![]() |
Re: SNL General Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Count Dooku
(Post 14479787)
When SNL chooses a female performer to play a male politician, there is an absolute subtext of demeaning that person's masculinity.
Do you think the same is true of all men portraying women? That making fun of how masculine they are is baked into the cake? Because I feel like I can come up with plenty of men -> female drag performances (funny, unfunny, acceptable today and not) where that isn't part of the bit. |
Re: SNL General Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Coral
(Post 14479585)
We've seen this with Adam Sandler, Mike Meyers and Jim Carrey as well (in their respective eras). Coincidentally, all the guys we're talking about did sketch comedy shows - all on SNL except for Carrey.
Maybe their agents tell them to work less to keep their high profile gigs and stature since their comedy might be outdated and new generations will not respond? Jack Black was making tons of comedies too like those guys and then he stopped or maybe he is more choosy? Maybe the Kung Fu Panda residuals satisfied him like Shrek did with Mike Myers. |
Re: SNL General Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by JeffTheAlpaca
(Post 14479834)
Maybe their agents tell them to work less to keep their high profile gigs and stature since their comedy might be outdated and new generations will not respond?
Jack Black was making tons of comedies too like those guys and then he stopped or maybe he is more choosy? Maybe the Kung Fu Panda residuals satisfied him like Shrek did with Mike Myers. |
Re: SNL General Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Decker
(Post 14479794)
That certainly wasn't my impression when Aidy Bryant was working overtime with the bald wigs. Do you have any citations for that assertion? Was Lorne quoted in The Journal of Trust Me Bro Quarterly?
|
Re: SNL General Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Nesbit
(Post 14479799)
I can only speak for myself but I didn't take the Spencer impression as demeaning his masculinity at all.
Do you think the same is true of all men portraying women? That making fun of how masculine they are is baked into the cake? Because I feel like I can come up with plenty of men -> female drag performances (funny, unfunny, acceptable today and not) where that isn't part of the bit. |
Re: SNL General Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Coral
(Post 14479585)
We've seen this with Adam Sandler, Mike Meyers and Jim Carrey as well (in their respective eras). Coincidentally, all the guys we're talking about did sketch comedy shows - all on SNL except for Carrey.
Originally Posted by Count Dooku
(Post 14479628)
You'd almost think that they all made a shit-ton of money, got into their 50s and decided to not work as much. :shrug:
It's like when in you're in twenties and thirties, you're cutting edge and the hottest thing on the planet. And then two decades later you're a fucking dinosaur like Bob Hope. In the early 1980s Eddie Murphy was on the top of the world doing stand-up, SNL, and cranking out hit movies like 48 Hours, Trading Places, and Beverly Hills Cop. Twenty years later, he's Pluto Nash and Norbit. |
Re: SNL General Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by JeffTheAlpaca
(Post 14479834)
Maybe their agents tell them to work less to keep their high profile gigs and stature since their comedy might be outdated and new generations will not respond?
Jack Black was making tons of comedies too like those guys and then he stopped or maybe he is more choosy? Maybe the Kung Fu Panda residuals satisfied him like Shrek did with Mike Myers. |
Re: SNL General Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Count Dooku
(Post 14479935)
It's subtext.
Since that was not what I posted, I'm gonna go with no. |
Re: SNL General Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Count Dooku
(Post 14479930)
My citation is the logic that SNL has many male cast members, so choosing a female cast member to play a male politician is a deliberate casting decision. Then, add on that they are intentionally mocking the politician with the portrayal. Not everyone gets subtext.
Same thing for a tiny white man being played by Kate McKinnon. Body size, not lack of masculinity. Just because you read it as subtext that does not make it fact. |
Re: SNL General Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by JeffTheAlpaca
(Post 14479834)
Maybe their agents tell them to work less to keep their high profile gigs and stature since their comedy might be outdated and new generations will not respond?
Jack Black was making tons of comedies too like those guys and then he stopped or maybe he is more choosy? Maybe the Kung Fu Panda residuals satisfied him like Shrek did with Mike Myers. |
Re: SNL General Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Decker
(Post 14479946)
Well, the counter is that for many of the years the 'beefiest' cast members were either Keenan, Aidy and Molly. So if they were mocking a chubby white man, it made more sense (at least to Lorne) to have Aidy or Molly play them in 'drag' costume than a thin white man or a heavier black man.
Same thing for a tiny white man being played by Kate McKinnon. Body size, not lack of masculinity. Just because you read it as subtext that does not make it fact. |
Re: SNL General Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Nesbit
(Post 14479945)
K and just to be clear I know that isn’t what you said. Was genuinely asking if you thought the dynamic went both ways.
|
Re: SNL General Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Count Dooku
(Post 14480030)
If you don't think it is an extra twist of the knife for a male politician like Ted Cruz to not only be mocked on national TV, but to also be played by a woman, I don't know what to tell you. I am 100% absolutely certain it is so.
|
Re: SNL General Discussion Thread
Michael Keaton and Stevie Nicks are pretty big gets. Too bad they're not on the same episode. Could have felt like an old '80s episode. |
Re: SNL General Discussion Thread
John Mullaney and Chappell Roan sounds like a must watch.
The return of Nate Bargatze means that his first appearance was well received. Expect a return of his George Washington bit. It also goes against the theory that the 50th Season would be all superstars. |
Re: SNL General Discussion Thread
Michael Keaton, Stevie Nicks and Jelly Roll for me.
|
Re: SNL General Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Decker
(Post 14482310)
John Mullaney and Chappell Roan sounds like a must watch.
The return of Nate Bargatze means that his first appearance was well received. Expect a return of his George Washington bit. It also goes against the theory that the 50th Season would be all superstars. |
Re: SNL General Discussion Thread
I know all of those people! :banana:
Great to see Bargatze and Mulaney back, and Michael Keaton? :up: |
Re: SNL General Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Count Dooku
(Post 14482389)
If anyone looks at that list and responds with a "Who's that?" they need to just give up on the show.
|
Re: SNL General Discussion Thread
Bargatze was polarizing last year and some liked him and some did not care.
Maybe Mulaney was on every season for the last 5 years except season 49 2023-24? |
Re: SNL General Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by JeffTheAlpaca
(Post 14482484)
Bargatze was polarizing last year and some liked him and some did not care.
|
Re: SNL General Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Count Dooku
(Post 14482519)
I don't know where you're getting that from. His episode was named as one of the better ones of the season on every review site that I know of, and the "Washington's Dream" sketch is universally seen as one of the year's best sketches, and people credit his performance as a big factor in that. He was a first-time host, who despite his stand-up success was not on a lot of people's radars, and they have immediately asked him to come back and host again.
Is this the first time Michael Keaton has hosted? I doubt it but I can't remember him on the show before. Also : Do you think they will not have any former cast regulars as hosts this season, instead saving them for the 50 Anniversary Special? |
Re: SNL General Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Count Dooku
(Post 14482519)
I don't know where you're getting that from. His episode was named as one of the better ones of the season on every review site that I know of, and the "Washington's Dream" sketch is universally seen as one of the year's best sketches, and people credit his performance as a big factor in that. He was a first-time host, who despite his stand-up success was not on a lot of people's radars, and they have immediately asked him to come back and host again.
But some people here were not big fans when they posted in the thread from last season. I thought maybe Glen Powell or Hugh Jackman would host the opener since they had the biggest movies of the Summer and a lot more exciting than Jean Smart who could have been saved for later in the season. |
Re: SNL General Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Count Dooku
(Post 14482389)
I was off on my Chappell Roan prediction, but that looks like a list of 10 superstars to me. If anyone looks at that list and responds with a "Who's that?" they need to just give up on the show.
;) Looks like a solid first 5 shows assuming the writers are up to it. There's certainly plenty of material for them to work with. |
Re: SNL General Discussion Thread
does Keaton have another movie or will this be for the push for VOD for Beatlejuice?
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:45 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.