Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > HD Talk
Reload this Page >

Blu-Ray = R-rated, DVD = unrated...why?

Community
Search
HD Talk The place to discuss Blu-ray, 4K and all other forms and formats of HD and HDTV.

Blu-Ray = R-rated, DVD = unrated...why?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-01-06, 09:52 AM
  #1  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,676
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Blu-Ray = R-rated, DVD = unrated...why?

I see that there are a few titles coming out where the dvd has an unrated cut while the Blu-Ray disc only has the R-rated version(Basic Instinct 2 & Ultraviolet) and am wondering if this will be the next trend. you want Blu-Ray but also want the unrated cut you need to make double purchases of both dvd and blu-ray. why not offer both versions on the blu-ray disc?
Old 06-01-06, 09:58 AM
  #2  
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
 
Adam Tyner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Greenville, South Cackalack
Posts: 28,824
Received 1,882 Likes on 1,238 Posts
I wonder if the goal is to:

1) keep the number of SKUs down (so no separate R-rated/unrated releases)
2) keep the prudish folks happy by not offering R-rated and unrated on the same disc
3) reconciling #1 and #2 by only having an R-rated version

I agree that it's colosally stupid. My guess: Sony would rather just have one disc per movie at launch, and they think that if there's only going to be one disc, it makes more sense for it to be rated.
Old 06-01-06, 09:59 AM
  #3  
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do we need to have 2 versions of every movie? THAT is the bigger question.
Old 06-01-06, 10:07 AM
  #4  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yet another reason I am not liking Blu Ray at this point....
Old 06-01-06, 10:10 AM
  #5  
Moderator
 
Giles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 33,630
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by gimmepilotwings
Yet another reason I am not liking Blu Ray at this point....
yeah!
Old 06-01-06, 10:27 AM
  #6  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mpls, MN
Posts: 6,830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just because we have a new disc format doesn't mean they are going to change the silliness that sometimes appears. We'll still have multiple releases of some movies, no doubt enough to make us insane.
Old 06-01-06, 10:41 AM
  #7  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Illadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,974
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Sony et al. are the king of double dipping. Prepare to se unrated versions on blu-ray later.
Old 06-01-06, 10:47 AM
  #8  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe they are having issues with seamless branching on BD??
Old 06-01-06, 10:53 AM
  #9  
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RockStrongo
Maybe they are having issues with seamless branching on BD??
This is a possibility. I haven't heard anything about it from either camp. Is it possible?
Old 06-01-06, 11:03 AM
  #10  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Illadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,974
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by RockStrongo
Maybe they are having issues with seamless branching on BD??
hey with all that space (lol), why not put both versions in full on there.
Old 06-01-06, 12:09 PM
  #11  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Oliver Clothesoff
hey with all that space (lol), why not put both versions in full on there.
Well, I suspect that some director's/unrated cuts are not already put together in full length.

They just insert the new/alternate scenes using seamless branching. This might be the issue they are running into. So, putting both full versions on it is not an option.

Im just speculating though because Im obviously not an editor.

Not saying this is just a problem with BD either. HD-DVD could have similar issues, but I dont know.
Old 06-01-06, 12:20 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Has seamless branching even been discussed by either camp?
Old 06-01-06, 12:51 PM
  #13  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
Has seamless branching even been discussed by either camp?
I dont know, but since BD is using MPEG2 encoding AND single layer discs (25gb) for a while, it very well may not fit on one disc.
Old 06-01-06, 04:48 PM
  #14  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: gloucester, uk
Posts: 2,154
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Are people really interested in watching the unrated version of the movie? It's always struck me as being like the "director's cut" scam where the studio trys to convince you you're missing out if you don't watch this version. Extra footage is better off being included as deleted scenes, IMHO.
Old 06-01-06, 04:52 PM
  #15  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Drexl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 16,077
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by RockStrongo
I dont know, but since BD is using MPEG2 encoding AND single layer discs (25gb) for a while, it very well may not fit on one disc.
That's what I was thinking.

Another reason could be that if they're only going to release one version, they figure it should be the theatrical cut for the "purists."
Old 06-01-06, 04:53 PM
  #16  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mpls, MN
Posts: 6,830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Really depends on the movie. Sometimes I prefer deleted scenes separate, but sometimes they are so good I wish they were just in the movie.
Old 06-01-06, 04:56 PM
  #17  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: gloucester, uk
Posts: 2,154
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
One possibility is that retailers have demanded fewer versions of the early movies, in order to use less shelving real estate for such low volume formats.

Sorry, just wanted to type "shelving real estate" : it makes me feel like such a pro.
Old 06-01-06, 05:10 PM
  #18  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Josh Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Boston
Posts: 11,763
Received 257 Likes on 181 Posts
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
My guess: Sony would rather just have one disc per movie at launch, and they think that if there's only going to be one disc, it makes more sense for it to be rated.
I agree. They chose the rated one so that retailers like Walmart will carry it.
Old 06-01-06, 07:58 PM
  #19  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Burnt Thru
Are people really interested in watching the unrated version of the movie?
Yes, if there were cuts to the movie due to the MPAA. High Tension is a perfect recent example as well as The Hills Have Eyes remake.
Old 06-01-06, 08:21 PM
  #20  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Pa
Posts: 11,956
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Spiky
Just because we have a new disc format doesn't mean they are going to change the silliness that sometimes appears. We'll still have multiple releases of some movies, no doubt enough to make us insane.
Thank You. These titles will probably be released numerous times in various forms.
Old 06-01-06, 11:41 PM
  #21  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Stuck doing T.P.S. reports for Lumbergh!!!!
Posts: 2,485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Spiky
Really depends on the movie. Sometimes I prefer deleted scenes separate, but sometimes they are so good I wish they were just in the movie.
Perfect example would the the original Star Wars movies vs. the SE versions.
Old 06-02-06, 08:32 AM
  #22  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Josh Z
I agree. They chose the rated one so that retailers like Walmart will carry it.
Does Wal-Mart not carry any unrated versions? Or are they just selective as to which unrated titles to carry (like BBV)?

If the former, just another reason for me to hate WM.
Old 06-02-06, 08:37 AM
  #23  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Drexl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 16,077
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by RockStrongo
Does Wal-Mart not carry any unrated versions? Or are they just selective as to which unrated titles to carry (like BBV)?

If the former, just another reason for me to hate WM.
It depends on whether the title would get an NC-17 rating. If it would get an R or even a PG-13, they'll carry it.
Old 06-02-06, 08:55 AM
  #24  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mpls, MN
Posts: 6,830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TheKobra
Perfect example would the the original Star Wars movies vs. the SE versions.
Yes, those add-ons should be kept separate. Like still buried in a closet somewhere on Skywalker ranch.
Old 06-02-06, 08:56 AM
  #25  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Drexl
It depends on whether the title would get an NC-17 rating. If it would get an R or even a PG-13, they'll carry it.
Ah, so they are like Blockbuster then.

"They're driving me CRAZY. These Baptists are stupid. Stupid. STUPID."

jk

Last edited by RockStrongo; 06-02-06 at 08:58 AM.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.