Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > DVD Talk
Reload this Page >

ANH glaring error

Community
Search
DVD Talk Talk about DVDs and Movies on DVD including Covers and Cases

ANH glaring error

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-27-04 | 05:09 PM
  #26  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 7,784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
agreed
Old 09-27-04 | 09:02 PM
  #27  
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: saint paul, minnesota
i concede.

and yes, i am enjoying these movies on dvd very much.

thanks for the replys,
keith
Old 09-27-04 | 10:44 PM
  #28  
calhoun07's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 14,401
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think the transfers for these new DVDs are just so crisp and clean that people are noticing finer details for the first time. I know that happened to me the first time I put in the Emprie Strikes Back DVD. I swore they added all these details, but when I put in the previous version, I just saw the details were that much more crisp and detailed.

I also think that people have seen these movies so many times over their life that by now, they are noticing finer details they never caught before. There is nothing wrong with that, it isn't they are not enjoying the movies, it's just that after you see the same images so many times, your eyes tend to look at other things in the background and around the main action. It's natural, and I don't understand people who DON'T notice these things after a multitude of viewings of these movies.

Last edited by calhoun07; 09-27-04 at 10:46 PM.
Old 09-27-04 | 10:50 PM
  #29  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Massachusetts
I cant believe they didnt fix the alien in the cantina who has one human hand and one alien hand.
Old 09-28-04 | 02:22 PM
  #30  
New Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
While Lucas did address the parsecs=distance vs. time dilemma in the commentary, I personally don't think he did a very good job. He kinda fumbled his way through it and didn't make much sense. It was kind of like he was explaining a theory that he didn't really understand himself. Anyway, I've heard 3 possible explanations with increasing degrees of believability (the second one is somewhat similar to what Lucas said on the commentary):

1: The Kessel Run involves delivering smuggled goods to a number of cargo ships moving on a set course at a predetermined speed. The longer it takes you to complete your delivery, the further they will have traveled before you get to them. So the '12 parsecs' that han was referring to is the distance travelled by the cargo ships. If he had taken longer, the ships would have flown farther from their original destination before he was finished.

2: The Kessel Run involves navigating through (I think it was called the Great Maw) an area of space that is heavily clustered with black holes. Everyone knows that if you get too close to a black hole you will be sucked in and never heard from again. So in order to complete the Kessel run, pilots have to plot a long and twising course that veers far away from any of the black holes. Of course, the faster your ship travels, the closer you can get to a black hole without being sucked in, because you're whooshing by with such great velocity. Han's '12 parsecs' refers to his nearly straight-line course through the maze of black holes. I read somewhere that anything below 18 parsecs is something to be proud of. This is pretty similar to what Lucas said, but when I heard him tell it he didn't tell it very well.

3. (and this one needs the least explanation) Han was lying. He was talkin' tall to make a buck. Either he didn't know, or he was betting that THEY didn't know, WHAT a parsec was, but thought it sounded good and hoped they bought it (likely, LUCAS didn't know what a parsec was but thought it sounded good...and hoped they bought it...and they did. On VHS, THX, LD, SE, and DVD)
Old 09-28-04 | 07:32 PM
  #31  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,809
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Carrollton, Ga
While Lucas did address the parsecs=distance vs. time dilemma in the commentary, I personally don't think he did a very good job.
Or how about, who gives a flip. This aint Star Trek, pardon my grammar. It was just a line of dialogue to convery the speed capabilities of the Falcon. It wasn't meant to be dissected in minute detail.


It's silly little things like this that Star Wars fans obssess over, that make me shake my head in disbelief.
Old 09-29-04 | 09:35 AM
  #32  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 29,850
Received 23 Likes on 16 Posts
From: Bartertown due to it having a better economy than where I really live.
here's a glaring error
Old 09-30-04 | 07:01 PM
  #33  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: vancouver, WA, USA, Earth, Sol, Milkyway
Originally posted by SMB-IL
Another glaring error I heard in the cantina scene (while continuing to ENJOY the movie ) is that Han says something along the lines of "I made that route in less than 30 parsecs" referring to a unit of time. A parsec is a unit of distance.
i see no problem here. Who is to say that the "kessel run" or whatever its called isn't an event in which you have a certain amount of time to travel as far as you can... Han is bragging that he made it almost 30 parsecs.

j
Old 09-30-04 | 11:55 PM
  #34  
Cool New Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by TopHatCat64
Is anyone even ENJOYING these movies or is everyone just trying to pick everything to death?
How fast can YOU do the Kessel run in tough guy?!?!
Old 10-06-04 | 12:42 AM
  #35  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,068
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Hoboken, NJ
Originally posted by bumperfish
While Lucas did address the parsecs=distance vs. time dilemma in the commentary, I personally don't think he did a very good job. He kinda fumbled his way through it and didn't make much sense. It was kind of like he was explaining a theory that he didn't really understand himself. Anyway, I've heard 3 possible explanations with increasing degrees of believability (the second one is somewhat similar to what Lucas said on the commentary):

1: The Kessel Run involves delivering smuggled goods to a number of cargo ships moving on a set course at a predetermined speed. The longer it takes you to complete your delivery, the further they will have traveled before you get to them. So the '12 parsecs' that han was referring to is the distance travelled by the cargo ships. If he had taken longer, the ships would have flown farther from their original destination before he was finished.

2: The Kessel Run involves navigating through (I think it was called the Great Maw) an area of space that is heavily clustered with black holes. Everyone knows that if you get too close to a black hole you will be sucked in and never heard from again. So in order to complete the Kessel run, pilots have to plot a long and twising course that veers far away from any of the black holes. Of course, the faster your ship travels, the closer you can get to a black hole without being sucked in, because you're whooshing by with such great velocity. Han's '12 parsecs' refers to his nearly straight-line course through the maze of black holes. I read somewhere that anything below 18 parsecs is something to be proud of. This is pretty similar to what Lucas said, but when I heard him tell it he didn't tell it very well.

3. (and this one needs the least explanation) Han was lying. He was talkin' tall to make a buck. Either he didn't know, or he was betting that THEY didn't know, WHAT a parsec was, but thought it sounded good and hoped they bought it (likely, LUCAS didn't know what a parsec was but thought it sounded good...and hoped they bought it...and they did. On VHS, THX, LD, SE, and DVD)
I had heard something similar. Since space/time distorts near black holes, by travelling quickly enough you can fly very close to the singularities, decreasing time and distance travelled.

It's probably mostly junk science anyway, but it seems as reasonable as any other explanation.

birrman54
Old 10-09-04 | 05:35 PM
  #36  
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Denmark
*Janice mode on* O-H M-Y G-O-D *Janice mode off*

Cīmon..I know its Star Wars, but jeez...its "just" a movie...Its not science ! Its science FICTION...as in its not real...

Dont get me wrong...Im a big Star Wars fan too, and I hate that Greedo shoots first, and I would rather have the originals (thank God for Laserdisc), but really...do we have to pick everything apart and ruin the fun (or in this case, the fun thats LEFT) of movies...

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.