The Official PS3 Thread Part II.
#402
Originally Posted by Decker
Okay, does anyone know this : Will I need the $600 model if I want to have wireless interconnectivity with my PSP? I'm still not sure what it will be, but if it's stuff like steaming video feeds, that might be worth the $100 more.
I had always assumed the reason the Wii was coming with WiFi standard was to enable DS-Wii communication painlessly and not because they were abhorrent to Ethernet, per se. Of course, it could also have something to do with their relationship with Buffalo.
But, if I'm right and the WiFi standard is to communicate with the DS, then I don't know how the PS3 is planning on bridging that gap with the $500 model with regard to PSP interactivity.
#403
DVD Talk Godfather
Originally Posted by pinata242
But, if I'm right and the WiFi standard is to communicate with the DS, then I don't know how the PS3 is planning on bridging that gap with the $500 model with regard to PSP interactivity.
#404
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally Posted by edstein
Standard.


Stupid Sony, putting the main power button on the back again.
#406
Retired
Some people like to turn it off everytime rather than putting it in standby, thus the switch in the back is annoy (I assume such people are annoyed with the placement of PC powerswitches as well).
I don't see the big deal either, my PS2 has been in standby for 4 years when not in use.
I don't see the big deal either, my PS2 has been in standby for 4 years when not in use.
#407
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by hail2dking
But you want the Sony brand HDMI cable....
#408
DVD Talk Hero
Originally Posted by DRG
I'm surprised they're not coming up with a trademarked name for the thing, like Sony HiLink or something, so people who don't know better will buy their version even though it's the same thing. It's sort of like how they call their Firewire connections on their camcroders 'iLink'. It's the same standard Firewire, but some unknowing consumers probably seek out the specific iLink name.
#409
DVD Talk Godfather
Originally Posted by Josh Hinkle
Some people like to turn it off everytime rather than putting it in standby, thus the switch in the back is annoy (I assume such people are annoyed with the placement of PC powerswitches as well).
I don't see the big deal either, my PS2 has been in standby for 4 years when not in use.
I don't see the big deal either, my PS2 has been in standby for 4 years when not in use.

#410
DVD Talk Godfather
Originally Posted by DRG
I'm surprised they're not coming up with a trademarked name for the thing, like Sony HiLink or something, so people who don't know better will buy their version even though it's the same thing. It's sort of like how they call their Firewire connections on their camcroders 'iLink'. It's the same standard Firewire, but some unknowing consumers probably seek out the specific iLink name.
#411
Retired
Originally Posted by fumanstan
I can't see how anyone would want to manually turn off the power on a PC like that 

1. Save power (lame as standby uses hardly any).
2. To reduce the risk of surge damage by not having it draw power all the time (also seems silly to me).
#412
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally Posted by Josh Hinkle
Me either, nor why they'd want to turn of the PS2, but I've heard of people doing both for 2 reasons.
1. Save power (lame as standby uses hardly any).
2. To reduce the risk of surge damage by not having it draw power all the time (also seems silly to me).
1. Save power (lame as standby uses hardly any).
2. To reduce the risk of surge damage by not having it draw power all the time (also seems silly to me).
Everyone one I know turns off their PS2 from the back switch. I never wanted to leave it stand by, especially since I could go weeks without playing it. Why can they not have one power button like every other system out there?
#413
Retired
I just don't see what it hurts. I haven't touched my PS2 in probably 6 months, and it's been on standby the whole time.
But not having the button does suck for those that do want to turn it off.
I just kind of look at it like a TV. The TV is pretty much in standby all the time, else it couldn't pick up the remote signal to turn on. You have to unplug it to turn it off completely.
But not having the button does suck for those that do want to turn it off.
I just kind of look at it like a TV. The TV is pretty much in standby all the time, else it couldn't pick up the remote signal to turn on. You have to unplug it to turn it off completely.
#414
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Josh Hinkle
I haven't touched my PS2 in probably 6 months, and it's been on standby the whole time.

#415
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: McKinney, TX
Originally Posted by hail2dking
It was more in reference to all the people that bought the Microsoft Xbox Link Cable for $20+ when a generic $3 cross link cable did the same thing
#416
DVD Talk Limited Edition
I'm sick of everything in the house being on standby. I hate the PS2 power button leaving it on standby. I miss the power switch on the old boxy PS2 - the slimline has to be unplugged, which I don't normally bother to do.
See this article by PC magazine about the costs of all those gadgets on standby....
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1645410,00.asp
And this news story from the BBC:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programme...ne/4929594.stm
See this article by PC magazine about the costs of all those gadgets on standby....
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1645410,00.asp
And so my survey began: A small three-piece speaker system, with the speakers turned off, 6 watts. A larger three-piece system, also turned off, 12W. The router, 6W; the cable modem, 7.5W. An IBM "dogbone" laptop charger with no computer plugged in was using 2.5W; with a fully charged computer, 3W; with a running computer, 16W. My iPod charger consumed a commendable 0.6W when nothing was connected to it; it used 2W to 3W when charging the player.
The HP OfficeJet multifunction printer was using 7W. A 19-inch Dell Trinitron monitor was also eating up 7W in standby, and when I turned it off with the power switch, it dropped one whole watt. It drew ten times as much power (70W) when it was on, but you still have to wonder—what's the point of the switch? Likewise, the HP Pavilion desktop drew 6W when it was "off" and nary a light was glowing. Compared with the 70W startup power and 60W running power, that's not bad. But if these devices are not remote powered, why aren't they truly off when they're off?
All told, I had about 80 watts' worth of computer stuff running day and night, whether I had turned it off or not. Depending on how many laptops and other devices were plugged in at a given time, the number could range up to 100W.
You might think that 80 or 100 watts is no big deal in the grand scheme of things. But it is precisely in the grand scheme of things where those 100W bulbs add up. That's 876 kilowatt-hours per year, or just over 9 percent of my total electric bill—and I'm just counting computer gear, not home electronics. At local rates, I'm paying about $100 per year for the convenience. Maybe it's worth it, or maybe I'd like to halve it and take my wife out to dinner with the savings instead.
The HP OfficeJet multifunction printer was using 7W. A 19-inch Dell Trinitron monitor was also eating up 7W in standby, and when I turned it off with the power switch, it dropped one whole watt. It drew ten times as much power (70W) when it was on, but you still have to wonder—what's the point of the switch? Likewise, the HP Pavilion desktop drew 6W when it was "off" and nary a light was glowing. Compared with the 70W startup power and 60W running power, that's not bad. But if these devices are not remote powered, why aren't they truly off when they're off?
All told, I had about 80 watts' worth of computer stuff running day and night, whether I had turned it off or not. Depending on how many laptops and other devices were plugged in at a given time, the number could range up to 100W.
You might think that 80 or 100 watts is no big deal in the grand scheme of things. But it is precisely in the grand scheme of things where those 100W bulbs add up. That's 876 kilowatt-hours per year, or just over 9 percent of my total electric bill—and I'm just counting computer gear, not home electronics. At local rates, I'm paying about $100 per year for the convenience. Maybe it's worth it, or maybe I'd like to halve it and take my wife out to dinner with the savings instead.
And this news story from the BBC:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programme...ne/4929594.stm
Figures from the Energy Saving Trust on standby power use in the UK home are astonishing:
Stereos on standby cost £290m and produce 1.6 million tonnes of CO2
VCRs and DVD cost £263m and produce 1.06 million tonnes of CO2
TVs on standby cost £88m and produce 480,000 tonnes of CO2
It means that in one year, in the UK alone, our equipment on standby produces a total of 3.1 million tonnes of CO2.
But there is a bigger culprit out there: the personal computer, as Scott Richards from power supply manufacturer Antec explains.
If you really want to be green with your PC, when you're done using it turn it off
Scott Richards, power supply manufacturer
"The PC is a special case because if you don't turn it off completely, in other words pull the switch on the back, it's always drawing some kind of power.
"And depending on what kind of mode you're in that power can be anywhere between five watts to 60 and beyond.
"If a million PC users switched to a more efficient power supply, it would save almost the equivalent of 250 thousand litres of gasoline a day."
Stereos on standby cost £290m and produce 1.6 million tonnes of CO2
VCRs and DVD cost £263m and produce 1.06 million tonnes of CO2
TVs on standby cost £88m and produce 480,000 tonnes of CO2
It means that in one year, in the UK alone, our equipment on standby produces a total of 3.1 million tonnes of CO2.
But there is a bigger culprit out there: the personal computer, as Scott Richards from power supply manufacturer Antec explains.
If you really want to be green with your PC, when you're done using it turn it off
Scott Richards, power supply manufacturer
"The PC is a special case because if you don't turn it off completely, in other words pull the switch on the back, it's always drawing some kind of power.
"And depending on what kind of mode you're in that power can be anywhere between five watts to 60 and beyond.
"If a million PC users switched to a more efficient power supply, it would save almost the equivalent of 250 thousand litres of gasoline a day."
#417
Guess who's getting a great launch title? Yup. PS3.
September 28, 2006 (Rockville, MD) – Bethesda Softworks® announced today that its blockbuster role-playing game, The Elder Scrolls® IV: Oblivion™ will be a launch title for the PLAYSTATION®3 computer entertainment system this November in North America, and next March in Europe when the new console is expected to be released there. In addition, The Elder Scrolls® Travels: Oblivion™ will be released on the PSP® (PlayStation®Portable) system in the Spring 2007 in North America and Europe.
Both the PLAYSTATION 3 and PSP system titles will be published exclusively in North America by Bethesda Softworks, while in Europe, Ubisoft will serve as co-publisher. Complete details on both games are available in Official U.S. PlayStation Magazine’s (OPM) exclusive cover story (November issue), which hits newsstands Oct. 10. In its article OPM previews the gameplay, graphics, and new content in Oblivion and concludes: “If any game is worth the price of the PS3, Oblivion is it."
September 28, 2006 (Rockville, MD) – Bethesda Softworks® announced today that its blockbuster role-playing game, The Elder Scrolls® IV: Oblivion™ will be a launch title for the PLAYSTATION®3 computer entertainment system this November in North America, and next March in Europe when the new console is expected to be released there. In addition, The Elder Scrolls® Travels: Oblivion™ will be released on the PSP® (PlayStation®Portable) system in the Spring 2007 in North America and Europe.
Both the PLAYSTATION 3 and PSP system titles will be published exclusively in North America by Bethesda Softworks, while in Europe, Ubisoft will serve as co-publisher. Complete details on both games are available in Official U.S. PlayStation Magazine’s (OPM) exclusive cover story (November issue), which hits newsstands Oct. 10. In its article OPM previews the gameplay, graphics, and new content in Oblivion and concludes: “If any game is worth the price of the PS3, Oblivion is it."
#418
Unfortunately a lot of gamers will still think of Oblivion as 'last years game' especially if they drop the price for the 360 version.
Isnt KOTOR3 coming soon? That would be a killer game to launch the PS3
Isnt KOTOR3 coming soon? That would be a killer game to launch the PS3
#420
It would be interesting if it included the horse armor and other premium downloads. I do find it odd though that they refer to an older multiplatform game as being something "worth the price of the PS3."
#421
Banned
KOTOR3 has not been announced. It is only a rumor that it is being developed. See here: KOTOR3 rumor. Since nothing has even been announced, I wouldn't expect to see it until late next year at the earliest (if it actually is in development).
#422
DVD Talk Godfather
Originally Posted by Save Ferris
Unfortunately a lot of gamers will still think of Oblivion as 'last years game' especially if they drop the price for the 360 version.
Oblivion WAS mentioned in the blurb about the new Platinum series pricing(SRP $29.99). I believe it will be in the second batch starting in Jan., from what I read(on this forum, I think). So for a launch title, 500,000 people are safe to buy. By the time the PS3 hits the masses though, it will be half the cost of the PS3 version.
#423
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
Oblivion WAS mentioned in the blurb about the new Platinum series pricing(SRP $29.99). I believe it will be in the second batch starting in Jan., from what I read(on this forum, I think). So for a launch title, 500,000 people are safe to buy. By the time the PS3 hits the masses though, it will be half the cost of the PS3 version.
#424
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Riverside, California. USA
I was wondering if we can start a sticky thread. Dates for Reservations taken for PS3 at....? thread . Or is the info going to be in this thread? Just wondering. Lil over 1 month to go and counting.
#425
Originally Posted by ILikeDVD
I was wondering if we can start a sticky thread. Dates for Reservations taken for PS3 at....? thread . Or is the info going to be in this thread? Just wondering. Lil over 1 month to go and counting.



