![]() |
Re: Fox is open to a Firefly reboot.
Originally Posted by davidh777
(Post 14713887)
The easiest solution would be an animated prequel series with a recast preacher.
I'm guessing that they're doing an audio drama, like the Big Finish Doctor Who stuff, Orphan Black: The Next Chapter, or Star Trek: Khan. They are quite popular these days, and can be made on the cheap. It also has the benefit of being able to be done quickly; just having the actors read scripts in a studio somewhere. No need to worry about anyone aging out of their roles, and roles can be recast if necessary. |
Re: Fox is open to a Firefly reboot.
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 14713879)
Pedantic nitpick: If it's with the original cast, it's not a "reboot," but a revival. A reboot implies a reset of continuity.
See how the new Scrubs season is called a revival in news stories about it.
Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
(Post 14713973)
"Reboot" tends to get thrown around a lot in the entertainment industry, and it's nearly meaningless term. It gets applied to remakes, continuations, revivals, and everything in between.
|
Re: Fox is open to a Firefly reboot.
No thanks. Just, please. Huge fan of the original show and you’ll never touch that cast, time, etc. It was one of those things that just worked out and while the show was far too short-lived I love that it is short which makes every episode special. The Serenity movie is a solid entry too and at least a proper send off if a little sad. If you haven’t already, I highly recommend purchasing the blu-ray box set with the cool case. It’s got unaired episodes, cool cards and booklets & the discs look good too. Throw in the 4K of Serenity and you’ve got yourself a wonderful TV show and film combo. I watch it all annually. :)
I realize that reboots don’t always mean the same thing but if you use the name or likeness of anything prior then to me it’s a reboot. And, we know how there is a good chance of some new show royally screwing up something attempting to "modernize" it. Wish they’d take their funding and energy and put it into something original instead. Just leave Firefly alone. |
Re: Fox is open to a Firefly reboot.
Originally Posted by MisterMike
(Post 14714096)
I realize that reboots don’t always mean the same thing but if you use the name or likeness of anything prior then to me it’s a reboot.
|
Re: Fox is open to a Firefly reboot.
To be fair, Wikipedia has this to say about the "reboot" semantics:
A television series can return to production after cancellation or a long hiatus.[21][22] Whereas a reboot disregards the previous continuity of a work, the term has also been used as a "catch all" phrase to categorize sequel series or general remakes due to the rise of such productions in the late 2010s.[23][24] https://people.com/scrubs-reboot-rel...-news-11903433 |
Re: Fox is open to a Firefly reboot.
I don't know how I managed to have this same argument about two different words within 24 hours, but just because some people use a word incorrectly doesn't mean I have to accept that usage.
As I noted in my original post, it's a pedantic nitpick. |
Re: Fox is open to a Firefly reboot.
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 14714166)
I don't know how I managed to have this same argument about two different words within 24 hours, but just because some people use a word incorrectly doesn't mean I have to accept that usage.
As I noted in my original post, it's a pedantic nitpick. At least most of us can agree that whatever this Firefly thing ends up being, we probably prefer that they leave well enough alone. :D |
Re: Fox is open to a Firefly reboot.
I like precise vocabulary more than the next person, but I will point out that there was a TV series called "Reboot" about the revival of an old sitcom with the original cast.
|
Re: Fox is open to a Firefly reboot.
Originally Posted by kefrank
(Post 14714179)
Fair enough and I do feel the same with some words, but it seems like your nitpick is based on a definition that isn't universally agreed upon by legitimate semantic sources. Even Cambridge Dictionary defines it more generally as...
Go look up the definition of the word "literally" for an example of dictionaries including a definition many people think is wrong. |
Re: Fox is open to a Firefly reboot.
Originally Posted by Count Dooku
(Post 14714203)
I like precise vocabulary more than the next person, but I will point out that there was a TV series called "Reboot" about the revival of an old sitcom with the original cast.
|
Re: Fox is open to a Firefly reboot.
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 14714222)
And Alanis Morrisette wrote a song called "Ironic" listing a lot of situations that weren't ironic.
|
Re: Fox is open to a Firefly reboot.
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 14714218)
English dictionaries are descriptive, not prescriptive. If a poor usage becomes common enough, they'll include it. Dictionaries aren't there to say what words/definitions/usages are "correct," just what's common.
For related reference: https://www.merriam-webster.com/word...ot-word-origin |
Re: Fox is open to a Firefly reboot.
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 14714222)
And Alanis Morrisette wrote a song called "Ironic" listing a lot of situations that weren't ironic.
|
Re: Fox is open to a Firefly reboot.
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 14714222)
And Alanis Morrisette wrote a song called "Ironic" listing a lot of situations that weren't ironic.
|
Re: Fox is open to a Firefly reboot.
This could turn out to be as amazing as Disney's Star W....oh wait.
|
Re: Fox is open to a Firefly reboot.
Originally Posted by kefrank
(Post 14714179)
At least most of us can agree that whatever this Firefly thing ends up being, we probably prefer that they leave well enough alone. :D
|
Re: Fox is open to a Firefly reboot.
Originally Posted by davidh777
(Post 14714310)
Eh, I don't have a problem with a new version of Firefly existing. Maybe it turns out great. At worst, it's ignorable. I watched most of the new X-Files, and while it didn't make an impression on me, it didn't tarnish my memory of the original. I admit others may have stronger reactions, though. :lol:
As an aside, there is also an X-Files "reboot" in the works. There's been a pilot ordered for Hulu: https://deadline.com/2026/02/ryan-co...er-1236733363/ This description makes it sound like a sequel series, sort of a "X-Files: The Next Generation": In it, two highly decorated but vastly different FBI agents — one played by [Danielle] Deadwyler — form an unlikely bond when they are assigned to a long-shuttered division devoted to cases involving unexplained phenomena. |
Re: Fox is open to a Firefly reboot.
Not to go too off topic, but this Reboot vs Revival talk has me curious. How would you guys classify the most recent Hawaii Five-0 as. Reboot or revival? Obviously same title except for an o vs a 0, some same character names, different actors, same basic premise. How about Magnum PI? Some same and some very similar character names, same premise.
|
Re: Fox is open to a Firefly reboot.
Originally Posted by Count Dooku
(Post 14714225)
Given the songs popularity and critical acclaim, I guess that means that within the context of any music industry discussion, all those things she listed are officially ironic.
|
Re: Fox is open to a Firefly reboot.
Originally Posted by jjcool
(Post 14714326)
Not to go too off topic, but this Reboot vs Revival talk has me curious. How would you guys classify the most recent Hawaii Five-0 as. Reboot or revival? Obviously same title except for an o vs a 0, some same character names, different actors, same basic premise. How about Magnum PI? Some same and some very similar character names, same premise.
However, when a new movie in a franchise cuts ties with the previous films, and resets the continuity, typically retelling the original story, or at least starting back at the beginning, that's a reboot. It's starting over, with a new continuity. So, the movie Spider-Man came out, then Spider-Man 2 and Spider-Man 3 were sequels, and then Sony rebooted the franchise with The Amazing Spider-Man, and then made a sequel to that, The Amazing Spider-Man 2, and then the franchise got rebooted again for the Tom Holland movies. For TV shows, we're used to the sequel seasons getting greenlit almost immediately, so when the sequel season is years or decades later it feels different, but it's still a continuation of the original show, so terms like "revival" or "continuation" fit. It's when the show returns to the original premise but resets the continuity that it's a reboot. |
Re: Fox is open to a Firefly reboot.
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 14714166)
I don't know how I managed to have this same argument about two different words within 24 hours, but just because some people use a word incorrectly doesn't mean I have to accept that usage.
|
Re: Fox is open to a Firefly reboot.
Whedon won't be involved so anyone expecting anything but a legacy reboot/next gen project wearing Firefly IP as a skin suit will be disappointed.
|
Re: Fox is open to a Firefly reboot.
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 14714222)
And Alanis Morrisette wrote a song called "Ironic" listing a lot of situations that weren't ironic.
nah. |
Re: Fox is open to a Firefly reboot.
Originally Posted by Count Dooku
(Post 14714203)
I like precise vocabulary more than the next person, but I will point out that there was a TV series called "Reboot" about the revival of an old sitcom with the original cast.
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/dvdtalk...f3516e78c3.jpg Spoiler:
|
Re: Fox is open to a Firefly reboot.
Reboot = turn it off and turn it back on to get it running again.
They aren't rebooting the property, they are rebooting cash flow. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:40 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.