Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > HD Talk
Reload this Page >

Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!

Community
Search
HD Talk The place to discuss Blu-ray, 4K and all other forms and formats of HD and HDTV.

Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-16-09 | 10:57 AM
  #176  
Overpar's Avatar
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,351
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Alexandria, VA
re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!

Overpar is offline  
Old 04-16-09 | 11:14 AM
  #177  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Arizona
re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!

Can't find what audio format these will be in,does anyone know if it's in TrueHD or DTS HD/MA? If it's in MA I am definitely in on these!(mostly in TrueHD also). I too don't think I can wait 3 years for the EE version. I,m hoping the transfer is as good as the SD versions.IMO these are benchmark movies on how to transfer a movie(especially on the audio side).
SUPERMANROB is offline  
Old 04-16-09 | 12:08 PM
  #178  
mattysemo247's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,551
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!

Originally Posted by slop101
i'd rather watch the extended versions in sd than the theatrical versions in hd, so put me down for passing on this set.
+ 1

Unless I can get the set for under $40, i'll wait
mattysemo247 is offline  
Old 04-16-09 | 12:12 PM
  #179  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bay Area, CA
re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!

Ill ask for the first set for xmas and then get the EE later on. I am a completist and want any and all LOTR versions they offer.
Rammsteinfan is offline  
Old 04-16-09 | 12:15 PM
  #180  
Giles's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 33,646
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
From: Washington DC
re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!

Originally Posted by SUPERMANROB
Can't find what audio format these will be in,does anyone know if it's in TrueHD or DTS HD/MA? If it's in MA I am definitely in on these!(mostly in TrueHD also). I too don't think I can wait 3 years for the EE version. I,m hoping the transfer is as good as the SD versions.IMO these are benchmark movies on how to transfer a movie(especially on the audio side).
Isn't Warner's exclusively TrueHD now, including the New Line titles.
Giles is offline  
Old 04-16-09 | 12:41 PM
  #181  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!

I actually prefer the theatrical cuts of Fellowship and Return (the extended of Fellowship drags, while the extended of Return completely kills the suspense of what happens to Aragorn when he goes to raise his army, even though it does restore the Saruman scene), so I will be buying this. When I watch the trilogy, I usually watch Fellowship TE, Two Towers EE, Return TE.
Supermallet is offline  
Old 04-16-09 | 12:54 PM
  #182  
Giles's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 33,646
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
From: Washington DC
re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!

Originally Posted by Suprmallet
I actually prefer the theatrical cuts of Fellowship and Return (the extended of Fellowship drags, while the extended of Return completely kills the suspense of what happens to Aragorn when he goes to raise his army, even though it does restore the Saruman scene), so I will be buying this. When I watch the trilogy, I usually watch Fellowship TE, Two Towers EE, Return TE.

even though that scenes obviousily concludes Saruman's character arch, Jackson in the commentary does state even reinstated it still seems not that well edited and perfunctory. What was odd about that scene was that when Entertainment Weekly first published it's initial then 'new' pics of the trilogy Saruman's demise in green screen form was included - it felt like forever to see THAT scene in the extended cut of 'Return'. And yes, I agree with you Two Towers in it's extended cut is the best of the three - watching that cut on the huge Uptown theatre screen was near cathartic
Giles is offline  
Old 04-16-09 | 01:05 PM
  #183  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Update: BACK
re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!

Originally Posted by Suprmallet
I actually prefer the theatrical cuts of Fellowship and Return (the extended of Fellowship drags, while the extended of Return completely kills the suspense of what happens to Aragorn when he goes to raise his army, even though it does restore the Saruman scene), so I will be buying this. When I watch the trilogy, I usually watch Fellowship TE, Two Towers EE, Return TE.
Agree with this. The EE of Two Towers raised my enjoyment of this installment much higher, but I still greatly prefer the pacing of the theatrical FOTR version.
naitram is offline  
Old 04-16-09 | 01:08 PM
  #184  
Mr. Cinema's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 18,044
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!

Originally Posted by Giles
Isn't Warner's exclusively TrueHD now, including the New Line titles.
They always use TrueHD. However, given Peter Jackon's clout, they could offer up DTS-HD as well. Sort of how Sony added DTS-HD to Spielberg's Close Encounters, even though they also are a TrueHD studio.
Mr. Cinema is offline  
Old 04-16-09 | 01:12 PM
  #185  
Giles's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 33,646
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
From: Washington DC
re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!

Originally Posted by Mr. Cinema
They always use TrueHD. However, given Peter Jackon's clout, they could offer up DTS-HD as well. Sort of how Sony added DTS-HD to Spielberg's Close Encounters, even though they also are a TrueHD studio.

just not on their IMAX bluray titles ... ...
Giles is offline  
Old 04-16-09 | 02:31 PM
  #186  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,097
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!

hey if you have $70 to throw around for the inferior cuts more power to you
despite my love for the trilogy the number of times I actually watch it (extended or theatrical) doesn't warrant me rushing to get the first thing thrown out there by New Line. I have never even watched the theatrical cuts since the release of the extended cuts... there is no reason to.
The high quality of the dvds are more than sufficiant to hold me over till the extended cuts are released
musick is offline  
Old 04-16-09 | 04:16 PM
  #187  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!

Originally Posted by musick
hey if you have $70 to throw around for the inferior cuts more power to you
despite my love for the trilogy the number of times I actually watch it (extended or theatrical) doesn't warrant me rushing to get the first thing thrown out there by New Line. I have never even watched the theatrical cuts since the release of the extended cuts... there is no reason to.
The high quality of the dvds are more than sufficiant to hold me over till the extended cuts are released
The theatrical cuts of Fellowship and Return are actually better edited and paced. Plus the theatrical cut of Return doesn't ruin a major scene for the sake of a bunch of crew cameos. That's plenty reason to watch them instead of the extended cuts, and to spend $70 to get them in HD.
Supermallet is offline  
Old 04-16-09 | 04:32 PM
  #188  
slop101's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 44,034
Received 472 Likes on 327 Posts
From: So. Cal.
re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!

Originally Posted by Suprmallet
The theatrical cuts of Fellowship and Return are actually better edited and paced. Plus the theatrical cut of Return doesn't ruin a major scene for the sake of a bunch of crew cameos. That's plenty reason to watch them instead of the extended cuts, and to spend $70 to get them in HD.
That's just, like, you're opinion, man. As usual, I think you're pretty much wrong on every point.
slop101 is offline  
Old 04-16-09 | 04:36 PM
  #189  
bunkaroo's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 16,400
Received 206 Likes on 139 Posts
From: Chicago West Suburbs
re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!

If there are any new supplements in HD I may check them out. One of the rare film series I try to watch everything.

I think I could actually live with the TE's to a certain extent, but the lack of anything else with Saruman in ROTK ruins it for me.
bunkaroo is offline  
Old 04-16-09 | 04:42 PM
  #190  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,097
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!

Originally Posted by slop101
That's just, like, you're opinion, man. As usual, I think you're pretty much wrong on every point.
not sure about the "as usual" part but... yep
musick is offline  
Old 04-16-09 | 06:46 PM
  #191  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!

Originally Posted by slop101
That's just, like, you're opinion, man. As usual, I think you're pretty much wrong on every point.
As usual? Do we have a history of disagreements?
Supermallet is offline  
Old 04-16-09 | 07:14 PM
  #192  
slop101's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 44,034
Received 472 Likes on 327 Posts
From: So. Cal.
re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!

I think I tend to disagree with your opinions more often than not - no biggie.
slop101 is offline  
Old 04-16-09 | 07:39 PM
  #193  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!

Fair enough. I'd never really noticed. Regardless, we can both agree that your avatar is awesome.
Supermallet is offline  
Old 04-16-09 | 10:32 PM
  #194  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,413
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: 5280
re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!

Originally Posted by Overpar
So nice!
Big Worms is offline  
Old 04-16-09 | 10:58 PM
  #195  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,097
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!

Originally Posted by Big Worms
So nice!
but why did they have to go with this oddball packaging
why isn't the box blu
it will throw the whole uniform look of my blu collection off
musick is offline  
Old 04-17-09 | 06:33 AM
  #196  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,762
Received 28 Likes on 20 Posts
From: TX USA
re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!

Originally Posted by Suprmallet
The theatrical cuts of Fellowship and Return are actually better edited and paced. Plus the theatrical cut of Return doesn't ruin a major scene for the sake of a bunch of crew cameos. That's plenty reason to watch them instead of the extended cuts, and to spend $70 to get them in HD.

While I prefer the EE of Fellowship, I agree with you about ROTK. Although it was nice to see Saruman, there were just too many unnecessary scenes added to an already long movie. I especially hated the scene you're referring to.
collven is offline  
Old 04-17-09 | 07:01 AM
  #197  
tylergfoster's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,540
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!

I'll probably end up getting both sets. I presume the extra features will mimic the DVD counterparts, and thus these will have all the TV specials and trailers, and the Extended Editions later on will have the Jackson-produced bonus features.
tylergfoster is offline  
Old 04-17-09 | 07:58 AM
  #198  
Mr. Cinema's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 18,044
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!

Originally Posted by musick
but why did they have to go with this oddball packaging
why isn't the box blu
it will throw the whole uniform look of my blu collection off
I'm going to guess that these films will be in the same color cases the dvds came in.
Mr. Cinema is offline  
Old 04-17-09 | 08:26 AM
  #199  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 2,787
Received 49 Likes on 27 Posts
From: Chicago, IL
re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!

Originally Posted by Suprmallet
The theatrical cuts of Fellowship and Return are actually better edited and paced. Plus the theatrical cut of Return doesn't ruin a major scene for the sake of a bunch of crew cameos. That's plenty reason to watch them instead of the extended cuts, and to spend $70 to get them in HD.
I agree. I think that the Intro in Fellowship is so much better in the TE than the EE. When I watch the EE, I keep thinking how I wish the intro would have stayed the same from the TE. Like Suprmallet said, I think the pacing is much better in Fellowship as well as Return. So I'm going to be a buyer of this boxset.
Neitzl is offline  
Old 04-17-09 | 09:39 AM
  #200  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,762
Received 28 Likes on 20 Posts
From: TX USA
re: Lord of The Rings on Blu-Ray in 2010!

Originally Posted by droidguy1119
I'll probably end up getting both sets. I presume the extra features will mimic the DVD counterparts, and thus these will have all the TV specials and trailers, and the Extended Editions later on will have the Jackson-produced bonus features.

I wouldn't be so sure. I don't know how much PJ will have to do with this set, but he has said multiple times in the past that he never wants to repeat extras from previous versions when there is a re-release. I'm not sure if this applies to a new format though.
collven is offline  


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.