Pointless bumps of old threads
#1
Pointless bumps of old threads
Seems to be a trend of people bumping long dead threads for no reason lately. Pretty annoying, right up their with the "phantom bump" problem we had years back that was banned.
Here are two examples of 2+ year old threads being bumped in movie talk for no reason (on the same movie as well).
http://forum.dvdtalk.com/showthread.php?t=381525
http://forum.dvdtalk.com/showthread.php?t=345198
And one in sports that was bumped just to post a lame picture.
http://forum.dvdtalk.com/showthread.php?t=207536&page=4
Not a major issue I suppose, but it is annoying to click on a thread expecting new discussion on an old topic, just to see some pointless post someone added to an old thread.
Here are two examples of 2+ year old threads being bumped in movie talk for no reason (on the same movie as well).
http://forum.dvdtalk.com/showthread.php?t=381525
http://forum.dvdtalk.com/showthread.php?t=345198
And one in sports that was bumped just to post a lame picture.
http://forum.dvdtalk.com/showthread.php?t=207536&page=4
Not a major issue I suppose, but it is annoying to click on a thread expecting new discussion on an old topic, just to see some pointless post someone added to an old thread.
Last edited by Josh Hinkle; 01-12-06 at 04:00 PM.
#2
DVD Talk Legend
Ummm... Your sports link is the same as your second movie link.
I'll delete when you fix
Though, to be fair, the Pete Rose thread (assuming that is what you meant) was only bumped from a 2 month hiatus.
I'll delete when you fix

Though, to be fair, the Pete Rose thread (assuming that is what you meant) was only bumped from a 2 month hiatus.
#3
Fixed the link, guess the copy didn't work the first time. 
Yep, the sports thread wasn't dead as long, but put it in as well as it's the same behavior--searching out a dead thread to bump it for something not related to renewing the discussion there.
Again, no big deal, just a pet peeve I thought I'd point out in hopes something could be done if it bothered others as well. But I guess not.

Yep, the sports thread wasn't dead as long, but put it in as well as it's the same behavior--searching out a dead thread to bump it for something not related to renewing the discussion there.
Again, no big deal, just a pet peeve I thought I'd point out in hopes something could be done if it bothered others as well. But I guess not.
#9
Originally Posted by mikehunt
then don't open the thread
Especially in movie talk as someone could bump an old review thread to add their thoughts on the film, which I like to see if it's a film I like. But it's pointless when they bump it like those two American History X threads for no reason whatsoever.
#10
Originally Posted by pilot
if you report the thread, usually a mod will fix ..personally, I just delete the comment that bumped it and all ones after, so it goes back into the abyss..
Cool, I'll just report and request that from now on with these bumps.

There's three links above you can take care of.
#12
Originally Posted by Gallant Pig
Did you report them?
Don't want to bug you mods too much!
#16
DVD Talk Hero
I thought this thread was going to be about a certain member who likes to hold year-long conversations with himself about a particular female singer. Imagine my disappointment.
#17
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Numanoid
I thought this thread was going to be about a certain member who likes to hold year-long conversations with himself about a particular female singer. Imagine my disappointment. 

#18
DVD Talk Hero
Mr. Hinkle-I saw a reverse type thing happen recently. Someone started a new thread on "Shaun of the Dead" and was berated for not bumping the old thread.
What he basically said in his new thread was "it's a great movie, does anyone like it?"
Would you say such a statement should have been bumped into the old thread as others advised? Or maybe you would have thought such a statement didn't really offer any new information and should be killed out?
It did seem to have interest to others as another 29 posts were made.
What he basically said in his new thread was "it's a great movie, does anyone like it?"
Would you say such a statement should have been bumped into the old thread as others advised? Or maybe you would have thought such a statement didn't really offer any new information and should be killed out?
It did seem to have interest to others as another 29 posts were made.
#20
Originally Posted by Buford T Pusser
Mr. Hinkle-I saw a reverse type thing happen recently. Someone started a new thread on "Shaun of the Dead" and was berated for not bumping the old thread.
What he basically said in his new thread was "it's a great movie, does anyone like it?"
Would you say such a statement should have been bumped into the old thread as others advised? Or maybe you would have thought such a statement didn't really offer any new information and should be killed out?
It did seem to have interest to others as another 29 posts were made.
What he basically said in his new thread was "it's a great movie, does anyone like it?"
Would you say such a statement should have been bumped into the old thread as others advised? Or maybe you would have thought such a statement didn't really offer any new information and should be killed out?
It did seem to have interest to others as another 29 posts were made.
I'd say yes, bump the old thread. Would have probably generated more discussion their as it did in the new thread. Though it would have been nice for the person to have posted more detailed thoughts on the movie (i.e. why they liked it, if they were going to bump a dead thread or especially start a new one).





