![]() |
Originally Posted by PopcornTreeCt
Wow, way too far away. Is this a sign that 2008 is gonna be a terrible year for catalog titles? I think so.
|
Originally Posted by Hammer99
I think the delay on this & others is a sign that they will be giving us BD encodes and not previously prepared HD DVD ports. :thumbsup:
|
Originally Posted by missingtoof
This would definitely be a God send. I remember reading somewhere that Darabont is "embarrassed" of the deleted scenes and doesn't want them shown publicly. I can't imagine that it'd be worse (or more embarrassing) than all the other crap deleted scenes that make it on every other DVD release out there. If anything, Shawshank wasn't long enough!
Can someone give me some more info on this deleted scene special? First I've heard of it. |
Originally Posted by Numes
It was in his commentary. I just listened to it yesterday and he said that people ask him about deleted scenes and that they were deleted for a reason and he was NOT going to put them on the DVD.
Can someone give me some more info on this deleted scene special? First I've heard of it. |
Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
Same here. I can see his stance though. The film is revered and why take a chance at tainting the film just to throw some half-baked extras on a dvd release?
as for the deleted scenes, they were culled together and aired on Showtime in 1995. It sounds from what I've seen on the internet, is that's only two scenes, but I thought there were additional ones, since the cable show was under thirty minutes in length |
Deleted scenes are usually not worth it. If they have a director's commentary over them, it does make it much more worthwhile as an extra to a DVD.
However, Shawshank is probably my favorite movie of all time, so I'll take any tidbit pertaining to this movie that is available. |
I was absolutely thrilled when i saw the release date. Full BD encode and not recycled encode with hd dvd specs. Delicious. Cannot wait.
|
i'm confused by the "BD encode" comments. did warner ever do an HD DVD encode? if so, why wasn't it announced for release on HD DVD at some point? or was it, and i just missed it (very possible)? and why does that particular release date ensure a "BD encode" if a hi-def encode of some kind does already exist? aren't there any number of factors that can contribute to a release date?
i want the best possible presentation as much as anyone else, but i don't think the fact that it comes out in November necessarily guarantees that. |
I don't have The Shawshank Redemption on DVD yet, so it looks like I'll just wait until November and buy it on Blu-ray.
|
Originally Posted by kefrank
i'm confused by the "BD encode" comments. did warner ever do an HD DVD encode? if so, why wasn't it announced for release on HD DVD at some point? or was it, and i just missed it (very possible)? and why does that particular release date ensure a "BD encode" if a hi-def encode of some kind does already exist? aren't there any number of factors that can contribute to a release date?
i want the best possible presentation as much as anyone else, but i don't think the fact that it comes out in November necessarily guarantees that. |
Originally Posted by Hammer99
No guarantee at all, just a hunch and a hope. I do guarantee that there will be many unhappy campers if they half-ass this release.
aside from some early slip ups (like my jaggy Enter the Dragon BD), warner has seemed fairly dedicated to providing solid transfers on classic catalog titles (2001, Blade Runner, etc). |
|
Originally Posted by kefrank
ha! agreed. personally, i do expect them to give great care to this transfer, no matter when they release it.
aside from some early slip ups (like my jaggy Enter the Dragon BD), warner has seemed fairly dedicated to providing solid transfers on classic catalog titles (2001, Blade Runner, etc). |
Originally Posted by Hammer99
IMO Warner still has a lot to prove. Their transfers-to-date are good by 2006 standards, but now it's 2008, and they have yet to match the best that Fox, Sony, and (especially) Disney have been giving us. Just look at last week for an example: Dolby Digital the best on Michael Clayton, WTF?
|
Originally Posted by wewantflair
What does the soundtrack have to do with the transfer?
|
Well, Warner has been saddled with maximum 30 GB transfers, while the best of Fox, Sony and Disney have not. Now that they've shed HD-DVD, we'll see if there is an improvement.
|
And the worms are out of the can.... :D
|
Giving this thread a bump, as I got a good laugh when Bill Hunt revealed the big news today (of Shawshank's release date).
|
Originally Posted by bretski
Giving this thread a bump, as I got a good laugh when Bill Hunt revealed the big news today (of Shawshank's release date).
|
This has long been one of my favorite movies. I will double dip on this one.
|
12/2
http://www.dvdtimes.co.uk/content.php?contentid=68878 love the movie, not a fan of the book style packaging http://www.dvdtimes.co.uk/protectedi...true&width=500 |
Originally Posted by musick
(Post 8934838)
12/2
http://www.dvdtimes.co.uk/content.php?contentid=68878 love the movie, not a fan of the book style packaging http://www.dvdtimes.co.uk/protectedi...true&width=500 I will definitely be purchasing this one... I never even got around to getting it on DVD and this is one of my favorite films! |
I too am not a fan of the Digi-Book packaging, but they could package this in a brown paper bag or a cardboard sleeve and I'd still pick it up on release day.
|
They should have housed it in a make-shift bible and include a little pick axe.
|
Same ugly cover art. Yuck.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:16 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.