Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Video Game Talk
Reload this Page >

How to Kill a brand PS3 video

Community
Search
Video Game Talk The Place to talk about and trade Video & PC Games

How to Kill a brand PS3 video

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-29-07 | 02:31 PM
  #26  
Michael Corvin's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 63,472
Received 1,379 Likes on 945 Posts
From: Louisville, KY
Originally Posted by DodgingCars
I would say that's everyones opinion. I can't imagine even the most hardcore PS3 fanboy saying otherwise. The 360 does have a year lead though.
I still call bullshit on this one. The PS3 was slated to launch alongside the 360. Developers knew it and should have had some games in progress at that point. Sure they didn't have final dev kits, but working on specs they can get pretty far along in the development process.

Fast forward to Spring 06, the *new* launch date. Those games that were in the works for the original '05 launch should be nearing completion or all but done by that point, and more titles being in the works.

Fast forward to Nov. 06, the actual launch date. Fully polished games should have been abundant at launch, what with the extra year and all. Not to mention a slew of other games should have been in the works at that point. So in reality they should have had Gears worthy material at launch having a year extra to work on those games. That's why I also call bullshit on that typical argument that you can't compare first year 360 titles to launch PS3 titles.

Same goes for their online service. All reps and execs say is that MS had a year headstart. Well what the fuck did Sony do during that year that they couldn't even put out something comparable at launch? Nevermind the 3+ year development time of the system that they could have been working on the PSN. What the fuck were they doing all that time?

So I don't see it so much as Microsoft having a year headstart as much as I see Sony and developers squandering away a year that could have yielded a stronger launch and a decent library of releases during the first few months. So anytime I see the "MS had a head start" I have to laugh because that has to be the lamest excuse known to man gamers. It's nothing but an excuse. Sometimes you have to call a spade a spade.
Old 06-29-07 | 02:40 PM
  #27  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,009
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Good points.
Old 06-29-07 | 03:22 PM
  #28  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
I still call bullshit on this one. The PS3 was slated to launch alongside the 360. Developers knew it and should have had some games in progress at that point. Sure they didn't have final dev kits, but working on specs they can get pretty far along in the development process.

Fast forward to Spring 06, the *new* launch date. Those games that were in the works for the original '05 launch should be nearing completion or all but done by that point, and more titles being in the works.

Fast forward to Nov. 06, the actual launch date. Fully polished games should have been abundant at launch, what with the extra year and all. Not to mention a slew of other games should have been in the works at that point. So in reality they should have had Gears worthy material at launch having a year extra to work on those games. That's why I also call bullshit on that typical argument that you can't compare first year 360 titles to launch PS3 titles.

Same goes for their online service. All reps and execs say is that MS had a year headstart. Well what the fuck did Sony do during that year that they couldn't even put out something comparable at launch? Nevermind the 3+ year development time of the system that they could have been working on the PSN. What the fuck were they doing all that time?

So I don't see it so much as Microsoft having a year headstart as much as I see Sony and developers squandering away a year that could have yielded a stronger launch and a decent library of releases during the first few months. So anytime I see the "MS had a head start" I have to laugh because that has to be the lamest excuse known to man gamers. It's nothing but an excuse. Sometimes you have to call a spade a spade.
Agree 100%, if anything it should have turned out the opposite, where people were complaining about the 360's lack of comparable software (graphically) and the 360 fan's saying the PS3 had another year to work on everything.
Old 06-29-07 | 05:14 PM
  #29  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If anyone cares, there is an mp3 of the "Red Ring of Fire" song without the lame video. The video was apparently added by some random kid, noticeable by the atrocious spelling in the video.

Red Ring of Fire mp3

There is also another PS3 song on that site: No Fricking Games song

And finally a parody of the MS Surface trailer: MS Surface trailer Surface is that new computer table MS just recently unveiled.
Old 06-29-07 | 08:32 PM
  #30  
pinata242's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 30,155
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Owasso, OK
Just saw this on GoNintendo. I have no idea where it came from or how old it is, but it made me smile.

Old 06-30-07 | 10:45 AM
  #31  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,731
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
That was pretty funny. Both of the spoofs were pretty good actually.
Old 06-30-07 | 12:51 PM
  #32  
lordzeppelin's Avatar
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Pittsburgh, PA GO PENS!
Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
- Xbox live? fair enough but we got home and its free.
And Home is as robust as Xbox live? Seriously, MS has Sony at it's mercy with online gaming, and will continue to do so for the forseeable future. Also...with the $200 console price difference, you can have 4 years of Live.

I personally don't mind paying for Live. I see some people have issues with it...but I certainly don't. $50 for a year of the best online gaming? (let's not get into the PC-console wars here...) Word.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.