Original Star Wars Trilogy Being Re-Released On DVD...The Non-SEs
#826
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Argentoholic
The '04 versions were modified to fit smoothly with the prequels.
I include myself in this group.
Originally Posted by Argentoholic
I am almost certain that at the end of the day, the SW nut will prefer to watch the '04 versions not only for their obvious AV qualities but for their fuller treatment of Star Wars mythos.
But that doesn't mean that I'm happy with the changes that were made in '97 or '04. Some are fine. Some suck. It doesn't make me any less of a fan to want to watch the same ESB film that I saw 200 times as a youth, the way it existed for the first 17 years.
I find the '04 version of all 3 of these films distracting to the extreme.
And to have the original versions finally released after years of begging, only to be intentionally degraded (or, more accurately, intentionally not upgraded) is upsetting. It doesn't mean that I'm more of a home theater nut than a SW nut.
EDIT: Never mind. I posted this before I realized how big your unit was.
Last edited by bboisvert; 05-18-06 at 05:54 PM.
#827
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Glad to see that Luca$ is still a money hungry whore. God do I hate this man.... and the fanatics.
Is this meant to be a joke, because the first part of your comment sounds like the comments of a fanatic.
#828
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Giles
pun intended?
Was it a penis thing?
#829
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 7,568
Received 229 Likes
on
129 Posts
From: Part of the Left-Wing Conspiracy
Please stop thinking that a non-anamorphic DVD of these will be the same as ANY of the fine bootlegs that are out. I would bet lots of $$ that any version Lucas puts out (even a non-anamorphic one) will be much better looking than the best fan made DVD.
Come on now. A 1993 D2 tape > DVD will look much better than a LD > DVD.
Come on now. A 1993 D2 tape > DVD will look much better than a LD > DVD.
#830
DVD Talk Legend
Regardless of how good the LD transfer is, it's still not a new 16x9 transfer taken from film. Folks, you all need to seriously stop accepting "good enough". Even if you don't believe that we "deserve" a better treatment of these, think of it this way: "the films *deserve* better than this".
Also, I called the number that's been posted and they're apparently getting flooded with calls as the nice young lady asked me to send it toan email. Since she gave it so handily, I have no problems sharing it here:
[email protected]
Remember, keep it civil! This bickering on the boards is pointless, we must be unified in this effort.
Also, I called the number that's been posted and they're apparently getting flooded with calls as the nice young lady asked me to send it toan email. Since she gave it so handily, I have no problems sharing it here:
[email protected]
Remember, keep it civil! This bickering on the boards is pointless, we must be unified in this effort.
#831
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chrisedge
Please stop thinking that a non-anamorphic DVD of these will be the same as ANY of the fine bootlegs that are out. I would bet lots of $$ that any version Lucas puts out (even a non-anamorphic one) will be much better looking than the best fan made DVD.
Come on now. A 1993 D2 tape > DVD will look much better than a LD > DVD.
Come on now. A 1993 D2 tape > DVD will look much better than a LD > DVD.
I'm just sayin', don't discount the amount of time and effort some people have put into bootlegs.
#832
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Portland, Oregon
Originally Posted by chanster
Here is a pretty good mix of fact and speculation, as well as editorial (I apologize to everyone if this has already been posted - I don't think it has). This guy has been writing about Star Wars for a long long time..so his voice is worth something.
http://www.starwarz.com/tbone/editor...ilogy_dvds.htm
http://www.starwarz.com/tbone/editor...ilogy_dvds.htm
--THX
#833
Moderator
Mod note:
Can't you people be civil enough to carry on a decent/respectful conversation. Disagrement is fine, comparing body parts and swapping insults is not. Unfortunately this is typical of Star Wars threads for some reason... I'm leaving this open for now but if it continues in this vein it will be closed.
Can't you people be civil enough to carry on a decent/respectful conversation. Disagrement is fine, comparing body parts and swapping insults is not. Unfortunately this is typical of Star Wars threads for some reason... I'm leaving this open for now but if it continues in this vein it will be closed.
#834
Banned
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by ThatGuamGuy
For whatever it's worth, I'm pretty sure I've had a few run-ins with digitalfreak ... I actually think I may remember not liking him very much. But since when is calling a new poster "newbie" bashing? From reading this thread, you seem to be kinda riding him a little, though there may be context here I'm not seeing.
[EDIT: It should be pointed out, I'd swear he was a "new member" until his latest post; at what point does that switch over? When DF made that post, the forum itself was basically calling him a newbie.]
However, now that the newbie has revealed himself to be a straight-up troll, I think we can all agree to just ignore him, and he'll drag his gargantuan genitalia elsewhere.
[EDIT: It should be pointed out, I'd swear he was a "new member" until his latest post; at what point does that switch over? When DF made that post, the forum itself was basically calling him a newbie.]
However, now that the newbie has revealed himself to be a straight-up troll, I think we can all agree to just ignore him, and he'll drag his gargantuan genitalia elsewhere.
that said...it's par for the course with chance-boy. He's got a hard-on for me that would put my ex's to shame.I love you all.
and i love star wars.
And I'd love to know who EXACTLY is going to buy this...because it's obviously NOT the people in this forum. Hmmm....good idea for a poll.
#835
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally Posted by Chrisedge
Please stop thinking that a non-anamorphic DVD of these will be the same as ANY of the fine bootlegs that are out. I would bet lots of $$ that any version Lucas puts out (even a non-anamorphic one) will be much better looking than the best fan made DVD.
My boots are anamorphic, or at least "zoomed" from the original LD sources, so how can you call these abortions "much better looking than the best fan made DVD"?
#836
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by BuckNaked2k
My boots are anamorphic, or at least "zoomed" from the original LD sources
This is all theoretical at this point, but a properly mastered non-anamorphic transfer from the original D2 masters zoomed in manually on your 16x9 set should look significantly better than a bootleg sourced from a laserdisc and then manipulated to be 16x9.
[These are just the facts. It shouldn't be read as any sort of defense of Lucasfilm. I still think that to finally release these after all this time -- and hype the hell out of it -- only to have them be non-anamorphic is a travesty.]
#837
Originally Posted by bboisvert
I've got a life sized Han in Carbonite in my home theater. I own every action figure since 1977. I have just about every non-fiction SW book ever written.
#839
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bboisvert
These are just the facts.

I think assuming it will be properly mastered is a big assumption, given (strike 1) the 2004 release's audio problems and (strike 2) the indifference they're showing this release.
#840
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
And I'd love to know who EXACTLY is going to buy this...because it's obviously NOT the people in this forum. Hmmm....good idea for a poll.
But you may notice, if you wanted to waste the time it would take to look back through my posts in this thread, that I've never said a single word about not buying them. Just don't tell LFL that because the truth is, I'd buy them on release day if they were anamorphic. If not, I'm sure I will still buy them, but it will be very low priority.
#842
Banned
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by ThatGuamGuy
Nobody wants to suggest that they'll support this release in any way, especially given that HTF has gotten people working at Lucas to see the thread over there (which is much, much worse than this one, except that nobody is comparing manhood yet).
#843
Originally Posted by Chrisedge
Please stop thinking that a non-anamorphic DVD of these will be the same as ANY of the fine bootlegs that are out. I would bet lots of $$ that any version Lucas puts out (even a non-anamorphic one) will be much better looking than the best fan made DVD.
Come on now. A 1993 D2 tape > DVD will look much better than a LD > DVD.
Come on now. A 1993 D2 tape > DVD will look much better than a LD > DVD.
I am not going to judge anybody at Lucasfilm until all the facts are in. www.thedigitalbits.com wrote how and why it may very well be possible there is no way they can make an anamorphic transfer of these old movies anymore. If their scenario is true, then I will accept what we get. So far, I've not been able to find bootlegs of the original cuts that have satisfactory quality. I will be buying them regardless and living with it.
#844
Member
Originally Posted by JackBurton
Where can I get the CliffsNotes for this thread? 

, here's what you've missed:1) The announcement that the non-SE Original Trilogy are coming to DVD
2) Joy from fans and an upswelling of love for George Lucas
3) Speculation on what might be corrected in these versions
4) Complaints about having to repurchase the 2004 SE's
5) Announcement that the Original Trilogy will be non-anamorphic
6) Anger toward George Lucas and a return of balance to the force
We now return you to your "George Lucas raped my childhood" thread alrady in progress...
#845
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
how did they get people from Lucasfilm to see the thread?
Dunno as it'll do anything, but the barrage of E-mails and phone calls isn't hurting the release...
#847
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by ThatGuamGuy
Somebody called the number which is floating around and got a woman on the phone who stayed on for 15 or 20 minutes, and when she asked "Where are people complaining about it?" he directed her there as an example. She read it while on the phone with him, and, while having no power herself, was at least going to bring it up the chain.
Dunno as it'll do anything, but the barrage of E-mails and phone calls isn't hurting the release...
Dunno as it'll do anything, but the barrage of E-mails and phone calls isn't hurting the release...
Let's assume that someone from LucasFilms is reading this thread and asks the question, "okay... what do I have to do to get you into these releases?"
What is your answer? Being realistic, what would it take for you to purchase the new releases of these discs?
#848
DVD Talk Legend
Man, I just read the article on The Bits, and I am disgusted. It is OUTRAGEOUS that Lucasfilm is releasing NON-Anamorphic DVDs of the original versions of the Star Wars trilogy. It's also hard to believe that Lucas is claiming that all anamorphic-worthy elements have been destroyed. He had to have kept the originals around - if for nothing else than to compare the multiple versions to the originals.
It is ridiculous at the advent of the widescreen age to intentionally put out a DVD that will look like CRAP (relatively speaking) on a widescreen TV! Hell, I think most people here would have been happier even if they took less worthy elements and anamorphically enhanced them. At least it would be formatted correctly for the new TVs!
I've been saying for years that Lucas is horribly out of touch with the fans - and that maybe he just doesn't care. This from a guy who was the ultimate fanboy success story. Money and ego have blinded him to what is really important to the fans.
Am I angry? Damn right I'm angry! And I know I'm nowhere near alone!
It is ridiculous at the advent of the widescreen age to intentionally put out a DVD that will look like CRAP (relatively speaking) on a widescreen TV! Hell, I think most people here would have been happier even if they took less worthy elements and anamorphically enhanced them. At least it would be formatted correctly for the new TVs!
I've been saying for years that Lucas is horribly out of touch with the fans - and that maybe he just doesn't care. This from a guy who was the ultimate fanboy success story. Money and ego have blinded him to what is really important to the fans.
Am I angry? Damn right I'm angry! And I know I'm nowhere near alone!
#849
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by sracer
Ok, pre-emptive complaining in this case would be a good thing. And if we're going to do it, let's at least be coherent about it. (as opposed to some of the emotional outbursts of late)
Let's assume that someone from LucasFilms is reading this thread and asks the question, "okay... what do I have to do to get you into these releases?"
What is your answer? Being realistic, what would it take for you to purchase the new releases of these discs?
Let's assume that someone from LucasFilms is reading this thread and asks the question, "okay... what do I have to do to get you into these releases?"
What is your answer? Being realistic, what would it take for you to purchase the new releases of these discs?
#850
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We have to be careful to word it exactly right, but all I really want is a new anamorphic transfer of the original three movies ... I personally don't care whether it has the episode 4 crawl or not, but I do like the sound of it not having it. It's not a deal breaker, but I like it.
Things that would be nice (aka "pipe dreams"):
- a box
- not having the 2004 editions attached
- if you're gonna have the 2004 releases, at least correct the audio and light saber issues, and whatever else people are complaining about.
- previously released extras (is there a theatrical-cut commentary anywhere?)
- put the subtitles back into the picture so they don't get cut off
- remotely decent cover art
Things that would be nice (aka "pipe dreams"):
- a box
- not having the 2004 editions attached
- if you're gonna have the 2004 releases, at least correct the audio and light saber issues, and whatever else people are complaining about.
- previously released extras (is there a theatrical-cut commentary anywhere?)
- put the subtitles back into the picture so they don't get cut off
- remotely decent cover art



