LOTR: The Two Towers Extended Edition details!! (merged)
#78
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by REL77
I could really see them doing a 2 towers statues, one of Orthanac, and one of Barud Dur (spelling). I think that would be an awsome package.
I could really see them doing a 2 towers statues, one of Orthanac, and one of Barud Dur (spelling). I think that would be an awsome package.
If so, then yes, Orthanac and Barud Dur should be the statues with the extended cut. If not, then they should be the two towers.
Last edited by marioxb; 04-15-03 at 11:54 AM.
#81
Moderator
Re: Re: For those who have DVD changers...
Originally posted by RocShemp
According to IMDB.com:
"Rumors in early 2003 have it that the first cut is six hours long because of the amount of material from Tolkien's original story that remains to be covered."
http://us.imdb.com/Trivia?0167260
If this is true, comparing the rough cut estimates to the actual runtimes of the EE of the first two films, I'd say we should expect something closer to 5+ hours for the ROTK EE.
According to IMDB.com:
"Rumors in early 2003 have it that the first cut is six hours long because of the amount of material from Tolkien's original story that remains to be covered."
http://us.imdb.com/Trivia?0167260
If this is true, comparing the rough cut estimates to the actual runtimes of the EE of the first two films, I'd say we should expect something closer to 5+ hours for the ROTK EE.
How the hell can ROTK have a rough cut of 6 Hours, the book itself doen't seem that long.
#82
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How about the 20+ hour challenge?
Watch the whole Theatrical release(est 9+ hours), followed by the EE of the trilogy (est 11+ hours)....
If you are truly insane, do the 20+ hour challenge then rewatch all 3 movies with commentaries right after another, I am not even sure how many days that will take!
Watch the whole Theatrical release(est 9+ hours), followed by the EE of the trilogy (est 11+ hours)....
If you are truly insane, do the 20+ hour challenge then rewatch all 3 movies with commentaries right after another, I am not even sure how many days that will take!
#83
Member
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Olympia, WA, USA
It's been a couple years since I read the books, but I think that TT ended early, and there was still some stuff that was supposed to happen. I guess that means that the end of the TT book is the beginning of RotK movie. Of course, my memory might be wrong.
#84
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 3,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally posted by Ghery
It's been a couple years since I read the books, but I think that TT ended early, and there was still some stuff that was supposed to happen. I guess that means that the end of the TT book is the beginning of RotK movie. Of course, my memory might be wrong.
It's been a couple years since I read the books, but I think that TT ended early, and there was still some stuff that was supposed to happen. I guess that means that the end of the TT book is the beginning of RotK movie. Of course, my memory might be wrong.
#85
Moderator
Originally posted by Ghery
It's been a couple years since I read the books, but I think that TT ended early, and there was still some stuff that was supposed to happen. I guess that means that the end of the TT book is the beginning of RotK movie. Of course, my memory might be wrong.
It's been a couple years since I read the books, but I think that TT ended early, and there was still some stuff that was supposed to happen. I guess that means that the end of the TT book is the beginning of RotK movie. Of course, my memory might be wrong.
#86
Member
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Olympia, WA, USA
Sorry, Spoiler alert...
I just remember the end of the TT book ending with Pippen and Gandalf taking off after Pippin used the seeing stone, and Sam already taking the ring from Frodo (after the big spider chick encounter). Sorry, exact names escape me.
I just remember the end of the TT book ending with Pippen and Gandalf taking off after Pippin used the seeing stone, and Sam already taking the ring from Frodo (after the big spider chick encounter). Sorry, exact names escape me.
Last edited by Ghery; 04-15-03 at 04:12 PM.
#87
DVD Talk Limited Edition
^ ^
Spoiler.
I read the books, but not everyone has.
Spoiler.
I read the books, but not everyone has.
#88
DVD Talk Hero
I think I will be picking up both editions, just like I did w/ the FotR last year.
I can't wait for this release, even though I loved the theatrical edition, I think the film will greatly benefit from the extended footage.
I can't wait for this release, even though I loved the theatrical edition, I think the film will greatly benefit from the extended footage.
#89
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the spoilers!!!!!! Now I'm going to jump out of the window since I already know what's going to happen. Seriously put "spoilers" please, as I have not yet read the book and by reading you post, I think I know the ending.
#91
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Manassas, VA
Yes, PJ has stated that he is moving some of the stuff around. For those that have read the books, the very ending of the book will not be in the movie. It will end with the climatic part. And not due the last 2 or 3 chapters I believe. I can understand why. They showed the forshadowing of it in the FotR and that was all they were doing. PJ has handeled this as best he could for such an incrediable long movie.
#93
Member
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Olympia, WA, USA
Originally posted by REL77
Yes, PJ has stated that he is moving some of the stuff around. For those that have read the books, the very ending of the book will not be in the movie. It will end with the climatic part. And not due the last 2 or 3 chapters I believe. I can understand why. They showed the forshadowing of it in the FotR and that was all they were doing. PJ has handeled this as best he could for such an incrediable long movie.
Yes, PJ has stated that he is moving some of the stuff around. For those that have read the books, the very ending of the book will not be in the movie. It will end with the climatic part. And not due the last 2 or 3 chapters I believe. I can understand why. They showed the forshadowing of it in the FotR and that was all they were doing. PJ has handeled this as best he could for such an incrediable long movie.
The end of RotK you mean? Where they have to fight to regain control of the Shire? I hope you mean that isn't in the movie, I didn't like that part of the book....
#94
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Manassas, VA
Originally posted by Ghery
Spoiler...
The end of RotK you mean? Where they have to fight to regain control of the Shire? I hope you mean that isn't in the movie, I didn't like that part of the book....
Spoiler...
The end of RotK you mean? Where they have to fight to regain control of the Shire? I hope you mean that isn't in the movie, I didn't like that part of the book....
#95
DVD Talk Hero
It's true TTT ended much earlier than the book.
Even though I'm cool with Jackson leaving this part for the beginning of part three (imagine how startled and confused the one's who haven't read the book would feel if the sequence is actually presented in parts rather than one whole continous event) but I would have prefered that
I just felt that even though it was a good try to have Gollum/Smeagol sound so ominous at the end of the second film it just didn't have any real oomph and felt more like the film ended as if no big deal.
As for the last part of the book,
Anywho, I guess I'll just have to wait 'til this December to find out.
Spoiler:
Even though I'm cool with Jackson leaving this part for the beginning of part three (imagine how startled and confused the one's who haven't read the book would feel if the sequence is actually presented in parts rather than one whole continous event) but I would have prefered that
Spoiler:
As for the last part of the book,
Spoiler:
Anywho, I guess I'll just have to wait 'til this December to find out.
Last edited by RocShemp; 04-15-03 at 07:52 PM.
#96
Retired
Originally posted by RocShemp
I just felt that even though it was a good try to have Gollum/Smeagol sound so ominous at the end of the second film it just didn't have any real oomph and felt more like the film ended as if no big deal.
I just felt that even though it was a good try to have Gollum/Smeagol sound so ominous at the end of the second film it just didn't have any real oomph and felt more like the film ended as if no big deal.
This makes sense since LOTR is one book. It's a common misconception that it's a trilogy. It was all written and released at the same time and the breaks between the books are really no more than the breaks between any other chapters. It was just originally published in those three sections (and still is today for convenience/money grubbing).
#97
DVD Talk Hero
I know it was all one book but I guess The Empire Strikes Back has me spoiled. But since Jackson ended it earlier I think he could have ended atmore of a cliffhanger. In fact, even though it's all one book where The Two Towers portion of the novel ends is a cliffhanger (moreso then the pseudo cliffhanger in the film version). itjust came across as if Jackson wastrying togive film goers a nagging feeling that no good is going to happen to Frodo and Sam in part three but it didn't com across quite right.
#98
DVD Talk Special Edition
I will buy both versions simply b/c I loved the film.
Really cool that Jackson is letting us know whats coming on the EE before the release of the theatrical cut.
Really cool that Jackson is letting us know whats coming on the EE before the release of the theatrical cut.
#99
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: NY
Suprisingly I didn't see anybody mention the rating of the Two Towers Extended Cut. If anyone is interested it's rated PG-13.
http://www.filmratings.com/ lists the following:
Lord Of The Rings: The Two Towers Special Extended Edition, The (2003)
New Line Home Entertainment
PG-13 Rated PG-13 for epic battle sequences and scary images.
http://www.filmratings.com/ lists the following:
Lord Of The Rings: The Two Towers Special Extended Edition, The (2003)
New Line Home Entertainment
PG-13 Rated PG-13 for epic battle sequences and scary images.
#100
Yikes!!
Originally posted by RocShemp
If this is true, comparing the rough cut estimates to the actual runtimes of the EE of the first two films, I'd say we should expect something closer to 5+ hours for the ROTK EE.
If this is true, comparing the rough cut estimates to the actual runtimes of the EE of the first two films, I'd say we should expect something closer to 5+ hours for the ROTK EE.

I just can't imagine a five-hour Extended Edition of the movie on DVD, either.



