Black Hawk Down & Layer Cake BD50 (11/14)
#76
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Blu-Ray: We Don't Need No Stinkin' Petition
Yes. Four titles with TrueHD out of the how many released? Yeah, I take issue with that. You don't need bias to see that we, as consumers, are being jipped.
#77
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by joshd2012
Yes. Four titles with TrueHD out of the how many released? Yeah, I take issue with that. You don't need bias to see that we, as consumers, are being jipped.
So, there are alot more factors than you think.
You complain about hd-dvd, but you dont even speak of the fact that the BD version didnt include an uncompressed track either!
Oh, we are in a BHD thread....ill stop digressing
#78
DVD Talk God
And now I have to admit that I really don't care much about TrueHD or any of the other audio formats. My ears are not nearly as good as my eyes, though. I actually think my iPod sounds great.
#79
Originally Posted by RockStrongo
Cj just told me that Corpse was pushing the bandwidth on hd-dvd and that the disc size didnt have anything to do with it. He said its probably 80% full.
#80
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by DthRdrX
I wonder what problems they had with bandwidth. The topic has been discussed too much on AVS but I would think the live action movies with TrueHD like Troy/Batman/Superman Returns would take up more bandwidth than Corpse Bride?
#82
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Blu-Ray: We Don't Need No Stinkin' Petition
Originally Posted by RockStrongo
CJ made a good point about Corpse Bride...he said that since it was their first stop-motion movie, they gave more to the pic bitrate to be cautious. This was WHV's call.
So, there are alot more factors than you think.
You complain about hd-dvd, but you dont even speak of the fact that the BD version didnt include an uncompressed track either!
Oh, we are in a BHD thread....ill stop digressing
So, there are alot more factors than you think.
You complain about hd-dvd, but you dont even speak of the fact that the BD version didnt include an uncompressed track either!
Oh, we are in a BHD thread....ill stop digressing

Edit: missed your earlier post.
#83
Originally Posted by RockStrongo
Read my next post and maybe that will answer it.
Anyway, I'd prefer better PQ anyway over SQ. I'm just surprised this title was an issue for WB.
#84
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Blu-Ray: We Don't Need No Stinkin' Petition
Originally Posted by RockStrongo
Cj just told me that Corpse was pushing the bandwidth on hd-dvd and that the disc size didnt have anything to do with it. He said its probably 80% full.
He said that WHV decided to give more bandwidth to the picture.
Anyways, why arent you complaining about the BD version not having a TrueHD or uncompressed track??
He said that WHV decided to give more bandwidth to the picture.
Anyways, why arent you complaining about the BD version not having a TrueHD or uncompressed track??
Of course, that might be the bandwidth avaiable for VC-1 rather than the HD DVD limits. I don't think this was ever addressed as a potential issue with going with VC-1.
#85
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by joshd2012
But I was talking about both formats. I don't know why people keep thinking that TrueHD is a HD DVD only audio codec. Incased you missed the announcement, Dolby said they would have 7.1 TrueHD in the PS3. The TrueHD track would be for both discs! I wouldn't care that the BD disc didn't have an uncompressed track as long as it had a TrueHD track.
Edit: missed your earlier post.
Edit: missed your earlier post.
#86
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Mpls, MN
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
TrueHD is an EXTRA on HD DVD. it's not a requirement, IMHO.
Rock, Josh,
DD and DD+ can have the same bitrate on anything. DD+ adds better compression to fit more in that bitrate. And it adds 2 channels. That is the only difference between these two codecs. (I should say it adds many channels, limited to 2 more on HDDVD/BD)
#87
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by Spiky
Rock, Josh,
DD and DD+ can have the same bitrate on anything. DD+ adds better compression to fit more in that bitrate. And it adds 2 channels. That is the only difference between these two codecs. (I should say it adds many channels, limited to 2 more on HDDVD/BD)
DD and DD+ can have the same bitrate on anything. DD+ adds better compression to fit more in that bitrate. And it adds 2 channels. That is the only difference between these two codecs. (I should say it adds many channels, limited to 2 more on HDDVD/BD)
#88
Banned
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by Spiky
Thank God your HO is not gospel, Freak. Quality audio is not an extra. And IMHO, you should not consider it so. There still hasn't been a disc that would make me drop everything and go buy either format. It's looking like there won't be for some time. Esp considering the discs that do have this are only including 30 year old lossless tech so far.
#89
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,680
Received 2,789 Likes
on
1,854 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
Originally Posted by joshd2012
That is pretty insane if they are maxing out bandwidth!!!
#90
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
It really is. I'm curious what would cause this.
He said to me "pushing the bandwidth" and josh said "maxing out the bandwidth", that may not necessarily mean the same thing.
#91
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Blu-Ray: We Don't Need No Stinkin' Petition
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
It really is. I'm curious what would cause this.
I would like to post on AVS and get Amir's take, but I don't want to call out CJ like that and quote him without him posting it.
#92
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by joshd2012
I would like to post on AVS and get Amir's take, but I don't want to call out CJ like that and quote him without him posting it.
I dont think anything he said to me on this subject is really "in confidence", but just in case.
#93
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Mpls, MN
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
Who said that the current audio specs are not "quality?" Certainly not *I*.
#94
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Blu-Ray: We Don't Need No Stinkin' Petition
Originally Posted by RockStrongo
Yes, if you do so, please do it generically, id rather not lose CJ's confidence.
I dont think anything he said to me on this subject is really "in confidence", but just in case.
I dont think anything he said to me on this subject is really "in confidence", but just in case.
#95
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by joshd2012
Exactly why I won't be posting anything. It is his information to post, and if he feels he can post it, he will.
#96
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally Posted by joshd2012
BD has a lot of titles with uncompressed PCM. HD DVD has 4 with TrueHD.
The good news is that newer BD releases seem to have pretty good PQ and some, at least, have PCM audio. Why Sony refuses to use modern compression codecs for both picture and audio is a mystery to me.
However, I entirely agree with you (and kvrdave) that PQ and AQ are more important than extras. Nevertheless, why not have both? Using modern codecs they could do that, or, at the very least, they could include a second disc for extras. Instead they are releasing substandard discs. I just don't get it.
The Dolby Digital track on BD is the same bitrate as the DD+ track on HD DVD. The difference is that HD DVD limited their DD tracks to 448Kbps (?) and BD did not. So they are both running at 640Kbps. The "+" is just a marketing scheme to make you think you are getting more when you really aren't.
More to the point, I use DD+ and the difference between that and plain old DD (or DTS) is truly stunning. Whether Dolby TrueHD will be a noticeable improvement over DD+ on my system I look forward to checking on when I get my copy of Batman Begins in a couple of weeks.
#97
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Blu-Ray: We Don't Need No Stinkin' Petition
Originally Posted by lizard
BD also has a lot of titles with poor PQ as well as many with plain old SD DVD sound codecs. All the HD DVD titles I have seen at least have DD+. I would guess that TrueHD will become more common on HD DVD releases going forward.
The good news is that newer BD releases seem to have pretty good PQ and some, at least, have PCM audio. Why Sony refuses to use modern compression codecs for both picture and audio is a mystery to me.
However, I entirely agree with you (and kvrdave) that PQ and AQ are more important than extras. Nevertheless, why not have both? Using modern codecs they could do that, or, at the very least, they could include a second disc for extras. Instead they are releasing substandard discs. I just don't get it.
Spiky beat me to it on this one, so I assume that it is now clear that the compression algorithm is much more important than bit rates.
More to the point, I use DD+ and the difference between that and plain old DD (or DTS) is truly stunning. Whether Dolby TrueHD will be a noticeable improvement over DD+ on my system I look forward to checking on when I get my copy of Batman Begins in a couple of weeks.
The good news is that newer BD releases seem to have pretty good PQ and some, at least, have PCM audio. Why Sony refuses to use modern compression codecs for both picture and audio is a mystery to me.
However, I entirely agree with you (and kvrdave) that PQ and AQ are more important than extras. Nevertheless, why not have both? Using modern codecs they could do that, or, at the very least, they could include a second disc for extras. Instead they are releasing substandard discs. I just don't get it.
Spiky beat me to it on this one, so I assume that it is now clear that the compression algorithm is much more important than bit rates.
More to the point, I use DD+ and the difference between that and plain old DD (or DTS) is truly stunning. Whether Dolby TrueHD will be a noticeable improvement over DD+ on my system I look forward to checking on when I get my copy of Batman Begins in a couple of weeks.
#98
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Mpls, MN
Well, DVD-A brings tears of joy to my eyes. And then tears of sadness when I think of it dying. And that's with Klipsch speakers!
Keep in mind that TrueHD and LPCM are still only giving you CD audio at this time on HDDVD/BD. One disc has LPCM 48/24, still not up to spec. Although for most things I rate CD PCM above DD/DTS. They (TrueHD & DD+ as currently used) are probably very comparable.
Keep in mind that TrueHD and LPCM are still only giving you CD audio at this time on HDDVD/BD. One disc has LPCM 48/24, still not up to spec. Although for most things I rate CD PCM above DD/DTS. They (TrueHD & DD+ as currently used) are probably very comparable.
#99
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by joshd2012
The DD and DD+ streams on BD and HD DVD are exactly the same. You are correct that DD+ compresses better, but that also means that quality can be slightly worse than DD, atleast according to Dolby.
It would be nice if we could get full 96/24 audio, but I doubt they want us to ever have a copy of the movie that close to perfect.
Last edited by darkside; 09-26-06 at 02:05 PM.
#100
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Blu-Ray: We Don't Need No Stinkin' Petition
Originally Posted by darkside
I have yet to find a single DD+ track that was anything but superior to the DD track. I definitely wouldn't buy a Blu-ray player that didn't fully decode DD+.



