Blu-Ray = R-rated, DVD = unrated...why?
#51
Banned by request
Well, if you want to get the thread back on track, my original point still stands. Even if BD didn't exist, Sony would still have released R-rated versions first, and unrated as a double-dip. The format has nothing to do with it. And it's not a good reason to not support BD.
#52
Banned
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
Well, if you want to get the thread back on track, my original point still stands. Even if BD didn't exist, Sony would still have released R-rated versions first, and unrated as a double-dip. The format has nothing to do with it. And it's not a good reason to not support BD.
There are about 100 other good reasons not to support BD.
#53
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
Well, if you want to get the thread back on track, my original point still stands. Even if BD didn't exist, Sony would still have released R-rated versions first, and unrated as a double-dip. The format has nothing to do with it. And it's not a good reason to not support BD.
#54
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Originally Posted by Josh Z
Isn't Sony releasing these movies both R and Unrated on DVD simultaneously, yet only R-rated on Blu-Ray?
#55
Banned by request
Originally Posted by Josh Z
Isn't Sony releasing these movies both R and Unrated on DVD simultaneously, yet only R-rated on Blu-Ray?
#56
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
Yes, and there were several reasons given for why they might do that. All I'm saying is those reasons would all stand if Sony were supporting HD-DVD.
#58
New Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My guess is that the manufacturing capacity is limited for BD. So, they chose to release the R rated version. With any new format there is ramp up time to reach the levels of production they would like. By sticking with the one BD version they maximise their number of units they can produce with the equipment they have. As capacities increase I would expect simultainous released of rated and unrated BDs to become more common.
#61
DVD Talk God
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
Yes, and there were several reasons given for why they might do that. All I'm saying is those reasons would all stand if Sony were supporting HD-DVD.
I agree. But since it is a crappy practice, AND they are trying tolaunch a format, I think there is more reason to resent them for it. If some random studio were doing it, I could give them the finger and not buy their crap. If Sony gets their way, they will have the only format, and we will be stuck with their double dip. Thus, it is nice to hope that they fail, so that in so doing, they will pay doubley for trying to double dip. Seems like poetic justice to me.
#64
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,731
Received 2,825 Likes
on
1,873 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
We don't know. it's not out yet.
#67
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,731
Received 2,825 Likes
on
1,873 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
Okay, I am mistaken.
#69
Banned
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by Giles
so under theory, since MGM has only released the unrated version, the Blu-Ray will be the unrated version.
#71
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Here is a question concering separate HD/BR Unrated/Rated releases. Why not have both versions on the same release? Especially in the case of something like Robocop where the difference is 40 seconds of graphic footage?
Can BR/HD not handle seemless branching or not have enough space for two layers and two prints of a film?
That seems like a smarter option that spending a ton of money on creating two editions of a film on the formats.
Can BR/HD not handle seemless branching or not have enough space for two layers and two prints of a film?
That seems like a smarter option that spending a ton of money on creating two editions of a film on the formats.
#72
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,731
Received 2,825 Likes
on
1,873 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
Originally Posted by Julie Walker
Here is a question concering separate HD/BR Unrated/Rated releases. Why not have both versions on the same release?
#73
Moderator
Originally Posted by Julie Walker
Here is a question concering separate HD/BR Unrated/Rated releases. Why not have both versions on the same release? Especially in the case of something like Robocop where the difference is 40 seconds of graphic footage?
Can BR/HD not handle seemless branching or not have enough space for two layers and two prints of a film?
That seems like a smarter option that spending a ton of money on creating two editions of a film on the formats.
Can BR/HD not handle seemless branching or not have enough space for two layers and two prints of a film?
That seems like a smarter option that spending a ton of money on creating two editions of a film on the formats.
#75
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Mr. Cinema
I'm not sure they've figured out how to get seamless branching to work for the HD formats yet.



