![]() |
WOW! what is that poster for Supes 2? Never seen it before...
|
Looking at that tin a few pages ago reminds me of the upcoming Forbidden Planet Collectors edition tin.
|
Originally Posted by Kant
WOW! what is that poster for Supes 2? Never seen it before...
May have been used elsewhere too, but those are the only two I know about. |
Originally Posted by Paul_SD
It was the design used on the Italian (and Argentinian) one sheets.
|
Originally Posted by Paul_SD
Now that's a reason to pick a side in the war. |
*Spits coffee all over monitor*
Where did you get those images? The Man Room? Talk about best cover art ever! :drool: |
I'm sure those are fakes, but damn I wish WB would use that for the HD-DVD releases. Of course, that's assuming these titles even get released on the format. We still haven't heard any confirmation.
|
How the hell could they make a cover for Superman III and not have Richard Prior on the cover anymore???
|
Originally Posted by Rockybalboa
How the hell could they make a cover for Superman III and not have Richard Prior on the cover anymore???
|
Originally Posted by Son_Of_Zod
Why would it have the same extras? I mean the extras are listed at dvdactive:
.... If you buy the boxset with both then you'll get all the features. I don't get why he'd think they'd replicate the same special features for both dvds. |
Originally Posted by Filmmaker
Ask youself, did having Richard Pryor in the film help or hurt the franchise? Now put yourself in the head of a studio marketer who actually wants to sell his product...
|
On behalf of auditors, consultants, and bank examiners across the world, please, please, please put Richard Pryor back on the cover, and maybe a few of those 1/2 pennies too........
|
Originally Posted by Son_Of_Zod
Superman III was awful regardless of Richard Pryor. But putting the old lady, the old man, and his whore on the cover and not Richard Pryor is an insult to the man's memory.
|
Originally Posted by DieselsDen
Only Margot Kidder managed to escape due to her severely truncated role.
|
It'd be a good cover if it showed Evil Superman using his heatvision on Pryor, and then showing him run. A lenticular cover perhaps.
|
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
And that happened because she had a big mouth about the S2 fiasco.
|
Originally Posted by DieselsDen
Well, that was her reporter's instinct getting the best of her.
I'm a terrible person. |
Originally Posted by DVD Josh
Or one of her many personalities.
I'm a terrible person. |
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
Honestly, having read what she said, I applaud her honesty. you'd never see that in hollywood now.
|
Originally Posted by Duh Vuh Duh
linky please, digi.
i'm sure there are others as well... |
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
Thanks for the link. |
Originally Posted by LorenzoL
Damm! I didn't know the extent of the behind the scenes "drama" that occurred in shooting the Superman movies.
Thanks for the link. |
Originally Posted by Filmmaker
Ask youself, did having Richard Pryor in the film help or hurt the franchise? Now put yourself in the head of a studio marketer who actually wants to sell his product...
Um... Richard Prior is more of a name than the 2 girls on the cover who are nobodys.. and I cannot remember the guys name... Think also that maybe the African American community would rather see Richard that those 3?? I would say that Richard would sell more... |
mabe the hope is that people will buy it not knowing Pryor is in it...
as opposed to, "No don't get the one with Richard Pryor, that one is awful." which i think most people feel, compared to the first two |
3 was 1000 times better than 4! At least we got to see good vs evil Superman.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:42 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.