Hd-Dvd/Blu-Ray to Unite?
#1
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Special Edition
Hd-Dvd/Blu-Ray to Unite?
Link
After more than a year of touting Blu-ray as the best technology to replace DVD for storing high-definition video and winning proponents including Apple, a top executive at Sony Corp., one of Blu-ray's major backers, has opened the door to the possibility of unifying the format with its arch rival, HD-DVD.
"Listening to the voice of the consumers, having two rival formats is disappointing and we haven't totally given up on the possibility of integration or compromise," Ryoji Chubachi, Sony's president-elect, said at a news conference Thursday in which he discussed the company's performance and future strategy.
The statement may surprise backers of the rival camps, who have assembled consortiums of major electronics companies, disc makers and Hollywood studios to promote the formats in a battle that echoes one fought a quarter of a century ago between Betamax and VHS.
HD-DVD backers, which include NEC Corp. and Toshiba Corp., say HD-DVDs can be produced for about the same price as DVDs and are backward-compatible with DVDs and CDs, making the format more convenient for both consumers and the industry. HD-DVD movie titles, PC drives and players are all due out by the end of the year.
Sony has steadfastly promoted Blu-ray as a technology that has greater capacity, saying this makes the format more useful because more content can be stored on a disc. The technology also has wider support in the technology industry, although release dates for movie titles have not yet been announced.
Chubachi's comments mark the second time that a Sony executive has signalled the possibility of a compromise between the two camps. In January, Ken Kutaragi, executive deputy president of Sony, said a format war was not in the public interest and that Sony had not ruled out the possibility of uniting the formats.
After more than a year of touting Blu-ray as the best technology to replace DVD for storing high-definition video and winning proponents including Apple, a top executive at Sony Corp., one of Blu-ray's major backers, has opened the door to the possibility of unifying the format with its arch rival, HD-DVD.
"Listening to the voice of the consumers, having two rival formats is disappointing and we haven't totally given up on the possibility of integration or compromise," Ryoji Chubachi, Sony's president-elect, said at a news conference Thursday in which he discussed the company's performance and future strategy.
The statement may surprise backers of the rival camps, who have assembled consortiums of major electronics companies, disc makers and Hollywood studios to promote the formats in a battle that echoes one fought a quarter of a century ago between Betamax and VHS.
HD-DVD backers, which include NEC Corp. and Toshiba Corp., say HD-DVDs can be produced for about the same price as DVDs and are backward-compatible with DVDs and CDs, making the format more convenient for both consumers and the industry. HD-DVD movie titles, PC drives and players are all due out by the end of the year.
Sony has steadfastly promoted Blu-ray as a technology that has greater capacity, saying this makes the format more useful because more content can be stored on a disc. The technology also has wider support in the technology industry, although release dates for movie titles have not yet been announced.
Chubachi's comments mark the second time that a Sony executive has signalled the possibility of a compromise between the two camps. In January, Ken Kutaragi, executive deputy president of Sony, said a format war was not in the public interest and that Sony had not ruled out the possibility of uniting the formats.
Last edited by Premise; 03-24-05 at 02:30 PM. Reason: streamline
#2
DVD Talk Hero
This is good news, right? Or am I missing something?
#4
Member
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Seattle
Originally Posted by RocShemp
This is good news, right? Or am I missing something?
We're missing just how they plan to unite these formats. I mean this was a worthless statement without anything to back it up. Seems rather careless.
#5
DVD Talk Legend
These are major corporations we're dealing with, not the cast of Sesame Street. One will buy out the other, and the loser will be bitter and leak dirty photos of the winner.
#7
Originally Posted by CharlesTisMe
What are you guys gonna do about the DVDs you already own that arent Blu-Ray or HD?
#8
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by CharlesTisMe
What are you guys gonna do about the DVDs you already own that arent Blu-Ray or HD?
#9
DVD Talk Hero
I guess I haven't been paying as close attention to all this as I thought, but in the statement in the article describing that HD-DVD is backwards compatible, does that imply that Blu-Ray is not?? Somewhere I got the impression that both formats were. To me, that would be a key point in which format I would want to support.
#10
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Denmark
Looks like some studio execs finally grew a brain...Now everyone be quiet...this brains needs space, nurture and silence to get to grow up and make a logic decision on behalf of all consumers
#11
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: New Orleans
Originally Posted by DanishDVDfreak
Looks like some studio execs finally grew a brain...Now everyone be quiet...this brains needs space, nurture and silence to get to grow up and make a logic decision on behalf of all consumers
#12
DVD Talk Hero
Originally Posted by Bronkster
I guess I haven't been paying as close attention to all this as I thought, but in the statement in the article describing that HD-DVD is backwards compatible, does that imply that Blu-Ray is not?? Somewhere I got the impression that both formats were. To me, that would be a key point in which format I would want to support.
#13
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by hmurchison
We're missing just how they plan to unite these formats. I mean this was a worthless statement without anything to back it up. Seems rather careless.
Video Business and the like have just started posting the results from polls about retailer opinions of High Definition DVD. There was a huge percentage (40-ish% if I recall...) that were not planning on carrying *either* format, because of the confusion it would cause consumers.
And they had some consumer information recently that a huge percentage of people who had HDTVs and DVD players thought that they *already* were watching HD-DVDs. A format war is the worst thing in the world when you have such a huge education curve to overcome.
I personally think that Sony is finally waking up to the fact that stores and customers are going to sit this out until the studios shake hands and play nice.
#14
DVD Talk Hero
So it is good news then. So what do you guys suppose will happen? Short of a format war, I don't see any side dropping there preffered format. A player that plays both Blu-Ray and HD-DVD discs as well as being backwards compatible with current DVDs? Sounds more like a nice dream....
#15
DVD Talk Hero
Originally Posted by Bronkster
I guess I haven't been paying as close attention to all this as I thought, but in the statement in the article describing that HD-DVD is backwards compatible, does that imply that Blu-Ray is not?? Somewhere I got the impression that both formats were. To me, that would be a key point in which format I would want to support.
Blu-Ray recorders that are currently on sale in Japan can definitely play current DVDs. It would be marketing suicide if they couldn't.
#16
DVD Talk Special Edition
The only thing that worries me about the possibility of some sort of compromise is Sony's PS3, or whatever they end up calling it. It is already locked in that it will be Blu-Ray, and I don't think Sony can change it now. I kinda doubt that they will release millions of Blu-Ray PS3's and then use something else for their stand-alone players. I'm not so sure a player that supports both formats is the best way to go either, simply because I can't see the movie studios being happy about still having 2 different formats to support.
Here is a quote from The Digital Bits story on this that I was kind of shocked to read:
"While Sony's technological and engineering base is sound, the company must ensure that its products are aligned with the wants of consumers, Chubachi said on Tuesday. Sony's engineers have traditionally been regarded within the company as heroes and the creators of new markets, but recently their ideas have not always led to products that matched consumers' needs, he said."
This is a huge understatement.
Let me see:
BetaMax- yeah, that really took off
Minidisk- has to be the shortest shelf life ever of an audio format
Memory Stick- successful, but really, did we need another flash memory type, and still one of the most expensive types of flash memory
UMD Movies- as much as I really like the idea of the PSP and the way the games are looking, do they really expect people to buy movie only disks, most of which are cropped to fit 1.66:1 AR, are only watchable on a PSP, and cost about as much as regular DVDs?
I think Sony has always been too enamored with creating their own product and trying to make everyone else conform to their ideas.
Here is a quote from The Digital Bits story on this that I was kind of shocked to read:
"While Sony's technological and engineering base is sound, the company must ensure that its products are aligned with the wants of consumers, Chubachi said on Tuesday. Sony's engineers have traditionally been regarded within the company as heroes and the creators of new markets, but recently their ideas have not always led to products that matched consumers' needs, he said."
This is a huge understatement.
Let me see:
BetaMax- yeah, that really took off
Minidisk- has to be the shortest shelf life ever of an audio format
Memory Stick- successful, but really, did we need another flash memory type, and still one of the most expensive types of flash memory
UMD Movies- as much as I really like the idea of the PSP and the way the games are looking, do they really expect people to buy movie only disks, most of which are cropped to fit 1.66:1 AR, are only watchable on a PSP, and cost about as much as regular DVDs?
I think Sony has always been too enamored with creating their own product and trying to make everyone else conform to their ideas.
#17
Suspended
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Los Angeles
I think Sony has always been too enamored with creating their own product and trying to make everyone else conform to their ideas.
#18
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Bronkster
I guess I haven't been paying as close attention to all this as I thought, but in the statement in the article describing that HD-DVD is backwards compatible, does that imply that Blu-Ray is not?? Somewhere I got the impression that both formats were. To me, that would be a key point in which format I would want to support.
#19
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Originally Posted by collven
Let me see:
BetaMax- yeah, that really took off
Minidisk- has to be the shortest shelf life ever of an audio format
Memory Stick- successful, but really, did we need another flash memory type, and still one of the most expensive types of flash memory
UMD Movies- as much as I really like the idea of the PSP and the way the games are looking, do they really expect people to buy movie only disks, most of which are cropped to fit 1.66:1 AR, are only watchable on a PSP, and cost about as much as regular DVDs?
I think Sony has always been too enamored with creating their own product and trying to make everyone else conform to their ideas.
BetaMax- yeah, that really took off
Minidisk- has to be the shortest shelf life ever of an audio format
Memory Stick- successful, but really, did we need another flash memory type, and still one of the most expensive types of flash memory
UMD Movies- as much as I really like the idea of the PSP and the way the games are looking, do they really expect people to buy movie only disks, most of which are cropped to fit 1.66:1 AR, are only watchable on a PSP, and cost about as much as regular DVDs?
I think Sony has always been too enamored with creating their own product and trying to make everyone else conform to their ideas.
#20
DVD Talk Hero
Originally Posted by collven
Minidisk- has to be the shortest shelf life ever of an audio format
#21
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by rennervision
I couldn't agree more. It always seems like whenever there is a format war, it doesn't take long to notice Sony is one of the biggest reasons the war exists in the first place.
I don't remember Sony being involved with Laserdiscs. Weren't there 2 different but compatible laserdisc formats? (and an analog vinyl videodisc too)
#22
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by sracer
Well, in the case of videotape, Sony had invented both Beta and VHS...but sold VHS to JVC since it was inferior to Beta.
In any case, "invention" is too strong a term for either format. Both were simple adaptations of existing technology.
I don't remember Sony being involved with Laserdiscs. Weren't there 2 different but compatible laserdisc formats? (and an analog vinyl videodisc too)
There were two different systems for formatting information on a Laserdisc -- CLV and CAV -- which yielded different running times and acess to features like still-frame. But this isn't analogous to Blu-Ray and HD-DVD; CLV was a later extension to the medium that allowed 60-minute sides at the expense of still-frame and a tiny bit of resolution.
#23
DVD Talk Hero
Originally Posted by sracer
I don't remember Sony being involved with Laserdiscs. Weren't there 2 different but compatible laserdisc formats? (and an analog vinyl videodisc too)
#24
Banned
Originally Posted by collven
BetaMax- yeah, that really took off
Originally Posted by collven
Minidisk- has to be the shortest shelf life ever of an audio format
#25
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by rdclark
::blink:: Would you be so kind as to cite a source for that?
In any case, "invention" is too strong a term for either format. Both were simple adaptations of existing technology.
In any case, "invention" is too strong a term for either format. Both were simple adaptations of existing technology.
Originally Posted by rdclark
There were two different systems for formatting information on a Laserdisc -- CLV and CAV -- which yielded different running times and acess to features like still-frame. But this isn't analogous to Blu-Ray and HD-DVD; CLV was a later extension to the medium that allowed 60-minute sides at the expense of still-frame and a tiny bit of resolution.
I remember looking at all 3 (CAV, CLV, and RCA's Selectavision) when they first came out.... RCA Selectavision had a "talking dog" coolness factor (I found getting video playback from a vinyl record pretty interesting) but dismissed it as a shortlived medium. Then between CAV and CLV there was enough uncertainty for me to pass on it. I know that I wasn't alone in thinking that.





