![]() |
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
There's more to the newsletter than just the headlines above. I have never seen any challenge mentioned other than the Drive-In challenge last year and this year. Doesn't mean there hasn't been more, but that's the only times I've seen it.
I was pretty much the opposite of MinLShaw. I used the site strictly for reviews and info on upcoming releases. I never visited the forum before I looked into the DI challenge. |
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
Yeah, I alternatively blame IB for not caring enough about the site to put things in the newsletter that may encourage more visitors, like our Challenges; and blame myself for not contacting them every month with a blurb for the upcoming Challenge.
If only we had someone well suited for that task: an active Challenger who was also a writer, someone who not only participated in most of the Challenges but moderated two of them...... |
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
Originally Posted by Trevor
(Post 11735847)
If only we had someone well suited for that task: an active Challenger who was also a writer, someone who not only participated in most of the Challenges but moderated two of them......
|
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
Originally Posted by MinLShaw
(Post 11734761)
Wait. There's a newsletter?
|
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
Looking the DVDTalk home page, it looks a lot like the newsletter.
|
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
Originally Posted by cliffl
(Post 11735750)
There's more to the newsletter than just the headlines above. I have never seen any challenge mentioned other than the Drive-In challenge last year and this year. Doesn't mean there hasn't been more, but that's the only times I've seen it.
|
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
Considering how much traffic and discussion the Challenges and Sheep games create, and how much work members put into them, to my knowledge the site doesn't really do anything to support them. The only thing I know of was the offer to expand the PM boxes of people who run the things after it was requested in the feedback thread. This didn't help me because I had already gone premium specifically for the PM capacity to run a Sheep game.
|
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
That would have been nice if I knew to ask for it.
|
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
About a week before the challenge, I contact the mod who first contacted me and give him a heads up about the Drive-in challenge.
|
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
Originally Posted by caligulathegod
(Post 11738664)
About a week before the challenge, I contact the mod who first contacted me and give him a heads up about the Drive-in challenge.
|
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
Originally Posted by caligulathegod
(Post 11738664)
About a week before the challenge, I contact the mod who first contacted me and give him a heads up about the Drive-in challenge.
If it had shown up in the newsletter in the week prior to the start date I know I would have been participating a year ago. |
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
It's John Sinnott. He specifically asked me to tell him just a week prior, because that's when they do the newsletter. He does a lot of reviews, so you can find his contact through the reviews.
|
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
I've been wondering about the checklists. It seems to me that only a handful of participants even bother with them in any challenge other than Horror (which is a world unto itself!). I know some participants don't use them because it "feels like work". Those tend to be participants who are quiet in discussion threads, too, so I don't know that there's much we can do to further engage them and that's okay.
But I also see a lot of participants who are active in discussion threads who don't bother with checklists as well. Given that 100 movies is pretty much an abandoned inherent goal of these challenges - for various reasons - I wonder if perhaps we ought not consider a sort of arbitrary cap on checklist items. You know, kind of standardize them from challenge to challenge. Obviously, Academy Awards and Criterion have built-in categories but the rest are sort of improvised. What I'm thinking would be something like this:
To keep things fresh, the pools of directors/actors and sub-genres would rotate each year. Any thoughts? |
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
Originally Posted by Travis McClain
(Post 11771964)
I've been wondering about the checklists. It seems to me that only a handful of participants even bother with them in any challenge other than Horror (which is a world unto itself!). I know some participants don't use them because it "feels like work". Those tend to be participants who are quiet in discussion threads, too, so I don't know that there's much we can do to further engage them and that's okay.
But I also see a lot of participants who are active in discussion threads who don't bother with checklists as well. Given that 100 movies is pretty much an abandoned inherent goal of these challenges - for various reasons - I wonder if perhaps we ought not consider a sort of arbitrary cap on checklist items. You know, kind of standardize them from challenge to challenge. Obviously, Academy Awards and Criterion have built-in categories but the rest are sort of improvised. What I'm thinking would be something like this:
To keep things fresh, the pools of directors/actors and sub-genres would rotate each year. Any thoughts? This reminds me to put in vacation for the entire month of October so I can get crazy with my uber-checklist in Horror. :frankie::rip::chainsaw: |
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
Originally Posted by Travis McClain
(Post 11771964)
I've been wondering about the checklists. It seems to me that only a handful of participants even bother with them in any challenge other than Horror (which is a world unto itself!). I know some participants don't use them because it "feels like work". Those tend to be participants who are quiet in discussion threads, too, so I don't know that there's much we can do to further engage them and that's okay.
But I also see a lot of participants who are active in discussion threads who don't bother with checklists as well. I have been doing better this month so I might decide to add a checklist... |
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
Originally Posted by davidh777
(Post 11773551)
I always used to post checklists even if my use of them was spotty, and there were only a couple times I came even close to completing them. I thought I abandoned them last year, but I just checked my sig and I used one for the TV challenge in January. I think I skipped it for Oscars because I knew I wasn't going to watch a whole lot (and didn't), but after that... I don't know. I think it may be because I haven't been feeling good about my performance in challenges lately.
|
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
I don't know if other participants run into this issue with checklist items but if you don't happen to have a film in your own personal collection they can be hard to find unless you're willing to shell out some cash. If a title isn't available via Netflix, Amazon Prime, or your local library, it can be tough to complete the checklist. It makes you long for the days of Blockbuster Videos being on every other block! I'm not sure what can be done about that besides having the participants check free streaming availability before a challenge begins. Of course this issue might not effect anyone else and could just be me being cheap.
|
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
Originally Posted by lisadoris
(Post 11773931)
I don't know if other participants run into this issue with checklist items but if you don't happen to have a film in your own personal collection they can be hard to find unless you're willing to shell out some cash. If a title isn't available via Netflix, Amazon Prime, or your local library, it can be tough to complete the checklist. It makes you long for the days of Blockbuster Videos being on every other block! I'm not sure what can be done about that besides having the participants check free streaming availability before a challenge begins. Of course this issue might not effect anyone else and could just be me being cheap.
|
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
Originally Posted by lisadoris
(Post 11773931)
I don't know if other participants run into this issue with checklist items but if you don't happen to have a film in your own personal collection they can be hard to find unless you're willing to shell out some cash. If a title isn't available via Netflix, Amazon Prime, or your local library, it can be tough to complete the checklist. It makes you long for the days of Blockbuster Videos being on every other block! I'm not sure what can be done about that besides having the participants check free streaming availability before a challenge begins. Of course this issue might not effect anyone else and could just be me being cheap.
|
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
Originally Posted by lisadoris
(Post 11773931)
I don't know if other participants run into this issue with checklist items but if you don't happen to have a film in your own personal collection they can be hard to find unless you're willing to shell out some cash. If a title isn't available via Netflix, Amazon Prime, or your local library, it can be tough to complete the checklist. It makes you long for the days of Blockbuster Videos being on every other block! I'm not sure what can be done about that besides having the participants check free streaming availability before a challenge begins. Of course this issue might not effect anyone else and could just be me being cheap.
Anyway... all that to say: "You're not alone." :) |
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
Originally Posted by Travis McClain
(Post 11771964)
I've been wondering about the checklists. It seems to me that only a handful of participants even bother with them in any challenge other than Horror (which is a world unto itself!). I know some participants don't use them because it "feels like work". Those tend to be participants who are quiet in discussion threads, too, so I don't know that there's much we can do to further engage them and that's okay.
I no longer do the checklists because in most of the challenges I don't plan on watching the kind of numbers necessary to complete one. |
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
My $0.02. I don't normally work on completing checklists, as I just like to watch what I want to watch and am in the mood to watch.
|
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
I did the checklists as best I could in the first year I participated in the challenges. And I confess it was fun. But since then, I have so many things in my collection I need to watch and that dictates my choice of viewing items in each challenge, so there's usually not a wide enough range to be suitable for doing checklists.
|
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
I must bring a different mindset to the challenges because I almost always try to do the checklists. I figure that I can watch whatever I want any time but during the challenges the checklists encourage me to try different things. I do not buy dvds for the challenges but I do tape movies from Turner Classic Movies and other channels on occasion. I also use Netflix, the local library, Youtube and other streaming sources on occasions. I prefer checklists for challenges but I guess if they were removed I could always use one from the past with minor variations.
|
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
I love doing the checklists. I like being able to mark things off as I watch them and fill that sucker in! However, I have run into problems with some of the list items-trying to find something to fill it in without having to pay extra for it. I have a great local library with many options, but even then it can be hard to find the more obscure stuff without buying. My other problem is that I don't necessarily want to watch some of the items needed. The first time it was fine but after than, you've given it a shot, now you know you don't like it but have to watch it.
I guess my thoughts are that I'd be ok with streamlining them but I'd be sad to see them go. I have been able to find quite a few movies I would never have watched without them. Though, leaving them as is would be fine too, I think. More of the challenges have gone from getting an extra chance at the monthly prize (for those that offer it) to one chance for participating and that is it. So, the main reason for finishing has been taken away... |
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
Originally Posted by Travis McClain
(Post 11773829)
Would shorter, more manageable checklists entice you to give them a go again?
Originally Posted by lisadoris
(Post 11773931)
I don't know if other participants run into this issue with checklist items but if you don't happen to have a film in your own personal collection they can be hard to find unless you're willing to shell out some cash. If a title isn't available via Netflix, Amazon Prime, or your local library, it can be tough to complete the checklist. It makes you long for the days of Blockbuster Videos being on every other block! I'm not sure what can be done about that besides having the participants check free streaming availability before a challenge begins. Of course this issue might not effect anyone else and could just be me being cheap.
|
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
Guess we're getting close to time to start a Criterion discussion thread. I assume CardiffGiant will host again, but if not I could probably manage it. That one basically runs itself anyway at this point. It's probably my favorite challenge of the year, to be honest, and a big reason for that is that the discussion thread is always interesting. I give credit for that to the regulars who are enthusiastic about participating - and, of course, to CardiffGiant and Trevor before him, for hosting leadership.
Just to follow up on the checklist discussion, I was never proposing that they be scrapped. On the contrary, I was trying to see if we might engage some of those who have backed off from bothering with them by abridging them. |
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
Originally Posted by Travis McClain
(Post 11793967)
Guess we're getting close to time to start a Criterion discussion thread. I assume CardiffGiant will host again, but if not I could probably manage it. That one basically runs itself anyway at this point. It's probably my favorite challenge of the year, to be honest, and a big reason for that is that the discussion thread is always interesting. I give credit for that to the regulars who are enthusiastic about participating - and, of course, to CardiffGiant and Trevor before him, for hosting leadership.
Just to follow up on the checklist discussion, I was never proposing that they be scrapped. On the contrary, I was trying to see if we might engage some of those who have backed off from bothering with them by abridging them. |
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
Not to ignore the current topics forever, but I have a quick random thought.
Since participation in the discussion threads is our ultimate goal (right?); perhaps participants with no discussion thread posts shouldn't be in the running for prizes, and winner announcements should only be made in the discussion threads. |
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
Originally Posted by Trevor
(Post 11794021)
Not to ignore the current topics forever, but I have a quick random thought.
Since participation in the discussion threads is our ultimate goal (right?); perhaps participants with no discussion thread posts shouldn't be in the running for prizes, and winner announcements should only be made in the discussion threads. This also encourages prize-seekers to post just once in the discussion thread to meet the minimum. They could wait until the last day and post "Had fun!" That one post may not actually contribute to the discussion in any meaningful way, but then we have to debate the merits of what constitutes participation. I'll tell you this much: As a host, I hate prizes. It took me a month to give away the prizes for this year's TV on DVD* challenge! That was partly my fault, because I used the credit that GoldenWheels graciously allotted me to maximize the number of prizes, rather than go for a couple big ones. My hope was to increase the chances of participants winning *something* and walking away from the challenge happy. You'd be surprised how hard it is to get people to claim a damn prize, though! |
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
Originally Posted by Travis McClain
(Post 11794028)
I'll tell you this much: As a host, I hate prizes. It took me a month to give away the prizes for this year's TV on DVD* challenge! That was partly my fault, because I used the credit that GoldenWheels graciously allotted me to maximize the number of prizes, rather than go for a couple big ones. My hope was to increase the chances of participants winning *something* and walking away from the challenge happy. You'd be surprised how hard it is to get people to claim a damn prize, though!
|
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
Originally Posted by Travis McClain
(Post 11794028)
In spirit, I tend to agree. As a host, though, this isn't particularly practical. For one thing, verifying who has participated in the discussion thread requires cross-checking the list thread with the discussion thread and running a search for each list thread participant to see if he or she has a post in the discussion thread. That's as tedious as it is time consuming.
This also encourages prize-seekers to post just once in the discussion thread to meet the minimum. They could wait until the last day and post "Had fun!" That one post may not actually contribute to the discussion in any meaningful way, but then we have to debate the merits of what constitutes participation. I'll tell you this much: As a host, I hate prizes. It took me a month to give away the prizes for this year's TV on DVD* challenge! That was partly my fault, because I used the credit that GoldenWheels graciously allotted me to maximize the number of prizes, rather than go for a couple big ones. My hope was to increase the chances of participants winning *something* and walking away from the challenge happy. You'd be surprised how hard it is to get people to claim a damn prize, though! |
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
Originally Posted by Trevor
(Post 11794021)
Not to ignore the current topics forever, but I have a quick random thought.
Since participation in the discussion threads is our ultimate goal (right?); perhaps participants with no discussion thread posts shouldn't be in the running for prizes, and winner announcements should only be made in the discussion threads.
Originally Posted by Travis McClain
(Post 11794028)
You'd be surprised how hard it is to get people to claim a damn prize, though!
|
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
Has anyone considered asking *up front* for mailing addresses from those wishing to win a prize? Post the request several times during the month to allow people to decide if they want to win one of the prizes and respond. Provide one last chance at the end of the month including the list of respondents just in case someone was missed or forgot. A couple of days into the next challenge you have your pool of interested parties and simply draw from that. Post the results in the discussion thread and you're done. You already have mailing addresses so you just sent out the prizes.
You can still require a winner has a somewhat active list or at least watched one film. It would be great if winners actually participated in discussions but as Dimension X says there are some who would rather watch another film than spend time typing comments and I understand that desire. |
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
Originally Posted by BobO'Link
(Post 11794226)
Has anyone considered asking *up front* for mailing addresses from those wishing to win a prize? Post the request several times during the month to allow people to decide if they want to win one of the prizes and respond. Provide one last chance at the end of the month including the list of respondents just in case someone was missed or forgot. A couple of days into the next challenge you have your pool of interested parties and simply draw from that. Post the results in the discussion thread and you're done. You already have mailing addresses so you just sent out the prizes.
|
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
Originally Posted by Dimension X
(Post 11794235)
Keeping a list of mailing addresses is an additional "chore" I wouldn't want to handle (but I'm lazy). I have asked people to "opt out" of drawings in the past, and I actually had two people do that.
|
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
Originally Posted by Trevor
(Post 11794356)
If we decide to go this route I'd volunteer to maintain the list and coordinate prizes with all the Challenge leads.
|
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
Originally Posted by Dimension X
(Post 11794235)
Keeping a list of mailing addresses is an additional "chore" I wouldn't want to handle (but I'm lazy). I have asked people to "opt out" of drawings in the past, and I actually had two people do that.
A "master list" like it seems that Trevor is suggesting sounds like more work as you would need to make sure addresses are current and filter such a list against challenge participants opting in each time. But as Trevor is volunteering who am I to tell him it sounds like more work... :D I thought about the "opt out" method but think you would have people who either would forget to opt out or just not bother at all which brings you back to the original problem. |
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
Originally Posted by davidh777
(Post 11794127)
Maybe fewer, larger prizes would have been fewer contacts and also more likely to get people to claim.
I find it odd that people don't check the discussion thread until all prizes have been sent. If they are that uninterested the polite thing to do would be to send the host a opt-out request. I sometimes wonder if someone wins a prize but doesn't want the title won so rather than decline they ignore the request knowing in a week or so it'll be re-drawn. |
Re: "Official" DVDTalk Challenges Compendium
Originally Posted by BobO'Link
(Post 11794397)
It *would* be extra work but as you would only be dealing with those who wanted to be included in a month end drawing it should be fairly simple and quick to drop them all in a spreadsheet as they come in (that could also provide numbering based on rows). From what I've seen some of you go through with the drawings it seems that it might be less work overall.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:46 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.