Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > HD Talk
Reload this Page >

Transformers [Blu-Ray] - September 2, 2008

Community
Search
HD Talk The place to discuss Blu-ray, 4K and all other forms and formats of HD and HDTV.

Transformers [Blu-Ray] - September 2, 2008

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-28-08 | 12:30 PM
  #51  
Suspended
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 31,779
Received 101 Likes on 87 Posts
From: Formerly known as "GizmoDVD"/Southern CA
So the only thing new is 2 lossless tracks?
Old 05-28-08 | 12:33 PM
  #52  
Mr. Cinema's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 18,044
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
So the only thing new is 2 lossless tracks?
What would be missing?
Old 05-28-08 | 12:42 PM
  #53  
Suspended
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 31,779
Received 101 Likes on 87 Posts
From: Formerly known as "GizmoDVD"/Southern CA
...just asking if anything is new besides the audio tracks. I don't have my HD DVD copy with me to compare.
Old 05-28-08 | 01:16 PM
  #54  
bunkaroo's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 16,400
Received 206 Likes on 139 Posts
From: Chicago West Suburbs
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
...just asking if anything is new besides the audio tracks. I don't have my HD DVD copy with me to compare.
You mean you don't keep it on your person at all times?
Old 05-28-08 | 01:32 PM
  #55  
Suspended
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 31,779
Received 101 Likes on 87 Posts
From: Formerly known as "GizmoDVD"/Southern CA
No. The movie is not even that good so I never understood why it was wanted so bad I think ive watched my copy twice.
Old 05-28-08 | 02:32 PM
  #56  
tonymontana313's Avatar
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Houston, Texas
Looks like all internet features were ported over as well. Don't understand the point of two lossless tracks but will most definitely be a first day purchase.
Old 05-28-08 | 02:44 PM
  #57  
Drexl's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 16,077
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
From: St. Louis, MO
Originally Posted by tonymontana313
Looks like all internet features were ported over as well. Don't understand the point of two lossless tracks but will most definitely be a first day purchase.
It's possible that the PCM track could be 16-bit while the TrueHD track could be 24-bit, as is the case with some of Sony's titles. There are still some people who have early players not capable of decoding TrueHD, so that's a way of throwing them a bone. I believe Sony has switched over completely to TrueHD now, but for a little while they were offering both.
Old 05-28-08 | 02:46 PM
  #58  
Suspended
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 31,779
Received 101 Likes on 87 Posts
From: Formerly known as "GizmoDVD"/Southern CA
Sony is TrueHD now. They have dropped PCM completley.
Old 05-28-08 | 03:34 PM
  #59  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 46,662
Received 1,383 Likes on 1,085 Posts
Smart move
Old 05-28-08 | 03:49 PM
  #60  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Update: BACK
Won't double-dip for lossless, but good news for the Blu-only folks.
Old 05-28-08 | 04:03 PM
  #61  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 27,815
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: I'm Still Alive in Los Angeles...or am I?
Me neither. I'm most pleased with my HD DVD copy, thank y'all very much!
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
The movie is not even that good so I never understood why it was wanted so bad
But the Babe in the film is nice to watch over & over again.

(...if only her thumbs didn't look like toes, all would be well with the world.)
Old 05-28-08 | 04:38 PM
  #62  
Mr. Cinema's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 18,044
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
HD Digest mentions only a TrueHD track.
Old 05-28-08 | 08:19 PM
  #63  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 42,192
Received 1,461 Likes on 1,136 Posts
Originally Posted by bunkaroo
First you poke out your eyes as well as the eyes of a loved one...


No, seriously. I've always heard the term "double blind test" but never really knew what it meant.
Old 05-28-08 | 09:31 PM
  #64  
Drexl's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 16,077
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
From: St. Louis, MO
Originally Posted by RocShemp


No, seriously. I've always heard the term "double blind test" but never really knew what it meant.
It's where both the researchers and the subjects are unaware of which is the experimental and which is the control group. In this sense, both you (the listener) and the person with the remote would be in the dark as to which is the lossy track and which is the lossless.

This would be very hard to do with one disc, since I believe the selector would have to cycle through the tracks. The problem is, on discs with PCM and even some with TrueHD (Warner's titles), the lossy track is the default, so that's track 1, with the lossless being track 2. So, if there's a commentary or foreign language track, the only switching that can be done is from track 1 to track 2 (not vice versa), and you already know that track 2 is the lossless one.

Then, you have discs where the lossless is the default, with a core (DTS) or parallel (DD) track that only plays if the equipment doesn't support lossless. How you would go about switching between those, I don't know. Maybe switch between HDMI and optical output? So, you might need a disc with only 2 separated tracks. I'll go through my collection and see if I can find any.

The other way would be with 2 discs in separate players, with the input assignments unknown to the selector. They may even have to be unknown to you, if the players are different and you know what input goes with what.

Frankly, I think the single-blind test would be good enough. As long as the selector stays out of sight and keeps his mouth shut, he shouldn't be injecting any bias into the experiment.
Old 05-28-08 | 09:43 PM
  #65  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
Yes, when you put it that way, a single blind test would be sufficient.
Old 05-28-08 | 11:55 PM
  #66  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 42,192
Received 1,461 Likes on 1,136 Posts
I see. Thanks for explaining it to me, Drexl.
Old 05-29-08 | 05:56 AM
  #67  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 9,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Chicago, IL
I was excited about this when it came to HD DVD because I enjoyed it in the theaters...and then when I started watching it on HD DVD I fell asleep during the movie....sold it the next day....
Old 05-29-08 | 10:00 AM
  #68  
bunkaroo's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 16,400
Received 206 Likes on 139 Posts
From: Chicago West Suburbs
Originally Posted by chanster
I was excited about this when it came to HD DVD because I enjoyed it in the theaters...and then when I started watching it on HD DVD I fell asleep during the movie....sold it the next day....
Funny - it was the opposite for me.

Was not too crazy about it in the theater (even though the presentation in DLP was kick ass), but when I saw it again at home I liked it better the second time. Probably my expectations being gone helped.
Old 05-29-08 | 10:27 PM
  #69  
PopcornTreeCt's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 25,913
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
No. The movie is not even that good so I never understood why it was wanted so bad I think ive watched my copy twice.
Yeah, I don't like Cloverfield either.
Old 07-14-08 | 11:11 PM
  #70  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 42,192
Received 1,461 Likes on 1,136 Posts
Last I checked, Amazon was asking like $28 for this. Is there anywhere else it might be up for preorder a bit cheaper? or should I just reserve it at Amazon and hope they drop the price closer to release date?
Old 07-15-08 | 08:22 PM
  #71  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 8,733
Received 153 Likes on 115 Posts
From: SnogBox
Originally Posted by RocShemp
Last I checked, Amazon was asking like $28 for this. Is there anywhere else it might be up for preorder a bit cheaper? or should I just reserve it at Amazon and hope they drop the price closer to release date?
I understand Amazon will automatch if the price drops elsewhere (and is pointed out by somebody I suppose).
Old 07-15-08 | 09:16 PM
  #72  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 42,192
Received 1,461 Likes on 1,136 Posts
Cool. I may just preorder it from them, in that case. Thanks, Superman07.
Old 08-12-08 | 06:21 AM
  #73  
Mr. Cinema's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 18,044
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
DVD Empire has a scan of the back cover, confirming there is only a TrueHD track.
Old 08-12-08 | 09:22 AM
  #74  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Skip... HD-DVD version is good enough for me. The movie is entertaining, but not good enough to double dip. Will get it when my add-on dies...
Old 08-12-08 | 09:08 PM
  #75  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 42,192
Received 1,461 Likes on 1,136 Posts
Lossless is lossless so I'm okay with just a TrueHD track. Besides, with the lack of a PCM track they can either maximize the bitrate of the video or cram in some extra features.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.