Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > DVD Talk
Reload this Page >

Original Star Wars Trilogy Being Re-Released On DVD...The Non-SEs

Community
Search
DVD Talk Talk about DVDs and Movies on DVD including Covers and Cases

Original Star Wars Trilogy Being Re-Released On DVD...The Non-SEs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-18-06 | 02:21 PM
  #801  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,809
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Carrollton, Ga
Jesus! Rick Berman? I couldn't think of a worse choice.
Terrell is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 02:23 PM
  #802  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I just don't understand the mixed signals. He says in the MTV interview,
"It's just the original versions, as they were," Lucas said. "We didn't do anything to it at all. But we're not sure how many people want that." and Lucasfilm is putting very little effort into the original versions yet the way they are promoting it to the retailers is "FINALLY, STAR WARS fans can experience the trilogy like NEVER before!!!" Technically, that's inaccurate. If you own the laserdiscs and the SE dvds, you already have had the experience. If the OOT had been anamorphic, then it would be correct.

and then the line, "THESE ARE THE DVDs FANS HAVE BEEN DEMANDING! HUGE SALES POTENTIAL!" when this is not the case.

Confusing, much?

d
Davy Mack is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 02:28 PM
  #803  
Retired
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 27,449
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Non-anamorphic=no purchase for me as well.

I was a bit on the fence anyway as the SEs don't really bother me. They're just great popcorn flicks, a few new scenes, effects and greedo shooting don't lower it much for me. I love them either way.
Josh H is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 02:36 PM
  #804  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Terrell
Jesus! Rick Berman? I couldn't think of a worse choice.
Fine, you guys don't like Rick Berman? How 'bout Mike Scully?

Perhaps that should've been accompanied by "(OMG J/K!!! lol!)" I thought the joke was clear, even if people didn't get the obscure Bruce McCulloch semi-reference. All I meant was, at a certain point, Roddenberry ran out of ideas and/or got sick of people criticizing his "new" ideas and let other people take over.

Incidentally, I disagree with what you said previously, that *nobody* could tell anymore stories in the 'Star Wars' universe, but I do agree that Lucas himself is tapped on ideas. What I've seen of the 'Clone Wars' seemed pretty good, though that may just be compared to the prequel trilogy.
ThatGuamGuy is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 02:54 PM
  #805  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by ThatGuamGuy
Incidentally, I disagree with what you said previously, that *nobody* could tell anymore stories in the 'Star Wars' universe, but I do agree that Lucas himself is tapped on ideas. What I've seen of the 'Clone Wars' seemed pretty good, though that may just be compared to the prequel trilogy.
Enh. I must be the only one who wasn't fond of them. I liked season 1 pretty much. As long as it stuck to the basics I was ok with it. Season 2 got too weird for me.

But hey, at least they were anamorphic.
digitalfreaknyc is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 02:54 PM
  #806  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,809
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Carrollton, Ga
Incidentally, I disagree with what you said previously, that *nobody* could tell anymore stories in the 'Star Wars' universe
What I said is nobody could tell stories in the Star Wars universe that could hope to live up to the original trilogy.
Terrell is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 03:01 PM
  #807  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 9,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Chicago, IL
Here is a pretty good mix of fact and speculation, as well as editorial (I apologize to everyone if this has already been posted - I don't think it has). This guy has been writing about Star Wars for a long long time..so his voice is worth something.

http://www.starwarz.com/tbone/editor...ilogy_dvds.htm
chanster is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 03:23 PM
  #808  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: East Coast
good article. everything's always "Marcia, Marcia, Marcia!!!"
darmok is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 03:40 PM
  #809  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,809
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Carrollton, Ga
See, you can blame Marcia, not Lucas

I'm not sure T'bone knows the details of Marcia and George's divorce. Suffice it to say she porbably got half due to the community property laws in California. If Marcia does get a big paycheck when the originals are released, I can at least sympathize with Lucas on not doing anything that would result in her getting money. Because she screwed him incredibly bad, and ran out and left him with their baby.

But her getting a paycheck everytime the original trilogy is released sounds like rampant speculation.
Terrell is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 03:42 PM
  #810  
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ThatGuamGuy
My story is simple; I think the original three 'Star Wars' movies are pretty damn good; I'd like to own them.
And now Lucas is giving you the opportunity. What more should be said?
I guess this means I must be a zealot. *shrug* I would personally argue that the "zealots" are the ones who buy up every release no matter what and, therefore, the news isn't going to change their behavior... they'll still buy it. That, to me, is zealotry.
No, those are called fans.
Originally Posted by bboisvert
Your definition of a true fan seems to be someone who loves to watch the 2004 editions, but is uninterested in the original films that that started it all. Many people would dispute that.
The '04 versions were modified to fit smoothly with the prequels.

Maybe you're both missing the point here. The typical SW fan, yes, would buy everything branded "Star Wars". The Home Theater nut still living in the past refuses to buy the modified trilogy (and furthermore whines about there not being a DTS track)

SW fan = sale
HT nut = no sale

Lucas then decides to release the OT in it's original glory to please the fans. The HT nut is shocked and appalled by the 2.0 track and further thrown into a state of nausea when he learns of the non-anamorphic transfer. He of course refuses to buy it. The SW fan is also disappointed but not to the extreme length the HT nut was. He is curious however and given the "attractive pricing" he picks them up anyway for the sake of completion.

I am almost certain that at the end of the day, the SW nut will prefer to watch the '04 versions not only for their obvious AV qualities but for their fuller treatment of Star Wars mythos.

SW fan = sale
HT nut = no sale

See, mythos is what drives the Lucas empire. If you're not sucked into his galaxy of video games and action figures, your lack of a sale means nothing. The fan is hooked in and lost in his world of fantasy. The HT nut comes to the table with nothing and in the end leaves with nothing.
Argentoholic is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 03:46 PM
  #811  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
Sorry, newbie. I have a fucking Star Wars tattoo and I'm not buying this if it's non-anamorphic. It's a waste of money.

I would consider myself a Star Wars fan AND a HT nut. I've had non-anamorphic versions for over 10 years. I don't need this. It's a slap in the face, IMHO.
digitalfreaknyc is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 04:04 PM
  #812  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: East Coast
it really does feel like Lucas is trying to prove that fans don't want the original versions, and lends a helping hand in trying to get that point across by providing inferior quality. anamorphic versions will come eventually. this is just one more version being released to cash in on the demand.
darmok is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 04:05 PM
  #813  
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
Sorry, newbie.
This is my favorite response ever. I will forever cherish it.
Argentoholic is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 04:06 PM
  #814  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
Sorry, newbie. I have a fucking Star Wars tattoo and I'm not buying this if it's non-anamorphic. It's a waste of money.

I would consider myself a Star Wars fan AND a HT nut. I've had non-anamorphic versions for over 10 years. I don't need this. It's a slap in the face, IMHO.
I agree with this. If you already have the Laserdisk versions why even bother?You can basically pick up the exact same thing off ebay for half the price they're charging. I'm a pretty big star wars fan too, but now it seems like they are almost trying to make me not buy this. Packaging it with the 04 version? Fine. 2.0 Audio? That's fine too. Using the 93 mastered version and non animorphic? Why bother.

To use sports as an example: Let's say you're a big Cubs fan and then they finally win the world series. But, it's in a strike shortened year and all the players are scabs you've never heard of. Kind of diminishes the experience.

Last edited by Kocheese99; 05-18-06 at 04:10 PM.
Kocheese99 is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 04:08 PM
  #815  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Argentoholic
And now Lucas is giving you the opportunity. What more should be said?
"I'd like this to look as if the transfer was made some time within this millennium."

No, those are called fans.
I'm going to pretend, as you do, that there are absolutes. Those are 'Star Wars' zealots; 'Star Wars' fans have bought the six DVDs and, when these come out, will say "I don't understand what this is supposed to be." You're just defining yourself as "fan", unwilling to accept that the majority of people who like 'Star Wars' [and, thus, are "fans" of it] are more-or-less unaware of the raging controversy regarding the special editions.

Sorry, that's a fact.

The '04 versions were modified to fit smoothly with the prequels.
I don't want to own the prequels either. I prefer to own movies I consider good, or at least worth watching for some reason. Sorry, that's just more of my CRAZY Home Theater Star Wars zealotry leaking out!

The Home Theater nut still living in the past refuses to buy the modified trilogy
Now you're saying something completely different; I never denied being a movie* zealot, though the "Home Theater nut" is a joke that my 20" TV and I will laugh at. A lot. Because you're making wildly over-generalized comments which harm your argument severely.

[* = I had written "DVD", but I edited it when I realized that I have, in fact, bought movies which were full screen only because I loved the movie. Man, I sure am a sucky home theater zealot...]

See, mythos is what drives the Lucas empire. If you're not sucked into his galaxy of video games and action figures, your lack of a sale means nothing.
Thus showing your total lack of understanding with regard to economics; given that the "SW nut" will buy *anything* with 'Star Wars' on it, Lucas needs to do nothing to cater to them. If, however, he catered to what you call the "Home Theater nut", he would stand to make more profits. The "SW nut" would buy it either way. "lack of a sale" = "lost profits". I guess you think that's nothing but, I assure you, most successful billionaire businessmen disagree.

The fan is hooked in and lost in his world of fantasy. The HT nut comes to the table with nothing and in the end leaves with nothing.
Not true. He comes to the table with his money, begs George Lucas to offer something he will exchange the money for, and walks away with his money in his pocket.

Last edited by ThatGuamGuy; 05-18-06 at 04:10 PM.
ThatGuamGuy is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 04:11 PM
  #816  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by Argentoholic
This is my favorite response ever. I will forever cherish it.
Ever......as in...the last two months?

Sorry, your post was non-sensical, at best.
digitalfreaknyc is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 04:21 PM
  #817  
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ThatGuamGuy
Thus showing your total lack of understanding with regard to economics; given that the "SW nut" will buy *anything* with 'Star Wars' on it, Lucas needs to do nothing to cater to them. If, however, he catered to what you call the "Home Theater nut", he would stand to make more profits. The "SW nut" would buy it either way. "lack of a sale" = "lost profits". I guess you think that's nothing but, I assure you, most successful billionaire businessmen disagree.
Not at all. Putting these out on dvd in bare bones non-anamorphic, 2.0 will cost them next to nothing to produce. Any sales they make will be all profit.

The HT nuts are only in it for 3 sales and then pull out. The SW fan is in it forever (or till he decides to move out of his parent's basement)
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
Ever......as in...the last two months?

Sorry, your post was non-sensical, at best.
I assure you, my dick is quite larger than yours.
Argentoholic is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 04:22 PM
  #818  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 9,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Chicago, IL
(Edited - because I reported the post to a mod..and I don't ever want to be on digitalfreaknyc's "back", for obvious reasons)

Last edited by chanster; 05-18-06 at 04:30 PM.
chanster is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 04:24 PM
  #819  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: The Other Side
Originally Posted by Argentoholic
I am almost certain that at the end of the day, the SW nut will prefer to watch the '04 versions not only for their obvious AV qualities but for their fuller treatment of Star Wars mythos.
So a "SW nut" must love the 04 versions unconditionally? I'm a Star Wars fan, but of the original 3 films as they were originally released. I don't consider myself anything less of a fan. So I'm "living in the past"? Sweet Zombie Jesus, YOU are the zealot, here.
Egon's Ghost is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 04:26 PM
  #820  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by chanster
Digitalfreak, what the hell is up with you today? I mean seriously. You go around bashing new members for expressing their opinions.. What has gotten into you lately?
Ask ThatGuamGuy and Egon. Obviously they found it as ridiculous as I did.

You consistantly have a problem with me. Get off my back.

Originally Posted by Argentoholic
I assure you, my dick is quite larger than yours.
Feel free to whip it out whenever you like.

Just don't be surprised with what this legitimate Star Wars fan and HT nut does to it.

Last edited by digitalfreaknyc; 05-18-06 at 04:28 PM.
digitalfreaknyc is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 04:28 PM
  #821  
BuckNaked2k's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,174
Received 43 Likes on 33 Posts
From: Hartford, CT
Originally Posted by The Valeyard
A madman. Pure and simple. A madman.
That's no joke. Didn't Van Gogh destroy a lot of his works because he wasn't quite "satisfied" with the outcome?

This guy is such a textbook case of the "tortured artist" that it borders on pathological. If he lops off an ear we'll know for sure.
BuckNaked2k is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 04:28 PM
  #822  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: ...wait a minute, where the hell am I?
Glad to see that Luca$ is still a money hungry whore. God do I hate this man.... and the fanatics.
purplechoe is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 04:31 PM
  #823  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Argentoholic
Not at all. Putting these out on dvd in bare bones non-anamorphic, 2.0 will cost them next to nothing to produce. Any sales they make will be all profit.
And it would cost a few thousand dollars to make an anamorphic transfer, which would translate easily to ten times as much, due to the sales which will be lost due to a non-anamorphic transfer. You're talking in circles.

The HT nuts are only in it for 3 sales and then pull out. The SW fan is in it forever (or till he decides to move out of his parent's basement)
Right, so again I point out, the "SW fan" will buy anything regardless, their money is already there, but a portion of that money could be used to invest in a transfer which *more* "HT nuts" will buy, which translates quite quickly into profits. Even ignoring your bizarre definition of "fans" vs. "zealots", you're not making much sense here.

I assure you, my dick is quite larger than yours.
Ooooooh, I get it. You're a troll. A troll who's insecure about his penis size. Jeez, I'm sorry, dude. Penis envy is a horrible thing in a man.
ThatGuamGuy is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 04:35 PM
  #824  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chanster
Digitalfreak, what the hell is up with you today? I mean seriously. You go around bashing new members for expressing their opinions.. What has gotten into you lately?
For whatever it's worth, I'm pretty sure I've had a few run-ins with digitalfreak ... I actually think I may remember not liking him very much. But since when is calling a new poster "newbie" bashing? From reading this thread, you seem to be kinda riding him a little, though there may be context here I'm not seeing.

[EDIT: It should be pointed out, I'd swear he was a "new member" until his latest post; at what point does that switch over? When DF made that post, the forum itself was basically calling him a newbie.]

However, now that the newbie has revealed himself to be a straight-up troll, I think we can all agree to just ignore him, and he'll drag his gargantuan genitalia elsewhere.
ThatGuamGuy is offline  
Old 05-18-06 | 05:03 PM
  #825  
Giles's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 33,646
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
From: Washington DC
Originally Posted by ThatGuamGuy
From reading this thread, you seem to be kinda riding him a little, though there may be context here I'm not seeing.
pun intended?
Giles is offline  


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.