro-bassoonist
...this is probably a fare point to make, but, I am certain you don't share the opinion that "typical consumers" are on board with Blu-ray, do you? I assume that you are concerned that if these prices remain as they are, and I doubt they will, then how will Blu-ray become mass? My answer to you is: following the same progression DVD mapped out on the road to mass - as the market expands prices will come down and awareness will improve. And as we are currently seeing, the market is expanding.

But people already built their libraries with DVD? Unless there is one generation only that cares about cinema then this entire argument is absolutely laughable.
Which just circles back to whether you believe Blu-ray will follow the same path as DVD, and I don't think it quite will do to numerous reasons that have been pointed out in the past, which certainly isn't isolated to pricing. Either way, don't see anything wrong with the original writer's assertions.



Could we also believe that most people are not such sophisticated film-buffs with massive DVD libraries?

Pro-B
Yeah, so? Not sure what that has to do with my comment about folks shopping online and hunting for bargains.
fumanstan is offline  
Old 12-24-08 | 02:05 AM
  #188  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by pro-bassoonist
NEW ZOGBY RESEARCH: BLU-RAY PLAYERS TOP LIST OF GIFTS FUELING HOLIDAY EXCITEMENT
Amazing what a difference one year has made. Last year the number of people who had even heard of Blu-ray was depressingly meagre.
Gerry P. is offline  
Old 12-24-08 | 02:23 AM
  #189  
pro-bassoonist's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 10,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Blu-ray.com
Originally Posted by fumanstan
Which just circles back to whether you believe Blu-ray will follow the same path as DVD, and I don't think it quite will do to numerous reasons that have been pointed out in the past, which certainly isn't isolated to pricing. Either way, don't see anything wrong with the original writer's assertions.
I do. United market, united studios, gradual growth, phasing out standard definition. And, I do.

Originally Posted by fumanstan
Yeah, so? Not sure what that has to do with my comment about folks shopping online and hunting for bargains.
If most people are not sophisticated film buffs with large libraries hunting for bargains online then why should I take seriously the discomfort of an internet blogger who apparently isn't willing to remember that DVD followed the same pricing model followed by the same concerns:

blogger:

There's a very loud and vocal minority that insists that Blu-ray will be a huge success. The market would seem to indicate otherwise.
.
The market does not indicate otherwise, and DVD's past shows us that such prices were very much the standard for it as well before it went on to become mass.

Pro-B

Last edited by pro-bassoonist; 12-24-08 at 02:29 AM.
pro-bassoonist is offline  
Old 12-24-08 | 03:22 AM
  #190  
Moopher's Avatar
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,238
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: kj
Don't know if this is appropriate but I was at BB yesterday about 20 minutes from here and they had about 40 Band of Brother BD's last night...but when I went in there tonight to pick up my laptop, there were two left in the HBO stand which was much more picked over than the night before. IMO I think Blu-ray has been a decent holiday hit, I've seen quite a few people purchasing them in the last few weeks, which is a nice change of pace.
Moopher is offline  
Old 12-24-08 | 03:39 AM
  #191  
beebs's Avatar
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,772
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: California, USA
Originally Posted by pro-bassoonist
I do. United market, united studios, gradual growth, phasing out standard definition. And, I do.

Pro-B
And yet, the early days of DVD were much different than Blu-ray. There was little or no question of the success of the format. Clear sales numbers of SA decks were released weekly.

Here's a sample from Holiday season 3 for DVD, like this one for Blu-ray, from Digital Bits:

Originally Posted by DigitalBits_Dec_14_99
We've updated our CEA numbers again, to include the reported 150,778 DVD players that shipped in the first week of December. That takes us right up to the brink of 5 million players in the U.S. marketplace, at 4,928,274.
BDA has been incredibly obtuse in the release of information. Details slip, but nothing is confirmed. Numbers are spun and muddied. I notice they talk dollars for software sales and avoid unit counts. More obtuse reporting and spin. If they are doing as well as DVD... it would be easy to figure, and easy for them to prove. Instead they have released very few hard numbers.

Catalog for BD is also much smaller. Clearly the format war and the studios pumping out SD DVD has not allowed them to match DVD's original pace. At this point in DVD history we had 5000 titles on the format (and Disney was late to the game).

One thing that is encouraging is the sales figures for Dark Knight and Iron Man. Solid numbers. Those high totals for Dark Knight suggest Blu-ray is doing quite well regardless of the price of the discs. The comparison always goes back to the Matrix DVD sales. In August 2000, Matrix passed 3 Million copies. TDK looks to top that, I think, come the same point in Blu-ray history -- August 2009.

(Of course people will argue the timeline of DVD vs. Blu-ray, but in my opinion, mid-2006 was the launch of Blu-ray and that syncs nicely with Q2 1997 launch of SD DVD. The vast bulk of sales are during the holidays and Q4. This is the third Q4/holiday season for Blu-ray. 1999 was the third Q4 Holidays season for SD DVD.)

We'll see. I'm not sure if Blu-ray is going to go for mass acceptance. It will take me until Q4 2009 to feel like I know. Others see signs in what data is available of this already. I am not so optimistic, yet.

-beebs
beebs is offline  
Old 12-24-08 | 04:41 AM
  #192  
pro-bassoonist's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 10,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Blu-ray.com
Originally Posted by beebs
And yet, the early days of DVD were much different than Blu-ray. There was little or no question of the success of the format.
I have to disagree with you. There were plenty of questions as to the viability of the format and had it not been for Warner (Liberfarb), how ironic, no one knows how far and where the format would have ended.

Originally Posted by beebs
Clear sales numbers of SA decks were released weekly.
What makes you think that SA numbers aren't released? The fact that they are not made public does not mean that they aren't supplied to those who know how to use them. If there is anything that has changed since the early days of DVD, it is the "free info" -- nowadays you have to pay to get the data you need. Take my word on this one.


Originally Posted by beebs
BDA has been incredibly obtuse in the release of information.
See above.

Originally Posted by beebs
If they are doing as well as DVD... it would be easy to figure, and easy for them to prove. Instead they have released very few hard numbers.
This isn't a realistic observation. No one, certainly not official parties that I am aware of, has claimed that Blu-ray is doing as well as DVD. There is still a large discrepancy in the numbers, both in terms of software and hardware, that prevents Blu-ray from performing as well, or outperforming, DVD. The point that has been made here, and this is certainly what I have argued, is that there are two different trends in existence now - a surge in total BD sales, and a decline in SDVD sales (which has been discussed by industry parties for quite some time now).

Originally Posted by beebs
Catalog for BD is also much smaller. Clearly the format war and the studios pumping out SD DVD has not allowed them to match DVD's original pace.
I agree 100% with you.

Originally Posted by beebs
At this point in DVD history we had 5000 titles on the format (and Disney was late to the game).
It is a different history: Blu-ray has had full studio support for less than 10 months now.

Originally Posted by beebs
One thing that is encouraging is the sales figures for Dark Knight and Iron Man. Solid numbers. Those high totals for Dark Knight suggest Blu-ray is doing quite well regardless of the price of the discs. The comparison always goes back to the Matrix DVD sales. In August 2000, Matrix passed 3 Million copies. TDK looks to top that, I think, come the same point in Blu-ray history -- August 2009.
I would agree with this observation as well. It is inevitable not to compare The Matrix on DVD with The Dark Knight on BD. Both are certainly milestones, both were hyped by the industry as titles capable of solidifying formats, and somewhat ironically, both were/are courtesy of Warner.


Originally Posted by beebs
(Of course people will argue the timeline of DVD vs. Blu-ray, but in my opinion, mid-2006 was the launch of Blu-ray and that syncs nicely with Q2 1997 launch of SD DVD.
I am sorry. I must disagree with you here. Launching means zero if you don't have full studio support. Without enough content everything else - hardware, pricing, PR, etc - is meaningless. See: HDDVD.

Originally Posted by beebs
The vast bulk of sales are during the holidays and Q4. This is the third Q4/holiday season for Blu-ray. 1999 was the third Q4 Holidays season for SD DVD.)
This is the first holiday season for Blu-ray on its own. And performance, to use your description, has been solid.

Pro-B

Last edited by pro-bassoonist; 12-24-08 at 04:45 AM.
pro-bassoonist is offline  
Old 12-24-08 | 05:30 AM
  #193  
Mr. Cinema's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 18,044
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Moopher
Don't know if this is appropriate but I was at BB yesterday about 20 minutes from here and they had about 40 Band of Brother BD's last night...but when I went in there tonight to pick up my laptop, there were two left in the HBO stand which was much more picked over than the night before. IMO I think Blu-ray has been a decent holiday hit, I've seen quite a few people purchasing them in the last few weeks, which is a nice change of pace.
I'll add what I saw last night at one of my local Best Buys. I was in there around 5:30 and there were lots and lots of people in the BD section. There were several titles sold out and they were completely sold out of the Sony BD 350. The BD section was booming at this location.

Just glancing online, all 6 of my local stores are out of the Sony 350, half are out of the Samsung 1500, and all but 1 are out of the Sony 550.

Hopefully this is happening at other stores.
Mr. Cinema is offline  
Old 12-24-08 | 07:52 AM
  #194  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Lakeville, MN
I find myself in one of a few Super Target stores at least four times a week for various reasons, and I never go in without just passing by the electronics area to look for their famous non-advertised clearance deals.

For about the past month, the BR section has had the most "browsers". Can't say for sure how many of these people are buying, but they're at least interested and possibly educating themselves.
SonOfAStu is offline  
Old 12-24-08 | 08:05 AM
  #195  
Adam Tyner's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,704
Received 2,802 Likes on 1,863 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
Originally Posted by pro-bassoonist
2. The technology isn't baffingly (not a word by the way)
While I agree that "baffingly" is not a word, the author wrote "bafflingly", which most certainly is.

If you're going to flame someone (incorrectly) for his spelling, take more care not to make your own mistakes in the same post:

Originally Posted by pro-bassoonist
...this is probably a fare point to make
...

Originally Posted by pro-bassoonist
This being said, disinterest isn't an obstacle for Blu-ray either.
I disagree, and I personally don't believe that around 500 people saying they'd like to receive a Blu-ray player as a Christmas gift means anything as far as the future of the format goes. Using that fluffy survey-slash-press release's logic, I'd be excited about receiving a GPS as a Christmas gift, but I wouldn't buy one myself.

Yes, I agree that there is interest in Blu-ray, and I expect that to grow. I also have every expectation that Blu-ray will be a success and won't be going anywhere anytime soon. I want the format to succeed, and I think it will. I don't think it will replace DVD.

You're comparing the course Blu-ray will take over DVD to what happened to VHS. My argument is that DVD was such a massive leap over VHS -- in terms of quality, pricing, availability of titles, ease of use, etc. -- that it made for a more compelling upgrade for any conceivable consumer. Blu-ray and DVD are similar enough that it won't gain that same traction, and I don't think Blu-ray is doing enough to excite the average consumer. DVD will be "good enough" for a considerable chunk of the home video audience (this is what I mean by 'disinterest'), and that'll prevent Blu-ray from gaining that same sort of traction. There's also a ubiquity and...emotional investment with DVD that people didn't have with VHS. I see these two formats -- DVD and Blu-ray -- existing side by side, and there's nothing wrong with that.
Adam Tyner is offline  
Old 12-24-08 | 09:36 AM
  #196  
The Man with the Golden Doujinshi's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,882
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
From: Mister Peepers
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
I disagree, and I personally don't believe that around 500 people saying they'd like to receive a Blu-ray player as a Christmas gift means anything as far as the future of the format goes.
I agree. Having a minority group(excited about blu-ray), out of another minority group(hd owners) isn't anything groundbreaking.

It's an improvement over a year ago but it's still early to be claiming anything.

It's even more silly to compare blu-ray and dvd with dvd and vhs since there was a huge leap with one and not the other. It's dumb for anyone to completely disregard facts, such as this, just because it doesn't fit in their argument.

It's great percentages(but never real numbers) are improving but acting like crazed fanboys just because a percentage went up isn't going to do anything but turn people off to the format. It certainly isn't going to make anyone want to sign up because of that.
The Man with the Golden Doujinshi is offline  
Old 12-24-08 | 09:58 AM
  #197  
Suspended
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 31,779
Received 101 Likes on 87 Posts
From: Formerly known as "GizmoDVD"/Southern CA
Originally Posted by pro-bassoonist
I am sorry. I must disagree with you here. Launching means zero if you don't have full studio support. Without enough content everything else - hardware, pricing, PR, etc - is meaningless. See: HDDVD.
Care to point out when DVD had full studio support? Hint - took much longer then Blu-ray.
Gizmo is offline  
Old 12-24-08 | 10:29 AM
  #198  
redbill's Avatar
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,777
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
From: Shirley, MA
I sure am glad we closed the Blu-ray sales discussion thread...
redbill is offline  
Old 12-24-08 | 11:13 AM
  #199  
Drexl's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 16,077
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
From: St. Louis, MO
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
Care to point out when DVD had full studio support? Hint - took much longer then Blu-ray.
It wasn't much longer. I believe Dreamworks was the last holdout in mid-1999, although at the time they only had a handful of titles. Fox and Disney had started releasing DVDs prior to then, even though Divx didn't die until June of 1999. Going by March of 1997 as the DVD launch, that was only a few months longer than the 2 years it took to get Universal titles on BD (or if you count Criterion, it took longer to get full studio support for BD).
Drexl is offline  
Old 12-24-08 | 11:39 AM
  #200  
namja's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 25,061
Received 32 Likes on 17 Posts
From: In Transit, HQ
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
You're comparing the course Blu-ray will take over DVD to what happened to VHS.
I think that DVD will eventually be replaced, maybe even by Blu-ray, but not in the same way that the VHS was replaced DVD. Around 2000, we all knew that VHS was all but dead. It was only a matter of time. This is certainly not the case with DVD.


Originally Posted by redbill
I sure am glad we closed the Blu-ray sales discussion thread...
namja is offline  


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.