Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > HD Talk
Reload this Page >

Blu-ray Disc Player Thread

HD Talk The place to discuss Blu-ray, 4K and all other forms and formats of HD and HDTV.

Blu-ray Disc Player Thread

Old 05-15-08 | 06:05 AM
  #201  
Mr. Cinema's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 18,044
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by sg2386
i am pretty set on purchasing the Panny BD30 standalone for now til profile 2.0 come out, but from what i read on user reviews on CNET.com several people said they have some problems working with Samsung LCD and Plasma sets, hooking up via HDMI causes handshake problems making the screen flicker and causing white snow as well as signal lose.

I bought my Samsung plasma last year and i hope not the case.
My Panasonic/Samsung LCD combo work fine. Firmware 1.6 addressed the HDMI handshake issue.
Old 05-18-08 | 12:31 PM
  #202  
lizard's Avatar
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 7,944
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: the Western Slope, Colorado
The release dates for the new Pioneer players have been announced:

Pioneer BDP-51FD, MSRP $600, Early July
Pioneer BDP-05FD, MSRP $800, Early August

Both are Profile 1.1 and full-featured (7.1 analog output, bitstreaming lossless codecs, decoding lossless codecs).

By the way, Chris Walker, the Pioneer rep who posts on AVS, said that production of the 05FD won't even begin until July.

Last edited by lizard; 05-18-08 at 01:44 PM.
Old 05-18-08 | 12:57 PM
  #203  
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: CALI!
The BDP-51FD will be mine.
Old 05-18-08 | 01:11 PM
  #204  
Suspended
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 31,779
Received 101 Likes on 87 Posts
From: Formerly known as "GizmoDVD"/Southern CA
The 05FD looks mighty nice.
Old 05-18-08 | 01:38 PM
  #205  
lizard's Avatar
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 7,944
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: the Western Slope, Colorado
Originally Posted by Arpeggi
The BDP-51FD will be mine.
I understand the feeling! Although I don't like the high price, the 51FD is the first BD player that meets my needs, so I am sorely tempted.

I will be interested to see if Sony holds to their previously announced prices on the S350 and S550 (I'm guessing they won't). The S550 will also be full-featured. The Panny BD50 is too expensive for now, although they might drop the price as other players become available.

But everything I have read suggests that the Pioneer players will be a step above the others in performance and support.
Old 05-18-08 | 01:47 PM
  #206  
Suspended
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 31,779
Received 101 Likes on 87 Posts
From: Formerly known as "GizmoDVD"/Southern CA
I would not be shocked to see Sony raise the price of the S550 (and maybe the S350).
Old 05-19-08 | 10:02 PM
  #207  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Cranston RI
If not mentioned or discussed, you should consider the new Samsung BD-P1500, I just got it at Walmart for 348.00 after reading some stellar reviews, and I have to say, it is awesome!! Beautiful picture, and passes all the new audio formats via bitstream! DTS MA is just amazing to hear..
Old 05-20-08 | 01:28 AM
  #208  
Suspended
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 31,779
Received 101 Likes on 87 Posts
From: Formerly known as "GizmoDVD"/Southern CA
I won't touch a Samsung player after their 1st, 2nd and 3rd generation player had so many bugs. I won't even mention their Dual format player that has all 2 channels of TrueHD power. Hopefully Samsung got things right this time but its too late for me.
Old 05-20-08 | 03:39 PM
  #209  
lizard's Avatar
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 7,944
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: the Western Slope, Colorado
Originally Posted by Rockybalboa
If not mentioned or discussed, you should consider the new Samsung BD-P1500, I just got it at Walmart for 348.00 after reading some stellar reviews, and I have to say, it is awesome!! Beautiful picture, and passes all the new audio formats via bitstream! DTS MA is just amazing to hear..
Those at AVS who bought the 1500 seem to like it also. If/when Samsung adds Profile 2.0 and DTS-HD MA decoding via firmware updates, that player would fit the needs of many, save those of us with older non-HDMI receivers. The downside of bitstreaming lossless codecs is that one loses secondary sounds, such as commentaries and menu sounds, which have to be mixed in the player. This would require switching to PCM to listen to those sounds.

How is your player at loading java-heavy discs? What are the boot times like? [On to tray eject, On to menu screen with disc already loaded, tray closing to menu screen (varies with the title, of course), and shut down time?]
Old 05-20-08 | 05:31 PM
  #210  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Cranston RI
Boot time very fast, faster than I have seen from any Blu Ray, no issues at all so far with any movie I have tossed into it, I got a new Onkyo reciever with all the sound formats built into it, so for me, this Samsung was perfect.
Old 06-02-08 | 10:07 AM
  #211  
Pointyskull's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,834
Received 52 Likes on 44 Posts
From: Formerly known as "12thmonkey"/Frankfort, IL
Originally Posted by Rockybalboa
Boot time very fast, faster than I have seen from any Blu Ray, no issues at all so far with any movie I have tossed into it, I got a new Onkyo reciever with all the sound formats built into it, so for me, this Samsung was perfect.
Have you tried it with any single layer DVD-R or DVD+R and/or dl DVD+R?
Old 06-03-08 | 06:11 AM
  #212  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Republic of Texas
Originally Posted by lizard
How is your player at loading java-heavy discs? What are the boot times like?
On to tray eject = 5 seconds
Tray closing to menu screen = Superbad: 25 seconds to penis head loading screen + 15 seconds from penis head screen to main menu. Penis. Run Lola Run: 20 seconds to Lola loading screen + 10 seconds from Lola screen to main menu
On to menu screen with disc already loaded = Superbad: 30 seconds; Run Lola Run: 25 seconds
Shut down time = 6 seconds to blank screen + 2 seconds from blank screen to blue light on player switching to red
Originally Posted by lizard
The downside of bitstreaming lossless codecs is that one loses secondary sounds, such as commentaries and menu sounds, which have to be mixed in the player. This would require switching to PCM to listen to those sounds.
Oddly, while that is exactly what the manual says, that doesn't seem to be the case. I'm bitstreaming the TrueHD track over optical on Superbad and I can still hear the "dings" on the Super-Meter - and I have no problem switching over to the commentary. Wouldn't those be considered "secondary audio"?
The player is also nice and quiet during play. I have to have my head at least three feet from the player before I can hear anything; only loading and shutting down produces brief noise. The only problem I've had with the BDP-1500 is that it wouldn't play Disc 2 of The Muppet Show Season 3 (which presented no problem in any of my other players). Not a big deal, since I didn't have a pressing need to watch that upconverted - but I'm hoping that problem doesn't crop up again.
Old 06-03-08 | 12:20 PM
  #213  
BSTNFAN's Avatar
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NW of Boston
Originally Posted by Luther Heggs
I'm bitstreaming the TrueHD track over optical on Superbad and I can still hear the "dings" on the Super-Meter - and I have no problem switching over to the commentary. Wouldn't those be considered "secondary audio"?
You should double check what track you are actually getting. I'm pretty sure TrueHD cannot go over optical (or coax), but only via HDMI.
Old 06-03-08 | 06:26 PM
  #214  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Republic of Texas
Originally Posted by BSTNFAN
You should double check what track you are actually getting. I'm pretty sure TrueHD cannot go over optical (or coax), but only via HDMI.
Yes, it's definitely the TrueHD track I'm listening to. I'm not getting its full dynamic range over optical, but the discrete channels (and the menu/supplement audio) are definitely coming through. That's with the player set to "Bitstream (Audiophile)." With the Uncompressed PCM track, the player has to be set to "Re-Encode" to get the discrete channels over optical.
BTW, no problems with single layer DVD-Rs so far.
Old 06-03-08 | 07:40 PM
  #215  
BSTNFAN's Avatar
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NW of Boston
Originally Posted by Luther Heggs
Yes, it's definitely the TrueHD track I'm listening to. I'm not getting its full dynamic range over optical, but the discrete channels (and the menu/supplement audio) are definitely coming through. That's with the player set to "Bitstream (Audiophile)." With the Uncompressed PCM track, the player has to be set to "Re-Encode" to get the discrete channels over optical.
BTW, no problems with single layer DVD-Rs so far.
I'm not trying to be rude, but the fact is that neither optical or coax has the capability to transmit either Dolby TrueHD or DTS-MA. Chances are you are getting the "lossy" core track that is embedded. To get the new codecs you MUST have HDMI. There is no way around it. The choices of "Audiophile,' and "Re-encode" only impact HDMI. Sorry.
Old 06-03-08 | 08:53 PM
  #216  
Mr. Cinema's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 18,044
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You CAN'T bitstream LOSSLESS audio via OPTICAL. It doesn't have enough bandwith.
Old 06-03-08 | 09:04 PM
  #217  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Republic of Texas
Originally Posted by BSTNFAN
I'm not trying to be rude, but the fact is that neither optical or coax has the capability to transmit either Dolby TrueHD or DTS-MA. Chances are you are getting the "lossy" core track that is embedded.
Well, yeah, that sounds like it exactly. I didn't know how to put it, but I realized I wasn't getting the full dynamic range of the TrueHD track.
Originally Posted by BSTNFAN
The choices of "Audiophile,' and "Re-encode" only impact HDMI. Sorry.
No need to apologize, but that's not the case either. Even the BDP-1500 manual will tell you that changing these settings changes how the audio is sent via optical. But like I said, it also warns of resultant problems with "secondary audio" that must be either disc-specific or non-existent as I have yet to experience them.
Old 06-04-08 | 07:03 PM
  #218  
darkside's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 19,879
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
From: San Antonio
My Toshiba A-2 took a mysterious dive on me last week. I had the extended warranty on it from Best Buy and they called me today to let me know they would not fix it and I would have to get a replacement player.

The value of the exchange is $500 which is the exact price of the LG BH200.

Edit: Basically my only option for HD DVD was the BH200 and the Sammy. The Sammy was not going to happen with all the bad Samsung BD player stories and I really didn't want to lose HD DVD.

I went with the LG BH200 Super Blu and the first one I took home was a super dud. Crashed constantly usually before I could even start the movie. It would freeze for a few seconds and just turn off. I returned it and took the stores last BH200 home with hopes it was just a bad player.

So far it seems that the first one was just a bad player. The second BH200 is performing very well. I have watched two HD DVDs, 1 DVD and 1 Blu-ray with no issues. I also tossed in a few dozen other discs to see if I could repeat the freeze ups, but it had no issues so far. The firmware and driver update made it a profile 1.1 player so unlike my piece of junk Sharp BD player it actually has the ability to navigate a Java menu without choking to death and it loads the discs just a bit slower than the PS3. Compared to the Sharp that could take minutes to load the Java menus on some discs.

I'm also fairly impressed with the Qdeo chip for DVD. Very nice upconverting on the discs I have checked out so far. All of these Linux boxes have issues, but I'm finding the BH200 problems to be pretty minor. On the plus side it decodes Dolby TrueHD 7.1, has very good video quality with all formats and can handle all the advanced features of HD DVD and BD profile 1.1. It was also a breeze to hack and is now a region free player that supports PAL. My TV can handle it so I can watch Region 2 PAL DVDs on it with no problems. It also has the ability to be profile 2.0 compatible if LG decides to upgrade it. It has the network port already for HD DVD and a front USB port that can be used to store all BD downloads if the internal gets full.

The negatives are minor so far. No DTS MA decoding though it will pass it if I had a compatible receiver, It stretches 4:3 material which is a minor hassle but can be fixed by changing the resolution to 480p for that stuff and pillarboxing with my TV, and reading through some forums some people say it has occasional audio drop outs through HDMI though I haven't noticed one yet.

I'm going to keep it in heavy use the next month to try and find other flaws, but considering the issues I have had with the Toshiba HD DVD players (A-1, A-2 and A-3 all had freeze ups and A-1 and A-2 both ended up getting disc read errors before getting retired) and my Sharp standalone BD player this one is looking to be the best player I have owned. Now I just have to hope it lasts.

Last edited by darkside; 06-05-08 at 08:43 PM.
Old 06-06-08 | 08:13 PM
  #219  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,863
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: The lonely depths of my mind
Could someone help me please ? I'm getting a blu-ray player in a few weeks and have a question. On the back of the player is an HDMI port. I know that this can be used for audio, but what about video ? If I were to use it for video, how would I go about this ? Is it possible to have the HDMI cable do both video and audio at the same time ? Thank you.
Old 06-06-08 | 08:33 PM
  #220  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 8,733
Received 153 Likes on 115 Posts
From: SnogBox
Originally Posted by Spottedfeather
Could someone help me please ? I'm getting a blu-ray player in a few weeks and have a question. On the back of the player is an HDMI port. I know that this can be used for audio, but what about video ? If I were to use it for video, how would I go about this ? Is it possible to have the HDMI cable do both video and audio at the same time ? Thank you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hdmi
Old 06-06-08 | 08:36 PM
  #221  
Drexl's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 16,077
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
From: St. Louis, MO
Originally Posted by Spottedfeather
Could someone help me please ? I'm getting a blu-ray player in a few weeks and have a question. On the back of the player is an HDMI port. I know that this can be used for audio, but what about video ? If I were to use it for video, how would I go about this ? Is it possible to have the HDMI cable do both video and audio at the same time ? Thank you.
Fresh fish! Fresh fish!

Yes, as you no doubt read in the link above, you can use it for both audio and video.

Now, if your TV has HDMI but your receiver does not, you'll have to use optical or coaxial digital for audio (assuming you have a home theater system). If your receiver has HDMI, you connect a cable to that, then another HDMI cable to the TV.
Old 06-08-08 | 03:29 PM
  #222  
lizard's Avatar
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 7,944
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: the Western Slope, Colorado
A CNET review of the Panasonic BD50 is up:
http://reviews.cnet.com/video-player...-32815617.html
Old 06-08-08 | 03:35 PM
  #223  
Suspended
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 31,779
Received 101 Likes on 87 Posts
From: Formerly known as "GizmoDVD"/Southern CA
Originally Posted by lizard
A CNET review of the Panasonic BD50 is up:
http://reviews.cnet.com/video-player...-32815617.html
Yikes. CNet pretty much slammed it. PS3 still reigns supreme and for $300 less. The Sony S550 appears to be a carbon copy of the Panasonic just $200 cheaper...looks like I will for sure be waiting on that one.
Old 06-08-08 | 04:12 PM
  #224  
darkside's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 19,879
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
From: San Antonio
Why anyone looking for just a BD player would go with anything but the PS3 is a complete mystery to me. Yeah, I know some people just want a regular CE player, but these things are so underpowered and overpriced.

To get the full use of the BD format with no issues the PS3 is the "only" real option out there. I'm liking my LG BH200, but the PS3 is still better than it and every other player on the market. I can't wait for the $2K Denon to get released just to see if something can compete with the $400 PS3 and the cell processor.
Old 06-08-08 | 06:14 PM
  #225  
Suspended
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 31,779
Received 101 Likes on 87 Posts
From: Formerly known as "GizmoDVD"/Southern CA
Originally Posted by darkside
Why anyone looking for just a BD player would go with anything but the PS3 is a complete mystery to me. Yeah, I know some people just want a regular CE player, but these things are so underpowered and overpriced.

To get the full use of the BD format with no issues the PS3 is the "only" real option out there. I'm liking my LG BH200, but the PS3 is still better than it and every other player on the market. I can't wait for the $2K Denon to get released just to see if something can compete with the $400 PS3 and the cell processor.
I want something that has an actual display and something that can be stacked. PS3 can not do either of these.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.