Black Hawk Down & Layer Cake BD50 (11/14)
#51
Banned
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by joshd2012
Because of the size constraints, one was never attempted! That is a damn shame! To leave off better AQ just to keep the extras is, to me, a wasted effort when the title could have been so much more.
And luckily, you're in the minority on the extras issue. People are used to getting their moneys worth. Do you see "normal" people buying superbits? No. So what makes you think they'd buy an HD version that's barebones or extra-lite for even MORE money?
Last edited by digitalfreaknyc; 09-26-06 at 10:19 AM.
#52
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by joshd2012
Because of the size constraints, one was never attempted! That is a damn shame! To leave off better AQ just to keep the extras is, to me, a wasted effort when the title could have been so much more.
#53
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Blu-Ray: We Don't Need No Stinkin' Petition
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
True HD is so much more? Hmmm...wait a second. I thought you didn't own an HD DVD player. So how the hell would you know the difference?
#55
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Blu-Ray: We Don't Need No Stinkin' Petition
Originally Posted by RockStrongo
What is your source on this?? I just emailed CJ and will see what he has to say about this.
#56
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Blu-Ray: We Don't Need No Stinkin' Petition
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
And you don't have one of those either...
Try again.
Try again.
#57
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by joshd2012
Please do. If CJ says they could have added a TrueHD track but decided not to, then I blame the studio for being lazy. If he says they couldn't because of size contraints, then I blame the studio for placing extras above AQ.
Like digi said, TrueHD right now is being treated as an extra and included on their major releases. I wish it were the norm.
I highly doubt that Corpse Bride just didnt have room (its only a 76 minute feature), but we will see what CJ says. Batman Begins has ALOT of extras, has IME and a TrueHD soundtrack. Troy, of course, has already been discussed.
I think it probably comes down to the cost of it more than anything, but thats just my guess.
Last edited by RockStrongo; 09-26-06 at 10:34 AM.
#58
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Blu-Ray: We Don't Need No Stinkin' Petition
Originally Posted by RockStrongo
Like digi said, TrueHD right now is being treated as an extra and included on their major releases. I wish it were the norm.
#59
Banned
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by joshd2012
So clever, aren't we? I guess the fact that I will have one in less than two months, and that this title will still exist on the format at that time without TrueHD doesn't mean anything to you? Despite the fact that I will not be watching that title today doesn't negate the fact that it will still be lacking when I do watch it in less than 60 days.
Give me a break. I want the best possible presentation with a packed disc of extras. That's not too much to ask.
SD DVD already set that bar pretty high and I'm not going 3 steps forward and 1 step back like BD is doing. IMHO, HD DVD is taking 3 steps forward and stopping.
#60
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by joshd2012
And that is the sad truth. With so many PCM releases on Blu-Ray, there should be no excuse for every release, on both sides, to have a lossless audio track.
#61
DVD Talk God
I will side with josh2012 and say that I don't give a rat's ass about extras.
Back on topic, BHD was pulled? I wonder if it is just to allow an official press release. Eventually Sony has to get BD50 figured out, I would think.
Back on topic, BHD was pulled? I wonder if it is just to allow an official press release. Eventually Sony has to get BD50 figured out, I would think.
#62
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Blu-Ray: We Don't Need No Stinkin' Petition
Originally Posted by RockStrongo
Well, thats a different debate....Sure BD has some titles with uncompressed PCM, but HD-DVD does have some TrueHD titles along with almost every title (maybe all im not sure) at least having Dolby Digital + where on BD many just have the same track as the standard dvd.
The Dolby Digital track on BD is the same bitrate as the DD+ track on HD DVD. The difference is that HD DVD limited their DD tracks to 448Kbps (?) and BD did not. So they are both running at 640Kbps. The "+" is just a marketing scheme to make you think you are getting more when you really aren't.
#63
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Blu-Ray: We Don't Need No Stinkin' Petition
Originally Posted by kvrdave
I will side with josh2012 and say that I don't give a rat's ass about extras.
Back on topic, BHD was pulled?
Back on topic, BHD was pulled?

No, BHD was not pulled. The announcement was, but not before enough people saw it. They are probably planning a big announcement to usher in the BD-50 and wanted to save any official notice for that.
#64
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by kvrdave
Back on topic, BHD was pulled? I wonder if it is just to allow an official press release. Eventually Sony has to get BD50 figured out, I would think.
It very well might be delayed past 11/14. It wouldnt surprise me, but if thats the case, I wonder how that affects the BD50 version of Superman Returns.
#65
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by joshd2012
No, BHD was not pulled. The announcement was, but not before enough people saw it. They are probably planning a big announcement to usher in the BD-50 and wanted to save any official notice for that.
But, the announcement WAS pulled off the official website according to TDB....Your probably right and it will be announced soon, but it also wouldnt surprise me if they delay it.
#66
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by joshd2012
The Dolby Digital track on BD is the same bitrate as the DD+ track on HD DVD.
Unlike the picture quality though, for many movies, I dont think an uncompressed track would make a huge difference over the Dolby Digital at a higher bitrate. RV on BD has an uncompressed PCM track. Big whoop.
I have alot of hd-dvd titles that just have Dolby Digital +, i think they sound great and they include all of the extras from the sd release. I think the trade off is worth it....that doesnt even mention that TrueHD might have delayed a release, increased the cost and might not have made a big difference anyways (Rumor Has It??).
For big titles like Superman Returns, Batman Begins and Troy, TrueHD is/will be a big benefit on hd-dvd. Luckily, for BHD, it looks like they are including an uncompressed PCM track.
Last edited by RockStrongo; 09-26-06 at 11:23 AM.
#67
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by RockStrongo
Was there confirmation that a TrueHD soundtrack existed and was scrapped due to the extras taking up too much space??
That makes sense too....like I said, many longer running titles have it included.
So, basically, the HD-DVD and BD versions are the same in this case.
#68
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Blu-Ray: We Don't Need No Stinkin' Petition
Originally Posted by RockStrongo
Cj said that it was "creative choice" on the part of WHV not to include it on the hd-dvd. He didnt go in to specifics. So, it doesnt sound like the size was the factor in it.
That makes sense too....like I said, many longer running titles have it included.
So, basically, the HD-DVD and BD versions are the same in this case.
That makes sense too....like I said, many longer running titles have it included.
So, basically, the HD-DVD and BD versions are the same in this case.
#69
Banned
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by joshd2012
"Creative choice" is a political non-answer. Size could have very well been the factor, and you can't really remove any possibility of that because you didn't have an answer saying it wasn't.
#70
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by joshd2012
"Creative choice" is a political non-answer. Size could have very well been the factor, and you can't really remove any possibility of that because you didn't have an answer saying it wasn't.
Originally Posted by joshd2012
Because of the size constraints, one was never attempted!
#71
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Blu-Ray: We Don't Need No Stinkin' Petition
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
What's your point? It's not a guarantee on EITHER format.
#72
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dallas, TX
Cj just told me that Corpse was pushing the bandwidth on hd-dvd and that the disc size didnt have anything to do with it. He said its probably 80% full.
He said that WHV decided to give more bandwidth to the picture.
Anyways, why arent you complaining about the BD version not having a TrueHD or uncompressed track??
He said that WHV decided to give more bandwidth to the picture.
Anyways, why arent you complaining about the BD version not having a TrueHD or uncompressed track??
#73
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Blu-Ray: We Don't Need No Stinkin' Petition
Originally Posted by RockStrongo
Whoa buddy, your the one who made the initial claim without backing it up.
I just said that "it didn't sound like size was a factor". My opinion.
#74
Banned
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by joshd2012
If size really was the reason for the decision, then dropping the extras for a TrueHD track would have been my prefered option. Also would show that extras were included at the expense of audio quality, something you said BD "had" to do but HD DVD didn't.



