Have any Blu Rays finally replaced controversial DVDs with problematic video/audio?
#51
DVD Talk Legend
Kim Aubry may insist that the movie's interpositive was always intended to look that way, but I have a very hard time believing that the film's editor and special effects supervisor would go to the trouble of compositing that effect if they didn't want viewers to ever see it.
It's safe to say that the quality of the Dracula transfer is at least debatable. This might not be the best thread to resurrect this debate, so let's just label the Dracula transfer as "controversial" and move on.
#52
DVD Talk Legend
There are people that "vividly" remember seeing the "To Be Continued" at the end of Back to the Future in theaters as well. I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just saying that one's memory is as reliable as we'd like to think it is, especially if it's been augmented by later home video viewings.
#53
DVD Talk Legend
There are people that "vividly" remember seeing the "To Be Continued" at the end of Back to the Future in theaters as well. I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just saying that one's memory is as reliable as we'd like to think it is, especially if it's been augmented by later home video viewings.
Besides, my point still stands -- Why would that effect be composited over the frame if they didn't want anyone to see it?
#54
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That the new Blu-ray transfer is different than the original theatrical release really isn't in dispute. Even Robert Harris and Kim Aubry admit that. Their argument is that the theatrical release and every previous home video edition were wrong, and only this recently-resurrected interpositive is correct.
Besides, my point still stands -- Why would that effect be composited over the frame if they didn't want anyone to see it?
Besides, my point still stands -- Why would that effect be composited over the frame if they didn't want anyone to see it?
#55
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 9,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Chicago, IL
That the new Blu-ray transfer is different than the original theatrical release really isn't in dispute. Even Robert Harris and Kim Aubry admit that. Their argument is that the theatrical release and every previous home video edition were wrong, and only this recently-resurrected interpositive is correct.
Besides, my point still stands -- Why would that effect be composited over the frame if they didn't want anyone to see it?
Besides, my point still stands -- Why would that effect be composited over the frame if they didn't want anyone to see it?
#56
DVD Talk Legend
Since it's clear this revived discussion isn't going to go away, I answered your post in a different, more appropriate thread:
http://forum.dvdtalk.com/showthread....40#post8936040
http://forum.dvdtalk.com/showthread....40#post8936040
#57
DVD Talk Legend
#58
Banned by request
Mod Note: Just because a poster may be critical of Blu-ray does not mean other members have the right to gainsay or attack every post that person makes. This thread was perfectly within the OP's right to post. I thought it was a good question, personally.




