Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > DVD Talk
Reload this Page >

Original Star Wars Trilogy Being Re-Released On DVD...The Non-SEs

Community
Search
DVD Talk Talk about DVDs and Movies on DVD including Covers and Cases

Original Star Wars Trilogy Being Re-Released On DVD...The Non-SEs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-18-06 | 05:05 PM
  #826  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 14,259
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Docking Bay 94
Originally Posted by Argentoholic
The '04 versions were modified to fit smoothly with the prequels.
There are many SW 'fans' who feel that the prequels should have matched the OT to begin with... not required some retroactive tweaks to classic, beloved films that are 25 years old.

I include myself in this group.


Originally Posted by Argentoholic
I am almost certain that at the end of the day, the SW nut will prefer to watch the '04 versions not only for their obvious AV qualities but for their fuller treatment of Star Wars mythos.
Not sure what you mean by "fuller treatment of the SW mythos". I'm a huge 'nut' as you say. I've got a life sized Han in Carbonite in my home theater. I own every action figure since 1977. I have just about every non-fiction SW book ever written.

But that doesn't mean that I'm happy with the changes that were made in '97 or '04. Some are fine. Some suck. It doesn't make me any less of a fan to want to watch the same ESB film that I saw 200 times as a youth, the way it existed for the first 17 years.

I find the '04 version of all 3 of these films distracting to the extreme.


And to have the original versions finally released after years of begging, only to be intentionally degraded (or, more accurately, intentionally not upgraded) is upsetting. It doesn't mean that I'm more of a home theater nut than a SW nut.

EDIT: Never mind. I posted this before I realized how big your unit was.

Last edited by bboisvert; 05-18-06 at 05:54 PM.
bboisvert is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 05:44 PM
  #827  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,809
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Carrollton, Ga
Glad to see that Luca$ is still a money hungry whore. God do I hate this man.... and the fanatics.
Is this meant to be a joke, because the first part of your comment sounds like the comments of a fanatic.
Terrell is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 05:47 PM
  #828  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Giles
pun intended?
I must confess, not only was no pun intended, but none is recognized ... which is weird, as I'm usually the one making bad puns that nobody catches.

Was it a penis thing?
ThatGuamGuy is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 05:51 PM
  #829  
Chrisedge's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 7,568
Received 229 Likes on 129 Posts
From: Part of the Left-Wing Conspiracy
Please stop thinking that a non-anamorphic DVD of these will be the same as ANY of the fine bootlegs that are out. I would bet lots of $$ that any version Lucas puts out (even a non-anamorphic one) will be much better looking than the best fan made DVD.

Come on now. A 1993 D2 tape > DVD will look much better than a LD > DVD.
Chrisedge is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 05:57 PM
  #830  
milo bloom's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 19,008
Received 1,672 Likes on 1,209 Posts
From: Chicago suburbs
Regardless of how good the LD transfer is, it's still not a new 16x9 transfer taken from film. Folks, you all need to seriously stop accepting "good enough". Even if you don't believe that we "deserve" a better treatment of these, think of it this way: "the films *deserve* better than this".


Also, I called the number that's been posted and they're apparently getting flooded with calls as the nice young lady asked me to send it toan email. Since she gave it so handily, I have no problems sharing it here:

[email protected]


Remember, keep it civil! This bickering on the boards is pointless, we must be unified in this effort.
milo bloom is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 06:08 PM
  #831  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chrisedge
Please stop thinking that a non-anamorphic DVD of these will be the same as ANY of the fine bootlegs that are out. I would bet lots of $$ that any version Lucas puts out (even a non-anamorphic one) will be much better looking than the best fan made DVD.

Come on now. A 1993 D2 tape > DVD will look much better than a LD > DVD.
I'm not exactly endorsing the bootlegs (and I should point out, I intend to buy the release and have no 'Star Wars' bootleg in my collection, because I started to look on ebay about two weeks before this announcement, thinking I might finally buy it, and I had a lot more trouble finding it than it used to be ... I think they were cracking down), but some of them are anamorphic, and the bootleggers generally have a better record of quality control when compared to Lucas's previous release of these films. I have heard nothing about audio problems. I am even aware (thanks to HTF) of a bootlegger who has successfully removed the garbage mattes ... which Lucas didn't do.

I'm just sayin', don't discount the amount of time and effort some people have put into bootlegs.
ThatGuamGuy is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 06:22 PM
  #832  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Portland, Oregon
Originally Posted by chanster
Here is a pretty good mix of fact and speculation, as well as editorial (I apologize to everyone if this has already been posted - I don't think it has). This guy has been writing about Star Wars for a long long time..so his voice is worth something.

http://www.starwarz.com/tbone/editor...ilogy_dvds.htm
After reading this, I'm starting to get a bad feeling about these new releases. I'm starting to imagine what they might look like, and I'm picturing The American President. Would seem Lucas was right when he said, "We didn't do anything to it at all." They really didn't, did they! Going to have to wait for the reviews before I make any decisions. Damn, and it sounded so sweet.

--THX
CertifiedTHX is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 06:23 PM
  #833  
nemein's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 34,198
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
From: 1bit away from total disaster
Mod note: Can't you people be civil enough to carry on a decent/respectful conversation. Disagrement is fine, comparing body parts and swapping insults is not. Unfortunately this is typical of Star Wars threads for some reason... I'm leaving this open for now but if it continues in this vein it will be closed.
nemein is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 06:27 PM
  #834  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by ThatGuamGuy
For whatever it's worth, I'm pretty sure I've had a few run-ins with digitalfreak ... I actually think I may remember not liking him very much. But since when is calling a new poster "newbie" bashing? From reading this thread, you seem to be kinda riding him a little, though there may be context here I'm not seeing.

[EDIT: It should be pointed out, I'd swear he was a "new member" until his latest post; at what point does that switch over? When DF made that post, the forum itself was basically calling him a newbie.]

However, now that the newbie has revealed himself to be a straight-up troll, I think we can all agree to just ignore him, and he'll drag his gargantuan genitalia elsewhere.
enh. everyone hates me until they get to know me. that said...it's par for the course with chance-boy. He's got a hard-on for me that would put my ex's to shame.

I love you all.

and i love star wars.

And I'd love to know who EXACTLY is going to buy this...because it's obviously NOT the people in this forum. Hmmm....good idea for a poll.
digitalfreaknyc is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 06:37 PM
  #835  
BuckNaked2k's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,174
Received 43 Likes on 33 Posts
From: Hartford, CT
Originally Posted by Chrisedge
Please stop thinking that a non-anamorphic DVD of these will be the same as ANY of the fine bootlegs that are out. I would bet lots of $$ that any version Lucas puts out (even a non-anamorphic one) will be much better looking than the best fan made DVD.
Unless I am mistaken, non-anamorphic video with an AR of 2.35:1 shown on Digital 16x9 TVs will have both "pillarbox" gray bars on the sides, as well as black letterbox bars top & bottom. This will leave only 40-50% of the total screen area for the actual image.

My boots are anamorphic, or at least "zoomed" from the original LD sources, so how can you call these abortions "much better looking than the best fan made DVD"?
BuckNaked2k is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 06:51 PM
  #836  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 14,259
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Docking Bay 94
Originally Posted by BuckNaked2k
My boots are anamorphic, or at least "zoomed" from the original LD sources
Exactly. Your boots are just zoomed in (with duplicated scan lines). They don't have any actual increased screen resolution.

This is all theoretical at this point, but a properly mastered non-anamorphic transfer from the original D2 masters zoomed in manually on your 16x9 set should look significantly better than a bootleg sourced from a laserdisc and then manipulated to be 16x9.


[These are just the facts. It shouldn't be read as any sort of defense of Lucasfilm. I still think that to finally release these after all this time -- and hype the hell out of it -- only to have them be non-anamorphic is a travesty.]
bboisvert is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 07:42 PM
  #837  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,797
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by bboisvert
I've got a life sized Han in Carbonite in my home theater. I own every action figure since 1977. I have just about every non-fiction SW book ever written.
That last sentence does not compute.
Darknite39 is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 08:04 PM
  #838  
Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: New York, NY
Behind the scenes stuff.
The Third Jake is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 08:27 PM
  #839  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bboisvert
These are just the facts.
If you assume that it will be properly mastered, then I'd say, yes, it will be better overall than any bootleg. However, as soon as the bootleggers have this and stretch it out to anamorphic, which will look better?

I think assuming it will be properly mastered is a big assumption, given (strike 1) the 2004 release's audio problems and (strike 2) the indifference they're showing this release.
ThatGuamGuy is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 08:31 PM
  #840  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
And I'd love to know who EXACTLY is going to buy this...because it's obviously NOT the people in this forum. Hmmm....good idea for a poll.
Nobody wants to suggest that they'll support this release in any way, especially given that HTF has gotten people working at Lucas to see the thread over there (which is much, much worse than this one, except that nobody is comparing manhood yet).

But you may notice, if you wanted to waste the time it would take to look back through my posts in this thread, that I've never said a single word about not buying them. Just don't tell LFL that because the truth is, I'd buy them on release day if they were anamorphic. If not, I'm sure I will still buy them, but it will be very low priority.
ThatGuamGuy is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 09:04 PM
  #841  
JackBurton's Avatar
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,057
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Where can I get the CliffsNotes for this thread?
JackBurton is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 09:12 PM
  #842  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by ThatGuamGuy
Nobody wants to suggest that they'll support this release in any way, especially given that HTF has gotten people working at Lucas to see the thread over there (which is much, much worse than this one, except that nobody is comparing manhood yet).
how did they get people from Lucasfilm to see the thread?
digitalfreaknyc is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 09:17 PM
  #843  
calhoun07's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 14,401
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Chrisedge
Please stop thinking that a non-anamorphic DVD of these will be the same as ANY of the fine bootlegs that are out. I would bet lots of $$ that any version Lucas puts out (even a non-anamorphic one) will be much better looking than the best fan made DVD.

Come on now. A 1993 D2 tape > DVD will look much better than a LD > DVD.
While I am agreeing 100% with you that this is better than any fan made bootleg (on a purple DVD-R no less with home made printed inserts on some ink jet printer), Lucas shouldn't put out a product that's barely above bootleg quality. He should strive to put out the best damn product he can muster so nobody has an excuse to say they will just hang on to their bootlegs.

I am not going to judge anybody at Lucasfilm until all the facts are in. www.thedigitalbits.com wrote how and why it may very well be possible there is no way they can make an anamorphic transfer of these old movies anymore. If their scenario is true, then I will accept what we get. So far, I've not been able to find bootlegs of the original cuts that have satisfactory quality. I will be buying them regardless and living with it.
calhoun07 is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 09:27 PM
  #844  
Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by JackBurton
Where can I get the CliffsNotes for this thread?
For those just joining the thread , here's what you've missed:

1) The announcement that the non-SE Original Trilogy are coming to DVD
2) Joy from fans and an upswelling of love for George Lucas
3) Speculation on what might be corrected in these versions
4) Complaints about having to repurchase the 2004 SE's
5) Announcement that the Original Trilogy will be non-anamorphic
6) Anger toward George Lucas and a return of balance to the force

We now return you to your "George Lucas raped my childhood" thread alrady in progress...
TheHypnoToad is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 09:37 PM
  #845  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
how did they get people from Lucasfilm to see the thread?
Somebody called the number which is floating around and got a woman on the phone who stayed on for 15 or 20 minutes, and when she asked "Where are people complaining about it?" he directed her there as an example. She read it while on the phone with him, and, while having no power herself, was at least going to bring it up the chain.

Dunno as it'll do anything, but the barrage of E-mails and phone calls isn't hurting the release...
ThatGuamGuy is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 09:46 PM
  #846  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 17,015
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: NYC
Man. This thread sucks.
Breakfast with Girls is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 09:51 PM
  #847  
sracer's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 15,380
Received 60 Likes on 38 Posts
From: Prescott Valley, AZ
Originally Posted by ThatGuamGuy
Somebody called the number which is floating around and got a woman on the phone who stayed on for 15 or 20 minutes, and when she asked "Where are people complaining about it?" he directed her there as an example. She read it while on the phone with him, and, while having no power herself, was at least going to bring it up the chain.

Dunno as it'll do anything, but the barrage of E-mails and phone calls isn't hurting the release...
Ok, pre-emptive complaining in this case would be a good thing. And if we're going to do it, let's at least be coherent about it. (as opposed to some of the emotional outbursts of late)

Let's assume that someone from LucasFilms is reading this thread and asks the question, "okay... what do I have to do to get you into these releases?"

What is your answer? Being realistic, what would it take for you to purchase the new releases of these discs?
sracer is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 09:53 PM
  #848  
B5Erik's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,071
Received 580 Likes on 412 Posts
From: Southern California
Man, I just read the article on The Bits, and I am disgusted. It is OUTRAGEOUS that Lucasfilm is releasing NON-Anamorphic DVDs of the original versions of the Star Wars trilogy. It's also hard to believe that Lucas is claiming that all anamorphic-worthy elements have been destroyed. He had to have kept the originals around - if for nothing else than to compare the multiple versions to the originals.

It is ridiculous at the advent of the widescreen age to intentionally put out a DVD that will look like CRAP (relatively speaking) on a widescreen TV! Hell, I think most people here would have been happier even if they took less worthy elements and anamorphically enhanced them. At least it would be formatted correctly for the new TVs!

I've been saying for years that Lucas is horribly out of touch with the fans - and that maybe he just doesn't care. This from a guy who was the ultimate fanboy success story. Money and ego have blinded him to what is really important to the fans.

Am I angry? Damn right I'm angry! And I know I'm nowhere near alone!
B5Erik is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 09:55 PM
  #849  
B5Erik's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,071
Received 580 Likes on 412 Posts
From: Southern California
Originally Posted by sracer
Ok, pre-emptive complaining in this case would be a good thing. And if we're going to do it, let's at least be coherent about it. (as opposed to some of the emotional outbursts of late)

Let's assume that someone from LucasFilms is reading this thread and asks the question, "okay... what do I have to do to get you into these releases?"

What is your answer? Being realistic, what would it take for you to purchase the new releases of these discs?
What would it take? Simple - anampophic versions of the original trilogy in it's original form. I've got the super-dee-duper versions with all the extras already, all I want are the originals in anamorphic widescreen.
B5Erik is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 10:07 PM
  #850  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We have to be careful to word it exactly right, but all I really want is a new anamorphic transfer of the original three movies ... I personally don't care whether it has the episode 4 crawl or not, but I do like the sound of it not having it. It's not a deal breaker, but I like it.

Things that would be nice (aka "pipe dreams"):
- a box
- not having the 2004 editions attached
- if you're gonna have the 2004 releases, at least correct the audio and light saber issues, and whatever else people are complaining about.
- previously released extras (is there a theatrical-cut commentary anywhere?)
- put the subtitles back into the picture so they don't get cut off
- remotely decent cover art
ThatGuamGuy is offline  


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.